the sum total of my knowledge

by **Trifecta** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:07 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>I am hardly the first to speak of a conspiracy; I have read and enjoyed fictitious works which embodied various aspects of the stratification of power with-in their storylines, and know that theories regarding this or that "secret society" holding sway over the courser of events are a popular form of speculation. I realize that mine is but one more voice added to the cacaphony, perhaps to be lost in the tumult; indeed, the very documents that I have seen include ideas, plans, for the sort of "disinformation" lamented by many, produced for the purpose of misleading those rare few who spend not all of their fime pacified by popular amusements. How are you to know that I speak the truth? You cannot. You can verify for yourself the historical facts which I have presented, which form the gist of my own notes, copied laboriously from the original papers at the Vatican archives and supplemented by information gleaned from other clerics and servants of God, but this, I understand, cannot be taken as a guarantee of veracity. I have divulged what I know; I must ask to remain forever anonymous. I am not a young man, strong-willed and inspired; nor yet an old man, who may plead his years: I am but a weak man, seemingly alone, and very much afraid, mea ~ima culpa. Though I cannot offer verification beyond what the diligent scholar might find in a careful examination of historical texts, and must admit that this my recounting of the facts as known to me is, of necessity, but a skeleton of the whole story, concentrating on only the most important (to my mind) aspects of the history of the struggle, I offer it in the hope that at least some might be moved to action. If my sharing of what I know saves, or even merely betters, one life, then I have in some small way striven to fulfill my vow of service to my fellow-children of God. Majorem caritatem nemo habet Ut animam suam ponat quis pro amicis suis; would that I had such strength. Such is the gist of my knowledge of the situation; I hope that this casts some light on your interest in the takeover of the Vatican. I have endeavored to keep this recounting to manageable length; I could have told somewhat more, but it would only add detail to the overall picture presented here, and I believe that the total situation is best and most accurately depicted in broad, bold strokes. I offer you only those proofs of my sincerity as cannot be traced to me, for obvious reasons; nunc dimittis servum mum. <hr></blockquote> David Icke has done a great deal for furthering the advancement of hidden knowledge. David Icke has done a great deal of damage to the movement for change ... That said this a disturbing article (not written by Icke) but well worth reading. It covers the history of secret society's the groups and factions that control our world, the points of commonality that seperate the elites from the commoners, nee "useless eaters" This is not pleasant reading. <a href="http://www.davidicke.net/religiousfrauds/catholic/secretsupressed1.html">www.davidicke.net/religio...ssed1.html</a> <a href="http://www.davidicke.net/religiousfrauds/catholic/secretsupressed2.html">www.davidicke.net/religio...ssed2.html</a> <a href="http://www.davidicke.net/religiousfrauds/catholic/secretsupressed3.html">www.davidicke.net/religio...ssed3.html</a> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Most 'Jewish' parents during the Templar periods (the times during which a properly-con secrated temple stood at Jerusalem) were required to redeem their children with an offering (see chapter 12 of Leviticus); at these time, the children of the destitute (who could not offer the prescribed ransom) were used - in modem times, any so-called 'Jewish' child may be kidnapped & used for the sacrifice, or for the ordination, though for the sin offering a Gentile child may be used. The child, preferably an infant or toddler (but any child up to the age of thineen being acceptable, if virginal), is stood upon the grating over the head of the Kohen-elect, nude, facing northward; the child's head is grasped firmly by the officiating priest (or by him and his assistant, should the child be older & put up a fight), and the child's throat is then slit to open the jugular vein. Some of the blood is made to splatter against the eastern face of the altar itself, while the rest spatters through the grating to bathe the Kohen-elect, who drinks a mouthful of the blood as it pours over him. The officiating Kohen then wets his fingers with the screaming innocent's blood and, walking counter-clockwise around the altar, traces certain arcane sigils upon the altar's horns with the blood; then, arriving back at the child's position, he takes a mouthful of the spurting blood. The Kohen-elect is helped out from under the grating & joins the assisting Kohens at the child's side, and all are liberally mouth-sprayed with the child's blood by the officiating Kohen, thus sealing the new Kohen as a member of the priesthood. The child, weak from loss of blood but still very much alive, is butchered; the internal fatty tissue, the liver, and the kidneys are set aside to be burnt, and the Kohens feast on what they want of the rest, burning tlie unused Portions before sunset, according to Levitical law. This is also the basic procedure for the regular ritual sacrifice, with the exceptions being that in regular sacrifice, the blood spills uninterrupted through the grating, to renew the consecration of the sill on which the temple or killing-floor rests, and that the mouth-spraying of the child's blood is omitted. Similarities between the Jewish and Teutonic rituals are close; the parallels suggest, perhaps, a common origin for certain practices, perhaps deriving from central Asia via the Khazars. in the Teutonic rite, the altar is generally an unhewn dolmen, and the pit and its attendant grating are absent. The priest to be consecrated in this rite merely lies, nude, on the ground at the eastern face of the stone altar (the eastern face of the altar being sacred to both the Zionists and the Teutons), and the victim -a child of either gender between the ages of seven and twelve, virginal -is brought to him. The child is forced down upon the priest~lect in a kneeling position, straddling the elect's hips, at which time sexual penetration (notably absent in the Zionist rite) is achieved, anally for a young boy, vaginally for a young girl. The child's head is faced east, as in the Zionist rite, and the jugular is opened, showering the priest-elect with blood, some of which is ingested. The child is then penetrated sexually by the attending priests until such time as death occurs. In both rites, the bathing in and ingestion of the blood of the child is required for proper consecration, and in the Teutonic rite (as in the Zionist), the body of the child is eaten. In the everyday ritual of sacrifice in the Teutonic rite, no priest-elect lies before the dolmen; instead, the child is penetrated by each of the priests in turn, according to rank or seniority (depending on which of two rites is being followed; I am unclear as to the exact distinction between the two, other than this particular difference of practice). The Order of Knights Templars - who operated extensively in the north - had been influenced heavily by the Teutonic/Zionist cult. The northern houses of the Templars had indeed adopted several practices from the northern clique, including the Zionist practice of consulting preserved oracular heads for augury. The southern houses of the Templars in combination with the Hospitallers, approached French king Philippe Iv with a list of charges, substantiated by eyewitness testimony of a number of the southern Templars, and acting on this information Philippe issued an order of arrest in September of 1307. The order was finally suppressed through all Europe (except Scotland), and the Grand Master, Jacques DeMolay, was burned at the stake in 1314. Those Templars remaining in the south were absorbed into the order of Hospitallers, while those in hiding in Scotland became the nucleus of the Priory of Zion, turning their considerable talents and remaining wealth over to the service of the Teutonic/Zionist clique. The southern clique, now dominated by an uneasy alliance of the French and Roman aristocracies, began exhibiting signs of paranoia very early in this stage of the crisis <hr></blockquote> Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=osculuminfame@rigorousintuition>Osculum Infame</A> at: 1/14/06 7:09 am

by **Seventhson** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:18 pm

appears here unchallenged and seriously out of context. I should mention that the post itself would not have been so offensive if it had at least included on its face the following caveat by Icke (about whom I know next to nothing except that I do not trust his writing based on what I have read here at RI mostly and believe it is itself predominantly disinformation) The first link provided (and I am reluctant even to go to Icke's site but thought I should at least check the context before lodging my complaint with Jeff) says this (quoting Keith): "From SECRETS OF THE VATICAN By Jim Keith Pages 215 - 238 SECRET & SUPPRESSED The following document was anonymously sent to me during this book's preparation. It purports to be a secret history of Western civilization gleaned from secret documents in the Vatican library by a member of the Franciscan order. The inked imprint of a Vatican library entrance chit affixed to the original document and duplicated at the end of the article is a strong indication that the author does have access to Vatican sources, although his conclusions are indicative of a highly right-wing slant that pegs the piece as possible disinformation - from what quarter, I cannot speculate. This document is included herein because of its unusual origin, and as an example of one very suspect sidepath in the tangle of competing conspiracy worldviews." The fact is that folks browing this board will see this blood libel and assume that we are all a bunch of Jew-hating antiSemites who love to pass on the blood libel (the story of Jews sacrifing gentile children in blood rituals) as "possible" and plausible CT (conspiracy theory). I could not let it pass without a declaration of my pissed offness at this reiteration of unfounded lies as a topic of serious discussion (especially without Icke's, though methinks he dost protest too much, caveat) Am I missing something? Do we HAVE to accept such posts which fail to specify that this is an unfounded and even caveated assertion without loud protest and condemnation?

by **robertdreed** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:15 pm

That Icke article is taken from an old collection of conspiro-lit called Secret And Suppressed, which is at least 10 years old. The original title was "Secrets Of The Vatican Library." "Proof" that the article was sourced from the Vatican archives was presented in the form of- hold on to your seats- a photocopy of a small metal-appearing chit alleged to be an ID for access to the Vatican library. Stop the presses...or maybe I should say, start the Xerox machines...

by **albion** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:56 pm

Gee, I love this site, but it's rather disheartening how often the most perniocious nazi lies still manage to shine thru. Not exactly a good sign, alas...

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:35 pm

for reasons mentioned in replies above. Blood libel isn't welcome on this board. <img src="http://www.bibliolab.it/materiali_dida/persecuzione/027q.jpg" style="border:0;"/>

the sum total of my knowledge

the sum total of my knowledge

You Know, it really pisses me off this "blood libel&quo

news to you...

Re: news to you...

locking and moving to the fire pit

Who is online