LogoWatch exclusive

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

LogoWatch exclusive

Postby MacCruiskeen » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:35 pm

To anyone pushed for time: scroll down to the logo and revolve it 90 degrees clockwise (i.e., turn your head to the left):

UK Office of Government Commerce cracks one off

Five-knuckle shuffle rebrand outrage

By Lester Haines Published Tuesday 22nd April 2008 12:46 GMT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nail down your security priorities. Ask the experts and your peers at The Register Security Debate, April 17, 2008 LogoWatch exclusive In April last year, London design outfit FHD proudly announced it would be rebranding the UK's Office of Government Commerce (OGC) - the HM Treasury tentacle "responsible for improving value for money by driving up standards and capability in procurement".

FHD's MD Adrian Day trumpeted to the sound of whalesong: “We are seeing growing demand from clients for consultancy support that spans branding, strategic and stakeholder communications, and this brief from OGC and OGCbuying.solutions is a perfect example of the need for a more integrated, informed approach to branding. We have worked on a number of successful corporate branding projects in the past few months and this project is an exciting new win for the business.”

Catherine Hastings, director of communications at the OGC, chipped in with: “We were impressed with the integrated approach FHD had to offer, which combined expertise in workings of government.”

So far so good - nothing more exciting than some traditional Strategy Boutique Newspeak. However, the wheels came off this particular rebrand in spectacular style when the new logo was presented to OGC staff.

According to an inside source, the graphic had allegedly already been inscribed onto mousemats and pens in anticipation of its imminent deployment, but it took OGC foot soldiers around 20 seconds to realise why this particular bit of joss-stick-driven madness was going to end in tears (of laughter):

Image

On dear, oh dear.* Well, at least it appears that FHD really does have expertise "in workings of government", as a quick 90 clockwise rotation reveals.

Quite remarkably, our informant suggested that, having spent the cash, OGC intends to roll out the logo anyway. Well, we contacted the OGC for comment, and a spokesman gamely explained: "The OGC is currently overhauling the design of its corporate materials following a new strategy and forward direction. As part of this, the OGC has been developing a new visual identity, one aspect of which is a new logo.

"The proposed version, which you have sent over, has been shared with staff, and is now going through final technical stages. It is true that it caused a few titters among some staff when viewed on its side, but on consideration we concluded that the effect was generic to the particular combination of the letters 'OGC' - and is not inappropriate to an organisation that's looking to have a firm grip on government spend!"

He concluded: "The new identity has been extremely well received, as it presents a very clean, uncluttered and modern identity."

The mind boggles. For the record, and in case you'd like to get your hands on a rebranded OGC mousemat, we gather staff have stripped the building of every example not nailed down, so check eBay later this week for your five-knuckle shuffle collectable. ®

Bootnote
*You're right - that not enough "oh dears". Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...

Oh yes, we contacted FHD for a comment, but no one had got back to us at time of publication.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/22/ogc_logo/
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lunarose » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:03 pm

?????????????????

i don't get it. please explain. i like jokes.

(having a dense incarnation, apparently~!)
"Some people just want to believe that there are nude space people out there somewhere." John Keel
lunarose
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: O'Neills,
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sweejak » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:06 pm

User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lunarose » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:38 pm

how kind of you to take pity on me, sweejak. greatly appreciated.

that's kinda what i thought i saw, but it seemed like a stretch..........plus my trying to get my head in the right position was bothering the cat.
"Some people just want to believe that there are nude space people out there somewhere." John Keel
lunarose
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: O'Neills,
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sweejak » Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:03 pm

LOL, not pity at all, I had no clue.
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:02 pm

Ohh, juicy! I feel a new user name comin' on...
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Seamus OBlimey » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:00 pm

Image
User avatar
Seamus OBlimey
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Gods own country
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Seamus OBlimey » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:08 am

That doesn't quite work, does it?. This one looks like it does..

Image
User avatar
Seamus OBlimey
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Gods own country
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to The Lounge & Member News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests