Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
stevie ray » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:48 pm wrote:well, goodbye, Canadian_watcher.
I have asked why you were banned and as you can see from reading the thread there is no real reason forthcoming. People are sure "it must have been bad." I guess only the mods know the secret list, the level of 'bad' that can't be crossed, and they have the power to silence. They won't spell it out and no one seems to have caught the obviously egregious infraction but ask about it too pointedly and you might get suspected of insulting the moderation team!
stevie ray » Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:29 pm wrote:I thought this was the thread for saying a respectful goodbye. the other thread is where you get to trash her in spite of her not being able to defend herself.
stevie ray » Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:29 pm wrote:I thought this was the thread for saying a respectful goodbye. the other thread is where you get to trash her in spite of her not being able to defend herself.
stevie ray » Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:29 pm wrote:I thought this was the thread for saying a respectful goodbye. the other thread is where you get to trash her in spite of her not being able to defend herself.
stevie ray » Sat Jul 20, 2013 2:48 pm wrote:well, goodbye, Canadian_watcher.
I have asked why you were banned and as you can see from reading the thread there is no real reason forthcoming. People are sure "it must have been bad." I guess only the mods know the secret list, the level of 'bad' that can't be crossed, and they have the power to silence. They won't spell it out and no one seems to have caught the obviously egregious infraction but ask about it too pointedly and you might get suspected of insulting the moderation team!
Wombaticus Rex » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:51 am wrote:
As for your inquiry into the legitimacy of CW's previous suspensions, that's not really a question so much as your insinuation that we did a horrible job moderating. If you'd like more information, it's all here. There are no internal records for you to FOIA. If you want to conduct your own independent investigation, you can start anytime. Pro Tip: use google in addition to the phpBB search, you'll locate the key threads faster by running parallel queries.
rollingstone » Mon Jul 22, 2013 11:57 am wrote:the members are still deciding as of now if you'd like to have a say.
Canadian_watcher's ban decision Poll
I don't know what time limit they've put on this nor whether or not it will even stand, however it seemed a shame to have it buried yet still active.
rollingstone » 22 Jul 2013 14:14 wrote:I joined because of the poll good sir, but I have only this account. If that's not kosher then I'm missing something?
Return to The Lounge & Member News
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests