Please read: guidelines for posting on the RI board
Post by Jeff
... suggesting a poster is purposefully spreading disinformation is not permitted... refrain from personal attacks, and keep arguments issue-based...
Wombaticus Rex » Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:11 pm wrote:I wish Hugh was here, too. Because if he was, that would mean he found the restraint within himself to discuss his own theories without coming across exactly like Gene Ray: this explains everything, and you understand nothing until you accept that.
I'm extremely interested in the subjects Hugh wanted to discuss, even more so than the WOO subjects he so despised. I was frustrated, though, by the fact Hugh was never very interested in actual discussion. While he was quite capable of posting 300 LexisNexus results to dispel questions through sheer weight of citation, when it came time to drill down to specifics, Hugh was suddenly exhausted with the whole conversation.
This is pretty common with longtime observers of psyops, though: once we settle on an explanatory model, we don't have to question so much, so often.
I wish Hugh was here because I have serious questions about how deeply he engaged with the material he claimed expertise in, and as things stand now, I'll never know.
Which is appropriate, for our line of work. Cheers to HMW. Write a fucking book already.
Wombaticus Rex » Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:03 am wrote:Is Hugh still using "Sig Mickelson" as an alias anywhere?
barracuda » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:34 pm wrote: It's just very hard to imagine a man like Hugh desisting in his prosthelytizing.
Pan unleashes a pre-emptive octopus's cloud of black ink to muddy the waters.
While I show time, place, and incident correlation with media counterpropaganda , Pan makes real movie psy-ops appear to be just free association.
Nordic » Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:44 am wrote:Does anyone remember an incident, some years back, where someone here wrote up a brilliant parody of a HMW post?
I can't remember who wrote it, or even what the thread was about, but it was beautiful and devastating.
I would love to read it again if anyone knows where it is or how to find it.
alan ford » Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:36 am wrote:I would vote Yes if I could...for some reason I can't vote...I was perceiving his writings almost as the literature...making new connections between the brain cells...as with literature it could have been fictional or not...
brainpanhandler » Tue Sep 17, 2013 12:50 pm wrote:alan ford » Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:36 am wrote:I would vote Yes if I could...for some reason I can't vote...I was perceiving his writings almost as the literature...making new connections between the brain cells...as with literature it could have been fictional or not...
I can't vote either. And neither can OP ED.
I pm'd justdrew about it awhile ago and he hasn't found the problem or hasn't gotten around to getting back to me. I am reluctant to hassle him as I believe his labors here are generally of the love variety.
I think Hugh should be allowed access to the Psyops and Meme Management thread only. It would be a weird accommodation and I am not sure if it is technically doable, but I imagine it would be.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest