Et in arcadia Ego Eve

by **Jeff** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:54 pm

"Et in arcadia Ego Eve" (not to be confused with Et in arcadia Ego) has registered and posted her first thread:

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=16305

She's been a central character in Dream's End's Theresa Duncan "role playing" theory. Initially because of her enigmatic comments on the blog, and then because she simply mindfucked him.

I don't know what exactly to make of her, but I think trying very hard to was one of DE's mistakes.

by **sunny** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:40 pm

Jeff wrote:She's been a central character in Dream's End's Theresa Duncan "role playing" theory. Initially because of her enigmatic comments on the blog, and then because she simply mindfucked him.

I don't know what exactly to make of her, but I think trying very hard to was one of DE's mistakes.

Exactly. She's a mindfucker, pure and simple.

Lot's of Scientology criticisms here lately. Are we 'fair game'?

Just let her do her thang unless she starts dividing the board into factions. And I can almost guarantee she will.

by **chiggerbit** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:01 am

So, why did she start right out with chem trails, considering that was one of Arcadia's missions, to reveal some skulduggery? Say, now that I think about it, should we move the thread over to the chem trail forum?

by **Jeff** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:21 am

chiggerbit wrote:So, why did she start right out with chem trails, considering that was one of Arcadia's missions, to reveal some skulduggery?

I want to resist trying to find a reason in what she does. But if she does much more of it she'll be banned.

Say, now that I think about it, should we move the thread over to the chem trail forum?

I think that's the way to go if the thread gets bumped and back on topic. Otherwise I'll be happy to just let it sink.

by **Jeff** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:38 pm

Jeff wrote:I think that's the way to go if the thread gets bumped and back on topic. Otherwise I'll be happy to just let it sink.

That just happened, so I've moved it.

by **sunny** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:05 pm

Eve must have skipped the chapter on subtlety in the Mindfuckers handbook.

I'm sooo tempted to say that to her face, but I'll be good I promise. No use stirring unnecessary shit.

by **chiggerbit** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:36 pm

ps, she's at it again. :lol:

by **Jeff** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:40 pm

Hmmm...

In the Johnny Gosch picture thread, she posts "The new pic is the one posted on valentines day. Some poor bloke already caused a stir on DU over it." The DU link leads to a post by "Ashford Dunwoody," who has only 27 posts there. An "Ashford Dunwoody" joined RI Feb 24, but hasn't posted yet. (Eve joined Feb 19.)

My curiosity about what she's doing here is close to maxing out.

by **chiggerbit** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:55 pm

I'm sitting back, waiting for sunny to rip the pompous, self-important *&^%*'s head off.

by **chiggerbit** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:11 pm

Ok, I'm not laughing anymore. She's on Alice's sad thread, playing her games.

by **Jeff** » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:25 pm

Thanks for calling her out on that.

I'm not a precog, but I think she has only hours or days left here.

by **sunny** » Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:18 pm

Oh good grief! I'm not sure if the image Eve has posted in this thread:

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewt ... 226#169226

is satire or not. If it is from N.A.M.B.L.A, should we be allowing this?

by **Jeff** » Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:37 pm

sunny wrote:Oh good grief! I'm not sure if the image Eve has posted in this thread:

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewt ... 226#169226

is satire or not. If it is from N.A.M.B.L.A, should we be allowing this?

I saw this earlier and immediately drafted a post asking her to remove it. Then I canceled it, because I thought it would add needless drama that she would probably delight in. But I'm still conflicted.

It's not from NAMBLA. I googled for the image and found it elsewhere, clearly as parody. However I'm still troubled because it uses a child's face in a context that would almost certainly horrify his parents.

And having just written that, I'm not conflicted anymore. I'm going to call her on the picture and ask her to remove it for that reason.

by **chiggerbit** » Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:38 pm

Have you noticed how adept she is at instigating, taking threads off-topic, twisting the discussion around until it's about her?

by **Jeff** » Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:19 am

Her latest provocation (posting a legit NAMBLA image when I asked her to remove the parody) was her last. I've banned her.

As noted above, please be watchful for "Ashford Dunwoody," who may be a sockpuppet.

Et in arcadia Ego Eve

Et in arcadia Ego Eve

Re: Et in arcadia Ego Eve

Who is online