Request for Antiaristo

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Request for Antiaristo

Postby Pants Elk » Fri Jul 22, 2005 6:45 am

I remember one of your posts where you wrote (from memory - forgive me if I get it wrong): "They needed two queens." You were referring to Queen Elisabeth the Queen Mother as having been, in actuality, a second queen.<br>My question is: who were/are "they", why did they need two queens, and what has changed in this respect since the Queen Mother's death? (apart from there being only one queen - if you discount Prince Charles).<br>Thank you in advance. <p></p><i></i>
Pants Elk
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Queen Mother

Postby antiaristo » Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:01 am

PantsElk,<br>Hi. Always delighted to answer questions.<br><br>When George became king his wife became queen (illegally, but that’s another story), specifically Queen Elizabeth.<br>When George VI died in 1952 his wife was still Queen Elizabeth. However the Heir had the same name and became Queen Elizabeth II. To distinguish between the two the widow became known as Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother. This was subsequently shortened to Queen Mother but if you look at her tomb next to George VI you will see her name when she died. Queen Elizabeth.<br><br>The power of this psyop is evident in your question. Most people do not know she was queen until the day she died.<br><br>“They” is the organisation controlled by the Windsor family. It is also called Scottish Rite Freemasonry, and Charlie Windsor is now the Sovereign Commander.<br><br>One of the two queens exercised her power in the shadows, offering plausible deniability (“Paul, there are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge”). Her purpose was the destruction of Socialism and the return of Feudalism.<br><br>For over sixty years she plotted to place her Freemasons into positions of power throughout the State. They are now in situ. Count the number of Scots in positions of power and compare that to their share of the population. There is a Scottish Raj in the United Kingdom.<br><br>That is the main reason the three main parties do not talk politics.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START >: --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/mad.gif ALT=">:"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

tangential question

Postby rain » Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:38 pm

John, just wondering if you could have a shot at it.<br><br>why is there a street called 'Columbia' in London ?<br><br>and I do think 'Warren' is a direct reference to the Warren Commission.<br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Columbia / Britannia

Postby antiaristo » Sat Jul 23, 2005 4:50 pm

rain,<br>Yes, very interesting.<br>There is no reason at all. I've done what you've done already, and found a few ships of the RN have borne this name, but nothing else.<br>That doesn't necessarily mean anything. I was born in Abyssinia Road, which may have been part of the Empire, but no other connection.<br><br>I thought early on this might have been the French SS, mainly because it was clearly not meant to harm. And if it WAS the French they might well want to point to the Kennedy assassination. <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

re:Columbia

Postby rain » Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:15 pm

still working on the Columbia aspect - yet another harsh mistress.<br>meanwhile - why I'm inclined to think it's a reference to the Warren Commission, hence not indicative of the french, <br>would mostly revolve around the disappearance of Congressmen Hale Boggs and Nick Begich Snr- eg:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www,ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/linkscopy/PWaircrashes.html">www,ratical.org/ratville/...ashes.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Nick Begich Jnr did have an account, but it appears to have gone, although he seems to have a piece on it in his latest newsletter<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http:/www.earthpulse.com/">ww.earthpulse.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>thus, whilst wondering why they just can't use the postal service like everyone else, I'm also inclined to read their 'message' as a substantive threat, directed at, oh let me guess, Conyers et. al., Fitzgerald, Hogan, et. al. ... if I remember correctly someone here already quipped about the dangers of small planes (well, any planes, really)<br>but don't mind me, I'm just another cons-piracy theorist. of course, if there are any frenchpersons out there who might like to add their perspective, please feel free.<br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: re:Columbia

Postby slimmouse » Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:32 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>still working on the Columbia aspect - yet another harsh mistress<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> I hate getting involved in all this word association stuff, since to me, there are enough indicators out there already.<br><br> But I couldnt help but smile when I heard the Columbia connection.<br><br> An online friend of mine, who isnt at all big on conspiracy theories, has harped on for long enough now about his father.<br><br> His father being someone, who apparently knows his onions with regard to the hi-tech spaceshuttle stuff, and who cannot for one moment accept that the last Space Shuttle disaster was anything like what it was made out to be.<br><br> Savais ?<br><br> Im definitely "agnostic" with regards to any of this. But it did make me smile. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

oui, savais

Postby rain » Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:06 pm

heya slimmouse,<br>the spaceshuttle is only one the possibilities in a multiplicity of metanomens.<br>Columbia of the more southern climes, and it's associated 'cartels', their 'product' being the reference to the 'harsh mistress', is another.<br>but I'm leaning towards, at least for now, the wider ripples like 'Columbia - the feminine aspect of America'.<br>fun isn't it!<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

The French

Postby antiaristo » Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:06 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>why I'm inclined to think it's a reference to the Warren Commission, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>hence not indicative of the french</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->,</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><br>rain,<br>You've lost me here.<br>If you see the Kennedy assassination as the grab for power by the Bush/Windsor gang, why would the French not want to highlight the Warren Commission?<br> <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Other

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests