PLEASE DO NOT POST

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:31 am

HRH The Prince of Wales 1.11.1999 Jeffrey Archer and Anglia Television Your Royal Highness, I write to make public important information pertaining to Jeffrey Archer, conservative candidate to become Mayor of London. For the prohibited trading in shares was the least of his sins at Anglia. What was devastating for the victims (the Archer cause hidden from public view) was the rank brutality visited upon the unfortunate employees at Anglia Television in the course of the cover up which followed. A brutality of itself worthy of national feature coverage (by Lisa Buckenham in The Guardian) before the inquiry became public. First of all came the prohibited trading by Lord Archer. Then came the mandatory enquiry into his "odd, if lucrative" activities. Then came the dead hand of State secrecy. Then came the Section 285 (Companies Act 1985) fraud against 200 naked and defenseless little people. Then came the forged Penal Notice and Court gagging order. Then came the second inquiry and yet more secrecy. Then "No Further Action", no publication and the absolute triumph of secrecy over democracy. But then Lord Archer said he had been "exonerated". And that is not true, for the efforts to conceal evidence of wrongdoing by Jeffrey Archer and the board of directors of Anglia Television have done immense damage to hundreds of ordinary decent people. I do not seek and will not accept money for all the pain and damage done to my family and me by agents of Mary and Jeffrey Archer. I have chosen to forgive. But this is about his fitness to become a Mayor with powers over police and judiciary. I cannot pretend these things did not take place. How do I forget those times he sent men from his gang to my front door late at night? I can forgive, but how do I forget having been on the run since 1994, my loving ties withered from these years of neglect? How can I forget when I have all this evidence which tells me the Archer connection is the reason for my utter ruin? Yet Lord Archer is by all accounts less than satisfied with his gilded perch above the law and claims moreover to have been "exonerated". And that is not true. Queens Bench 1994-c-2024, JP Cleary v Anglia Television. Case proven therefore cynically frozen and "sub judice" now for over five years, so that Jeffrey Archer can run for Mayor of Europe’s greatest city under false pretenses. Jeffrey Archer is now an official candidate of the Conservative Party to become the first Mayor of London elected by popular vote. He would exercise immense powers for good or ill. With this endorsement by one of the two parties of government he has been placed before the people of London as though exonerated, without blemish and worthy of our trust. And that is not true. The people of London are being deceived and defrauded by Jeffrey Archer and the Conservative Party. What I say is corroborated by documents attached from Anglia Television and the Chief Executive of the Court Service. It does not depend on the contents of the "unhappily never been published" inquiry report nor on any assumption that Archer broke the law. The damage came from triggering the inquiry and associated shroud of secrecy, which Lord Archer himself has confessed as a "grave error of judgment". These events took place during 1994 and 1995 but have been willfully covered up and buried. Just like the original decision by Lord Archer to break the rules, break his promise and trade in Anglia shares during a closed period. The decision which triggered the automatic inquiry leading to so much collateral damage to so many innocent bystanders. He cannot be exonerated, has in any event confessed and apologized to Mary, and is now cheating millions of Londoners. Should you wish to conduct due diligence I will gladly show you original signed documents, though you do of course have access to the inquiry report. Please do all that you can to let the mass of ordinary voters know about this material and so make less than likely another successful Archer con trick. For if London voters are deceived and tricked into electing this deeply flawed individual (and leaving aside the myriad judicial and political ramifications for our fast-dying democracy) please tell me what I should say to my two little girls when they are fully grown. How do I explain why Daddy was not there for them when they needed me the most? Why I failed them in every way as a father? How I never for a moment stopped loving them more than life itself? How Jeffrey Archer, freshly laundered statesman and pillar of democracy, could have been quite the dangerous, ruthless and amoral gang boss that my whole story would attest? Yours sincerely John P Cleary BSc MA MBA enc. separate list next page cc I have sent copies-hundreds of them-to others with the same interest in sparing London a gangster Chief Executive. Candidates, Parliamentarians, local government, Euro deputies, Party Leaders, significant foreign embassies, Law Lords, Cambridge University folk, Ministers of the Crown, Party Leaders, local union chiefs, local and national press, radio and television. Specifically including Sir Paul Condon, the SFO, the DPP, William Hague MP, Janet Reno, Lionel Jospin, Jack StrawMP, Gordon BrownMP, The Economist, The Guardian, The Sunday Times and the Evening Standard. Of all recipients I ask the same - do all that you canto let the mass of ordinary voters know the truth. Beauty is truth, truth beauty. That’s all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:33 am

Lady Mary Archer PhD Registered post 1 February 2000 Queens Bench 1994-c-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television "The board of MAI has given assurances to the board of Anglia that the rights of the management and employees of Anglia, including pension rights, will be fully safeguarded" * Offer document from MAI plc to Anglia shareholders. * Circular to Shareholders from the Anglia board recommending acceptance. Both dated 18 January 1994 and issued through the London Stock Exchange Dear Lady Archer, I write further to your reply of 7 June 1994 and further to my appeal to His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales dated 1 November 1999 (copies of both attached). I am still an employee of Anglia. I am employed under a contract sealed by Michael Hughes and Robin Stephenson on behalf of Anglia, and never terminated. But I have not been paid since May 1994. My pension rights no longer exist. I am unable to walk for want of a simple knee operation I cannot afford. I am destitute, Lady Archer. I have no money because I was robbed by the board of MAI. Have the promises of the board of directors issued through the London Stock Exchange no value? Have your words no value? (RSVP) We have no legal claim against Lord Archer. He is very clever for himself. It was you, Lady Archer, that accepted those assurances from the board of MAI on our behalf. It was you, Lady Archer, that advised Anglia shareholders, including so many employee shareholders like myself, to accept the MAI offer giving such prominence to those "safeguards". You yourself created the binding and enduring duty of care towards us, the "employees of Anglia". You then betrayed that duty of care at his behest and in order to cover up for his crimes. We know and can understand why you let us down back then for a man who was "aware of you from time to time". But now you know the whole truth there is nothing left to cover up and your dereliction is less easy to comprehend. Everybody knows how your husband bought a load of Anglia shares on the day after you were given your inside information, then sold them all five days later when the bid was announced and the price had soared. Everybody knows how he lied to you, soiled you and abused you. Everybody knows how he induced you to commit serious crimes in your own personal and private capacity as a Director of Anglia Television. Yes of course he swore blind he had done nothing wrong. But he swore so many times that he was not sleeping with young girls. You know your own husband of thirty years. I believe you knew little or nothing about the violence he tried to do me with paid thugs throughout 1995: but you can be in no doubt at all today, Lady Archer, about what sort of unsavoury character it is you married and you protected and you let loose on the employees of Anglia Television. Mr. Blair's man at the DTI has "had a look" and will maintain indefinitely the John Major pogrom against John Cleary and his family, if that be your wish. But sooner or later we must all make our peace with our maker. After six years you must know that you cannot do it his way, with violence and coercion and deceit, through front men and hit men and shady lawyers. You must know that you cannot soothe your marital pain by doing down my children. His way is not your way and your soul is in purgatory. Why not come out from behind that disgraceful forgery and begin to heal your life with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth? Why not open yourself to God's love? Why not make lasting peace? Why not get on with your own life, Doctor Archer, and let me get on with mine? (RSVP) Yours sincerely John P Cleary BSc MA MBA cc His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales (Registered Post)

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:36 am

Hon. William Archer Registered Post Hon. James Archer The Old Vicarage Grantchester 3 April 2000 Queens Bench 1994-c-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television Honoured gentlemen, We have never met although I am your elder brother. I am the last survivor from the corporate massacre at Anglia Television. Your mother and father came together to make me what I am today as surely as they came together to make you both. I grew up in the slums of South London. Slums which were condemned as unfit for human habitation and demolished around the time you were both born. I worked my way up out of those slums to the Harvard Business School where I won High Distinction from 1979 to 1981. By May 1994 my heavy educational debts were cleared and my family could look forward to the future with confidence. Then your unbelievably greedy and selfish father could control neither himself nor his criminal compulsions. He had to cheat and steal that easy money on the Anglia takeover and in so doing turned our lives upside down. Six years full of illegal pogrom later everything we had built in life lies in ruins and Victoria and Georgia are paupers growing up in the slums of Staffordshire without a father. My two little girls believe their daddy is dead: they have neither seen nor heard from me for more than half their lives. For six years now I have paid due honour to the rule of law while "the courts and police have been used against me in quite systemic ways" (8 April 1995). Victoria and Georgia Cleary are innocent victims doomed to poverty and have no chance in life without their father. With every day that passes my two little girls spend another day in the slum sinking deeper and further into an entirely predictable and entirely depressing future learning how to become poor white trash. This will not go on for much longer. I now believe those nasty threats and know that since June 1994 it has been the specific intent of the Archer family and their allies to squeeze then destroy the Cleary family. Ian Scott said I did not know what I was up against in December 1994 and now it is foolhardy verging on suicide for a responsible family man to show respect for those strange chaps who apply the laws of England. After six years I am in extremis and have the ancient and inalienable right to trial by combat. What began with his stupid and pointless crimes can end with our stupid and pointless deaths. I do not come in search of vengeance and death but your father pushes me to my limit. He believes himself more divine than Jesus: no trespasses to forgive. Like the architects of the Holocaust he dispatches something less than human and is exonerated from guilt or blame. Like death camp Jews little Victoria and Georgia Cleary have no souls and simply do not matter. Why all this fuss? Why are you going on like this? There is nothing to forgive. There is only the great man and his ascent to power. That's why your mother and father have lied and cheated at every turn these six years to deny Victoria and Georgia's father any hearing at all. That's why your father has paid good money to have my blood spilled (but very quietly and only in private). That's why I suffered the first of the written threats against my two little girls in June of 1994 when Victoria was six and Georgia just three years old. Your father went after my kids from day one. That's why the sins of the father have become the sins of the sons - until you expunge them. And that is why I will this once more enter into the valley of the shadow of death and travel 2000 miles to your home in search of peace and to talk to you both. Two Saturdays from today at two in the afternoon. Please be there to meet me when I call. The danger for you both is that your father will abuse and infect you as he habitually abuses your poor mother. So in your own best interests I advise you to read what he did to a decent man like Sir Peter Gibbings (in the barristers own words). Read my appeal to His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales, my open letter to the Lord Chancellor and the legal notice to your mother. Read my second, third and fourth affidavits. These latter documents were formally sworn between 14 December 1994 and 14 February 1995. Had I told but a single lie I could be extradited and put into prison a convicted perjurer, my credibility destroyed by his friend the Prime Minister ("Lord Archer is my friend. Lord Archer has been my friend. Lord Archer will continue to be my friend." - House of Commons March 1995 when questioned by Dale Campbell-Savours MP about the Anglia inquiry. And your mother has shown me the plaque in your home he dedicated while Chancellor of the Exchequer). That your father chose instead to pay hard cash for forgery, violence and gangland enforcers to suppress these documents speaks volumes for their veracity. Do you remember what happened to poor Jill Dando? There but for the grace of God go I. Someone knew they would get away with that murder. Jill knew something about someone with too much power and no self-control. Someone above the law. Someone with top connections, flawed character, a compulsion to "kick ass like Rudy", willing to pay cash for contract hit men and the money to buy contempt for justice. Does that ring any bells? It is your future and your decision about the kind of lives you will lead. You can allow him to infect you and hide away in this war of the implausible denial, in which case we are at war. You can let him thereby turn you into victims, accomplices, criminals or co-conspirators like your poor mother. You can let him offer up two more young lives on the high altar of his own incontinent ego. Or you can be there to talk peace and reason with the man your father tried to murder for the sound of silence-and failed. Until a week on Saturday I remain, Yours sincerely, John P Cleary BSc MA MBA cc His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales: His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury: President Mary McAleese(R): Sir Paul Condon(R): Lord Irvine: Señor Alvaro Gil-Robles(R). (R = registered)

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:39 am

Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 C/Eusebio Navarro 12 JP Cleary v Anglia Television 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain Ms Janet Reno 17 April 2000 Attorney General of the USA Ref: Sovereignty over American Lloyds Names Dear ms Reno, I write further to my copy letters of 1 November 1999 and 3 April 2000. I knew the Department of Justice had an interest in that latter documentation when I read David McClintick’s brave piece on the Lloyds/Names asbestosis litigation in Time Magazine. As I ruminated on what I had done I thought again about the wisdom of returning to England. And the Archer perjury decoy has confirmed my caution as being well founded. Rather than attempt a rehash I ask you to please refer to the two-page document attached headed “Nolan Submission 16.xii.1994”. Prime Minister Major established the Committee on Standards in Public Life and this is my receipted contribution. It is also Exhibit JPC5 attached to my second affidavit sworn on 14 December 1994. This brief document (by an angry man) gives the nuts and bolts of the Anglia fraud and cover up as it stood at that time. While I hold no special place in my heart for Lloyds Names they are the thin end of the sovereignty wedge. And like many who come from a less privileged background I do hold in my heart a special place for the rule of law as protector of the weak. Remember Sir Thomas More in A Lion in Winter? In my humble opinion Mr Richard Breeden cut down all the laws of America passed by Congress with the stroke of a pen. By sleight of hand he stripped these innocent American taxpayers of their American citizenship and turned them into feudal subjects of the British Crown. For in the United Kingdom the people are not sovereign, but subjects, and subjects have no rights at all to justice or truth other than those the Sovereign chooses to bestow. For cash. Look at that forged court order of 9 February 1995. Look at those two replies from the Court Service dated 28 April and 27 October 1995. The reference they studiously avoid using is the official case number: Queens Bench 1994-C-2024. On neither letter is this case number to be found anywhere because it is being systematically buried, and John Cleary with it. This is Denning’s Dictum, on which all Feudal jurisprudence is necessarily based, operating in all its glory. The reference they actually choose to employ is C 95/9/2 (Counterfeit 1995 9 February?). Clearly a second secret filing system is in operation here for cases like this. This is a jurisdiction which systematically issues, monitors and actively conceals counterfeit orders of the Court. This is a jurisdiction which regularly and systematically cheats its victims. And lies to Parliament about it. That forgery out of the English High Court was served on me in my own home country, the Republic of Ireland. A month later they came after me Mafia style with a trumped up complaint from a particular aristocrat, the Countess of Dalkieth (see my statement to the Dunleary police on 10 March 1995). For more than five years I have protested loud and often about what is, in English law, a capital offence. But Britannia waives the rules. All that happens is that British gangsters cross border and sea to shut my mouth, Mafia style. That second half of the Tyrone Power quote is completely accurate. Lloyds of London is the British Crown, and it is in the nature of the Windsor dynasty to shape that destiny and outwait resistance. It was not by chance coincidence that the nauseous and disgusting Financial Services Act and the “English Jurisdiction” clause were both enacted in 1986 under barrister Thatcher ready to bear fruit under barrister Blair. They are two sides of the same coin. So I ask you, Ms Reno: what protection against Denning’s Dictum can innocent American taxpayers expect when taking on their Sovereign in her own court? The British Crown had already stolen everything I had and taken away my reason for living when I repudiated on19 April 1995. They have subsequently tried to end my life many times and renewed my will to live and fight. I care only about my children and fulfilling my natural parental functions of love, care and nurturing towards them. There is no power on earth greater than my love for Victoria and Georgia. I will make common cause with any who are victimised, persecuted, oppressed or mugged by that cruel and heartless Sovereign who inflicts this illegal pogrom on me and my little girls. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That is my interest. But surely if Lloyds losses are in any way tax sheltering, is not Uncle Sam taking a hit on this too? Is that not America’s sovereign interest? So why oh why is the Government of the United States of America helping this cruel and grasping family to get their hooks into the people who pay your salary? Yours sincerely, John P Cleary BScMAMBA cc Vice President Al Gore The Head of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service enc. Forged Court Order 9.2.1995 [C 95/9/2] Court Service 28.4.1995 (Anna Lee) Court Service 27.10.1995 (Michael Huebner) Cleary statement to Dunleary police 10.3.1995 Nolan Submission 16.xii.1994

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:41 am

Ms Janet Reno C/Eusebio Navarro 12 Attorney General of the USA 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Ref: English Jurisdiction Spain 29 May 2000 Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Ms Reno, The sovereign people of America are in great danger from a malign foreign power. Some salient facts: 1) Lloyds of London and the British Crown are one and the same. What happened at Lloyds (Time Magazine 21 February 2000) represents the precedent for the surrender of American sovereignty. This process if unchecked will culminate with the re-absorption of the United States into the British Empire and the full extension of English jurisdiction over all American citizens 2) There is no public scrutiny or supervision of the English Court because the people are not sovereign. 3) Queens Counsel, though professional advocates and litigators, also have the power to sit in judgement and deputise as a High Court judge. 4) This obscene combination inevitably leads to reciprocity and a secret, though active market in purchased decisions. 5) The Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand personify this culture of cheating and corruption with High Court Judge John Baker available to issue forged documents under a false name. 6) Mr Blair trained as a barrister with Derry Irvine and formed his character within this culture of cheating and corruption. Though Scottish and still in his twenties he was given the safest Labour seat in England. Likewise Mr Major, when unknown, was given Huntingdon, the safest Conservative seat in the country. 7) Mrs Blair QC also trained with Irvine and obtained her powers from the Queen on the day Mr Blair became Prime Minister. She can now cheat low-paid council workers with greater efficiency and even more profit. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> Despite its poor public image the House of Lords served a clear constitutional purpose as an independent check. Hereditary Peers sit as of personal right and are not dependent on Crown patronage. By stripping these Peers of the right to vote but not their right to sit Mr Blair has completed the creation of a de facto hereditary dictatorship behind a smiling democratic façade. 9) The court is a diligent enforcer of draconian libel and secrecy laws buried deep within obscure legislation. There is no free speech, no plurality of the press. Look at the party line on the Princess of Wales and the Blairs’ reproductive achievement. Look at the suppression of Lloyds stories and the banning of Kitty Kelley’s book on the Windsors. Look at the career of Jeffrey Archer, from Star libel to withdrawal from the race to be mayor. The people are not stupid but they know nothing because they are subjects. And subjects have no rights to truth, information, balance or free expression other than those the Sovereign chooses to bestow. 10) Extra-territorial action and conquest is now an established fact. Look to Ireland’s leadership of liars paid by the British Crown and look to the future (two directly elected Presidents, the Prime Minister and Attorney General. And a press monopoly controlled from England). 11) This dictatorship actively and aggressively interferes in American politics and subverts the democratic process in many ways. Just one: she creates “Honorary Knights” – second identities with bank accounts and a passport which are not American citizens and so not subject to the universal “worldwide income” rule for American taxes. Not everyone pays their fair share and not everyone is chased by the IRS. 12) With American politics ruled by money and secrecy who can compete with those who pay no taxes? With those who maintain absolute personal privacy through a secret second identity in London? With those who take commissions from money grubbing brokers? With those who cheat? I repeat: the sovereign people of America are in great danger from this malign foreign dictatorship. 13) And last, the big secret. There are two persons called “Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth”. Both hate democracy and ordinary people with a passion. Both exercise Royal Prerogative powers. Both command private armies with “the right sense of duty”. But only one has sworn and is bound by the Coronation Oath of fidelity to the Nation. Do you know the story about the king who relied on two independent judges: one, always fair; the other always unjust. The king appoints the judge and lets him make his own decision. In England, the decision you get depends on which “Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth” the judge is obeying. So I say to you what I told the French Prime Minister two weeks ago. That “any State which recognizes this obscenity as a legitimate and trustworthy jurisdiction is laying its own people open to British totalitarianism by stealth”. The Feudal Menace. I write in this way because 42 days after I wrote to you to provide information pertinent to the furtherance of justice you have chosen to send no acknowledgement. I begin to smell plausible deniability in the air. “If the Brits can get him we can all go on pretending this never happened”. But that game has been going on since I gave Admiral Crowe the full story in November 1995, and how many lives have been ruined by “Lloyds of London” since then? American lives. I write to you personally because you interpret the law on behalf of the people, and that is real power. You will recall Spring broke his word and brought down the Reynolds government on the single issue of who gets to appoint the Attorney General of Ireland. I see your great nation, which once I knew so well, with a healthy growing body but with maggots worming their way into the brain. I see the one remaining superpower in which democracy is safe because the people are sovereign, but those who interpret and apply the law say otherwise. I see a new world order. Not Jorg Haider who, though nasty, is more diversion than threat. But a British Reich that will last a thousand years. I have an ailing mother, now in her eighty-first year and completely alone. At whatever risk to my own safety I am going back to tend to her, and I will tell you why with a little family history. Like Alfred Dreyfus I too come from a cultured people, persecuted for centuries, which then saw one-third its number murdered in four years. I too am the offspring of a death camp survivor. My late father lived through four years of hell in Burma as a war prisoner of the Japanese. When the hero came home broken and riddled with disease he was not the man my mother had married. He was put to work cleaning lavatories at Imperial Chemical Industries in Milbank. Deeply embittered, friendless, and racked by pain he turned to alcohol, then violence. We grew up in the slums of South London and my poor dear mother had a truly terrible time. When my father collapsed and died age 59 (walking to work at five in the morning) it was a release for her. I still remember how she would get up, walk to Victoria, clean offices, walk home and then, and only then got the three of us up and ready for school – every day. I love my mother very much and, as my own difficulties have mounted, I have come to admire deeply her stoic courage, good cheer and fortitude. I know that every extra day I spend on this earth is a gift from God to be used and I will not allow her to be alone at the end of her life, come what may. So I say that the British Harlot Queen can go and fuck herself. That’s what Peter Cook said and he’s dead. That’s what John Smith said, and Mr Blair stepped into his shoes. That’s what Jill Dando said. That’s what the Princess said too. Tom Wolfe’s stoics all. But the Harlot gang attacked me and used force on 6 June 1994 (D Day +50). They have robbed me of more than a million pounds. And I am an Irish citizen. We will see if any counts for aught. I have a very simple system of personal belief. I believe in the story of Eden and the final judgement. I believe each of us is put here by God for one purpose only – to learn the knowledge of good and evil. All other fruit is free but we must learn to tell the difference for ourselves. We then make the final judgement when we choose the path of one or other. The final judgement is made not of us, but by us. This year, signposted by scripture since time immemorial, that judgement is being made by men and women of power throughout the world. Whither thee, Janet? Yours sincerely, Freeborn Englishman & Citizen of Ireland John P Cleary BScMAMBA cc His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:44 am

Defendant J P Cleary First Affidavit 24 July 2000 WT 902314 IN THE WANDSWORTH COUNTY COURT BETWEEN THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH Claimant -and- JOHN PAUL CLEARY Defendant AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN PAUL CLEARY I, John Paul Cleary, of Calle Eusebio Navarro 12, 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain MAKE OATH and say as follows: 1 I am the defendant in this action and I make this affidavit in reply to the application of 12 April 2000. Save where otherwise stated, the facts within this affidavit are within my own knowledge. 2 The application of 12 April 2000 sent here by the Court under cover of a notice of hearing dated 25 June 2000 is a forgery. 3 This is the second hearing for claim WT 902314. This matter has been dealt with by the court once before on 5 November 1999, when judgment was given to the claimant in a judicial process held outside the knowledge of the defendant. 4 The signature at part B of the application by Mr. Walker is a rubber stamp. A genuine signature from the applicant’s own hand is required by law. 5 We are not informed as to whether Mr. Walker’s rubber stamp is the applicant or the applicant’s solicitor. 6 Mr. Walker’s rubber stamp breaks protocol and tells us he is Borough Solicitor in the main body of typed text, rather than in the box clearly indicated. The stamp does not want to write by hand, and a typed response in the box indicated would attract attention. 7 The signature applied to the statement of truth in Part C is of no value in its prime function - that of identifying the person making the charges against me. I do not doubt this is not the normal signature from this person’s hand. 8 The "Position or Office held" by the signatory to part C is generic and taken from the signature box, which is not deleted. Again this information is of no value in its prime function to identify that person who makes these charges against me. 9 The document is clearly deliberately defective from the sixth word of evidence. While anyone might write 1999 when beginning the New Year, it never happens the other way around. This is a clear signal to fellow professionals - "Do not get involved". 10 The evidence is distorted by being out of sequence. There were two separate actions running in parallel against me from 5 November 1999 to 6 April 2000. Only one was settled on the sale of my property. These are the uncomfortable facts concealed by the strategic displacement of item C5 11 The stamp tells us only how "I...... intend" to apply for an order and costs under Orders 30 Rule 12. So this is not an application, but a statement of intent. And there is, as yet, no applicant. Perhaps O30R12 relates to the deceased and his estate? 12 The asterisk which signed the Statement of Truth tells us that the applicant believes that the facts stated in this application are true. But we have just seen that there is no Applicant. So this is a deliberate lie. 13 Who is the "I(We)" that wishes to rely on the evidence? "I Believe" has been struck out, so the asterisk does not believe it. And there is no Applicant. 14 The Notice from the Court is dated 25 June 2000. Ten weeks late, in secret and on Sunday the Court tells me that if I want my money I must attend on 21 August at 11:00. Furthermore "This case may be released to a different judge, possibly at a different court." And the only documentation I have is what I know to be an untraceable forgery. 15 I know it is an untraceable forgery because of the method of payment equals paid before. The Court fees for WT 902314 had already been paid prior to the hearing on 5 November 1999. The Stamp and the Asterisk do not want two payments for the same judgement, so there is no financial trail for this document. Wandsworth County Court has set this hearing while receiving no payment from Wandsworth Council. 16 I read that the operation of the Constitutional Court of Spain is to be changed. Apparently it receives 7000 applications each year, and of these hears just 200. Yet three magistrates of the Constitutional Court of Spain found time to sit on 27 July 1998 and reject the plea by John Cleary BSCMAMBA for protection against British organized criminals. It may or may not be pure chance coincidence that Pearson plc has just sold the television interests that connect it with Clive Hollick (United News and Media PLC), Telefonica and Antenna 3; that Telefonica is known to use its advertising buying power to censor and censure the press; that Aznar and Telefonica are at war; and that all this is to be looked at by the European Commission. But what is in no doubt at all is that this forgery out of the English Court was served on me here in Spain. For the second time British organized criminals have invaded a foreign Sovereign people to attack me and deposit their trademark filth. 17 The first time that British organized criminals invaded a foreign Sovereign people to attack me and deposit their trademark filth was on 13 February 1995 when a forged Court Order dated 9 February 1995 was delivered to my door by hand. This was on the outskirts of Dublin in the Republic of Ireland, and related to the matter of Queens Bench 1994-c-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television. The Archer cover up. 18 A great deal of malpractice took place on either side of that event in 1995. So much so that I took it upon myself to publish some of the documentation. Attached as Exhibit JPC/W1 is the document I sent on 25 November 1995, together with 68 pages of exhibits, to sixty-five Ambassadors or High Commissioners of Sovereign states. Also included at Exhibit JPC/W! are two acknowledgements received from the Ambassadors of Sweden and Norway. 19 Every night I slept in Ireland I slept with a crowbar in the bed next to me. Every day the phone would ring, but hang up when my answering machine cut in. Unknown enemies came calling late at night and in broad daylight. I was persecuted by the President of Ireland, who interfered with my mail and caused my gas supply to be cut off in January. I could not stay, and was forced to flee my second country, for the second time, in May 1996. I came to Las Palmas with little money no Spanish, no friends, but a deep trust in the goodness of God. 20 Nearly a year passed. The British General Election would be held in May 1997. Major was twenty points behind in the polls and the late Lord Sutch could have beaten him. There would be a new Government. It was time to remind the Irish President of her bounden duty. At Exhibit JPC/W2 I attach my letter of 10 March 1997 to the President of Ireland, together with a letter of acknowledgement from the Attorney General. Two days later Mary Robinson announced to a stunned world that she would not seek re-election in November. She gave no reason, but vacated her office straight away. And Mary got her thirty pieces of silver. On 9 July 1997 it was announced that the new High Commissioner for Human Rights at the United Nations would be none other than Mary Robinson. 22 Still I was ignored. All my efforts over the next year came to naught. By early 1999 I could delay my return no longer. I had to see my mother, to see if there was any way I could be of benefit to my children. I cut back on all spending and in three months saved enough to buy a one-way ticket to Gatwick. I went back on 1 May 1999 knowing not what lay in store. 23 But cover-up rather than extermination was the policy that prevailed at the time, and I was not overtly molested. I stayed for two months, learned that my position was hopeless, but got to know my mother for the first time. We shared each other’s pain and I did what I could to build up her strength of mind and body. But for me there was no hope, for I was a financial liability, and I came back to Las Palmas on 1 July 1999. 24 Wandsworth Council must have moved as soon as I departed, for I now learn that on 9 July 1999, under claim number WT911421, an Order for Sale was issued by the Court. That on 11 October 1999 my property was repossessed under Warrant number K0001581. And that on 5 November 1999 a separate judgment was sought and obtained under claim number WT902314. By this point in time very strange things were going on. And Wandsworth Council/Court were committed. 25 The man that had come back to Las Palmas was a deeply troubled man. How can I give up on my own children? The election for London’s Mayor was high in my consciousness. If Archer were elected by the people he would be laundered of his crimes. I would lose my children forever, just one more deadbeat dad running out on his responsibilities. Surely my one remaining hope was to denounce Archer in public, standing as a candidate. Then, walking past a travel agent I saw the offer from Iberia. Anywhere in Europe from Spain, return, for 25000 pesetas. Maximum stay ten days. Pay in September and fly in November. I went back on 1 November 1999 armed with 200 copies of the document and attachments addressed to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales and dated 1 November 1999 which is included at exhibit JPC/W3 26 It was at this point that the good Lord had intervened once again on my behalf, for the timing was truly miraculous. Archer had just been nominated by the Conservative Party with a glowing character reference from William Hague. The written promise never to deal in Anglia shares had just been put into the public domain. The Labour Government, as a prelude to whitewash, had just asked a senior civil servant to "have a look" at the Anglia inquiry. And Mr. Blair was having unexpected difficulty in imposing his candidate in preference to Ken Livingstone. I sent the letters on 3 November 1999, including one to Mr. GK Jones, Chief Executive of Wandsworth Council. On 19 November 1999 Lord Archer stood down. 27 But that did nothing for my children. Co three months later I wrote to Lady Archer to suggest we make peace. This letter of 1 February 2000 is included at Exhibit JPC/W3, and was sent to third parties a few days early. Jeffrey Archer was expelled from the Conservative Party on 4 February 2000. 28 My property was entered into auction on 24 February 2000, nearly five and a half months after repossession, and sold for 65,500. In that boom market property was selling itself and a normal sale could have been achieved in one-fourth the time. Outside of my knowledge I was being systematically cheated by Wandsworth Council. 29 I waited nearly two months for a reply from Lady Archer, but none came. So I wrote to the children of Lord and Lady Archer, who are the honourable William Archer and the honourable James Archer. This document dated 3 April 2000 and attachments are included at Exhibit JPC/W3. One hundred copies were sent to significant third parties in London between 27 and 31 March 2000 30 For the second time the machine at Wandsworth Council moved into gear. On 6 April 2000 1,699 plus expenses and costs for WT9111421 were deducted, and the balance of 62,888.50 paid into court "To be held by the court for the Defendant’s benefit". Recall that the sale took place at auction on 24 February 2000. That means ten percent on the hammer and the balance in seven days. But nothing happened for six weeks. And the sum of 6170.55, the judgment for which had been won on 5 November 1999 under claim WT902314, was not deducted before payment into court. Nor were the associated costs, for the Stamp and the Asterisk did not want two sets of costs for just the single property. 31 Instead a third claim was launched on 12 April 2000, the second under claim number WT902314. And even though my address in Spain appears on the face of that claim of 12 April 2000, Wandsworth County Court kept control of my money and told me nothing about it. 32 Now imagine the position I would have walked into had I gone to Grantchester as promised. Had I called at the Old Vicarage to be met not by the honourable William or the honourable James, but by officers of the law armed with a warrant for the arrest of John Paul Cleary for the murder of Jill Dando? How could I defend myself with no money to buy legal representation? My name would be off the Property Register for 45 Youngs Court. The proceeds from the sale would be under the control of the court and I would not even know about it. Even if I did manage to find out, the little matter of WT902314 was still outstanding (the larger sum), the application for which had been made on 12 April 2000, three days before I was arrested. And the very large sums owed me by Anglia Television were still blocked by that forgery issued on 9 February 1995 by His Honour Judge John Baker under a false and fictitious name. (Can we blame the young and impressionable Mr. Blair if he learns from his father and mother?) 33 And for how long would the "killer" of golden girl Jill Dando survive on remand in prison? It would not be very long at all before Mr. Walker could apply on behalf of the claimant for an Order pursuant to Order 30 Rule 12 of the County Court rules. And include proper payment under this new claim number, so he could lawfully extract from my estate the sum of 6,170.55 plus all outstanding costs. Before the balance reverted to the Crown. 34 And of course that forgery of 12 April 2000 would never see the light of day. No payment had been made, no audit trail to follow, so no hearing had ever been intended. Nothing had been sent out. And the costs outstanding from claim WT902314 would be rolled into the new claim number. And nobody would know that the debt had been split into two as the basis for two separate actions against me. All loose ends neatly tied up. 35 But it was a feint, and one tempting enough and convincing enough to fool the Harlot into making her move. And when I did not return everything really fell apart for Mr. Blair. 36 Instead I wrote formally to Janet Reno, Attorney General to the United States of America, on 17 April 2000. The subject matter was the “Lloyds of London” extortion racket and a copy of this document, with attachments, is included at exhibit JPC/w3. 37 Then the coup de grace – from my hand but beyond my consciousness. My letter to Janet Reno of 29 May 2000 which is included at exhibit JPC/w3. Jeffrey Archer has broken the two cardinal rules: never confess and never snitch. Every jury in America will look at that exchange between Bischoff and Poskonov about Romanov and know for certain what happened to Lloyds names. What began so long ago with Archer’s stupidity will end with Archer’s stupidity. 38 Now imagine the Council of Europe at Feira. Germany had been blackmailed by Clinton and Blair – “We don’t want German Nazis as permanent members of the Security Council”. France and Germany see the danger and want to move ahead faster for mutual protection. “We should be allowed to press ahead and create a unified core. It is not exclusive, and any who wish to join us are welcome.” But Blair, Aznar and Aherne all subscribe to the Clive Hollick model for social policy in Europe – “rape and pillage”. It is put to the vote. Britain, Spain and Ireland play their veto card as one. “Are you sure?” asks the German foreign minister. “Yes, we are.” “Then you had better take a look at this” and passes to the British, with a copy to the Portuguese President, a sheet of paper in a familiar hand, this time in blue. Blair turns white. And sooner or later the veto is withdrawn. Dear Mr. Blair, I write further to our long history of correspondences on this fraud, going all the way back to 27 May 1994. The day your good friend Clive Hollick marched into Norwich with his marauding army and ripped the guts out of Anglia Television. And gave us a foretaste of the Blair vision for social policy in Europe. Between yourself and Queen Elizabeth II you exercise the Royal Prerogative. Two persons in secret coalition. Which is responsible, morally and in law, for the exercise of those powers? For there is safety in uncertainty (or plausible deniability) as I have found. It is my conviction and belief that, like Malcolm Wall, you are deliberately defective in your appointment; that you exercise your powers because everyone “knows” you are Prime Minister, but that in law you are acting ultra vires; and that you can be disowned by the Sovereign as she uses and discards so many others. All the way back to Crawfie. Prove you are acting in good faith and with the authority of the Sovereign. Or cede your right to vote in Portugal. 39 Next, to Ahern. The Irish veto is withdrawn. “…..you have sold us into bondage for thirty pieces of the Harlot’s silver. I, John Cleary, citizen of Ireland in good standing, refute your right to vote on behalf of the sovereign people of Ireland. You are a paid collaborator.” The German Chancellor looks at Aznar and the Spanish veto is withdrawn. The Scottish Rite Freemasons are routed, for Solomon was rejected by the God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Israel (IKings 11:11-13). And Europe can grow and develop anew as the bastion of democracy in this world 40 And of course everything in the world has changed since then, and very much for the better. And I take particular satisfaction from unmasking the fraudulent Mr. Blair for the rotten little Scottish Nazi he is, and will do the same for the fraudulent Mr. Major. For what began on 27 May 1994 came full circle on 19 June 2000. 41 And then, on 25 June 2000 Wandsworth Council/Court/Lodge tried to escape from the trap they had set for John Cleary. Ten weeks late, in secret and on Sunday they set a “hearing” and send this forged application into Spain. This forgery, whose only purpose was to deny me access to my own assets when most in need. To take away any possibility of defending myself by buying legal representation. To make me easy prey for when the Nazis chose to strike against me. 42 Within 24 hours of receipt on 29 June I wrote to denounce the forgery to the senior mason at the Wandsworth County Court and the Chief Executive of Wandsworth Council. In reply I was sent an inadequate acknowledgement from the CEO. Then a sign of defiance from the asterisk dated 17 July and included at Exhibit JPC/w3. This is most helpful. “MJC” is Mr. M J Cooper. The asterisk is smarter than Jeffrey Archer. She denies all wrongdoing. Except there is no claim number WT 902341 and the body of text has no meaning in law. And there was no letter of 5 July 2000. Since the Mayor and Burgesses choose to remain silent about the forgery with intent to murder and my letter of 3 July 2000 the jurors will be at liberty to draw their own conclusions about the complicity of Messrs. Walker and Jones. From the Court mason there has been nothing about my money. Four generations of Nazi bloodline withhold this Irishman’s only nourishment and the world looks on as history repeats itself. 43 So who put the hand and might of Wandsworth Council to the Statement of Truth on 12 April 2000? For the mason that lurks behind the asterisk is one of the Harlot’s pack of wolf bitches in sheep’s clothing. Middle class women lawyers with the eyes of Caligula, and who have never known real hardship nor real ecstasy in the arms of a man. Hard for a man to fight back when under attack – they tell you to act more like a gentleman (Angela Merkel). And so vulnerable and fragile and disadvantaged because they are women they are worthy of extra-special care and attention wherever they go. 44 In the present context I will paraphrase the archetype wolf bitch, who came to power with the words of St Francis of Assisi, established and brought to fruition the Lloyds extortion racket, and then robbed we English of our democracy: “Give me back the gold fillings you stole from my dead body”. 62888.50 being held by the Nazis of the Windsor dynasty 45 Who is this Nazi wolf bitch who thought she could steal this ram’s property, leave him naked and defenseless for his life, easy meat for the Harlot and her evil sect? Who is this Nazi wolf bitch who thought she could take away my only hope when framed for the murder of Jill Dando? As that other Nazi wolf bitch, Caroline Carter (of Ashurst Morris Crisp), took away my only livelihood and my rights to habeas corpus and free speech. Who is this Nazi wolf bitch who, while not personally my murderer, creates the right conditions for my murder to take place. As the Harlot creates the right conditions for this culture of cheating and corruption to flourish and devastate the English nation. As 150 years ago when the original Harlot Queen did not personally murder one-third the Irish nation. She just brought about the right conditions for their murder to take place. Then donated 50 to ease their suffering. 46 Never mind the Holocaust exhibition in London. I look forward to visiting the very first Irish Famine exhibition in the English capital. Or better still a timely reminder in Washington. For I find it hard to conceive of the changes that must take place in the human body when suddenly deprived of all nourishment, all raw materials. Possibly like the full-blown AIDS victim, though incomparably more acute. All that pain and suffering and decay, concentrated into perhaps three or four weeks of degradation. And all around that same death and destruction and decomposition. No food, no dignity and certainly no medical care. One-third the people. The Black Death of Central Europe as the Final Solution visited on the people of Ireland. And where else in years to come? 47 I know for myself that when the time comes for me to meet my maker I would choose to go quickly and with little pain, as in a holocaust gas chamber, or at the hands and feet of a violent schizophrenic. Than endure the slow, agonizing, lingering torture that is starvation with no hope. British Nazis really should not throw stones. 47 In the name of the most holy Trinity, from whom is all authority and to whom, As our final end, all actions of men and states must be referred, We, the People of Eire, Humbly acknowledging all our obligations to our divine lord Jesus Christ, who Sustained our fathers through centuries of trial, Gratefully remembering their heroic and unremitting struggle to regain the rightful independence of our nation, And seeking to promote the common good, with due observation of prudence, justice and charity, so that the freedom and dignity of the individual may be assured, true social order attained, the unity of our country restored, and concord established with other nations Do hereby adopt, enact, and give to ourselves this constitution. 48 Who is this Nazi wolf bitch who took away my financial defenses, as that other wolf bitch Mary Robinson took away my constitutional defenses and my Irish human rights? Who is this Nazi wolf bitch who took away my only nourishment as that other Nazi wolf bitch Mary McAleese took away the Irish Constitution and the Irish-American Friendship Treaty from the Republicans in the North? Who is this Nazi wolf bitch who thought she could hold on to this ram’s money and slip through a routine hearing on 21 August 2000 (possibly at a different court)? Was it LEG that manufactured this forgery with intent to murder? For I read that more men have been hung for forgery in England than for murder, that the death penalty is still extant under English law, and that what we all need is more positive discrimination in order to achieve true equality between the sexes. FREEDOM. EQUALITY. BROTHERHOOD. Copies of this document, when sworn, will be sent to: The Lord Chancellor of England (ref. Queens Bench 1994-c-2024) The president of France and Europe (ref. Justice and Subsidiarity) The President of the F.R. of Germany (ref. Angela Merkel) The Vice President of the USA (ref. Irish American Friendship Treaty) The Secretary General of the United Nations (Ref. Mary Robinson) The President of the Constitutional Court of Spain (ref. 3414/98 – M) The attorney General of the USA (ref. “Lloyds of London”) The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police (ref. Barry Bulsara) The Irish Government janitor (ref. Mary McAleese)

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:47 am

Defendant J P Cleary Second Affidavit 1 October 2000 WT 902314 In The Wandsworth County Court Between The Mayor and Burgesses of the LondonBorough of Wandsworth Claimant -and- John Paul Cleary Defendant Affidavit of John Paul Cleary I, John Paul Cleary, of Calle Eusebio Navarro 12, 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain MAKE OATH and say as follows 1 I am the defendant in this action and I make this affidavit in reply to the interim judgement of 21 August 2000. Save where otherwise stated, the facts within this affidavit are within my own knowledge. 2 The judgement sent here as an order sealed by the court made on 21 August 2000 is another forgery. Yet one more forgery in this series of forgeries which began in the Queens Bench with his honour Judge John Baker on 9 February 1995 (Queens Bench 1994-c-2024, JP Cleary v Anglia Television). 3 The "judge" making this "order" is not a real judge at all. No real judge would be so stupid. Rather it was made by Deputy District Judge Iller. My guess is that Mr/Ms Iller is nothing more than a retired solicitor (and Freemason) with little to lose. There were no court fees so Mr/Ms Iller could not use the Wandsworth County Court on 21 August 2000. And the court seal was then applied to this document in secret by that same Freemason that sealed the forged notice of hearing on Sunday 25 June 2000. 4 Mr/Ms Iller refers to "a copy of a document written in July 2000". I am not so stupid as to leave undated anything I sign. If said document was signed, why not give the date? If said document was not signed, what is a copy of an unsigned document doing in a "court of law"? Coco the Clown could do better than this shambles. But then - they expected me to be dead, and Coco never expected to "sit". 5 Mr/Ms Iller awards the 6170.55 which Wandsworth Council failed to deduct on 6 April 2000, together with 242.24 for costs. He/she further assesses costs at 242.25, which means that a single penny remains outstanding. And on the basis of this one penny of costs for a hearing which never took place I am denied access to that 62888.50 paid into court on 6 April 2000 "to be held by the court for the defendant's benefit" 6 Mr/Ms Iller sets a condition about the statement of truth that Wandsworth Council must meet. Nothing has been sent to me. Clearly Jones and Walker of Wandsworth Council also know it is a forgery. 7 I know this document is yet another forgery because the assessed costs include nothing at all for court fees nor for value added tax. Enclosed at Exhibit JPC/W4 is the statement of costs dated 11 August 2000. Once again the document is deliberately defective and carries a fictitious claim number (WT 902341). Once again the document is "signed" by Mr Walkers rubber stamp. I assume this sum is required to cover the costs of the genuine hearing held on 5 November 1999. The Stamp and the Asterisk do not want anything that leaves a financial trail. No fees; no value added tax; no real judge; no hearing at Wandsworth County Court on 21 August 2000. QED: the document is another forgery. 8 There are certain things I should like to make clear to the third and fourth generation Nazis in the Windsor family. I am an Irish Citizen and nothing to do with your family. I want that money your family stole from me. You waited until I had left the country and then began repossession proceedings. You sent out documents knowing full well they would not reach me. You split the debt into two as the basis of two separate actions. You repossessed my property outside of my knowledge. You sold my property for far below its true market value. You swindled me off the Property Register and your grasping elders are withholding the proceeds illegally. That money is not for the benefit of the thieving old slag in Buckingham Palace nor for the benefit of the even greedier old slag in Clarence House. It is for me and my children. It is to provide comfort to my mother in her final days. Give me back my money, you thieving bastards. 9 The Windsor Gang employs classic Cosa Nostra strategy. A thin veneer of superficial legitimacy (one penny of costs outstanding) allied to overwhelming force (the Prerogative of the Harlot Queen). Yes you have the power. As I have the power to pick up a small child and smash its head against a brick wall. But I am better than you. I know the difference between the legitimate use of force and the illegitimate. I exercise self-control and self-discipline. Your family is completely bereft of honour, of integrity and of decency. The women are prostitutes and the men are cowards. No wonder a courageous and compassionate woman like Diana Spencer chose to go down fighting for us "down below" rather than ally herself with that brutal and barbaric bunch of incontinent cutthroats "up above". Give me back my money, you thieving bastards. 10 The purpose behind this continuing pantomime is quite clear. That forged Application Notice with intent to murder was served on me here in Spain where the People are Sovereign. But the King of Spain is up to the same perverted tricks as the Harlot Queen and will bring the Spanish down low like the English. And the Constitutional Court, acting in the name of the King, had already denied me justice on 27 July 1998 (Reference number 3414/98-M). 11 Something remarkably similar was inflicted on the president of the Prisa Group by judge Javier Gomez de Liaño. The King's man used a thin veneer of superficial legitimacy (a fictitious crime) allied to the overwhelming power of the court to place Señor Jesus de Polanco under virtual house arrest for some eighteen months. While never actually hearing the case at all. The King's purpose then was to intimidate the free press, in particular the top Spanish newspaper El Pais. The King of Spain will not allow the law to be enforced against brother Freemasons. In both cases the same Cosa Nostra modus operandi. In both cases the same outcome when found out. The law does not apply to the Brotherhood. Fourteen-year-old children will be sent to prison while de Liaño and Conde laugh at justice. 12 So I would like to enquire of Señor Zapatero: who is the Nazi? Is it the Lehendakari, democratically elected and answerable every day to the Sovereign People, as Aznar would have us believe? Or is it the inviolable job for life King, elected by nobody but the Fascist dictator Franco. Who marshals his paramilitary secret society to pervert justice (Cleary and de Polanco), to smash down little people (my friend's disability pension), to send fourteen year old children to prison and to tell lies and hide the truth from the Sovereign People. The Puppet Master made in the image of Licio Gelli and his successor Silvio Berlusconi, who breaks the Constitution every day (Article 22.5). And who answers to none but the Harlot Queen in London? 13 For reasons I will explain a little later this affidavit may well become my last will and testament. That being the case I will take this opportunity to name the guilty men and women who conspired against me first to commit fraud, and then to commit murder. 14 At Anglia Television the lead role was played by Chief Executive David McCall, the man who recruited me away from Trusthouse Forte and whom I served outstandingly well, together with his deputy, Michael Hughes. Her Ladyship Mary Archer, who carried to Anglia the disease from her insider trader husband that cheated at least one hundred and seventy seven decent working people and their families. This woman knows neither decency nor humanity and clung tenaciously to her Directorate, ignoring all reason and appeals to fairness until I knocked her over in January 1995. But she knows well enough murder and vengeance and her immediate response was the first of many efforts to end my life. And more than five years after that first attempt she was still trying to murder me to cover up for her crimes. Some lady. Sir Timothy Colman lent the Eastern Daily Press to the propagation of lies on 27 May 1994 while still a Director. Lord David Puttnam and Patrick Sharman elected Malcolm Wall to the board of Directors knowing full well they were thereby consummating the fraud against those to whom they owed a legal duty of care. And Malcolm Wall, the defective Director and role model for Mr Blair until his exposure in Portugal. 15 At MAI (later to become United News and Media PLC) the mastermind of the fraud was Lord Clive Hollick, personal agent of the Windsor Gang since his days at Hambros Bank and a Director of British Aerospace. The Chairman Sir James McKinley together with Directors Raymond Wheeler and James Grierson, first made and then broke the pledge, issued through the Stock Exchange, that my rights would be fully safeguarded. Timothy Ovington, head of personnel, and Ajay Chowdhury who first revealed MAI's true intentions, were both active agents of the fraud. 16 Then the wives. Mrs McCall, Mrs Hughes and Mrs Wheeler all perjured themselves and swore false affidavits against me. These false affidavits were used as the basis on which I was to be detained as mentally ill. And then kicked to death like poor Christopher Edwards. Lady McKinley and Mrs Ovington volunteered correspondence from myself to be used in support of that forged court order issued on 9 February 1995 by his honour Judge John Baker under a false and fictitious name. 17 At City of London law firm Ashurst Morris Crisp the Managing Partner Andrew Soundy was complicit from the very outset and tried to deceive me on two occasions. Ian Scott was the partner in charge of the MAI account and acted for Anglia Television even though he was never `appointed by the company or its officers. He was the man who first threatened my life in the Royal Courts of Justice on 20 December 1994. Caroline Carter was the Nazi Wolf Bitch and the active solicitor on the account. And Graham Webb was the man who took over from Scott after I had denounced the latter, then forgot that the Independent Television Commission has Member rather than Directors. He it was that drafted the forgery initialed and sealed by his honour judge John Baker on 9 February 1995. 18 Other Freemason lawyers offering a very passable impression of the Keystone Cops were Mr Phillip Shepherd (former QC), who was counsel for Anglia Television, though never appointed by the defendant or its Officers. He acted in the High Court case for wrongful dismissal and the Tribunal hearing (which refused to rule) for unfair dismissal. His friend John Rogers QC issued the order on 20 January 1995 under which I was to be detained as mentally ill. Then kicked to death. And the mysterious "LEG" of Wandsworth Council, latest of the Harlot's pack of Wolf Bitches. She it was who signed the statement of truth and manufactured the forgery with intent to murder on 12 April 2000. 19 Amongst those clowns charged with the administration of what passes for justice in the Harlot Court were Master Eyre on 20 December 1994; Deputy Judge John Rogers on 20 January 1995; His Honour Judge John Baker on 9 February 1995; Lord Mackay of Clashfern on 28 April 1995; Mr Michael Huebner on 27 October 1995; Lord Irvine on 19 November 1999; and now Deputy Judge Iller on 21 august 2000. 20 At the Independent Television Commission was Chairman Sir George Russell, caught passing my complaint to David McCall of Anglia Television. That my complaint, clearly marked "Private and Confidential”, was put into court by the very subject of that complaint carried obvious prejudicial implications. The Deputy Chairman Sir Jocelyn Stevens tried to cover up Russell's crimes and thought he could treat me like a fool beneath his contempt. Commission Member the Earl of Dalkieth and his wife the Countess of Dalkieth, who came after me in Ireland Mafia style with a trumped -up complaint to the Dunleary police on 8 March 1995. Peter Rogers, great friend of David McCall, who took over as Chief Executive from David Glencross when the latter resigned in disgust. These men were responsible for the award of licenses for Channel 3 (ITV) and Channel 5. They opened all bids on receipt. And they used this trust to cheat, to reward old Mason friends like Sir Christopher Bland, Greg Dyke and Lord Clive Hollick. And to settle old scores like Thames Television and Richard Dunn. How very similar to what happened here in Spain when the licenses for third generation mobile telephony were given away for virtually nothing to old Mason friends of the King (Telefonica. Again). 21 Pre-eminent on the Parliamentary front were Mr Major and Mr Blair. Both were defective Prime Ministers acting ultra-vires. Both relied on threat, intimidation and blackmail as the source of their power - the same old Windsor formula of superficial legitimacy backed by overwhelming force. Mr Blair spent his career as a barrister in winning by cheating, and like Mr Shepherd (former QC) the poor chap is not very bright in matters of law. He built his eminence on a lifetime spent brownnosing his way up the Masons, so it is perhaps less than chance coincidence that Bomber Blair now appears before us in his true colours ("A threat must be credible to have any value"). Mere words are not enough to express my contempt for Messrs Major and Blair, two mercenary front men for the Harlot. Nor my distress at the deliberate damage and destruction they have wrought on the ordinary folk of England. From my vantage point from without of that sad and depressing country I am put in mind of nothing so much as the downtrodden masses of the former Soviet Bloc. These Scots, as Sir Sean Connery is so quick to remind us, absolutely hate the ordinary people of England. And how it shows on the faces of their victims. Their "classless" victims. 22 Indeed I should like to enquire of the smug and self-important Sir Sean Connery by what right it is that his Liege Lord should steal everything I once owned, and turn the children of this Irish Citizen into orphans. And in what way it differs from the "right" of any grown adult to murder a small child? 23 In Ireland were two of the Harlot's pack of Nazi Wolf Bitches masquerading as President of the Republic. First Mary Robinson, who went on to her reward as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva. And Now Mary McAleese. Both Nazi Wolf Bitches make Irish Citizens into British subjects. The traitor Dick Spring, former Tanaiste and mentor of Robinson. He broke his word and brought down the last constitutional government in Ireland so he could appoint his own crooked Attorney General in flagrant breach of Article 30 of the Constitution. The great Doctor Tony O'Reilly, who murdered the free press and funded the subjugation of Ireland. And Bertie Aherne, current Prime Minister and paid collaborator with the Harlot. He takes much pride in his stated intention to re-incorporate the Irish Republic back into that same United Kingdom that murdered fully one-third the people. And will do so again if given the chance. 24 And last to Wandsworth Council, the claimant in this current action and which tried to steal my property. Mr Gerald Jones, Chief Executive, and Mr Martin Walker, Borough Solicitor, are the officers responsible for the actions carried out in the name of the Mayor and Burgesses. Conspirators to theft, to defraud and to do murder, like all the rest. 25 I may have overlooked a few of the guilty conspirators. And there were many others who played a part, but did so with reluctance and under tremendous pressure. Towards this latter group I bear no ill will and they have my forgiveness. It is for they to ponder on the wisdom of joining this secret society and swearing blind obedience when not knowing what they will be told to do. They have sold their souls for a pittance, and must make their own peace with their maker. 26 I wrote earlier that I had served Anglia Television outstandingly well since I joined the company in 1989. No idle boast. Just one example was the partnership signed with the American giant Home Box Office on 15 March 1993. For eighteen months I had negotiated, literally single handed, on behalf of Anglia in an extremely hard-fought deal. I well recall the final week of negotiations. Not quite alone, but with Anglia's generalist solicitor, I bargained with and confronted no less than four specialist entertainment lawyers out of New York and Los Angeles and their equally specialist London attorney. For six straight days we tussled back and forth from nine in the morning until the small hours, when they would decamp to the Lanesborough while I went home alone to Anglia's dingy digs in Bathurst Mews. On the final day we completed at five in the morning, took time out for a shower and change of clothes, then returned at seven to prepare for the formal signing and press conference. David McCall signed on behalf of Anglia and trusted me that much that he had no idea at all what he was signing. Anglia's share price at the close of trading on 14 March 1993 was a lowly 153 pence. The Home Box Office association gave Anglia Television prestige and credibility in the entertainment world and thereafter the share price rose and rose. By the time Lord Archer stole that easy money less than ten months later the share price had risen more than threefold to stand at 485 pence. Before the takeover premium was added. The Home Box Office deal was a watershed for Anglia Television. 27 I learned a great deal during those hard-fought negotiations. I learned how lawyers think and work. I became adept enough to hold my own with the professionals. Yet David McCall (backed by Michael Hughes and the Directors of MAI) thought he could cheat me after all I had done for him and for Anglia. He was wrong and he brought the whole world down on his head. Up to, and including the unmasking of the fraudulent Mr Blair in Portugal on 19 June 2000. The event that changed the world, and no fluke at all. 28 Up to that point Bomber Blair had been the ultra vires front man for the most powerful, most successful, most ruthless organized crime syndicate in history: the Cosa Nostra/British Crown. Let us look at their extortion and money-laundering activities. It is now quite clear why it was, in spite of the Crown's iron grip over the British media, that Lloyds losses were given such high prominence in the early 1990's. With jurisdiction over American Citizens ceded to the English court the British Crown was able to extort the same losses over and over again. No individual victim could have grounds for complaint, because everyone knew the losses had been horrendous. Yet nobody would know that the same losses had been recovered more than once - apart from the English Court and Lloyds of London itself. Just as no one would have known that the English Court had split the Wandsworth debt into two as the basis for two separate actions against the late John Cleary. And we now know that both the English Court and Lloyds of London are both fronts for that same criminal institution. The British Crown. 29 And in the same way the great economic debate of our time is another sham. It has nothing to do with the single European currency and its effects on the economy of Britain. It has everything to do with a sovereign and independent Bank of England. Sovereign and independent to launder the profits from American organized crime on behalf of the Harlot's Cosa Nostra friends. Sovereign and independent to license half the tax havens in the world. Sovereign and independent to shelter all the malpractices of the City of London from prying eyes in Frankfurt. While remaining part of the single market. 30 How amusing is this upside down world in which we live. This upside down world in which the "Mister Big" of organized crime should turn out to be Her Majesty Mrs Midget. This upside down world in which the most brutal and barbaric practitioner of masculine vices should turn out to be a woman. 31 And it is this same unelected British Crown, controlled by that same person since 1936, that would set itself up as the legitimate government of the world through yet another front. The United Nations. They have the money from extortion and laundering and vice. They have the Nazi organization in place. It is now clear why Ugly Albright put the knife into Boutros-Boutros Gali. No Moslem will join an organization that worships the Solomon rejected by God and seeks to return to him the kingdom stripped away by God (I Kings 11:11-13). The successor to Bou-Bou, were he around 150 years ago, would doubtless laud the British "success" in halving the numbers in Ireland living in poverty in just four years. Look at what happened with Mary "Christians and Moslems are not human and have no rights" Robinson. And when all this comes to pass then the whole world can look forward to the same system of justice as that suffered by Lloyds Names. And Jesus de Polanco. And by the people of Iraq. And by the people of Libya. And by John Cleary and his two daughters. In the High Court of Justice, in the Staffordshire County Court, in the Constitutional Court of Spain. And now in the Wandsworth County Court. A justice in which no contract or law is enforced against the Medieval Mob. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 32 From paragraphs 14 to 24 I listed those individuals who were party to this conspiracy to defraud and this conspiracy to do murder. Eight separate and distinct institutions were involved. Sadly, as of 1 October 2000 a ninth name was added: GranadaCompass PLC, which is the new owner of Anglia Television Ltd. This company has benefited greatly from my efforts to defend myself. As of May 2000 United News and Media was on the threshold of acquiring Carlton Television to make itself the undisputed master of Independent Television and Independent Television News. In July 2000 United decided instead to cut its losses and sold its three ITV licensees to GranadaCompass PLC for 1.7 Billion. What happened in between was that the fraudulent Bomber Blair was unmasked at the Council of Europe in Feira. 33 So GranadaCompass is now the undisputed master of ITV and ITN. Mr Charles Allen, full of himself and his own personal coup, is trading already on those assets. He tells us triumphantly that Granada Television is ready to do business throughout the world. For control of the network is close to priceless, and the difference in value, from the Granada perspective, between the May 2000 and July 2000 positions is much greater than, perhaps three or four times as great, the cash price paid to Clive Hollick. GranadaCompass PLC were the beneficiaries of a forced sale. Like whoever it was bought my apartment at auction. 34 When Hollick tried to cheat me in May 1994 I advised him he was cheating the wrong man. That I always deliver, the bigger the stakes the better. In MAI's affidavit (none was ever sworn by the defendant, Anglia Television) I was told I was boasting. Now GranadaCompass PLC, and in particular Gerry Robinson and Charles Allen, do not want to do business with John Cleary. They refuse to acknowledge me or the debt they owe me. Nor will they acknowledge the additional crimes they commit with the passage of the month end. Anglia Television, Granada Television, GranadaCompass PLC and the Directors of each think they can cheat John Cleary. The wise man learns from the mistakes of others. 35 I have written before of my dear mother, now in her eighty first year, fast failing and completely alone. When I read of how Bomber Blair had framed poor Barry Bulsara for the murder of Jill Dando I knew for certain I would not be safe in England. For five or six months now I have been telling my mother that I will soon be able to see her, to hold on for a little while longer, that everything will soon come right. But she grows perceptibly weaker by the month. She is no longer able to look after herself well, lives in dread of being put into a home, and grows more and more depressed. Her will to live is slipping away. She has lived a terribly hard life, has always been cheerful and tried her best whatever the adversity, and has never in her life cheated anyone. She deserves better and I must give her hope. So I am going back, arriving on the morning of 24 December 2000. I will return to Las Palmas on 6 January 2001 and then take my leave of my lovely friend here. She has been attacked already by Borbon's secret society and I cannot further endanger her future. As with my own children I must demonstrate my love by going away. I take comfort in the knowledge that it is the good Lord and He alone that decides when we are called to meet him. I will not be intimidated by those that are not worthy to wipe my mother's boots, however much money they possess. Should I pay the ultimate price for what I do I will have no complaints. I've had real purpose and lived life to the full these years since I escaped from hell and saw the light. There are far worse reasons to lay down my life than for the love and veneration of she that gave me life and loved me without question through awful times for herself. A love the Windsor family could never know or understand. 36 But the central truth is this. Were Messrs Robinson and Allen not just as sleazy as all their fellow travelers it would not be necessary for me to take this risk. Were the Directors of Anglia Television, Granada Television and GranadaCompass PLC men and women of honour and integrity I would be able to bring my mother out, or pay for the care she so desperately needs. My blood will be on their hands too. 37 Copies of this sworn document will be sent on 2/3 October 2000 to: The prince of Wales Senator Joseph Lieberman The Prince William William Hague MP The Prince Henry The President of France Señor Rodriguez Zapatero The Prime Minister of Australia Sir Sean Connery E.U. Commissioner for Justice Chairman of GranadaCompass PLC President of the Spain Supreme Court Señor Jesus de Polanco Attorney General of New York The Prince of Asturias Chairman of European Central Bank Amazing grace, how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me I once was lost but now am found. Was blind but now I see.

by **dbeach** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:48 am

1776 1812 CIVIL WAR.. modern elite brits and their american traitor cousins like bush destory freedom how many former presidents are related to the british throne? members of congress??

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:21 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 HRH Prince William of Wales 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria St James´ Palace Spain (By registered post A83052407) 4 January 2002 THE SECRET OF THE MONCKTON PAPERS You Royal Highness, Further to my Second Affidavit sworn 1 October 2000, and my Third Affidavit sworn 29 November 2000. What is the one thing that Martin McGuinness and the Queen Mother have in common? Answer: they both refuse to swear an oath mandated by law and the Glorious Revolution. The Coronation Oath Act 1689 governs the conduct of the Crown. Queen Elizabeth II obeyed the Act and swore the Oath in 1953, as it is the law. That Act commands: But Elizabeth, wife of George, swore no oath in 1937. She dominated her weak husband and simply refused to sign an English oath to law, justice and good government. Thus blackmailed they called her Queen all the same, for she had it in her power to destroy the Monarchy at just the time the Nation needed unity above all else. Monckton was legal advisor to Edward VIII. Edward wanted his birthright back for himself. Elizabeth’s failure to swear the oath nulls the Coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth. In 1940 Elizabeth damned Wallis as “the lowest of the low” for bringing “unimaginable trouble” in copying her own blackmail over the faulty Coronation. Through Halifax Elizabeth sought an “arrangement” with Hitler that same year – treason had she sworn the oath. There is no doubt whatsoever that the illegal nature of the 1937 Coronation is the subject matter of the missing Monckton papers. The Bill of Rights 1689 governs the conduct of Parliament and requires a like oath of allegiance to the Crown. McGuinness, though elected by the People, cannot take up his seat in the Commons because he refuses to swear to be "...faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth her heirs and successors according to law so help me God". This oath is enforced ruthlessly by successive Speakers on behalf of the Queen. It is deliberately ambiguous and refers to two persons. Queen Elizabeth II herself: and to her mother, who took the name "Queen Elizabeth" in breach of the Coronation Oath Act 1689. So until McGuinness joins the rest and swears to obey a fraud he is a non-person. And so are his Irish constituents. The name of the Sovereign of this Kingdom is Queen Elizabeth II. That is how Commonwealth nations swear the oath and that is her lawful title. But this Sovereign has chosen to impose an ambiguous and illegal oath on Parliament, on the Judiciary and on the Constabulary. Each must swear an oath which includes a Shadow Sovereign, if they are to serve. This secret, hiding in plain view, is suppressed with the Monckton papers. If they still exist. The Queen Mother is a fraud and has no right to use the name Queen Elizabeth. Far from lending support to her husband at his hour of greatest need, she left him alone. Far from doing her duty as wife, woman and subject, she flounced a selfish blackmail. Little wonder the poor man died so young. And her prize was hidden, unlimited power, completely unconstrained by any oath, and which she has since employed selectively to amass a personal fortune. After Malcolm Wall, I recognize the impostor modus operandi. It is the hidden power of this Shadow Sovereign that lays behind the careers of Lord and Lady Archer, behind the meteoric rise of "Honest" John Major and "Trust Me" Tony Blair. It is the hidden power behind the Anglia Television fraud, behind the Lloyds insurance fraud and behind the suppression and destruction of so much evidence. It is the hidden power behind the disgraceful persecution and decimation of the Cleary family. It is for Your Royal Highness to decide whether he wishes to associate with such infamy and corruption. Yours sincerely John P.Cleary BSc. MA MBA Freeborn Englishman and Citizen of Ireland cc HH Prince Henry of Wales (by registered post) enc. John Cleary to Janet Reno (Attorney General of the USA) 29 May 2000 NOTE I'm not sure how to post a scan. In the original that space in the body of the letter contained the text from the original statute. It is quite impressive, including as it does an ancient typeface. Anyway, the wording is: IV Oath to be administered to all future Kings and Queens And the said Oath shall be in like manner Administered to every King or Queene who shall succeede to the Imperialle Crowne of this Realme at their respective Coronations by one of the Archbishops or Bishops of this Realme of England for the time be to be thereunto appointed by such King or Queene respectively and in the Presence of all Persons that shall be Attending Assisting or otherwise present at such their respective Coronations Any Law Statute or Usage to the contrry notwithstanding

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:02 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro 12 35003 Las Palmas de GranCanaria Spain 19 February 2002 Richard May, of the English Court, and Patrick Robinson, of the Jamaican Court, both swear to obey the same person. She is really out to get you, isn’t she? Another of her agents is Mr Blair. I think you will find that Mr Blair was an impostor at the time of the NATO campaign in former Yugoslavia. Check with anyone who was at Feira on 19 June 2000. Best of luck. PS Identical documents sent to all six ICTY Trial Chamber III defendants. C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Rt. Hon Anthony Blair MP 35003 Las Palmas de GranCanaria “Prime Minister” of the UK Spain 14 June 2000 Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 J P Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Mr Blair, I write further to our long history of correspondences on this fraud, going all the way back to 27 May 1994. The day your good friend Clive Hollick marched into Norwich with his marauding army and ripped the guts out of Anglia Television. And gave us a foretaste of the Blair vision for social policy in Europe. Between yourself and Queen Elizabeth II you exercise the Royal Prerogative. Two persons in secret coalition. Which is responsible, morally and in law, for the exercise of those powers? For there is safety in uncertainty (or plausible deniability) as I have found. It is my conviction and belief that, like Malcolm Wall, you are deliberately defective in your appointment; that you exercise your powers because everyone “knows” you are Prime Minister, but that in law you are acting ultra vires; and that you can be disowned by the Sovereign as she uses and discards so many others. All the way back to Crawfie. Prove you are acting in good faith and with the authority of the Sovereign. Or cede your right to vote in Portugal. Yours sincerely John P Cleary BSc MA MBA cc The President of the Council of Ministers (Portugal)

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:05 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 35003 Las Palmas de GranCanaria Spain 17 March 2002 Patrick Cox MEP President of the European Parliament Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Mr Cox, A fine Saint Pat’s Day to you. I see you were at Downing Street on Monday last, and President Kostunica has reappeared on the radar screen. I presume my note to Milosevic has bubbled to the surface and made a few waves. You know the story and you’ve seen some of the evidence. The fraud; the blackmail; the threats; the tampering with the evidence at trial; the flight to Ireland; the attempted abduction; the first forged court order into Ireland; the multiple murder attempts committed in your own Munster; the flight to Spain; the Constitutional Court ruling; the theft of my apartment; the second forged court order into Spain. THE UNMASKING OF MR BLAIR AT FEIRA ON 19 JUNE 2000. You must be perturbed by this final event. From May 1997 to June or July 2000 Mr Blair was an impostor whose word was without value. No document signed by Mr Blair is binding on the British State. Perhaps it can be fudged, by backdating his appointment by mutual agreement. But what about Mr Major? You will have noticed that Mr Major remains just that – Mr Major. Ask Emma Nicholson about how hard he fought, and lied, and cheated in order to gain a Peerage for Jeffrey Archer. You know that, as a former Prime Minister who has left the Commons, Mr Major is entitled to a Peerage as of personal right? Yet five years on and no Lord Major of Little Penis: he remains plain old Mr John Major. So perhaps Mr Major is not a former Prime Minister? Perhaps Mr Major’s signature is as worthless as that of Mr Blair? Maybe Maastricht is not binding on the British at all? I leave it to you to draw your own conclusions. You may find part of my second affidavit sworn on 1 October 2000 (attached) to have some evidential value (sorry for some of the language, but really the Windsors and their Scottish racism are way beyond common decency). Best of luck to you. A reply would be nice. Yours sincerely, John Cleary PS I see Mr Blair has been replaced as America’s roving ambassador. A sign of things to come, do you think?

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:07 am

C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Patrick Cox MEP 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria President of the European Parliament Spain 6 April 2002 Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Mr Cox, Twenty days, and no sign of the asked for reply. So I guess it’s not coming. That’s a bit of a worry because I’m going back to see my mother in less than a month…. Thank you, yes. She’s a lot better since I went to see her. But it’s now more than a year and she gets lonely all on her own. That Scottish racism of which I warned will not go away. Look at what Charles Allen is doing to English football. Last financial year he paid himself nearly five million pounds. This year he is screwing the English Football League through ITV Digital. For nearly two years he has been screwing John Cleary through Anglia Television. Charles Allen does not qualify as a “fit and proper person” under the Broadcasting Act 1990. The Independent Television Commission knows this to be true but does not enforce the legislation. The Football League representatives were entitled to rely on the Broadcasting Act and the Statutory Regulator. Yet Charles Allen and his fellow Granada Directors are party to a conspiracy to defraud and a conspiracy to do murder. To pull the plug on an unsecured subsidiary will mean nothing at all to such unfit persons. It was the same story nearly eight years ago under Honest John Major. You will recall that my second affidavit sworn on 1 October 2000 made specific reference to the involvement by the Independent Television Commission in the conspiracy against John Cleary (paragraph 20). Please let me refer you to the attached reply from the Deputy Chairman dated 17 November 1994. You will see that the ITC was formally notified of the fraud at Anglia Television in a letter dated 21 June 1994. Instead of acting on this information, the letter (clearly headed “Private and Confidential”) was passed to the subject of the complaint by the Commission Chairman.The subject of the complaint then put that letter into court. Were this not so deeply sinister it would make a fantastic comedy. Yours sincerely, John Cleary Carbon copies A Banks MP R Barber D Blunkett MP G Brown MP W Cash MP C Clarke MP R Cook MP P Dacre G Dyke Lord Goldsmith H Harman MP P Hewitt MP K Hoey MP T Jowell MP G Kaufman MP C Kennedy MP P Morgan A Salmond MP I D Smith MP Sir N Wickes R Wade Prince William D Yelland T Yeo MP

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:08 am

(Correos Certificado) C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain Patrick Cox MEP 17 April 2002 European Parliament President Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 JP Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Mr Cox, Further to my unrequited letters of 17 March and 6 April 2002. You have now seen the de facto system of government in Great Britain. Institutionalised Scottish racism. England’s Royal Prerogative powers have been unlawfully exercised by successive Scottish “prime ministers” acting ultra-vires and under the command of the Windsor family. All British subjects that refuse to go along with impostors Major and Blair are dealt with by the dark forces of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, operating through the State. Also under the command of the Windsor family and on Privy Council terms. So far as the People of England are concerned this matters, not least because those Royal Prerogative powers were used by Scotsman Blair to suppress the evidence against Elizabeth Bowes Lyons and her Scottish Rite gang. As would be proven by the buried Monckton Papers, they stole the English Crown in 1937. So far as John Cleary is concerned this matters because those Royal Prerogative powers were used by Archer’s Friend John Major to suppress the evidence of crimes committed by Mary and Jeffrey Archer and others at Anglia Television in 1994 and 1995. Let me show you how he used the DTI Inquiry process. (see documents enclosed dated 10 August, 24 August and 30 August 1995). As part of his efforts to trick me back into English jurisdiction Major had Kaye and Aldous make contact with me on 10 August 1995. I gave a full and corroborated reply on 24 August 1995. Major tried very hard to further entice me back to my demise during September and October 1995. When he failed in this endeavour he then invoked the Royal Prerogative to bury my evidence of the crimes committed by himself and by Mary and Jeffrey Archer. The Kaye and Aldous Inquiry findings were announced publicly as “No further action is to be taken against any of the parties” (much to the surprise of Hugh Aldous). The reports have never been published to allow the People to see the facts and the evidence for themselves. The Directors of Anglia Television and others are still bound to this day by the oath of secrecy imposed by the DTI Inspectors under sections 177 to 180 of the nauseous and disgusting Financial Services Act 1986. On pain of criminal penalties – that is on pain of imprisonment. Thus the proofs of the Archers’ guilt are hermetically sealed and buried by that very inquiry mechanism designed to expose them. How amusing is this upside down world, created by Elizabeth Bowes Lyons, in which we all live. Put this burial of the Kaye and Aldous report together with what you know already about the Independent Television Commission (6 April) and the English Court (17 March) and you have a subset of the broader conspiracy. Executed through HM Inspectors, the Commission and the Judges each operating with statutory powers; responsible to the Trade and Industry, Heritage and Lord Chancellors Departments respectively; run by Cabinet Ministers Heseltine, Dorrell and Lord Mackay of Clashfern respectively; each appointed and controlled by virtue of the Prime Ministerial Royal Prerogative; which was vested in….NOBODY. European democrats beware; the Beast created by Elizabeth Bowes Lyons lives on. I travel to Heathrow on 5 May and, God willing, return to Las Palmas on 26 May. Yours sincerely, John Cleary Carbon copies J Ashcroft J-M Aznar A Banks MP R Barber Lord Black D Blunkett MP G Brown MP W Cash MP J Chirac C Clarke MP R Cook MP P Dacre G Dyke Principe Felipe Lord Goldsmith H Harman MP P Hewitt MP K Hoey MP J Howard T Jowell MP G Kaufman MP C Kennedy MP V Kostunica Lord Millet J Monks P Morgan R Murdoch Sir A O’Reilly A Salmond MP I D Smith MP Dame Scardino J Solana Sir N Wicks R Wade Prince William Sir R Wilson Lord Woolf D Yelland T Yeo MP

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:10 am

C/Eusebio Navarro, 12 Rt. Hon. Robin Cook MP 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Leader of the House of Commons Spain 5 June 2002 Blair, Byers, Desmond, Hollick and the Express Dear Mr. Cook, Would Tony Blair prostitute himself for 100,000? No, of course not. As usual the British media are looking in all the wrong places when it comes to the Express takeover. Lets go back to basics and ask ourselves who gained the most from Byers' circumvention of the law. Richard Desmond was prepared to pay a very full price for the Express, and we all know the reason why. The only other offer on the table was from the Barclay brothers at 75 millions. Had the Desmond offer been referred to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission the Sullivan precedent would dictate that a pornographer was not a "fit and proper person" to own a regional, let alone a national newspaper. The vendor would have been forced to accept 75 millions rather than 125 millions. So the vendor, in obtaining an extra 50 millions, was the big winner. The vendor was Lord Clive Hollick. He was a forced seller, having been fingered along with the impostor Blair at Feira on 19 June 2000 (I'm sure you remember it well). Lord Clive Hollick, known gangster and the largest single financial donor to the Blair "project". Lord Clive Hollick, who at the time of the Desmond decision was Special Advisor to the Prime Minister at the Department of Trade and Industry, notionally run by Stephen Byers. Under the circumstances it is easy to see why Byers was pressurised and circumvented the rules. And having circumvented the rules, why it was that Blair was prepared to support him "For better or for worse" these past 12 months. And why, once Byers buckled and released the report, he was summarily dismissed. So the decision to break the rules was made by Blair himself. And would he prostitute the nation for 50,100,000? After Feira I will let you answer that yourself. Please forward copies of this letter to all the interested Select Committee Chairmen, including the one that “knifed Stephen Byers in the back” according to Two Jags. Oh, and a reply would be nice. Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc. MA MBA CC R Prodi I Duncan Smith MP C Kennedy MP Enc. Mary Archer’s Fraud 8 August 2001 Cleary to Blair 25 July 1994 Blair to Cleary 30 July 1994

by **antiaristo** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:12 am

C/Eusebio Navarro, 12 Senor Romani Prodi 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria President of the European Commission Spain 5 June 2002 Dear Senor Prodi, Attached is about ten percent of the material I circulated to some 200 named recipients throughout the United Kingdom between 29 July and 8 August 2001. Since that time a tidal wave of scandal has engulfed the British Prime Minister. Yet nothing at all about the Anglia fraud and its aftermath. So what is going on here? Who is telling lies - John Cleary or the British, Irish and Spanish States? The answer to this question gets easier when you know a little more about the political system in the United Kingdom. Like the fact that one Queen is sovereign over everything. Not 58 million people, but one single Queen. L'Etat, c'est moi. This is universally acknowledged. But we are then told that the Queen does not use her powers and the people love her and don't ask any questions. Every office holder must swear personal allegiance to his or her sovereign Queen Elizabeth. All three arms of the State, be it the Executive (Major or Blair, Dorrell or Byers) the Judiciary (Mackay of Clashfern et al or Irvine of Lairg et al) or the Legislative (Heseltine or Cook) must obey the person of the Sovereign. Simply to take up a seat in Parliament one must swear undying personal loyalty and allegiance to Queen Elizabeth (e.g. not Sinn Fein). This is the Royal Prerogative, which eludes the separation of powers (such as the quantum of Elizabeth Bowes Lyons’ estate and lawful taxes thereon). Bear in mind the Coronation Oath sworn by Elizabeth Windsor on 2 June 1953, and which will be sworn one day by her successor. "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples.... according to their respective laws and customs?" "I solemnly promise so to do." "Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?" "I will." "The things which I have here promised I will perform and keep. So help me God." So the question I raised can be restated thus: who is telling the lies - John Cleary or Elizabeth Windsor? Lord Jeffrey Archer was possibly the most senior of the secret agents run by the Shadow Sovereign, Elizabeth Bowes Lyons. His biggest contribution was the observation that the rich are often too stupid and lazy to themselves read a document put before them by a bank for signature. He takes the credit in his book "A Matter of Honour". Since 1986 his idea has yielded Billions of Dollars to Bowes Lyons and her gang out of the Lloyds of London fraud. So when Archer got caught for insider dealing in the shares of Anglia Television the Windsors were quick to ensure that their man got off Scot free. As usual. Therefore to expose Jeffrey Archer is to expose the Windsors and show how Elizabeth Windsor does indeed use her powers, and in the most pernicious ways. While there has been nothing about Anglia Television per se, there have been adjacent contributions, notably from Rupert Murdoch (Archer's publisher) and Greg Dyke (Hollick's partner). Dyke's BBC has done its best to whitewash the Archers, in breach of statutory provisions to the contrary. On at least three occasions he has given a preferential platform to Mary Archer. (The Today programme, where she was allowed to dictate the agenda; the World this Weekend, where she issued extraordinary threats against Emma Nicholson MEP; and Question Time, where she appeared as a member of the Great and Good having perjured herself weeks beforehand.). And Rupert Murdoch's News of the World has intervened three times. Most recently to entrap Angus Deayton, arch scourge of Jeffrey Archer; before that was the damaging material about Prince Harry on the front six pages, just to create a diversion. And before that, in order to pervert the course of justice, when his organ conspired with Max Clifford and Ted Francis to provide yet another fake alibi for Archer on 19 November 1999. The Windsor family is full of greedy liars, thieves, blackmailers, murderers, fornicators and adulterers. They have murdered to secure their hold on the Crown in perpetuity, and all the massive powers that go with it. Their problem is the succession and 1936 the pivotal year. We English do not have a written constitution, so the whole system hinges on the respect for precedent. In 1936 King Edward VIII was told he could not marry a divorcee. He chose to abdicate, and his younger brother Bertie who had already married took his place. The decision was made (by whom?) to change nothing else of the Coronation that had been planned for the following year. All the arrangements made for Edward were kept in place for the new King George - including the fact that only one person would swear the Coronation Oath. Thus did Elizabeth Bowes Lyons come to be crowned Queen of England in breach of the Coronation Oath Act of 1689. But now her own grandson is barred from succession by his own marital calumnies. So she wants to change the rules, but only in ways that directly benefit her own dynasty. In death, as in life, she wants it both ways. During the final years of her life Elizabeth Bowes Lyons spent much of her time in transferring the knowledge required for her grandson to take over as head of the 33º Scottish Rite Freemasons. She had convinced him that with their support he would be able to marry his mistress and accede to the Throne. The next step is to appoint a nodding donkey as Archbishop of Canterbury: one prepared to administer the Coronation Oath to a man far less worthy even than Edward VIII. One known to have broken numerous laws of God and of man. From your own perspective these matters are of much more than mere academic interest. Elizabeth Windsor is Commander in Chief of the British armed forces. She commands the English court, with its growing jurisdiction throughout the European Community. She personally controls British foreign policy and the concomitant permanent seat on the UN Security Council. She has a symbiotic relationship with the less savoury elements in the American elite. The Windsor family has a real and growing power over you and your family, whether you like it or not. The Shadow Sovereign created that power out of nothing. And the President of the European Parliament is too frightened even to admit it, though he’s not alone. If you allow criminals to control the law it is hardly surprising when the world turns upside down. We keep coming back to the man who used Archer’s cover up to instigate fraud at Anglia Television. See what I have to say to Robin Cook about Blair’s latest scandal in breaching precedent and the pivotal role played by Lord Clive Hollick. This man was ennobled and made a legislator for life on the advice of Neil Kinnock. Commissar Kinnock has yet to explain why it is ideologically acceptable for a socialist boss to steal the property belonging to his capitalist workforce, twice over. Neil Kinnock is a secret agent of the Windsor gang. This same Neil Kinnock is doing all that he can to sabotage the development of a European foreign policy, binding on the British (and their UN veto). They are buying European politicians with the proceeds from the fraud at Lloyds of London, and the primary conduits are Kinnock and Patten. After all, it was back in November 1995 that I issued my main warning to the Ambassadors of all EU countries. That’s six and a half extra years of secrecy to achieve their megalomaniacal fantasies, and maybe it is already too late. Yours sincerely, John Cleary BSc.MA MBA Enc. Cleary to Cook 5 June 2002 (with attachments)

PLEASE DO NOT POST

PLEASE DO NOT POST

Lady Mary Archer

William Archer & James Archer

Janet Reno

Janet Reno

First Affidavit

Second Affidavit

Re: Janet Reno

Prince William of Wales

Slobodan Milosevic

Patrick Cox MEP (President European Parliament)

Patrick Cox MEP

Patrick Cox MEP

Robin Cook MP

Romani Prodi (President European Commission)

Who is online