But that's not the case in Scotland.
This was published by the scotsman, in Scotland.
Scottish news direct from Scotland Tuesday, 6th January 2004
Tue 6 Jan 2004
Latest News
printer friendly
12:25pm (UK)
Butler Condemns Naming of Prince
By PA News Reporters
Former royal butler Paul Burrell today distanced himself from a decision to identify Prince Charles as the senior member of the Royal family who the Princess of Wales believed was plotting to kill her in a car crash.
As an inquest into the Princess’s death was opened and adjourned in London, Mr Burrell said he did not “support or endorse” the move by the Daily Mirror.
A statement released through his agent Ali Gunn read: “As the editor of the Daily Mirror will confirm, Mr Burrell never wanted any new information to be published following the serialisation of his book.
“Today’s publication was solely a decision taken by the newspaper without Mr Burrell’s knowledge or consent.
“He was only informed late on Monday evening and he does not support or endorse its publication.
“The Daily Mirror only became aware during the photographing of the letter for its book serialisation last October of certain sensitive information.
“Mr Burrell could not have made it clearer that he did not want any new information to be published then or in the future.
“Mr Burrell would also like to make clear that quotes attributed to him in today’s newspaper were made in relation to the inquest opening and not in relation to the publication of new material.”
Speaking to Sky News outside his home in Farndon, Cheshire, Mr Burrell said: “I’m not happy about it. I only learned about it late last night and it was always my intention never to publish that name. I never ever wanted it to be published.”
The princess’s allegation was made in a letter written 10 months before she died.
The letter was included in Mr Burrell’s book A Royal Duty by her last year, but was previously blanked out by the publishers Penguin and the Daily Mirror, which serialised the work.
But today the Mirror revealed that the relevant passage read: “This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous – my husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry.”
Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan defended his decision to publish Prince Charles’s name.
He said he was made aware in the last 24 hours by Mr Burrell that the coroner had formally approached him twice for the letter.
He said the letter was not going to be censored and therefore the information was going to be in the public domain at the inquest.
“At that point I think any newspaper that was aware of this kind of information has a duty to publish it and the situation changed.
He added: “This morning Paul Burrell was not aware of what we were doing. I knew he would not be very happy about it because he has always tried to keep this information suppressed.
“But I am afraid if a letter goes to a coroner for an inquest containing this kind of information it will come out.”
He said the letter was “utterly sensational”.
“Is it preposterous? Probably. I just don’t know.
“What I do know is that thankfully we finally have an inquest where perhaps we can finally lay to rest all these conspiracy theories.”
Within royal circles, the allegation is said to be viewed as merely another untrue and unfounded conspiracy theory.
Sources pointed to the conclusion of the French investigation which ruled that the deaths of Diana and Dodi were accidental.
It is understood that the matter was being looked at in legal terms, but it was not thought it would be taken further at present.