Second Batch 2002 - 2004

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:45 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Michael Howard QC MP 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Leader of the Opposition Spain Canaria Correos Certificado 78518 4 February 2004 Dear Mr Howard, Hutton represents a classic case study on how Queen Elizabeth “fixes” the System using the Treason Felony Act, exactly as described to Mr Pollock QC on 6 January 2004. A classic component of the mosaic of “Transcendental dishonesty and corruption that is, in point of fact, perfectly legal under English law”. Hutton cleared Blair. But let’s be clear about exactly how he did it. On 13 October 2003 Sir Kevin Tebbitt testified that the key decision on Dr Kelly’s naming was taken at Downing Street at a meeting chaired by the prime minister. Blair fingered! But then what happened in secret? Seven days later (and after Hutton’s deadline) the Treasury Solicitor submitted a “clarification” which contradicted Sir Kevin’s statement. The Treasury Solicitor is a Queens Counsel working for the Queen, and I suspect he handed Hutton a PII, signed (probably by Falconer) under authority of the Treason Felony Act of 1848. Freemason Hutton was “subconsciously influenced” to accept whatever it was that the Treasury Solicitor said in private, and so to reject what Sir Kevin Tebbitt bravely said in public. Ergo the prime minister is innocent of all charges: Kelly deserved what he got: and those bastards at the BBC are going to pay for daring to defy the will of our Most Gracious Lady the Queen. But if I am correct about the Treasury Solicitor, then Hutton’s verdict is flawed in law. For the Treason Felony Act (royal prerogative) was in suspense from 16 October to 13 November 2003. After what happened to myself and to Dr David Kelly, have you taken it upon yourself to look into the safety and well-being of the “unsound” Sir Kevin Tebbitt? Have you heard the pleas from the Kelly Family that this never be allowed to happen again? And what, apart from a sick sadistic pleasure, is the point of any further inquiry of any nature whatsoever when potential contributors are so wide open to the Windsors’ filthy homicidal Freemasons under the Treason Felony Act? The “Blair Cleared” headlines of last week were fabricated in exactly the same way as the “45 Minutes From Doom” headline was manufactured in September 2002. I’ve concluded that people like you are perverts who prefer not to be master of your own house. You choose to prolong living in all that shit, so you have to enjoy it all. Are you so out of touch with the people that you cannot see what I see from two thousand miles distant? That the people are in despair at all this shoddy theatre that passes for governance. The Iraqi people have al-Sistani, the British have nobody. Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc MA MBA cc Alan Beith MP Michael Mates MP Dr Tony Wright MP Ann Taylor MP enc Cleary to Pollock 6 January 2004

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:51 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Michael Howard QC MP 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Leader of the Opposition Spain Canaria Correos Certificado 78518 4 February 2004 Dear Mr Howard, Hutton represents a classic case study on how Queen Elizabeth “fixes” the System using the Treason Felony Act, exactly as described to Mr Pollock QC on 6 January 2004. A classic component of the mosaic of “Transcendental dishonesty and corruption that is, in point of fact, perfectly legal under English law”. Hutton cleared Blair. But let’s be clear about exactly how he did it. On 13 October 2003 Sir Kevin Tebbitt testified that the key decision on Dr Kelly’s naming was taken at Downing Street at a meeting chaired by the prime minister. Blair fingered! But then what happened in secret? Seven days later (and after Hutton’s deadline) the Treasury Solicitor submitted a “clarification” which contradicted Sir Kevin’s statement. The Treasury Solicitor is a Queens Counsel working for the Queen, and I suspect he handed Hutton a PII, signed (probably by Falconer) under authority of the Treason Felony Act of 1848. Freemason Hutton was “subconsciously influenced” to accept whatever it was that the Treasury Solicitor said in private, and so to reject what Sir Kevin Tebbitt bravely said in public. Ergo the prime minister is innocent of all charges: Kelly deserved what he got: and those bastards at the BBC are going to pay for daring to defy the will of our Most Gracious Lady the Queen. But if I am correct about the Treasury Solicitor, then Hutton’s verdict is flawed in law. For the Treason Felony Act (royal prerogative) was in suspense from 16 October to 13 November 2003. After what happened to myself and to Dr David Kelly, have you taken it upon yourself to look into the safety and well-being of the “unsound” Sir Kevin Tebbitt? Have you heard the pleas from the Kelly Family that this never be allowed to happen again? And what, apart from a sick sadistic pleasure, is the point of any further inquiry of any nature whatsoever when potential contributors are so wide open to the Windsors’ filthy homicidal Freemasons under the Treason Felony Act? The “Blair Cleared” headlines of last week were fabricated in exactly the same way as the “45 Minutes From Doom” headline was manufactured in September 2002. I’ve concluded that people like you are perverts who prefer not to be master of your own house. You choose to prolong living in all that shit, so you have to enjoy it all. Are you so out of touch with the people that you cannot see what I see from two thousand miles distant? That the people are in despair at all this shoddy theatre that passes for governance. The Iraqi people have al-Sistani, the British have nobody. Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc MA MBA cc Alan Beith MP Michael Mates MP Dr Tony Wright MP Ann Taylor MP enc Cleary to Pollock 6 January 2004

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:53 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Paul Braithwaite Esq 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Equitable Members Action Group Spain Canaria 28 February 2004 Dear Sir, You know all about the Equitable Life fraud from your own experiences. I have told you, through Gordon Pollock, about the fraud at the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. I have told you about the fraud at Anglia Television. How many examples does it take to demonstrate a pattern of racketeering? Let me give you one more, from that same insurance industry as Equitable Life. I imagine you are old enough to remember the Miners Strike in 1984/85. Once Thatcher had broken the union there was nothing left to restrain the Windsor Gang and their filthy homicidal Freemasons. The very next year, 1986, three seemingly unrelated events took place. First, the Thatcher government passed the Financial Services Act. Second, a controversial “English Jurisdiction” clause was quietly inserted into the contracts signed by Americans recruited as Lloyds “Names”. Third, Jeffrey Archer published A Matter of Honour. You probably remember the headlines from ten years ago. Massive losses at certain Lloyds syndicates. Names wiped out by unlimited liability. Respected men and women, pillars of their community, ending their own lives. Did you know that the very final face confronted by these doomed individuals was none other than Her Ladyship Mary Archer? The Chairman of Lloyds “Hardship Committee” was the hard-nosed debt collector for the Windsor Mob. But then who has sympathy for a Lloyds Name? With the benefit of hindsight it is easy to see how Lloyds salesmen targeted gullible wealthy Americans by playing to their snobbery. Thousands of American citizens were actively recruited as names during the 1980’s, only to have the sky fall in on them in the early 1990’s. Many felt cheated, and decided to fight. But when they tried to sue they found that they had signed a contract that stipulated that any dispute must be fought-out under English jurisdiction. How could this be? What competent US attorney would allow his client to agree to such ruinous terms? For not only did this mean that all disputes were to be settled in English courts by English judges, but it also meant that English law applied – specifically the Financial Services Act and the Lloyds Act. (And of course lurking in the background, out of sight, lay the Treason Felony Act of 184<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> . The answer of course is that none of those thousands of attorneys did allow his client to agree such suicidal terms. Which brings us to A Matter of Honour. It’s a crappy novel, of course. But there is one revealing exchange between a Swiss banker (Bischoff) and a Soviet agent (Poskonov). They have conspired to defraud a third party, Romanov (yes, Archer is that inspired!). But let Archer tell the story. “Not at all, my dear Bischoff,” said Poskonov. “After all these years the honour is entirely mine. And kind of you to open the bank on a Sunday. But now to business. Did you manage to get Romanov to sign the release form?” “Oh yes,” said Bischoff matter-of-factly. He did it without even reading the standard clauses, let alone the extra three you asked us to put in.” “So his inheritance automatically returns to the Russian state?” “That is so, Mr Poskonov, and we in return…” “…will represent us in all the currency exchange transactions we carry out in the West.” So there you have it. The spook targets the “mark”. The aristocrat recruits the “mark”. The banker switches contracts at the last moment. The “mark” can’t be bothered to read the “whole damn contract”. S/he signs. With fatal consequences (literally). I’ve enclosed about one half of a Time Magazine special report written by David McClintick, and which was my prime source of information about the scams at Lloyds. It was a great piece; it was enormous; it was true. So it got buried. At this point I suggest you read that material (Time, Feb 21 2000; pp41-51) To my mind understanding what happened at Lloyds, and why it happened, is the key to understanding quite a few present-day riddles. The three I personally would highlight are these. First, the amazing and enduring political influence enjoyed by the Archer family under successive governments of both left and right. During the Tory Supremacy of 1979 to 1997 he was noteworthy for being a “valued and trusted friend” of Thatcher and Major. Both nominated Archer for a peerage. Yet Blair was prepared to deliver Archer’s chosen opponent as Labour’s candidate for London Mayor. Blair was also preparing to endorse the Major treatment of what happened at Anglia Television. The favourable treatment from the courts (“the Fragrant Mary Archer”). The never-ending efforts at rehabilitation. The assassination of Jill Dando and Monica Coghlan. It seems the Windsor Mob is willing to grant any favour to their favoured son who dreamt up the Lloyds scam. A scam that grossed “at least $23.8 Billions for just the years 1988 through 1992”. Second, the massive push currently underway to marginalize the role of the jury as arbiter of fact, and to promote the role of the judges. You will have noticed that Archer was convicted by a jury of twelve honest men and women. But the Lloyds scam, like the rest of the Windsor protection rackets, was facilitated by pliable “professional judges” (i.e. failed Queens Counsel). In point of fact judge nobbling (the “subconscious influence” of the Treason Felony Act) is absolutely central to the Windsor plan for their Thousand Year Judicial Reich. Not that all of this has gone unnoticed elsewhere. You may have seen that Richard May was dumped this week from the International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia. Even Kofi Annan has had enough. So let me quote myself writing to Slobodan Milosevic right at the beginning of the Hague extravaganza of victors’ justice. “Richard May, of the English Court, and Patrick Robinson, of the Jamaican Court, both swear to obey the same person. She is really out to get you, isn’t she? Another of her agents is Mr Blair. I think you will find that Mr Blair was an impostor at the time of the NATO campaign in former Yugoslavia. Check with anyone who was at Feira on 19 June 2000. Best of luck.” (19 February 2002) Third and most important this drama explains why Blair took Britain to war in Iraq. Nobody is satisfied with Blair’s own various explanations. The British people still have no satisfactory accounting for what has been done in their name to the sovereign state of Iraq. And Blair wants to “draw a line and move on”. Well he would, wouldn’t he? Trying to understand “Blair’s reasons” is a chimera and a red herring because they do not exist. You might as well try to understand a hologram. Tony Blair is a first class Mob lawyer, untroubled by any moral implications of his craft. His flexibility is purely tactical. He represents the interests of his client (our Most Gracious Lady the Queen) at all times, and most notably when espousing his various personal missions from God. If the British held more faith he would never be able to get away with it. Blair took Britain to war in Iraq to pay off a private debt, pure and simple. It is the Windsor interest that maintains British subservience to the USA. A deal drawn up by Thatcher, brokered by Major, and delivered by Blair. A sweet deal, as they say, with a macabre inherent symmetry. For just as the people of Iraq had no possible defence against George Bush and his machine of death, so those American Names had no possible defence against our Most Gracious Lady the Queen and her Treason Felony Act. A few days ago I was reading about some of the treatment handed out by invading British squadies to Iraqi civilians in their own country. Of how one blameless man was bound and hooded, and then kicked to death. If you have taken the trouble to gain access to the documents lodged with the European Court of Human Rights* you will understand why I feel a certain affinity with that poor man. There but for the grace of God go I. Yours faithfully, John Cleary BSc MA MBA cc Allan Beith MP (with attachments, correos Certificado 54826) Dr Tony Wright MP ( “ “ ) Lord Goldsmith ( “ “ ) Gordon Pollock QC ( “ ) *See ECHR (Strasbourg) ref. 24316/03 John Cleary v United Kingdom Addendum 14 Marzo 2004 Michael Mansfield, President of the UN Court for Sierra Leone, is under the same pressure as Richard May. Mansfield too will be dumped. According to today’s London Observer, the financier behind the aborted coup in Equatorial Guinea is Ely Calil, a close associate of Lord Jeffrey Archer. Small world!

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:55 am

C/Eusebio Navarro, 12 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Dr Rowan Williams Spain Canaria Archbishop of Canterbury 8 June 2004 (Correos Cert. 84574 ES) Your Grace, I write further to my copy letters to Sir Michael Peat (Enclosed). I am moved to once again put words on paper by the extraordinary comments published by the retired Dr Carey. That he should slander a dead woman whose death, might I remind you, is the subject of a murder “inquiry”, runs counter to any notion of Christian conscience. Would you please be so kind as to have your office relay to him a copy of my remarks to Sir John Stevens of 12 January this year? To set up the dead Diana as the “baddie”, thus making Camilla the “goodie”, with an innocent Charles drawn naturally to the latter and repulsed by the former, is a grotesque inversion worthy of Bush. To pretend that this marriage campaign is anything other than a matter of State is a betrayal of the people and a lie of Blair proportions. The fact of the matter, Your Grace, is that the Windsors and the Bushes are absolutely desperate to create a new queen. The foundation of the Windsor Tyranny is the Treason Felony Act of 1848, which outlaws any opposition of any nature whatsoever to the person of “our Most Gracious Lady the Queen”. For the past hundred and fifty-six years there have been one, two or even (as in 1953) three queens simultaneously. But if there is no queen, there is no Treason Felony Act, and no wholesale criminalization of the Anglo/American working class. You yourself spoke out loudly against the invasion of Iraq. We know it was an illegal unjust and immoral war of choice. Yet Britain could never have taken part in this vile aggression had there been no queen. This war was forced down the throats of the people by means of lies and forgeries enabled and empowered by the Treason Felony Act. FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT: IF YOU CHEAT AND “BEND THE RULES” AS DR CAREY IS SUGGESTING, YOU WILL BE SOWING THE SEEDS FOR MANY FUTURE WARS OF AGGRESSION. Dr Carey suggests the couple be left to make the decision for themselves. This self-dealing is directly analogous to the self-dealing on the vast estate built up by the Queen Mother. Everybody has to pay taxes, except for any queen. Will Queen Camilla be any different, I wonder? For make no mistake: if Charles marries Camilla, and Charles becomes King, then Mrs Parker Bowles becomes the Sovereign. She can do anything, including kill the King, and nobody can stop her. SHE IS THE WOLF IN SHEEP’S’ CLOTHING. As a Christian I must say that I object strongly to Carey’s introduction of class discrimination into the love of Jesus. How can it be that Carey claims the love and compassion of Jesus on behalf of those he knows to deny that same love to members of the working class? Those he knows to have deliberately stolen our very souls? Jesus had his own words for the Pharisees, did he not? I take it you already know about all about the pain and suffering and desolation I have endured these last ten years on the run from the many sadists amongst the Windsors. No income and dependent on charity. Never daring to go near my beloved daughters Victoria and Georgia, for fear of broken bones. Knowing that my own life could be snuffed out at any moment, as they have snuffed out so many others. But I’ve said all this before, and shown all the proof to the European Court of Human Rights. It makes no difference at all to these “young lovers”, and I’ve no chance of ever getting back my children while there is a queen. If you do not already know then the documents are on file at the Court (ref. 24316/03 John Cleary v United Kingdom) and can be accessed at any time up to November this year. With respect, your duty is to protect your flock. We neither want, need nor deserve another Killer Queen. RSVP Yours sincerely, John Cleary Grandson of the Scribe & Child of God Enc Cleary to Peat 16/11, 26/11, 11/12, 14/12/2002 Peat to Cleary 21/11, 1/12/2002 Cleary to Stevens 12/1/2004 Cleary to Reid (European Court of Human Rights) 10/10/2003 Cc Dr David Hope, Archbishop of York (with enclosures) Alan Beith MP His Holiness Patriarch Alexy II His Holiness Pope John Paul II

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:28 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Kofi Annan 35003 Las Palmas de Gran UN Secretary General Spain Canaria (Correos Certificado 58464ES) 4 July 2004 Dear Secretary General, I write further to my unacknowledged letter of 26 August 2002. As I understand the situation, the International CRIMINAL court at The Hague plays the role of tribunal of last resort. That is, the Court is designed to be invoked only when the signatory states themselves have failed to investigate and try prima facie war crimes. Several such war crimes are at this very moment working their way up the British legal system, propelled by the Human Rights Act. If you actually read the Human Rights Act you will find that the European Convention on Human Rights has been adopted into UK law article by article. You will also find that Article 13, the right to an effective remedy, is missing. And it’s no mistake. The very antithesis of the Treason Felony Act of 1848,The Human Rights Act of 1998 had to be strangled at birth. Under British law we human beings are entitled to a theatrical performance of great skill that resembles due process. But we cannot have “law and justice in mercy”, the essence of the Coronation Oath. When it comes to British law, that’s up to the Brits themselves of course. If the House of Lords and the House of Commons want to carry on fucking over their people, that’s up to them. Fine. I’m Irish. But of course it’s not just the Brits, is it? Those poor Iraqis murdered, tortured and abused by the Brits have also been deceived into putting their hopes into the Human Rights Act. They don’t know that Blair quietly murdered it back in 1998, do they? At some point you will have to make a judgement about whether or not British war criminals are to be indicted at The Hague. If you want evidence for how the Windsors have no respect for human rights, read for yourself how clever lawyer Mr Blair “does a Rumsfeld” around the Human Rights Act. If you want evidence for how the Windsors have no respect for the law, read how clever lawyer Jack Straw used the Treason Felony Act just this last week to prevent judicial review of the legality of this vile, illegal war of aggression. RSVP Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc MA MBA cc Rt. Hon. Alan Beith MP Lord George Carey His Holiness Pope John Paul II His Holiness Patriarch Alexy II Once more, in memory of my two lost little girls, I include below a list of my writings since 26 August 2002, when last I wrote to you. Date Recipient/Title of Document 16.11.02 Sir Michael Peat 26.11.02 Tessa Jowell MP 26.11.02 Sir Michael Peat 11.12.02 Sir Michael Peat 14.12.02 Sir Michael Peat 25.03.03 The Enemy Within 05.04.03 Pope John Paul II 18.05.03 Felipe de Borbon 18.06.03 Lord Falconer 10.07.03 Judge Peter Cory 14.07.03 Luzius Wildhaber (ECHR) 16.07.03 Luzius Wildhaber (ECHR) 21.07.03 Andrew Gilligan 30.07.03 Luzius Wildhaber (ECHR) 30.07.03 Jacques Chirac 04.08.03 Brian Hutton’s Phoney Circus 05.08.03 Ambassador Joseph Wilson 20.08.03 Mrs Janice Kelly 02.09.03 K M Reid (ECHR) 10.10.03 K M Reid (ECHR) 03.12.03 F Elens-Passos (ECHR) 05.01.04 Charles Allen et al 06.01.04 Gordon Pollock QC (BCCI) 12.01.04 Sir John Stevens 15.01.04 Queen Elizabeth II 15.01.04 Equitable Members Action Group 17.01.04 Antonio Vitorino 23.01.04 Elfyn Llwyd MP et al 27.01.04 Sir George Russell 30.01.04 Equitable Members Action Group 04.02.04 Michael Howard QC MP 28.02.04 Equitable Members Action Group 08.06.04 Dr Rowan Williams Please make this letter available to all current members of the United Nations Security Council

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:40 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Sr. Paulino Rivero 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Chairman, 11-M Commission Canaria Congreso de los Diputados 11 September 2004 (Correos certificado 223435452) Dear Mr Chairman, Greetings from the beautiful Canary Islands. You would be well advised to not rule out the possibility that the terrorist attacks of 11 March were carried out by Manchurian Candidates. And that the purpose of the attack was to divert attention away from the planned coup in Equatorial Guinea. For all the confusion created thus far by your commission, there are really only two questions that the people of Spain want answered. The first question is why there were connections between the terrorists and the Spanish secret services prior to the attacks on Atocha? The second question is whether and why did the Aznar regime lie about the identities of the probable authors of the attack? They also want to know if there was any cause and effect relationship between those two issues. Let us hypothesise that the terrorists had been primed by their Controller to strike a little earlier in March. On 7 March Nick du Toit and sixteen others were arrested in Malabo. Simon Mann and seventy others were arrested in Zimbabwe. Severo Moto was here in Las Palmas in the company of Greg Wales and David Tremain, was delayed by the car rally at the airport, and then received a warning text message in Mali on his way to Malabo. The coup was frustrated, so of course the terrorists received no orders from their Controller. Soldiers on a war footing get edgy and frustrated when the attack they have prepared is delayed. They waited a few days, and then decided for themselves to carry out the plan. Under this scenario the Aznar regime hung itself with desperate lies in panic and guilt not for the fact that Madrid had suffered a terrible attack, but for LOSING CONTROL OF THE OPERATION. And had the coup been successful? Once Moto was in Malabo with du Toit and Mann the Controller would give the order to strike Madrid, a full six days before the General Election. The Spanish commandoes would be ashore in Malabo in force while a traumatised nation suffered through six days of Aznar attacking ZP as the terrorists’ friend. Aznar would assassinate the character of Rodriguez Zapatero, while Rajoy stood above the fray looking statesmanlike (straight out of the Karl Rove playbook). Rajoy would win by a landslide. And nobody would be in the least interested in the two Spanish warships and the 1000 Spanish troops taking control of a small country in the armpit of Africa. Mission Accomplished, and $5 Billion a year (and rising fast) to share out amongst the conspirators. The terrorist strikes in Madrid served the same intended purpose as the terrorist strikes in New York and Washington: to facilitate regime change in an oil-rich state abroad, and the re-election of a neofascist government at home. You should make it your business* to follow up on the latest revelations of hijacking “training *www.fromthewilderness.com/PDF/Commonwealth.pdf exercises” being run by Cheney on 11 September 2001. America’s air traffic controllers were unable to distinguish between 18 “phantom hijackings” and the four real hijackings because Cheney himself was running interference that morning. That’s why Cheney went ballistic when one of the National Security Agency intercepts leaked from the US Congress: “The match is tomorrow”. Indeed it might well be that the Controller of the Madrid terrorist cell intended to use these very same code words. The bombings of Madrid planned for 8 march were a direct attack on Spanish democracy and the popular sovereignty. You know now that the United Kingdom is not a democracy under the control of the people, but an autocracy under the control of the Queen. You know now that crimes are committed by privateers/pirates like Archer and Thatcher under license of that queen. You know that the Madrid terrorists were in contact with London. You know now that the coup in Equatorial Guinea was planned in London. We were indeed fortunate in that the courageous actions of black-skinned people saved our own white skins: it was a true act of God. Do you see now the dangers inherent in secret societies, and why Article 22.5 of the Spanish Constitution forbids such secret societies? Hundreds of people were always going to die at Atocha. But God’s miracle is that the actual victims did not die in vain. They died that their country might be spared a neofascist dictatorship exported from London. If I am correct in my hypothesis it means that the facilitators, members of a Spanish secret society controlled from London, are still in place at all levels of our security structure. Following the trials of Barrionuevo and Vera for their roles in GAL there exists the perfect precedent to put the Aznar regime on trial for crimes against the people of Spain. If you cover this up you may be certain that it will happen again. And the Good Lord might not smile upon us for a second time. I am at your service** and will gladly tell you all I know about the identity of the Controller. For more than seven years your colleagues now in power have chosen to ignore my warnings of danger. The cost of that mistake includes a great deal of lost time and money and 192 persons dead in Madrid. Please do not make that same mistake again. Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc MA MBA ** Apart from 6 to 27 October when I will be in London to see my mother. Cc President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Judge Teresa Palacios President Vladimir Putin Josep Borrell MEP Senator John Edwards The Prince of Asturias

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:43 am

C/Eusebio Navarro,12 Mr Justice Keith 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Zahid Mubarek Inquiry Chairman Spain Canaria 21 November 2004 Your Honour, “The same is true for the prisons. You can see from my application how the Windsors tried to do murder to me in January 1995 and then again in April 2000. How could they hope to get away with it? Easily. Over the past thirty years more than a thousand human beings have been murdered whilst incarcerated in a British prison. Overwhelmingly they were male, working class and ethnic minority. So I fit the profile quite well. Now this is very useful if you have a problem and make a habit of telling your servants to “make it go away!” So can we really feign surprise that our Most Gracious Lady the Queen should use her dictatorial powers to suppress all information about individual homicides? So no apologies, and never an inquiry in all these thirty years. Until the fight put up by the family and friends of Zahid Mubarek, a nineteen year old first offender who was murdered on 21 March 2000. Lord Woolf and two others had ruled that under English law no inquiry was mandated. Yet on 16 October FIVE Law Lords were hurriedly convened to overrule Woolf and effect an historic volte-face. Again, this is wholly unprecedented.” John Cleary to F Elens-Passos, European Court of Human Rights, 3 December 2004 Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc MA MBA Enc. F Elens-Passos (European Court of Human Rights) to Cleary 25.11.2003 Cleary to Elens-Passos 3.12.2003 Cellmate killer belonged to deadly gang, inquiry told David Batty Saturday November 20, 2004 The Guardian A racist prisoner who killed his Asian cellmate was part of a gang who murdered fellow inmates, a public inquiry was told yesterday. Zahid Mubarek was killed by Robert Stewart at Feltham young offender institution, west London, in March 2000. A statement from the Mubarek family, read out by their counsel, Patrick O'Connor QC, said Stewart deliberately chose to carry out the attack hours before Mr Mubarek was due to be released. "This was no accident," Mr O'Connor said. "The evidence will disclose that Robert Stewart was one of a group of murderous associates in other prisons. "Stewart's best friend in prison ... murdered another inmate on the day of the victim's 17th birthday. Another of Stewart's good friends killed his victim on the day of his grandmother's funeral. "'We are all evil,' Stewart gloated in a later letter to an associate. It is difficult to disagree," he added. Stewart had planned the killing of Mr Mubarek, 19, obtaining a wooden dagger and loosening a table leg which he later used to bludgeon his victim while he slept, Mr O'Connor went on. Stewart also wrote in a letter the month before the killing of his intention to take extreme measures to get moved from Feltham, including threats to "kill me fucking padmate" while dressed as a member of the Ku Klux Klan. The letter also made reference to Adolf Hitler and the murdered black teenager Stephen Lawrence. Three months after the murder, in June 2000, Stewart, then 24, wrote to his brother inciting harassment of the Mubarek family and giving their home address. He wrote: "Ya, do you want to get up to any of your phone antics? Do some dodgy orders? I'm not 100% sure but [address] Walthamstow, East London. It's an old friend of ours. Do a 192 check first." In another letter he expressed eagerness to receive morgue photographs of Mr Mubarek's body and promised to pass them on to a friend. The inquiry is expected to conclude in March. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004 Prison killer 'sent boasting letters to racist gangmates' By Cahal Milmo 20 November 2004 The Independent A racist prisoner who battered his Asian cellmate to death was part of a circle of murderous inmates scattered across British jails who plotted violent hate crimes, an inquiry was told yesterday. Robert Stewart, who is serving a life sentence for the murder of Zahid Mubarek four years ago, wrote to friends gloating over killings they had committed and predicting he would kill his "padmate" while dressed as a member of the Ku Klux Klan and carrying a flaming crucifix. Giving evidence at the second day of the judicial inquiry into the death of Mr Mubarek, his family's lawyer said the "sickening timing" of Stewart's attack, just hours before Zahid was due to be released, had been deliberate. Patrick O'Connor QC said: "This was no accident. The evidence will disclose that Robert Stewart was one of a group of murderous associates in other prisons." The inquiry, chaired by Mr Justice Keith, was told that Stewart had been copying his fellow gang members by choosing significant dates to carry out their killings. His best friend while in prison had murdered another inmate on day of his victim's 17th birthday, while another associate, also serving a prison sentence, had killed his victim on the day of his grandmother's funeral, Mr O'Connor said. In a letter to one member of the gang, Stewart proclaimed: "We are all evil." Underlining the premeditated nature of Stewart's racism, the inquiry in central London heard that, after the murder of Mr Mubarek at the Feltham young offenders' institution in west London, the killer wrote to his brother inciting him to harass his victim's family and supplying their address. Stewart wrote: "Do you want to get up to some of your phone antics? Do some dodgy orders? ... It's an old friend of ours." In other letters, displaying what Mr O'Connor described as "utter, callous indifference", Stewart, now 24, gave graphic descriptions of how he bludgeoned his 19-year-old cellmate with a table leg while he slept. The killer, who had been diagnosed as a psychopath, also promised to send a friend copies of autopsy photographs of Mr Mubarek. The inquiry heard that Mr Mubarek, from Walthamstow, east London, who was serving three months for theft, had written to his family expressing remorse while in custody. The teenager, described as a model prisoner, said: "Dad, I knew I should have listened to you ... Tell my mum I love her so much and not to worry." The Prison Service has apologised to the Mubarek family. Mr O'Connor asked the inquiry chairman not to be swayed by claims from the Home Office that the mistakes which led to the killing could not be repeated. The barrister, who has said the Prison Service missed 14 opportunities to save Mr Mubarek from his killer, said: "You will be suffocated with assurances that all but a few problems are history. The buzz words will buzz, the cliches will flow. Penetrating jargon will only be a first step." {According to the British press, the people of Spain are racists because they boo foul play in football. What of the Prince of Wales, whose Masons organize the slaughter of ethnic minorities in their vicious games of Gladiator?????}

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:46 am

C/Eusebio Navarro, 12 Sr Jose Manuel Barroso 35003 Las Palmas de Gran President Elect Euro Commission Spain Canaria (Correos Certificado 454689) All Saints’ Day 2004 Dear Mr Barroso, A few thoughts in support of your pending reshuffle. You doubtless know that Peter Mandelson is one of the Dirty Old Slag’s privateers/pirates, who plunders under cover of the missing Article 13. But did you know that his name features prominently on the “Wonga List” uncovered by the South African police? And that the South African authorities are in the process of extraditing Greg Wales and David Tremain in connection with their mercenary activities (which will lead straight to Severo Moto and his fellow conspirators in Spain**)? My source for these is Britain’s prestigious Channel 4 News, but if you are not too high and mighty you may wish to make contact with the South African police and find out for yourself. For context I provide three documents sent to your predecessor, the UN Secretary General and the Chairman of the Spanish parliamentary inquiry into the worst terrorist attack in the history of the European Union. My advice? Peter Mandelson for the overseas aid and development portfolio. Not everyone has such invaluable experience in promoting Coups d’Etat in Africa. RSVP Yours sincerely, John Cleary Ps Do you have any children of your own? I have two girls: Victoria who is nearly sixteen, and Georgia, nearly fourteen. I last saw them on Christmas Day 1994. What use is your Constitution to those of us who are not members of a secret society? Enc Cleary to Prodi 5.6.2002 Cleary to Annan 4.7.2004 Cleary to Rivero 11.9.2004 Human Rights Act 1998 1998 Chapter 42 - continued An Act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights; to make provision with respect to holders of certain judicial offices who become judges of the European Court of Human Rights; and for connected purposes. [9th November 1998] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- Introduction The Convention Rights. 1. - (1) In this Act "the Convention rights" means the rights and fundamental freedoms set out in- (a) Articles 2 to 12 and 14 of the Convention, (b) Articles 1 to 3 of the First Protocol, and (c) Articles 1 and 2 of the Sixth Protocol, as read with Articles 16 to 18 of the Convention.

by **slimmouse** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:51 am

Mindblowing stuff Anti. This issue is At the very core of everything we see to be wrong with this world. I only hope many on this board have read and can comprehend its significance. Pity you cant get these letters published along with a more simplified commentary, for the benefit of broader public consumption, which might get people to wake the fork up. As for yourself. Do NOT give up the fight. keep writing your letters. You absolutely must. As many as possible. To as many sitting MPs. This is whats needed to break what I now understand to be the REAL power in this country. Not that I ever particularly suspected it was any different. It just all makes sense to me now. Thank you again. You are a very courageous man

by **antiaristo** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:37 pm

Many thanks slimmouse. A certain amount of encouragement was needed to get me this far. You also serve! My own e-mail won't work. I have a four year old computer & operating system that are on their last legs. Half my stuff is in Spanish (which I don't speak - strange circumstances lead to strange outcome) and half in English. I have no support here. If my machine goes phut I'm in trouble. Which is a roundabout way of asking ALL my comrades here at Rigorous Intuition to PLEASE circulate the three URLs to ANYBODY that might be interested. Part I <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm7.showMessage?topicID=699.topic">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...=699.topic</a> Department of Trade & Industry Inquiry (State Secret) <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm7.showMessage?topicID=698.topic">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...=698.topic</a>

by **slimmouse** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:46 pm

Well now youve got them all in URL form, there are possibly a thousand such forums you might pass these onto ? Slowly of course, you dont want any kind of spamming rap. It would be interesting to see which retained them lol. DU anyone ?<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"> Ive suggested a few people look at them. It was the least I could do.

by **antiaristo** » Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:01 pm

Cross reference links Loftus: London bombing mastermind is MI6 agent <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=127.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=127.topic</a> Royal Servant George Smith Dies at 44 <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=569.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=569.topic</a> De Menezes execution <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=496.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=496.topic</a> Judith Miller and David Kelly <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=659.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=659.topic</a> MI6 Psyops on Moslems <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=724.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=724.topic</a> Act of Settlement: NWO Achilles Heel <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm11.showMessage?topicID=137.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=137.topic</a>

Second Batch 2002 - 2004

Michael Howard MP (Leader of the "Opposition")

Michael Howard QC MP (Leader of the "Opposition")

Equitable Members Action Group

Dr Rowan Williams (Archbishop of Canterbury)

Kofi Annan

Parliamentary Investigation into Madrid Bombing

Zahid Mubarek Inquiry Chairman

Jose Manuel Barroso (EC President)

Re: Jose Manuel Barroso (EC President)

What Now?

Re: What Now?

Re: Second Batch 2002 - 2004

Who is online