nathan28 wrote:Secret Cheifs:
from my casual reading, the Secret Cheif conceit dates to the 18th Century at least. There was a French secret society with a political-occult orientation that initiated a character who'd go on to found his own society and was fairly prominent. All the names escape me at the moment (i know some German, but french is foreign to me). These guys were so secret, though, that when they initiated this guy and met with him, they were always masked. Forget secret handshakes, these guys didn't even know what each other looked like.
Anyway, eventually they stop contacting this dude. In all likelihood these secret masters got executed, what with their agenda and all, save this one guy. Reign of Terror, etc. Anyway, a little later, he founds his own order, patiently waiting on the Secret Cheifs.
i have a comic book like that.
(why is it likely someone was excuted?)
why are we starting in the 18th century? (conceit?)
...
i think this may be a result of jargon literalism, i.e. mistaking the name of a thing for the thing.
So then St. Yves, "founder" of synarchy, grandfather of the Changing Images of Man project before SRI had even been founded, picks this up and runs with it. He inserts spiritual hidden masters from Agartha and Shambala into his racist-monarchist mystical narrative, and decides that these guys are so secret, they're not just masked, they don't physically exist. Theosophists go apeshit over this and it plays really well with Mdm Blavatsky's psychic schtick.
oh okay, if i have to have this conversation...
well yes, i know what "synarchy" is. my snarkic posture, as i saw it, was a pre-empting of the predictable "synarchical-martini-omni-conspiracy" (geo likes that shit) which always seems to come next. it isn't your fault, so please do not interpret any previous and/or future snark as being purposefully aggressive. (if i was attacking you, i'd say so)
mostly it is a result of my reactionary nature and my complete boredom and annoyance at the post-LaRouche-iness of the "martinist synarchist" super-theory of deep politics re: the New Left (and/or the "New Age" depending on whichever reductionist smear is more trendy this decade) and its supposedly Octopus-Like control of everything from Zionism to Communism. *YAWN*
(oh and they drink the blood of Christians, just like the Viet Minh)
(i also don't see what SRI has to do with "St. Yves" or his various offspring either, but that appears to be a minor digression so i'll simply note it for future reference in case it is relevant and i'm simply missing the point)
Anyway so a little later Aleister Crowley is out in the desert with is boyfriend Victor Neuberg, either invoking Choronzon or the spirit of an Egyptian workman (you decide!). To Mega T. is taking it the hard way and suddenly, white, robed figures appear before him. Probably pretty embarassing, but that's how it works. The Secret Cheifs of the Great White Brotherhood impart a whole bunch of knowledge about sex magick, sprituality, etc., or something like that. 0=2, 5=6, genitals as an appendage like the hand or foot blah blah blah, etc., etc.
[not exactly, this episode appears to be a conflation of two or three different things, but whatever]
[re: genitals = appendage re: Swedenbourg's "Divine Wisdom" also stolen from Indian subcontinent in general really; re: tantric toe sucking & etc; re: Blake's "Milton" and relevant bits of "Jerusalem"]
i don't recall anything quite so lurid. there are differing interpretations of the language, however...
There is probably a lot of conflation in this narrative, it's all from memory. It's also probably riddled with someone else's deliberate misinformation, though i'm presenting it in good faith.
there is lots of deliberate misinformation going around.
[what you describe sounds like a cartoon to me and not at all like what i am attempting to describe. more on that below]
So the Secret Cheifs are some head-honcho type non-physical entities out there to help humanity, or whatever. If you're a crypto-traditionalist like me, you'll say, "what's the point? i don't take orders from no entities" and if you're a little paranoid, you'll question why the Secret Cheif narrative has insinuated itself so thoroughly in the New Age, which sure lines up nicely with Changing Images of Man, don't it? etc.
i would certainly not describe most of the things i can account for as being
non-physical. that would be strange indeed.
some of them are/were people.
(one was an amphibian, that was akward)
(changing images of man, btw, isn't exactly machiavelli, it always struck me as essentially christian in tone, despite the supposed eccentricities of its author)
I think there are more space bretheren in the "New Age" (whatever that means) than there are Secret Chiefs nowadays. The term "new age" is sort of vague for my tastes really, and is normally only used as pejorative stand-in for "new left ideas i am not fond of". the general implied meaning of the term, in that sense is carried across despite.
the continuous ubiquitous nature of an idea that has paleolithic roots [in ancestor worship] isn't really all that suprising to me, honestly. it has become specialized and/or heavily altered in many places it is obvious. The words in english/french/german/etc. "Secret Chiefs" are admittedly not much older than 17th century at best (depending on who was translating the R.C. stuff*) but like most of the ideas of its time it had been imported from elsewhere, along with significant baggage. There is no such thing as a new idea.
[*i like Rudolf Steiner's versions, some of his best work, less nutty than it gets in places with him]
...
if its the neo-jargony nature of the term that offends you, i can abandon it. there are several others i use when discussing the associated packages of paranormal phenomena with distinct groups of people.
alternative terms follow:
as you mention traditionalism, and later specifically catholicism and buddhism, i'll start with traditionalist terms.
this is made easier by the fact that Mr. St. Yves' occult-theosophistry is very post-Catholic/Lutheran and very infected by memetics from both traditions (and some Jacob Bohme). For the catholics, the equivalents would be the angels, and more especially the Saints. and/or also the "Elders" and other assorted kindred holdovers, some misunderstood, from the Hebrew Prophets. some of these Prophet-folks, re: Enoch & Elijah are literally "ascended masters" of sorts. If you prefer your post-Christianity to be of the NeoGnostic Phillip Dick sort you could call them "Grey Christians" (servants of the ZEBRA plasmate since 70 A.D.) seeking the emancipation of life from the Black Iron Prison. (or whatever)
Buddhism is even easier, as Agartha is a literal retelling of the Kalachakra's shamballa myths. re: "Secret Chiefs" = "Sambhogakayan Bodhisattvas". one of whom, Manjusri, is often credited (in tibet at least) with having exported the Kalachakra/Shamballa/Agartha teachings to Westerners (specifically 300,000 or so Semites of some sort) to begin with. I prefer him as Yamantaka wherein he aligns better with my more primordial leanings in regard to the interpretation of this phenomena.

(the master of fate, Secret Chief of Agartha)
with my companion St. Jerome (both a musician and a gangsta so he can get away with calling hisself that) and due to his leanings, i might consider using a term with even deeper roots, such as "Djoto-Djevi" to connote the ancestral Hougan, whether he be disembodied and bonded with a tripartite man as a vessel or embodied still (the anti-zombi) in mortal flesh.
[Voodoo mixes especially well with Catholicism and unmasks its Saintly Traditions for the Ancestor Worship they are.]
these are considered distinct although not neccessarily seperate from the "axionic entities" or etheric parasites of the goetic processes.
in my own cabal, filled with nerds who spoke Klingon in highschool, in our contemporary jargon applied to the study of global religious currents as a singular progression in the prophetic-literary tradition; I'd likely use the composite modern term
Istari. Although outside of the local cabal, this term would seem silly to someone who didn't know any better.
[Blake's Imaginal-Literalist theory of Poetic Visionary Recreation, Phillip Dick's explanation of the undying character Elijah in "Divine Invasion", Crowley's insinuations of being the Great Beast (Eliphas Levi and Akfnkhonsu reincarnated), and Tim Leary's Personal Beliefs regarding his Divine Purpose as the Universal Gardener, are all representations of the same thing and all touch on the distinguishing line(s) between non-tripartite entities (demons) and the "ascended masters"]
there are probably better examples. Steiner's hierarchies are too dogmatically contructed for my tastes, personally.
...
nathan28 wrote:"Space opera" was a coinage by L. Ron to describe his own myths.
indeed. i suppose it is
kind of tangentially related. but I resent the implied comparison of my experiences to L. Ron Hubbard's fiction.

(i'm much more sophisticated than that)
...
I have a Jacques Vallee-esque attitude to some of this stuff... someone is benefitting from it, if they aren't controlling it (i doubt it can be controlled in a reliable way).
i understand "more abstract and possibly less human". It is like the 'angelic" and "archangelic" in Steiner's schema.
[see above re: Steiner]
but yes, sort of. except there are people too. just not in your attic.
well how hard is it to facilitate contact? triangle + incense (+ drugs)? a little bit of effort to seem serious enough? less comic books, more weird-ass shit!
if we're talking axionics, yes. but i had something a little more weighty in mind with my reference. you don't invoke them. they find you.
the post-Spare "chaos magick" (wanking in circles) doesn't really seem to do much for me. i need something that involves interacting with the world to get decent effects.
drugs help me to mop it up and learn states of consciousness. they're mostly useless for
actually doing things in most regards, however. which is not a slur. i think recreation is a useful process in and of itself.
i'm too obsessive-compulsive and antisocial (Cluster A) for occult orders (Cluster B). most of the occultists i've met you wouldn't trust to to wake up to feed your dog, let alone start fucking with major energies, and are hopelessly out of touch with the rest of the world. I guess i'm really a square at heart.
i rarely participate in group functions directly. i am a member of several organizations. meeting people is easy.
most of the "occultists" i know are merely lazy buddhists.
(
Buddhism for White People! now with even less work!)
I've never gotten real coherent narrative of that sort. i mean, i have, but way, way too boring. more like a character study than a narrative.
...
i don't think i could ever, ever impress this fully enough. anyone interested in this game should read about the sword of damocles and the monkey's paw.
i do not know what you mean by narrative. perhaps you could be more descriptive. i didn't get a cosmology or anything. i didn't ask for one.
i had a good highschool literature teacher, so i have your latter suggestion covered on my account.
...
what're you looking for, stories of weirdness? stock tips? secret handshakes?
stock tips? that's what goetia is for
(having cake and eating it too, yes?)
nathan28 wrote:Penguin wrote:Im not interested in any kind of games.
Was just inquiring out of curiosity.
My main interest being, what is reality, and what is life.
And what is freedom.
i think the stock answer is, "life is a serious game", so, no flippancy here
those are much more difficult than "what is this" and "who is it". though i probably ask myself those same questions every day. the "Secret Cheifs" are an optional part of that.
not optional for traditionalists.
nathan28 wrote:Perelandra wrote:I'm curious, too, Penguin.
But I'm also as wary as nathan, to whom thanks for bringing up some material for further research.
I may be wrong, but it almost sounds like some of you are bringing pure synchronicity into this? Synchronicity storms, as a friend put it. They happen to me often, literally impossible shit. Sometimes more, sometimes less marvelous. Sometimes laugh out loud stuff. However, the phenomena seem fairly benign and are not the result of any magickal manipulation of mine.
Nonlocality, I guess. Perhaps getting used to the garden-variety stuff means REALLY weird stuff will manifest. I don't know yet.
oh, i think the better part of "magick" is one part manipulation of chance and one part "second attention". Quoth Genesis P: "Force thee hand ov chance"
that said, there's also just the outright "acausal" (i.e., "impossible") shit. Though "acausal" is a bad word--"energy release" would be better.
My paranoia is two-fold: first off, there's the politicalization of some of this stuff. See Changing Images of Man, and St. Yves (google "synarchy yves"). Particularly, the CIoM (i've got to read the damn book) was about creating a new faith/culture that would keep society together. It's not that the technologies or techniques are somehow bad (some of them are but those are pretty easy to spot, usually.); it's the amount of support they've gotten. Why the hell are there institutes trying to apply "contemplative wisdom to social problems?" Normally you apply what the buddhists call "morality" and the catholics call "charity" and the politicians call "social initiatives" to that.
second. there are a lot of crackheads and welfare queens on the astral plane posing as imposters or benevolent things. they will fuck with you if you aren't careful, and will even if you are. kind of an avocational hazard.
i think the synchronistic effects are useful for tracking these sorts of encounters. the problem is that the synch doesn't actually provide any useful information itself as to whether or not one is moving in the right direction. they may be trying to tell you to stop.
certainly any dealings with anyone, whether mortal or axionic should be dealt with carefully. although i'm not really talking about the astral plane, at least not as such. (talking bout Seven Mile)
re: Nathan/Paranoia: some suggestions:
everything is politicized. if you're looking for a popular belief system with no politicization you're going to have to look on some other planet.
No one seems to be making a big deal out of millions of buddhists studying this stuff. (you seem to be ignoring it, and pretending St. Yves made it up hisself) no one is pushing any new ideas. the only thing universal about new ageism is the multiplicity of foreign memes imported into western post-monotheism. these systems, i'd argue in contrast to the picture you paint, get considerably LESS support from PTB than the more "traditional" systems. i see more press against them than for them, most of it generated by the "traditional" protestant servants of the right wing.
(Baptist school is where i first heard about "the new age conspiracy", so perhaps you'll understand my distaste of anything that resembles it in form and shape)
if Buddhist "morality" and Catholic "charity" had the capacity to fix our problems, wouldn't they have already done so
during the thousands of years they've ruled the hearts and minds of the majority world population?
(let the luciferians have their turn already)
...
I suggest that you should read the Saint-Yves Book. It really isn't so bad. I've personally coopted his triple branched system for fictional writings of my own. (heavily modified, of course)
Also read Bohme's "Aurora" which is where most of the these people have their roots, and explains the similarities (outside buddhism) of the various theosophists much better than links through synarchy or martinism.
You might also look into the actual Martinist writings. Not saints, of course, but not exactly sinister either. I'd suggest rather than starting with google (which will result in a plethora of Conspiracy Theory websites) you begin at the relevant wiki links. Start with the generally accepted information and then get into the stranger stuff. some of the martinist tracts, influential on
some synarchism are available as pdf at the wiki site.
(note: the Martinist use of the
Strict Observance Rite of Freemasonry makes their involvement in any Occultic-Secret-Society-Synarch-Conspircy somewhat less than likely, at least in my mind)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martinism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synarchism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandre_ ... 27Alveydre
I tend to regard most of these omni-theories as being resultant of Political Cult infighting amongst the Various New Agers.
(or used as smears from right wingers)
....
apologies for typos. will proofread afterwards.
more later, time for breakfast.
Love is the Law.
:: ::