Page 1 of 2
guruilla
Posted:
Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:25 pmby Peregrine
That fella is givin' off the oddball shit-stirrer vibe, to me, anyhow...
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:20 pmby Jeff
Yeah. I checked the IP, and it's identical to one that Plutonia has used.
I'm conflicted about what to do next, since part of me is curious about where all this shit is leading, so I'll throw it out to you two:
Ban 'em both?
Ban guruilla, and say nothing?
Ban guruilla, and warn Plutonia about socks?
Hold fire for time being?
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:18 amby barracuda
Plutonia seems so far like an interesting poster, and she's been registered here for two years, it appears. I'm not eager to lose her.
Guruilla hasn't crossed any real boundaries yet. An identical IP address means the posts are coming from the same machine, yes? I would recommend a pm to Plutonia with a request for information and a warning about socks, and see what happens. We can always ban if the answers don't work out right.
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:32 amby barracuda
I'm thinking she and Teh Hacktivist share a few too many hobbies as well, though. It's giving me pause to remain vigilant on the matter.
Posted:
Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:32 pmby Peregrine
Hmmm. maybe a polite but non-acusatory note about socks to Plutonia might be a good idea. And what got me was the little primate calling RI'ers losers. Little turd.
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:44 amby Peregrine
Any word fellas? I don't know much about IP addys, but I do see both Plutonia & guruilla on at the same time...
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:08 amby Jeff
I like the non-acustatory note idea. I'll send one to Plutonia this morning.
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:57 amby barracuda
Ban 'em all, and let God sort 'em out.
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:57 pmby Jeff
Plutonia wrote:No worries about G, that's Jason. He's on a cult-busting tear or something.
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:43 pmby barracuda
Okay, what does that mean? Are they roommates?
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:44 pmby Peregrine
Jeff wrote:Plutonia wrote:No worries about G, that's Jason. He's on a cult-busting tear or something.
Eh? So, are they roomies, partners, family, or....?
beat me to it, barracuda...
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:56 pmby Jeff
I replied with a cheery
Okay, thanks for clearing that up!So the story is established that the two are not one, but are close. Noted and filed.
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:58 pmby Jeff
And now:
guruilla wrote:dear Jeff,
FYI, I woz engaged in a frisky seduction with my wife, which you managed to F*** up completely. Never mind your motives, I'm sure they were good (Hitler's were). Keep this all in mind next time you want to whip out your s-word of rigor and in-chew-ition as King Mod.
how's your marriage goin' Jeffry?
(PS. I take full re-spawns-ability for not giving you heads up: live n' learn, skewer and burn)
I dunno. But kinda creepy.
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:11 pmby Peregrine
What a fuckin' wierdo. People these days. What's with the farked up lol-speak? That's "seductive"? I swoon....
Re: guruilla
Posted:
Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:17 pmby Peregrine
I don't like this statement from the "Wikileaks is a fraud" thread on page 15:
guruilla wrote:ARG:you all you want, round and round we go. the wolf doesnt know itz not tyed to the poll, and that the ties that bind are in itz mind
ARG....?