American Dream wrote:As I recall, "snitch-jacketing" was an important element of the psyops of the FBI's COINTELPRO agenda. Through cleverly crafted disinformation they were able to sow seeds of doubt and suspicion to the point where people would be fighting each other who did not need to be doing so at all.
So it seems important to stick to very clear procedures about publicly questioning if others are operating in good faith or not. Please note that I am not saying we should opt for trusting anyone who comes along- just that there should be reasonable protocols that inform our efforts to separate the wheat from the chaff...
The blog in question flaunted, at least twice, that it had real-world information about RI posters. And in one instance, its apparent author viciously attacked someone here in a way that may or may not have played on that person's past. There's a fine line between ambiguity and paranoia but suffice it to say, repeating Willow, they seemed to know some very interesting details.
Basically I think it is important to acknowledge that some very dangerous people may be playing games with this board and the people here and there may be some crossover between ARGers and persons much more nefarious. Again, who really knows?
IMHO, if it is an unjust consequence that those who registered concurrently with that blog's beginning are subject to some degree of mistrust, I am sure that a clear explanation of the history of RI/ARG relations (as was graciously offered by AD and PW, as I recall, at the time I voiced my suspicions) would allow them to be sympathetic and to understand it is not personal.
In the future I suppose I will simply note that mistrust and keep it to myself. But I maintain the earlier sentiment about listening to one's intuition wrt events here that seem suspect. And for the record, as I pointed out then, I've been on the other end of that process here at least 3 times myself and I bear no ill will towards any of those parties.
OTOH, the term "calling out" (in my earlier comment) was probably 1) too strong and 2) poorly chosen given that I did not in fact call anyone out. So consider that word reneged.
Perhaps I am off-base but it seems ideal to me that this board's honorable policy of not making interpersonal accusations of devious motivation also not function as an invitation for ARGers et al to generally fuck with all of us here.
There's got to be a workable balance in there somewhere though I will be the first to admit that I have a not-always-productive tendency to get suspicious and/or confrontational when I begin to suspect people are fucking with me or my friends. To that end, I am working on holding my own tongue a bit longer.
PS -- I changed the thread's title to protect outsiders or newbies who are looking for info about Larouche / Franklin from getting mixed up in all this stuff....