US Patent Office

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

US Patent Office

Postby Connut » Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:13 pm

Does anyone know - has the US patent office really been privatized??<br><br>...<br><br>Serious difficulties occurred when the US Patent office was privatized in 1992. The new for-profit company began demanding high maintenance fees from the inventors. Then the USPO installed the “20 month rule”: if your patent application is not completed in that length of time, you lose it. Many lost their lives’ work. The resultant group of angry, dispossessed inventors initially numbered three million individuals has now grown exponentially to thirty-three million. Many of those in the group have intellectual property derived from advances in Teslan based Quantum physics.<br><br>Over the past 13 years, this organization has worked to develop a program where the inventors themselves control the patents and copyright for their intellectual property. The inventors’ goals are to diffuse power and wealth in a constitutionally based program that places the highest priority on the General Welfare. Their unique ESOP plan is an effective business design to promote development and realization of new inventions by their creators. <br><br>With a business plan that eliminates self-serving greed and concentration of wealth, implementing the ESOP removes the risk that inventors might lose control of intellectual property to a small number of wealthy individuals, as happens regularly under a monopolistic patent system. Although not all inventors are Teslans, this entire community of inventors is highly supportive of the ESOP and Teslan principles; after all, they created the program.<br><br>For the past five years Robert Berman has been their spokesman. The combination of being the named spokesman for the inventors as well as being the named leader of the regrouped International Teslan Society has created a powerhouse of collective influence to make the necessary changes for a better future for all.<br><br>Built upon years of patient planning to make sure of getting it right, the healthy development intellectual property -- and of human society -- will follow. It is only a beginning -- a powerful launch. By its very nature, UltraTeslan International Inc. will become the intellectual center for all Teslan-based science, providing collective support for future creative inventions and their developments. <br><br>...<br><br>from the <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.utiaerospace.net/">www.utiaerospace.net/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Connut
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 11:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

On topic, but no answer re: privatization

Postby sussurus2 » Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:23 pm

I don't know about privatization of the USPatent Office, but I did have a colleague who lost his wallet, and upon contacting the federal office which is supposed to handle such things, was told that ChoicePoint had been contracted to handle all such identity theft services. Interesting, no?<br><br>Also, similar topic, on repression of patents. If it is true the USPO is privatized, what better way for the NWO elite to cull all useful new energy and medical patents before they can surface. Note the UK patent methodology, at least as of the writing of the below, includes publication BEFORE grant of patent, so that it becomes a public document:<br><br>THE REPRESSION OF INVENTIONS<br><br>Copyright, HAROLD ASPDEN, 1997<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.energyscience.org.uk/keynote1.htm">www.energyscience.org.uk/keynote1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=sussurus2>sussurus2</A> at: 11/2/05 11:49 am<br></i>
sussurus2
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 6:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

what about

Postby michael meiring » Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:28 pm

What about the invention secrecy Act 1951?<br><br><br>-----------------------------------------------------<br><br>FIFTY YEARS OF THE INVENTION SECRECY ACT<br><br>Under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951, the government is authorized to<br>impose a "secrecy order" on a patent application whenever it finds that<br>disclosure of the patent would be "detrimental to the national<br>security." In an extraordinary and possibly unconstitutional limitation<br>on First Amendment freedom, the inventor is prohibited by law from<br>disclosing his invention.<br><br>At the end of last year (FY01), there were 4,736 such secrecy orders in<br>effect, according to statistics compiled by the Patent and Trademark<br>Office that were released under the Freedom of Information Act this<br>week.<br><br>Most of these were renewals of secrecy orders that originated in past<br>years, but there were 83 new orders during 2001. Of these, more than<br>half (44) were imposed on private inventors or businesses who were not<br>government contractors. Because the government has no property interest<br>in such inventions, these so-called "John Doe" secrecy orders raise the<br>most substantial concerns about constitutionality.<br><br>------------------------------------------------------<br><br>many such inventors state that their new inventions which incidentaly create ulimited clean energy and would cost nothing to use, and where doing it to advance humanity, ie no more wars for oil, no pollution, advancement of poor nations etc, etc, have seen their inventions whisked off by government hoodlums. National security my ass. <br><br>This must act as an alarm bell to new inventors to stuff the patents and design them in secrecy and ship them all over the world.<br><br>I wonder who stands to lose most by oil having no value with new technologies about, at no cost to anyone, or at very little cost. Who would win? the enviroment, humanity etc, perhaps thats why such a law was created?<br> <p></p><i></i>
michael meiring
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 4:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Other

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests