Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Moderators: DrVolin, Wombaticus Rex, Jeff

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

1) Sources are irrelevant to a story and should be ignored.
0
No votes
2) Sources tell lots about a story and should be discussed.
1
50%
3) Sources are not the whole story but important enough to discuss.
1
50%
4) Sources are not the whole story and should be ignored.
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 2

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:58 pm

Is discussing an article's source threadjacking?
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:03 pm

Somewhat pedantic.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12881
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:03 pm

Discussing sources are the story. You're right. But - I feel Jeff would probably want this closed for now. Can we keep the discussion in the original thread?
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1401
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Fire Pit

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest