Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
One nun puts entire US intel community to shame over 'stage-managed' Syria footage
... study of the videos of the Syrian chemical attack shows they were productions involving staged bodies.
...Some of the same bodies were planted or recycled in different scenes and makeshift morgues that were supposed to be in different locations. The same bodies of the same children are spotted in different locations.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e36284.htm
stillrobertpaulsen » Wed Oct 21, 2015 6:25 pm wrote:John Wilkes Fucking Booth.
Stage actor certainly, but under no logical conception can you call what he did crisis acting.
Hugh Manatee Wins » Sat Jun 30, 2007 11:53 am wrote:
Stranger, the man's name is either 'Oswalt' or 'Oswald' and an internet search splits the results about 50/50. Anyone who hears or reads 'Oswalt' is going to think of the more common 'Oswald' anyway.
Is it a coincidence that Disney, which I've established as a covert youth conditioner for the National inSecurity State since WWII and which already put out 'The Shaggy D.A.' to trash DA Jim Garrison's prosecution of JFK conspirator Clay Shaw, would cast in their lead production for 2007/2008 and give prominence to the public name of 'Oswald' as in...Lee Harvey Oswald? Just as the disinfo season for next year's 45th anniversary of JFK's murder has a spate of 'Oswald dunnit' books coming at us.
Looks like a distinct case of keyword hijacking to me.
Wombaticus Rex » 04 Nov 2015 04:51 wrote:I regret everyone I've banned, most days when I spend more than 40 minutes here. I will never reverse any of those decisions, either. Given the chance to do it again? I'd have done it sooner.
jingofever » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:04 pm wrote:Wombaticus Rex » 04 Nov 2015 04:51 wrote:I regret everyone I've banned, most days when I spend more than 40 minutes here. I will never reverse any of those decisions, either. Given the chance to do it again? I'd have done it sooner.
I think that instead of banning or suspending users they should only be able to post in a special subforum, kind of like a jail. And only banned and suspended users would be allowed to read that subforum.
JackRiddler » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:53 pm wrote:The point is not whether governments, corporations and like entities have faked events, or stage-managed real ones for propaganda effect. "Crisis actors" recently has acquired a specific reference to the claims that e.g., the corpses of children in Connecticut and their grieving parents didn't exist but were portrayed by literal hired actors employed by the government, on the basis of "evidence" that is aggressively opposed to any supportable notion of standards of evidence or proof. "Crisis actors" is a troll -- a Trojan Horse -- on the "conspiracy theory" community, whose members are happy to expose themselves by eating it right up.
And no, the motherfucking gangster cop who killed himself because he was about to be caught and staged his own suicide as if he were done in by #BlackLivesMatter does not fit this category in the least. Not every act of deception or infowar is "crisis acting."
jingofever » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:04 pm wrote:Wombaticus Rex » 04 Nov 2015 04:51 wrote:I regret everyone I've banned, most days when I spend more than 40 minutes here. I will never reverse any of those decisions, either. Given the chance to do it again? I'd have done it sooner.
I think that instead of banning or suspending users they should only be able to post in a special subforum, kind of like a jail. And only banned and suspended users would be allowed to read that subforum.
Nordic » Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:23 pm wrote:But then that might be the cool place to go, and others might troll and provoke just so they could get banned for a while and read what was there!
Return to The Lounge & Member News
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests