Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Jeff » Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:44 am wrote:I thought I'd been unequivocal about that. There was no stealth modding.
Bruce Dazzling » Thu May 09, 2013 11:27 am wrote:Last week (May 1st) C_W sent me a PM wondering why she was unable to add barracuda to her "foes" list. I suspected that it may have had something to do with his former status as a mod, so I got Drew involved (and cc'd Jeff).
Drew said the following:justdrew wrote:no one ever removed his global moderate privs
you want me to?
I replied to Drew and Jeff as follows:Bruce Dazzling wrote:Jeff,
C_W wanted to add Barracuda to her list of foes, but was unable to do so because, as Drew confirmed below, he still has his mod privs.justdrew wrote:no one ever removed his global moderate privs
you want me to?
So my question to you is ... do you still want 'cuda to have those privs?
Thanks,
B.D.
Jeff never responded to this message, or any others regarding this topic. Drew, on the other hand, responded as such:justdrew wrote:ok... I've modified the phpBB code to allow people to put mods(and admins) on their foe lists.
I've not revoked any rights from 'cudda
but I informed CW that the problem is fixed and that she can now add him to her foe list, and explained the problem in a way that doesn't reveal that he still has "stealth" mod rights. CCed Bruce on that message. Not sure if we want to maintain a practice of having stealth mods, but it's your call.
Again, this took place a week ago, and since then, multiple board members have posted publicly about 'cuda's "stealth mod" status,
justdrew wrote:ok... I've modified the phpBB code to allow people to put mods(and admins) on their foe lists.
I've not revoked any rights from 'cudda
but I informed CW that the problem is fixed and that she can now add him to her foe list, and explained the problem in a way that doesn't reveal that he still has "stealth" mod rights. CCed Bruce on that message. Not sure if we want to maintain a practice of having stealth mods, but it's your call.
Bruce Dazzling » 14 Jun 2013 03:33 pm wrote:I guess it was all just a misunderstanding, though, the flames of which were fanned by your prolonged absence/unresponsiveness.
I hope you understand why I was concerned.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest