Don't Say That's It for me folks

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Don't Say That's It for me folks

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:29 pm

He said, 'and I hope he bans you forever', or something like that, what does it matter what he said exactlyanyway? <br><br>He edited a lot out, but anybody can testify he said I should be banned and he was "reporting me to Jeff". He posted it again twice right at the top of the board.<br><br>I'm confused, who do you think went "nuclear" in that thread?<br><br>I started by saying he was "drawn to Jewish power theory etc.", one line in a longer post having nothing to do with him. So what if it was provocative? You don't step in when anyone else is being provoked, or I am. Plus it was not meant to "provoke" anything with 4b, I could care less about his reactions at that point, if anything it was purposefully lumping him in w/ people and viewpoints that he didn't want to be lumped in with. Then I quote him anonymously, and legitimately but crudely paraphrase his views. So now I owe those that won't give my views nuance the obligation to nuance their words? Now there is no "lumping"? <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>I'm</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> the one who went "nuclear"?<br><br>I stepped back and didn't respond right away, and when I did <br>I simply restated my support for my view on him, and then got off of the thread. For like 36 hours. He then reposted his report to you.<br><br>And this doesn't warrant getting put in the "fire pit" when he was calling me a "fucking scumbag"? Or saying "nobody cares what happens to me" or "he would take care of it himself"? That's not "nuclear"? That's not "fire pit" material? <br><br>Too weird.<br><br><br> <br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Reporting Proldic to Jeff</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> <br>Quote:<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>I have noticed in the past how 4b and others that are drawn to Jewish power theory and Zionist conspiracy are the same ones who are obsessed with the masons and the shriners. <br><br>Because it's right there in front of their eyes, like "those Israeli art student-spies I saw in the mall proves that Israeli spying is the mother of all conspiracy", so they never consider think that it's been put there to distract them, "that's just madness!", or that what they see is not neccessarily a reflection of the real deal.<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br><br><br>If there's anything worse than calling someone a spook, it ought to be calling someone an anti-semite, especially when he had to make shit up in order to do it. Please let him know this was unacceptable. <br><br>Edited by: FourthBase at: 12/6/05 2:58 pm<br> <br>FourthBase<br>Registered Member<br>Posts: 418<br>(12/6/05 1:42 pm)<br>Reply Re: Reporting Proldic to Jeff <br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=proldic@rigorousintuition>proldic</A> at: 12/9/05 11:54 am<br></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Some advice

Postby osculum inafme » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:38 pm

This was written by one of them, for on or behalf of them????<br><br>Behind this are the Dark Forces. They continuously watch over esoteric organizations, and if perchance a group is inspired by Hierarchy and is doing its work for humanity, they set up the following plan:<br><br>1. Who are the leading lights in the group? Find them out and send some “help.” This so-called help is really the beginning of the end for the group if the members are not watchful. If the focal point of the group is a man they send a pretty woman to involve him in sex or some scandal; if a woman, they send a man. They come to the leaders with smiles and promises of dedication to the cause. Yet, at the critical moment, when they are trusted, they lead the disciple into directions that lower the standards of the group. The methods are subtle and difficult to detect. But we have witnessed them firsthand over the years.<br><br>2. Find flickering lights and send them to the group or organization. These lights will fail in the group, and then they will be the ones publicly slandering the group. Flickering lights are those people who flock to groups to get “quick” teaching that will help their ego and vanity. But, when they discover that real growth requires humility, resignation, and labor they quickly become the first people to destroy the integrity of the group. This type must not be confused with disciples sent by Hierarchy to aid and uplift a group through beauty, joy, and the spirit of sacrifice; yet many times the group fails to see the difference and turns away with scorn the incoming light.<br><br>3. If the first two points do not succeed, they then feed the suspicion of certain government agencies or fanatical religious leaders about the group. These agencies then investigate and try to hinder the group.<br><br>4. They find those in the group who are really striving and find the weak links in their nature and feed it. This is probably the single greatest doorway into the group for evil. They feed doubt, fear, and lower reactionary states. Those afflicted do not even realize that this is happening to them because they are not watchful over their emotional and mental life. This lack of awareness is all the dark ones need to succeed.<br>It is often asked how these people live with themselves in with such dark aims? The answer is that the destructive agents are 99% of the time unconscious of what is happening. True dark magicians never expose themselves directly but work through flickering lights to achieve their aims.<br><br>Yet, we have discovered individuals who actually enter groups with a dark agenda. They have money, property, and control over others as their goal. They will stop at nothing to achieve their aims. These are easily spotted by someone who is under the influence of the Higher Self and Heart. But, the one or two in the group who can see are of no consequence to these dark agents. They know that they merely have to control the majority and “appear” to be on the side of Light and Truth; they justify their selfish actions with esoteric principles. These are the tactics of the dictator. Hitler and his Nazis perfected this technique of using Arcane knowledge and the Ancient Wisdom to support their agenda. Very few citizens of Germany saw through it at the time, and those who did were eliminated or exiled. The same occurs in esoteric groups taken over by dark agents. The few who can see what is happening are discredited, slandered, and set-up.<br><br>"These dark agencies never tire and never let up. Rest assured of that. They work 24 hours a day planning, with the most heinous cunning, the downfall of the leadership of the group. It is not the overt and obvious attack that endangers the group or Lodge; it is the unseen attack from within. I once attended a Lodge where a very high ranking Mason of position and power was in attendance. This person was completely enslaved by resentment and other personality vices. During a very powerful moment in the Ritual the dark forces used this person’s anger and internal resentment to others to change the frequency in the Lodge and every student of the light in attendance felt a pain in his heart."<br><br>"The highest degrees of Masonry are wholly dark rituals invoking demonic forces from here on Earth and on Mars. I participated in them. Their agenda and takeover of the UN was ever their agenda, from the second world war on."<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
osculum inafme
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Hmmm...

Postby Jerky » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:39 pm

If I recall correctly, I believe you once called me a "Nazi/fascist symp" for no reason at all, and contrary to all available evidence.<br><br>How does it feel? Sucks, doesn't it? <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Jerky
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Probably it for me folks

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:48 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~vampire/thing/pic-autopsy1.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"Seems to be normal.."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hmmm...

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:48 pm

Um you don't get it at all do you? Read again. I just stated exactly the ooposite: that I don't really give a shit if someone calls me Scum, or Mossad or Zionist reptile evil one, certainly I don't try to get them banned. Threats are a different story. And really I'm just explaining myself due to hius constant challenge to provide examples and back it up.<br><br>I vaguely remember the post you refer to, can't find it, but I'm <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>100%</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> sure my intent was correct if you wish to spend the time to dig it up. Maybe I would use slightly different language nowadays, but my intent stands 100%. <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I see no threat

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:59 pm

FourthBase wrote "I will try to deal with the issue myself" as follow up to his having asked me in a post to intercede. Contextually I see nothing sinister about it.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hmmm...

Postby scollon » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:00 pm

Is that because you are Scum, Mossad, Zionist reptile evil one and proud of it ?<br><br>Only asking. <p></p><i></i>
scollon
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I think we all know where this thread is going,

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:01 pm

so here it goes.... <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I think we all know where this thread is going,

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:13 pm

first of all, I didn't remember that I could add to stuff that had been thrown in the fire pit.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I see no threat<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> FourthBase wrote "I will try to deal with the issue myself" as follow up to his having asked me in a post to intercede. Contextually I see nothing sinister about it.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I know that you see no threat. After he flips out and says "fucking scumbag" and "nobody cares what happens to you", contextually I do. <br><br>Whatever, threat or not, THAT's NOT THE POINT. <br><br>The point is it's not <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>me</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> who went "nuclear". <br><br>And it's incredible that you would use that word to refer to my defense, considering his original reaction being so obviously deranged. <br><br>But my defense is fire-pit material?<br><br>And your big point is "he never contacted me" after he plastered his intent to do just that all over the board?<br><br>What is up with that? <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I think we all know where this thread is going,

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:29 pm

Your first post was moderate in tone but the smear was conspicuously egregious.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"if anything it was purposefully lumping him in w/ people and viewpoints that he didn't want to be lumped in with"</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>I fail to see a constructive purpose in that, or why you would think it no big deal.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em><br>"Now there is no 'lumping'?"</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Not saying that. But there's no justification for getting all shirty when someone who's taking your lumps gets pissed about it.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I think we all know where this thread is going,

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:41 pm

Um, I <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>ignored</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> it. He's the one who challenged me more than once to back it up. I responded after much time had past. What is constructive in that was I believe he is who he is, call a spade a spade. And re-read my post, what's the point of that? Uh, duh, it's as important as anything, certainly as important as Masonic conspiracy, that's for sure.<br><br> Go re-read my defense. It's no "big deal" because people do it to me all the time here and I don't say boo. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Not saying that. But there's no justification for getting all shirty when someone who's taking your lumps gets pissed about it.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>You are just incredible. If you haven't noticed, I have had to have some of the thickest skin of anyone on this board, and have willingly endured being miscast and whipping-boy'd without complaint. I didn't get all crazy back. I didn't ask to ban them.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>You</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> fire-pitted <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>my</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> defense. Why are <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>you</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> being so "shirty"?<br><br>So the "smear" was <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>particularly egregious</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->, huh? How is that? I proved with his own words that he was who I said he was. I never said he was an anti-semite rascist, despite his constant miscasting of my words. <br> <br>You are really scaring me with you responses here Jeff. I find it just un-real. Leave it to old Proldic to bring the real you out, huh? <br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

hmmm...

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:53 pm

love to see that post Jerky.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re:Jeff

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:58 pm

So when people "lumped me in" with people I didn't want to be lumped in with, say, [take your pick] Sharon, Illuminati, Mossad, or reptiles, for months, you said nothing?<br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Re:Jeff

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:05 pm

As I said above, what you call "lumping in" is not disallowed, though if I see it, it will likely get threads consigned to the Fire Pit. As many were in which you were on the receiving end. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Re:Jeff

Postby proldic » Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:12 pm

Having open Nazis calling for the BNP or eugenics or racial seperation was not "<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>me</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> on the receiving end", and your choice to ban them was your own.<br><br>I did not ask for it, and do not want it in most circumstances.<br><br>I just explained that what I was calling "lumping" in this case was him not wanting to stand behind his words. READ THEM. I posted them. <br><br>I think that this assumption on my part is 100% correct and my opiniuon is valid and you focusing on that as the cause of banning to the pit by saying <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>I</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> went "nuclear" is just incredible. Again, incredible.<br><br>How can you deny that my basic point was correct without wearing extremely rose-colored glasses? <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to FIRE PIT

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests