How Do You Put On Your Bra?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Almost never wear one.

Postby banned » Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:33 am

Grew up in the 70s, got out of the habit. Only wear one if what I'm wearing demands it (indecent without it) or for, well, recreational purposes (hot date.) Hook in the back, hook in the front, depends on the style bra.<br><br>I've always been fascinated with how guys learn to unhook one. (On a woman that is, not talking to the trannies.)<br><br>Of course, if they're TOO good at it, I figure they've had a lot of practice and will have a fidelity problem. If they're too bad at it it's a turn off.<br><br>And if they know the exact page I ordered it from out of the Sticky Vicky's catalogue, see 'trannies' above. ) <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Hands-on practice

Postby Bismillah » Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:59 am

Now, here's a course I must take (with the delightfully named Ms. Biggins):<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.fashion.arts.ac.uk/shortcourses/23151.htm">www.fashion.arts.ac.uk/sh.../23151.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Bismillah
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hands-on practice

Postby Project Willow » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:59 am

It's never easy finding a well made and well fitting bra. Once you get one, you treasure it. How can the ladies here go without one? Mine have gone a little far south for my daily comfort. Unless I've got something special to wear, I put one on.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'm recalling a recent comment on another bulletin board I visit occasionally about a rock concert that the poster had attended, commenting on how foxy the women in their 40s- and yes, 50s- were, and how the 20somethings looked so skanky in comparison...the poster was in his 20s.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br> <br>Bless you! <br><br>I don't like tattoos either. If they could figure out a way to retain the color and a fine line, it might be different. It's just that blue they turn, it looks ugly next to the color of the skin. <br><br>I met a guy in a bar not too long ago. He was young enough to have been my son. He must have been drunk because he took ten years off my age when he guessed. I love it when that happens! In reality, it is probably not based on physical appearance, but kid parts showing through, that confuses folks. <br><br>sw, I used to look at women and wonder why the hell they went along with all these rules about appearance, I thought they looked so silly all made up and decorated. Why would they do that? Now sometimes I have a male part blend with my now more developed female parts, and it's not just the clothes, but hand/body movements, giggling (you name it) that are shocking to them. I had a very bizarre experience of witnessing myself behave like a female, from the inside, but from a very uncomfortable and lost male point of view. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4793
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

I just wonder

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:18 am

how am I going to archive this thread?<br><br>File under "secret societies"? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I was wondering why it's not in the Parlour...

Postby banned » Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:38 am

...am I missing the 'deep politics' angle?<br><br>Looks more like 'deep cleavage' to me <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

archive

Postby jenz » Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:29 am

could start a "women's issues" section. then we can <br> get furious about being demeaned and relegated to kinitting patterns and , er, fashion items <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
jenz
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 6:35 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Eyes Wide Shut

Postby Pants Elk » Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:39 am

So, anyway, I've been thinking about the <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>interiority</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> of Eyes Wide Shut; how it's <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>all</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> interior. The so-called exterior sequences are nothing more than corridors to be moved along to the next room. The use of sound-stages increases this feeling of never being truly "outdoors". If we go further, it becomes apparent that all the interiors are models, or echoes, or reflections, of each other. There is only one room, and Dr Bill goes from room to room as we do in a dream. They're dream rooms. He's stuck in the house of sleep, dreaming he's a doctor.<br><br>Sorry to derail this thread with an off-topic post! <p></p><i></i>
Pants Elk
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

dream rooms

Postby rain » Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:36 am

not at all.<br><br>"women's issues" already alerted to the cross-pollination. bzzz.<br><br>"men act', whereas "women appear" themes are already on the Kubrick thread.<br><br>but, dear Oedipa in the Vinelands, I'll restrain from giving my view of the essential 'interiority' of the works of both Kubrick and Pynchon, 'cos it'd spoil all the fun.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

A ten-minute break

Postby Pants Elk » Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:52 am

Spoil all the fun?<br><br>"Ladies and gentlemen,<br>I hope you're enjoying yourselves ..." <p></p><i></i>
Pants Elk
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Archiving

Postby Morgan Wolf » Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:38 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>how am I going to archive this thread?<br><br>File under "secret societies"? <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Morgan Wolf
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:20 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Interiors/Exteriors

Postby Morgan Wolf » Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:40 am

Very interesting line of inquiry. Can you move it over to the EWS discussion? I'll be back later on. Thx. <p></p><i></i>
Morgan Wolf
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:20 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

re:' a ten-minute break'

Postby rain » Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:03 pm

exactly.<br><br>relevent to the 'essential interiority'<br><br>are Kubrick and Pynchon just more of the magician's slight of hand, imparting to their audience the titillating sense of having been privy to some great revelation?<br> <br>is the apparent camaraderie of the linking of arms effectively a surreptitious engagement?<br><br>meanwhile, here on our unabashedly bi-polarised thread of secret stuff, that 'rage' against the darkness will inevitably make an appearance.<br><br>Pynchon's function would seem glaringly obvious by his utilisation of cliches.<br><br>Kubrick melds the delivery of the message in such a way as to make dear Willie smile.<br><br>is this to wrest the beast to the light of day or just as the world turns?<br><br>is 'to enjoy' synonomous with 'to en - joy'?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Meanwhile, back at the topic...

Postby marykmusic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:13 pm

A cousin of an ex-husband (and a delightful lady) once mentioned that the REAL purpose of fancy lingerie was not really about wearing it, but more like how fast will it come off? And the fancier it is, the more inspiring... --MaryK <p></p><i></i>
marykmusic
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Central Arizona
Blog: View Blog (0)

younger parts coming thru

Postby sw » Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:31 pm

edit
Last edited by sw on Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sw
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: younger parts coming thru

Postby marykmusic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:20 pm

I can feel like that, too, and it may or may not be "guys coming out." I stopped wearing Stupid Shoes on stage, for example, once my daughter was moved out ("Mom, you're not going out looking like THAT, are you?")<br><br>And I only wear a bra when I must for the sake of the people around me, like when I'm storytelling at a school. Oh, and if I'm riding, the sports bra really helps me trot. Up, down, up, down... (I ride English.) --MaryK <p></p><i></i>
marykmusic
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Central Arizona
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Other

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests