This obsession with Nazism is a Red Herring...

by **Watchful Citizen** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:08 am

as following both the money and the criminal tactics reveal. And the technologies of weapons and psy-ops get honed to better terrorize all populations as the internet races to warn of this scam to a population not quite sure who the real enemy is and mostly don't suspect the US government...until lately. I've told WWII vets that contrary to popular opinion, the Nazis won and are trying to shut off their Social Security checks. See the 2005 Cambridge University Press publication of 'U.S. Intelligence and the Nazis.' Bush, Dulles, and fascists finance Nazis. Nazis flee Germany to USA. Nazis ally with CIA. CIA takes over USA. Nazis take over USA. Hitler dead but winning, just like Ronald Reagan who was used to re-fascist-ify post-Vietnam America. (By the way, seventhson, you do portray things similarly to how I do. No wonder I was once mistaken for you at democraticunderground.com)

by **Watchful Citizen** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:37 am

Good for you and keep it up. This is the hidden story that cracks open the myth of American military virtue with the White Hat Uncle Sam saving the world from Evil. The USA built Hitler's war machine and his party and then took over Europe's colonies and economy after Hitler destroyed them. Get all the sources you can and just dump it on the unbelievers. I can give you a pile of em - National Security Archive <a href="http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm">www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NS.../index.htm</a> (National Security Archive Feb 4 2005 The CIA and Nazi War Criminals) OR <a href="http://www.spiritone.com/%7Egdy52150/timeline.html">www.spiritone.com/%7Egdy5...eline.html</a> (The Bush Family Connection to the Nazis) OR <a href="http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/">www.reformed-theology.org...ll_street/</a> (WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER, by Antony C. Sutton) OR <a href="http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi_2">www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin...ush_Nazi_2</a> (New Hampshire Gazette I National News I “Bush - Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951” - Federal Documents) OR <a href="http://www.upi.com/inc/view.php?StoryID=20040513-052654-5254r">www.upi.com/inc/view.php?...2654-5254r</a> (UPI: Files Show Nazi Criminals US Intel Role) OR <a href="http://www.john-loftus.com/bush_nazi_scandal.asp">www.john-loftus.com/bush_...candal.asp</a> (Former Federal Prosecutor John Loftus confirms the Bush-Nazi scandal) OR <a href="http://www.debatecomics.org/BushFamilyFortune/">www.debatecomics.org/BushFamilyFortune/</a> (The Large-scale Money Laundering for the Nazis by President Bush's Grandfather and Maternal Great-Grandfather) All documents provided here are in PDF format and consist of: copies of National Archive documents (declassified in September 2003), supporting articles, excerpts from books, and other materials compiled by independent journalist, John Buchanan, as well as introductory commentaries authored by him. OR <a href="http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:AIiMLcJg4KYJ:www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/536364.html+CIA+Recruited+Eichmann%27s+Assistants+2005&hl=en&client=firefox-a">66.102.7.104/search?q=cac...=firefox-a</a> ( Documents reveal CIA recruited five of Eichmann's associates By Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondent) >>>NOTE: This is the story that caused professor Ward Churchill to be excoriated by the right-wing media for using the words 'little Eichmanns" to describe some of the occupants of the Twin Towers killed on 9/11 in an essay he wrote describing US policy blowback as the reason for the attack. The CIA headed off the use of the keyword 'EICHMANN' because this article was about to come out showing CIA-NAZI alliances.<<< OR <a href="http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/rise_of_american_fascism.htm">www.rationalrevolution.ne...ascism.htm</a> (The Rise of American Fascism) OR <a href="http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/noon.html">www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/noon.html</a> (The Nazi Hydra in America)

by **pugzleyca3** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:45 am

Thanks so much for those bullets. I'll look them over and use them as part of my arsenal. Sometimes, though, when being attacked, it's kind of hard to take, they really are nasty about it. And I am a bit on the sensitive side, even if I am on the internet. I guess because I am me, whether in person or on line and I hate it when people hide behind the cloak of anonymity in order to be ugly toward someone. Is it because they are afraid when the proof is put to them? I can see the republicans getting bent, at least the few who have not jumped ship on Bush, but the dems are what really surprised me.

by **Watchful Citizen** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:55 am

The internet is the greatest tool of free expression to debunk con artists and out criminals. And they hate that. When you are attacked, use your shared cloaking device, internet anonymity, to relentlessly do good against the diffusers and ignore those who get personal and try to throw you off the topic of corruption by changing the topic to you. Don't fall for the personal crap. They use it because you have the facts on your side and that even makes the merely less informed uncomfortable and prone to playing 'more skeptical than thou' to cover their egos. And there are probably real intelligence people playing asshole at the larger websites to steer folks away from nasty truths, too..

by **pugzleyca3** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:10 am

I believe I may have run into one of the intel people on that board. This guy singled me out and called me out on every single post. I finally forced him to admit some things he was wrong about (sort of admitted it anyway). Right after that, he bailed and hasn't been back for months. He claimed to have seen the WTC terror attacks in person and that he was there and knew all and saw all. Of course, there was NO way that the govt. had ANYTHING to do with it and he tooted the official story ad nauseum. I felt he was a spook from day one, because he came after me constantly. I didn't let him shut me up, though, but sometimes those types of exchanges can wear a person out. But in this case, I must have worn him down to a frazzle because I haven't seen him since. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"> He reeked of government. So I guess I have had at least one victory. It got so bad that others didn't even get into our debates. And he made it known that he was a "genius". Right.

by **thumperton** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:12 am

what's with all this Noam Chomsky garbage? Do you think the New World Order is American? Or Neo-Nazi? The 'Nazis' did not infiltrate anything, they were built up as strawmen to direct your attentions at. Let's not take our eyes off the prize, which is one world government. That will NEVER be achieved by an imperialistic evil empire, but rather will rise like a pheonix after a great (and contrived) war. A NWO needs a morally righteous foundation. The US doesn't have it. Neither do the boogeymen 'Nazis'.

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:26 am

and hadn't seen this sooner. Locked, and off to the Fire Pit. And thumper, that's it. You've had enough warnings and time outs. This isn't the place for this, or for you. Good luck out there. I've also banned Soulman for his pro BNP/Zundel line. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rigorousintuition>Rigorous Intuition</A> at: 11/1/05 4:04 am

This obsession with Nazism is a Red Herring...

Exactly. Nazi-ism is a historical reference to fascism today

re: made the mistake of mentioning Bush plus Hitler

Re: re: made the mistake of mentioning Bush plus Hitler

Ignore personal attacks. That's a tactic to shut you up.

Re: Ignore personal attacks. That's a tactic to shut you up.

.

sorry I've been away from the board

Who is online