Subject: Re: LD 867 ,Fauci, Mass Psychosis, Malone & Greenfield, MA Update
Monday, January 10, 2022
Testimony of Meryl Nass, MD to the Health and Human Services Committee of the Maine Legislature, January 11, 2022
Honorable Chairpersons, Members and Senators,
I write in support of LD 867. There are many reasons why preventing COVID vaccine mandates until adequate, sufficient safety studies have been performed is the right decision for this committee and legislature.
1. COVID vaccines are experimental
Let me say, first, that no matter what claims have been made regarding these vaccines, they are not "safe and effective." "Safe and effective" is an FDA 'term of art'[1] that may only be applied to licensed drugs and vaccines. All currently available COVID vaccines in the United States are unlicensed and experimental, a.k.a. investigational.
Medicines and vaccines are either licensed products or experimental products. There is no gray area between them in US law. Whether or not research is explicitly conducted, the use of experimental products (including those issued under an Emergency Use Authorization) falls under the Nuremberg Code and under US law regulating experimental drugs. As former FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn himself noted, "EUA products are still considered investigational."[2]
According to 21CFR Subchapter D Part 312:[3] "an experiment is any use of a drug except for the use of a marketed drug in the course of medical practice." Vaccines are considered a subset of drugs by FDA.[4] And the use of unlicensed, Emergency Use Authorized vaccines is thus, by definition, experimental.
US law requires that humans receiving experimental products must provide written informed consent.[5] However, when the PREP Act creating Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) was written, this requirement was loosened slightly for emergencies in which EUA products would be used. The required disclosures when using EUAs were specified below. Please note the option to accept or refuse.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies[6]
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
All Moderna, Janssen (Johnson and Johnson) and all childhood Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines are being used under EUAs. And while the adult Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is supposed to be licensed with brand name Comirnaty, in fact the Pfizer vaccines being used in the US today are EUA products as well.
2. While FDA licensed Comirnaty, the only approved COVID vaccine, only Emergency Use Authorized (experimental) vaccines are being used
Despite claims to the contrary, the only vaccine currently available in the US is the Pfizer-BioNTech, not the licensed and branded Comirnaty. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization, which provides a broad liability shield to the manufacturer, distributor, administrator, program planner, and virtually anyone else involved in the vaccination process. The branded product, on the other hand, is subject to ordinary liability claims at the present time.
Exactly three weeks after FDA issued Comirnaty a license, the National Library of Medicine, part of the NIH, posted information that Pfizer was not planning to make Comirnaty available in the US while the EUA vaccine was still available:[7]
"SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
Pfizer received FDA BLA license for its COVID-19 vaccine
Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.
At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution. As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.
FDA extended the vaccine's EUA authorization on the same day it licensed the vaccine.
FDA appears to have been acceding to the White House demand that the vaccine be licensed, in order for it to be mandated for large sectors of the US population. Under an EUA, which specifies that potential recipients have the right to refuse,[8] mandates cannot be imposed. So a license was issued, allowing the administration to inform the public that the vaccine was fully approved and licensed. But in fact, the public was unable to access the licensed vaccine.
Why was this convoluted regulatory process performed? While under EUA, Pfizer has an almost bulletproof liability shield. According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS) on September 23, 2021,[9] "courts have characterized PREP Act immunity as 'sweeping.'" The CRS explains, "the PREP Act immunizes a covered person from legal liability for all claims for loss relation to the administration or use of a covered countermeasure."
3. FDA instructed Pfizer-BioNTech that FDA's Congressionally-mandated databases are inadequate to assess the danger of myocarditis (and other potential COVID vaccine side effects) and therefore Pfizer-BioNTech must perform studies to evaluate these risks over the next six years
On the day FDA issued a license for Comirnaty, August 23, 2021, FDA instructed Pfizer-BioNTech that it did NOT have sufficient information on serious potential risks of the product, and required Pfizer and BioNTech, the manufacturers, to conduct a series of studies to assess these potential risks.[10] These studies were to be performed on both products: the licensed Comirnaty and the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Note that they include the requirement for a safety study in pregnancy, which will not be completed until December 31, 2025.
I have reproduced part of what FDA wrote about these required safety studies below, directly from pages 6-11 of the FDA approval letter sent to BioNTech, linked below.
FDA's admission that it cannot assess these safety risks, and that up to 6 years will be taken to study them, provides us with additional de facto evidence that the Pfizer vaccines cannot be termed safe, as many of the fundamental safety studies are only now getting started.
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download"POSTMARKETING REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 505(o) Section 505(o) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) authorizes FDA to require holders of approved drug and biological product applications to conduct postmarketing studies and clinical trials for certain purposes, if FDA makes certain findings required by the statute (section 505(o)(3)(A), 21 U.S.C. 355(o)(3)(A)).
We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.
Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required to conduct the following studies:
4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021 Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022 Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023 Study Completion: June 30, 2025 Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025
5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval [EUA] Active Surveillance Study Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Page 7 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021 Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021 Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022 Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022 Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023 Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023 Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024 Study Completion: March 31, 2024 Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024
6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022 Study Completion: March 31, 2024 Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024 7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration with Pediatric Heart Network). We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021 Study Completion: December 31, 2026 Page 8 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027
8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021 Study Completion: November 30, 2023 Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024
9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of participants 16 to 30 years of age. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule: Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021 Study Completion: June 30, 2022.
Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022 ...
10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine [the EUA vaccine] Exposure during Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.”
Final Protocol Submission: July 1, 2021 Study Completion: June 30, 2025
Final Report Submission: December 31, 2025
4. The World Health Organization does not recommend COVID vaccines for normal children
The WHO website "WHO SHOULD GET VACCINATED"[11] states the following:
Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.
More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.
WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has concluded that the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above. Children aged between 12 and 15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups for vaccination. Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy.
If the World Health Organization believes there is insufficient evidence to support general vaccination of normal children, why would this committee and the Maine Legislature think otherwise?
To sum up:
· All available COVID vaccines are experimental products
· They must legally provide recipients the right to refuse.
· Mandates negate the right of refusal.
· Basic safety questions regarding the vaccines have not been resolved, and some will not be answered until 2027.
· The WHO does not recommend broad COVID vaccinations for children
· Parents should be permitted to make individualized decisions regarding their childrens' risks and benefits from COVID vaccines.
· Unfortunately, no one can make a fully informed decision about COVID vaccines until the public has access to complete information on safety and efficacy, which are not now available.
[1]
https://www.fda.gov/science-research/ri ... rch-agenda[2]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/202 ... 393865002/[3]https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=312.3#:~:text=Clinical%20investigation%20means%20any%20experiment,the%20course%20of%20medical%20practice.
[4]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152379/[5]
https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2018-07-19/titl ... p45.1.46.a[6]
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3[7]
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/d ... 2021-09-13[8]
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3[9]
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product ... B/LSB10443[10]
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download[11]
https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease ... nes/advicePosted by Meryl Nass, M.D. at 12:06 AM 0 comments
Sunday, January 9, 2022
Repost: My friend Dr. Mark Geier won punitive damages from each member of the Maryland Medical Licensing Board for their harrassment of him/ WaPo
Doctor who linked thimerosal to autism wins damages from Maryland Medical Board for harrassing and humiliating him/WaPo
State medical boards license doctors. They also enforce standards of practice. For example, medical boards took away the licenses of over 50 doctors who treated chronic Lyme disease, and investigated many more. Frustrated Lyme patients, unable to find doctors to treat them, went to their state legislatures to fight back. As a result, every state legislature in New England has passed legislation directing their medical boards to give doctors the right to diagnose and treat Lyme disease, outside of the restrictive guidelines issued by the CDC. It sounds crazy, but it's true. Here is the Maine law.
There are many reports of state medical boards taking action against doctors for other heretical beliefs, such as that vaccines may cause autism.
Dr. Mark Geier has published many research papers linking vaccines to adverse outcomes. His review of the evidence linking thimerosal to adverse neurological outcomes in small children was especially strong. He has testified in many vaccine injury cases, and advised government agencies internationally on vaccine issues. He also treated vaccine-injured children.
No doubt his advocacy rubbed many (in government and industry) the wrong way. The Maryland Board of Physicians went after him, pulled his medical license, and made spiteful (and illegal) personal attacks on him and his family. Board members and staff then destroyed evidence and failed to produce documents when Dr. Geier fought back and brought suit against them.
Medical boards have acted in egregious ways before, no doubt believing that their acts were protected because they were behaving as an arm of state government. Dr. Geier's case demonstrates that they cannot necessarily act with impunity.
In a most interesting turn of events, each member of the Maryland board who participated in the illegal harrassment of Dr. Geier has been personally directed to pay punitive damages, based on his/her net worth (from $10,000 to $200,000) to Dr. Geier and his family. Yes: out of their own pockets. Explaining the unusual award, the judge wrote that "It is necessary in this case, unfortunately, to deter such conduct in the future."
I imagine other medical boards will take note, and this may deter them from capricious harrassment in future.
The WaPo article is here.
Posted by Meryl Nass, M.D. at 10:42 PM 0 comments
Data from 3 European countries show the vaccinated are much more likely to get COVID at this point than the unvaccinated
PANDEMIC OF THE VACCINATED
Craig Kelly, a member of the Australian Parliament from Sydney who has criticized most of the pandemic measures, uses the expulsion of Novak Djokovic as the springboard to present data from the UK, Iceland and Denmark to show that the vaccine actually increases your risk of getting COVID.
Earlier, I thought this might be due to factors like higher natural immunity in the unvaccinated. But with the ascension of Omicron, which transcends both natural immunity and vaccine-conveyed "immunity" I concede that the vaccines are in fact causing recipients to be more susceptible to curent COVID infections.
Mr. Kelly begins showing his graphs at 2 minutes. I am so grateful that he has saved me from producing lots of words on this subject.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/r1eUVGLNVRLZ/?
Posted by Meryl Nass, M.D. at 10:36 PM 0 comments
Franz Kafka at the Medical Board: I asked the Medical Board staff lots of questions regarding their authority to pursue me for unspecified charges, which they ignored
I was never told what the charge (or charges) were that I was expected to defend myself against.
I was never told under what authority misinformation and disinformation are now crimes, although the legislature has not deemed them crimes. Here are two email responses and queries I sent to the Board investigator and the assistant attorney general for Maine HHS, but neither one answered my questions.
October 14, 2021
Dear Savannah,
1. You did not answer my question regarding the statutory basis for investigating something that happens in my personal life, outside the office. I await your sharing with me the law or regulation that authorizes the Board to investigate my private life.
2. The AMA is not a state or federal agency and nothing they issue has the force of law.
3. Since not one thing I said was mentioned in the complaint, how could I possibly respond to defend myself, when there is no charge? What precisely am I being charged with that I must defend against?
4. The above 3 important issues have not been addressed. When the Board, not the Board secretary, who has no authority to interpret Board law and decisions, and has failed to answer my questions, has answered them, I would be happy to respond.
Meryl Nass, MD
October 14, 2021
Dear Mr. Miller:
You say you are legal counsel. I am not sure what AAG stands for. Are you an attorney? If not, what are you?
Assuming you are an attorney, if I wrote to your board and said I heard you say things that were unprofessional for a lawyer and demanded you defend yourself, I have no doubt you would ask for what specifically it was you said or did that you needed to defend.
Both your email and those of Ms. Okoronko indicate that I am being asked to defend myself for potentially anything I have ever said and done, on or off social media. No attorney would fall for that, and I have not either.
The board website says the board decides if a complaint is within its jurisdiction. I assume the board also decides if a so-called complaint is an actual complaint. Neither you nor Ms. O have chosen to answer my queries as to what the charge is and whether the board found it was within its jurisdiction, as required and noted on the Board’s website.
I’m flabbergasted that there is neither a specific charge nor evidence the board decided to proceed.
And, just to make it clear, I am an expert who has published many papers, testified to 6 different Congressional committees, consulted for the World Bank, Director of National Intelligence, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) etc. I have been interviewed by all major TV networks and US newspapers. I don’t make public statements without evidence. I have never had a malpractice case or adverse board event in 41 years practicing medicine.
I look forward to hearing from Ms. Okoronkwo or Mr. Miller or the Board with answers to my questions. I welcome a chance to defend myself, if in fact, there is anything to defend.
Meryl Nass, MD
Posted by Meryl Nass, M.D. at 7:46 PM 1 comments
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 10, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Jonathan Mark <flybynews.com@gmail.com> wrote:
Flyby News
10 January, 2022
Jonathan Mark
Dear friends,
I screen the media to understand what is being pushed upon us and consistently see proof of the psychological operation, and corruption from the onslaught of propaganda and the anti-science method of censorship and dogma. The slogan in George Orwell's classic 1984 hits me hard that Resistance is Futile. Yet the miracle of life happens everyday. In the moment the future is born. The HighWire's 100th program on this issue shows us that we have a world wide media group with legal support and awareness that the time for change is on our side.
UPDATED NEWS & EVENTS
10 January, 2022 - Flyby News - Dr. Mercola
Censored mRNA Platform Inventor
Tells All on Rogan Show
07 January, 2022 - Vaccine Deaths - News Editors
More children die from the COVID
shot than from COVID
06 January, 2022 - Global Research - Peter Koenig
The Corona Crisis: Is the Tide Turning?
"A Rapid General Awakening"?
06 January, 2022 - HighWire (2:28:21) - Del Bigtree
BREAKING MASS PSYCHOSIS
A Look Back on HighWire’s Coverage of Covid; Welcome to the Party,
Joe Rogan; ICAN Sues for V-Safe Data; Are You Suffering From Mass
Delusional Psychosis?; COVID Deaths Down, excess Deaths up?
Are Government Payouts Manipulating US Covid Data?
Guests: Dr. Mark McDonald, AJ DePriest
08 January, 2022 - BitChute (2:20) - Morgan Wallace RN
Nurse Exposes Murder In Hospitals
Promotes Early Treatment
05 January, 2022 - YouTube (6:09) - Inspired
The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right All Along
Dr. Robert Malone 2022
Time for 3rd Party – Independents Rising Up
Resources – Flyby News - Wordpress
The Devolution of Pandemics
The Real Anthony Fauci & Health Freedom Vigil
11:00 AM to Noon – Saturday, January 15th, 2022
Greenfield MA Town Common
(Press Release Attached)
To subscribe or unsubscribe write to
FlybyNews.com@gmail.comOver 280 email addresses subscribed - thanks for reading/sharing.
Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus,
and has supported critical campaigns for a healthy
environment, human rights, justice, and nonviolence,
since the launch of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.
News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era