by antiaristo » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:19 am
C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12<br>Kofi Annan                                35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria<br>UN Secretary General                        Spain<br>26 August 2002<br>Dear Secretary General,<br>I thought you might be interested to know the reason why President Bush has turned a little less belligerent in his war rhetoric in recent weeks.<br>At this point in the Great Game the United States, acting alone, cannot attack another sovereign state. She must have diplomatic cover, and the wider the better. At minimum she must have the full support of and active participation by the United Kingdom, with its UN veto.<br>The Sovereign of the United Kingdom is Queen Elizabeth II. The people are NOT sovereign: the people do NOT control the UN veto, and they do NOT appoint the Prime Minister. Both powers (and virtually all others) are vested in the person of the Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II. Everyone must swear a solemn oath of allegiance to that person, or they do not get appointed .<br>Since 1990 a fraud has been perpetrated against the British people, a fraud identical to the one perpetrated by Lord Clive Hollick and Malcolm Wall against the workers at Anglia Television. Since that time the leader of the largest parliamentary party has NOT been appointed by the Queen as Prime minister. Both Major and Blair allowed the rest of the world to believe that their election by the people conferred the post of British Prime Minister. NOT SO, for the people are not sovereign. Only the Sovereign can appoint the Prime Minister, and this she chose NOT to do.<br>From the fall of Thatcher to the Council of Europe at Feira the British “Prime Minister” has been an impostor acting beyond his powers. True power has been wielded from behind the scenes by the Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth herself. Queen Elizabeth, hiding behind impostors who were happy to deceive the world and pretend they were in command, has waged all of the wars since Desert Storm. A game of double bluff has been going on all these years.<br>The Security Council of the United Nations confers the highest legal authority of all. As such it is a supremely moral entity, acting in the name of the Creator here on His creation. The Security Council is under the control of the five Permanent Members – USA, Russia, China, France, and UK. Yet there is no way that the British people can rid themselves of the British Crown or the Windsor family. There is no Republican Party because republicanism itself – in any form – is illegal and under penalty of death under the Treason and Felony Act of 1848.<br>The question is, for how much longer will the rest of the world tolerate the presence of an hereditary dictator Queen as a Permanent Member of the Security Council? Perhaps you should ask them all the question.<br>Queen Elizabeth has gone to great lengths to ensure she is not seen to use her dictatorial powers. She operates in the shadows behind her front men, Major and Blair, with their “democratic mandate”. I, John Cleary, am a victim of the tyrannical powers wielded by Queen Elizabeth II and have been fighting the tyrant for more than eight years. My first victory came in November 1999 with the downfall of Lord Jeffrey Archer. My technique since then has been the same. Write directly to those who shelter behind plausible deniability, copy the letter to those with a direct interest, and send out between 100 and 200 blind copies to others with an indirect interest. By this technique I have been able to demonstrate to sceptical observers that not all is as it seems in the United Kingdom and the United States. The wider diplomatic community are aware of my activities and they are watching the British intently. Queen Elizabeth now cannot use her power to provide the diplomatic cover that Bush requires. Hence the less belligerent war rhetoric emanating from Washington.<br>I tell you these things, and provide the attached list of my writings (1 November 1999 to 24 July 2002), not from a sense of self-aggrandisement, nor a desire to take credit for myself. Those things no longer matter. But I want to make sure my two little girls one day learn why it was they lost their daddy in 1994.<br>Yours sincerely,<br><br><br><br>John Cleary BScMAMBA<br><br>cc        China, France, Russia (with attachments)<br>        <br> Date                        Recipient/Title of Document<br>01.11 1999                HRH The Prince of Wales<br>01.02.2000                Lady Mary Archer<br>03.04.2000                Hon William & Hon James Archer<br>17.04.2000                Janet Reno<br>29.05 2000                Janet Reno<br>14.06.2000                Tony Blair MP (delivered by hand 19.06.2000)<br>24.07.2000                First Affidavit ( Wandsworth Council v JP Cleary)<br>01.10.2000                Second Affidavit (----------------- “ --------------------)<br>29.11.2000                Third Affidavit (----------------- “ --------------------)<br>29.07.2001                I Accuse Lady Mary Archer<br>08.08.2001                Mary Archer’s Fraud<br>04.01.2002                HRH Prince William of Wales<br>19.02.2002                Slobodan Milosevic<br>17.03.2002*                Patrick Cox MEP<br>06.04.2002                Patrick Cox MEP<br>17.05.2002                 Patrick Cox MEP<br>05.06.2002*                 Robin Cook MP<br>05.06.2002*                 Romano Prodi<br>30.06.2002*                 Patricia Hewitt MP<br>24.07.2002*                 John Ashcroft<br>24.07.2002*                 Harvey Pitt<br>                                                (NB * = attached herein)<br> <p></p><i></i>