What Is It? by Crispin Hellion Glover

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

What Is It? by Crispin Hellion Glover

Postby annie aronburg » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:08 am

What Is It?
(An essay concerning the subtext of the film by the same title)
by Crispin Hellion Glover
http://crispingloverinfo.com/essay.html

Is this culture content? Is it happy? Are the smiles broadcast by this culture's media the smiles that reflect the collective mind? Does the self-professed compassion of the media for the unfortunate seem sincere?

Is this culture a Judeo-Christian culture? Is forgiveness a quality of Christian ethos? Didn't Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold of Columbine high school pose with a caption that stated, "Stay alive, stay different, stay crazy"? Didn't they target Christians? Weren't they accused of being "Nazis"? Wasn't one of them Jewish? Wasn't one of them an honor student? If these fellows were staying "crazy" and staying "different," and thinking on their own, were they perhaps manifesting a counter-cultural ideal?

What else in this culture were the Columbine killers attacking? Aren't "jocks," whom they killed, generally considered common "good guys" buy our culture? Don't jocks represent pro-cultural values? Do those who hold values that counter the culture see jocks as boorish, vapid, brute, conceited and condescending, who willfully insult and violate those who refuse to gang with the masses?

Were Harris and Klebold reacting to the media itself? Did they give their own lives and take others to make a point about the media at large? Can it be true that the media-at-large is so neurotic that it is unable to truthfully describe the Columbine event? Is it true that a videotape they produced just before the killings is now being withheld so the public can not determine their own thoughts about Harris's and Klebold's statements?

In Civilization and Its Discontents, did Sigmund Freud define a neurotic as an individual holding thoughts that clash with those held by the prevailing culture, an individual who subverts those clashing thoughts to the subconscious that later manifest in the form of anxiety and unnecessary behavior? If this is so, what does one consider a culture whose prevailing ideas express hypocrisy, sham and double-standard? Does this somehow define a neurotic culture? Does Steven Spielberg hold the same values I wish upon myself? Does the mind of this grinning, bespectacled, baseball-capped man entirely reflect this culture?

Is it true that in his waning years, Orson Welles asked Steven Spielberg for a small amount of money with which he could make a final film? Is it true Steven Spielberg refused? Is it true that Steven Spielberg bought a sled used in Citizen Kane for an extremely large sum of money?

Do Steven Spielberg's passions burn? Do passions burn in the man now imprisoned who wished to anally rape Steven Spielberg? Do our cultural mouthpieces confidently inform us that the wish to anally rape Steven Spielberg is a bad thought? Could anal rape of Steven Spielberg be simply the manifestation of a cultural mandate? Do you believe Steven Spielberg is an ideal guide and influence for our culture? Do Steven Spielberg's films question our culture? What do Steven Spielberg's films question? Does Steven Spielberg focus much of his fantasy life on young people? Did he portray children wallowing in sewers filled with fecal matter in Schindler's List? Did he use children to finger paint an adult in Hook? Does he collect the illustrations of Norman Rockwell, such as the one showing a young boy in his underwear examined by a doctor? Are the inclinations of Steven Spielberg above suspicion by the media-fed culture? Was Steven Spielberg very friendly with Michael Jackson? Wasn't Michael Jackson supposed to play Peter Pan in Steven Spielberg's version of the story? Now that Michael Jackson is no longer held in favor by the mass media, does Spielberg associate with him? Do Michael Jackson and Steven Spielberg share similar opinions about the sexuality of young boys?

Did Joseph Goebbels popularize certain ideals to the mass culture? Does Steven Spielberg attempt to do the same thing? Is celebrity more special than actual truth in art?

When you join in a conversation with strangers, do you openly discuss any idea whatsoever without fear of conflict? Or do you restrain yourself from discussing certain things for fear of offending people and then becoming an outcast? Are there laws that deem certain forms of thought as bad and wrong? Is what is now termed "hate" a form of thought?

Does our culture consider it acceptable to have a minstrel represent a black person on film? Does our culture consider it acceptable to have a person of average intelligence represent a retarded person on film? Why is one thing questionable, and one thing acceptable? Did Adolf Hitler entertain any good thoughts? Was Shirley Temple sexy as a young girl?

What if you wish to express these ideas? Can people sue you for expressing ideas, particularly if they're blamed for inspiring behavior considered antithetical to cultural norms?

Would the cultural mainstream ever silence or suppress Steven Spielberg? Has the United States government given the immensely wealthy Steven Spielberg millions of dollars to fund a media project that reflects his religious heritage, and his cultural beliefs? Does The Talmud speak of the superiority of the Jews and the inferiority of other cultures and beliefs? Does Steven Spielberg reflect this religious imperative? Is Steve Spielberg neurotic? Is this belief hidden and suppressed?

If one discovers that everything one has been taught to be good is actually false, what then? At what point is one neurotic?

Did Vincent Van Gogh, Diane Arbus and Rainer Werner Fassbinder die for the sins of their culture? Did Joseph Goebbels? Are we fed massive cultural propaganda? Are we infused with the belief that we act as we wish and do what we want? Are we not simply believing what cultural propaganda suggests us to think?

Do you like MTV? Do you like Steven Spielberg? Do you like post-punk rock? Do you like trip hop? Do you like rap? Do you define yourself according to the music you listen to? Do you consider yourself a true lover of music because you are in a rock band, or because your boyfriend is in a rock band? Do you like tattoos? Do you like body piercing? Do you believe that love, kindness, compassion, recycling and equality will save this culture from all its woes? Do you? Do you? Is it considered "career suicide" to question Steven Spielberg if one is involved in the entertainment business? If one is not involved in the entertainment business is it considered a social suicide to question Steven Spielberg? If these things are so, what does that point to? Does this mean freedom of expression is actually curtailed in our culture by certain social pressures? Is calling someone a "fascist" in American culture today the counterpart to saying someone was a "communist" during the Joseph McCarthy era of the 1950s?

Does our culture congratulate itself for taking interest in the lack of original ideas personified by the name of Steven Spielberg? Do his films take chances or take risks in order to amplify, change or challenge the cultural though process? Dose Steven Spielberg take risks, or does he simulate the idea of taking risks? What risk was involved in making Saving Private Ryan or Schindler's List, or adopting a black child? Was there any risk at all? Would Steven Spielberg have adopted that same child in the deep South of the 1950s where there would have been risk of being called a "nigger lover"? Were the adoption of a black child and the subject matter of his movies actually business decisions for which he knew he would be congratulated?

When Steven Spielberg clutched his Academy Award for Schindler's List, saying it's for the "six million," was he speaking of a quantity of people killed, or the quantity of dollars poured into his bank account? Did Steven Spielberg truly help the culture understand Stanley Kubrick's ideas at an Academy Awards eulogy? Or did he accuse Kurbrick's films of being "hopeful" to make them seem as if they sell the same ideas as Steven Spielberg's movies? Was A Clockwork Orange about hope? Was Barry Lyndon about hope? Was Dr. Strangelove about hope? Was Lolita about hope? Was Full Metal Jacket about hope? Was The Killing about hope?

Was Steven Spielberg's company sued by an African-American woman who claimed that Amistad was based on her writing? Was this African-American woman suddenly happy with Steven Spielberg after he deposited a lot of money into her bank account?

Does the amount of money taken in by people determine happiness in this culture? Is the earth an unlimited resource, or is there a definitive quantity for people to exploit for gross amounts of money? When a capitalist invokes the word "hope," does he speak about the continued escalation of his earning power, without being stopped? Could this hope be an illusion?

Are the ice sheets of the Arctic and Antarctic melting and shearing off? Could negative population growth possibly help solve this problem? Isn't one child per two people negative population growth? Would Steven Spielberg ever support the idea of negative population growth within the medium? Have the goals of Freemasonry, as encapsulated by the back half of the dollar bill, succeeded? Has a megastate of greed been created?

Did DreamWorks, the megacorporate entity co-owned by Steven Spielberg, consider paving over the last remaining wetland in Southern California to create a studio? Does Steven Spielberg feel comfortable emasculating the natural? Is climbing the Alps, or is riding the Matterhorn rollercoaster in Disneyland, more attractive to Steven Spielberg? Is the theme park mentality of our culture, which is made to feel "right" and "moral" by the propagandizing movies of Steven Spielberg, helping to destroy individual thought processes and emasculate what remains of the earth?

Is it possible that the Columbine shootings would have not occurred if Steven Spielberg had never wafted his putrid stench upon our culture, a culture he helped homogenize and propagandize?

Would the culture benefit from Steven Spielberg's murder, or would it be lessened by making him a martyr? Or would people then begin to realize their lives had become less banal and more interesting due to his departure? Because I think it is possible a beautiful piece of non-lingual music could well be written by an angry victim once Steven Spielberg becomes a corpse. It could be that this angry victim of banal and ruinous propaganda will have written an anthem signaling a new era, a new thought process, a new music, and a new culture that is desperately needed in the coming days, and forevermore.

The one question lingering before this new utopian culture may very well be:

What is it?
"O Oysters," said the Carpenter,
"You've had a pleasant run!
Shall we be trotting home again?'
But answer came there none--
And this was scarcely odd, because
They'd eaten every one.
User avatar
annie aronburg
 
Posts: 1406
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:57 pm
Location: Smokanagan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Jeff » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:48 am

Thanks, I hadn't read that before.

Here's a pretty good companion interview about corporate culture, his influences and What is It?
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Jeff » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:37 pm

Bumping and moving to the Culture Studies forum.

And let's not forget:

It Is Fine! Everything Is Fine

“Although Paul's speech is unintelligible to us, each of the women he meets understands exactly what he says; they often find him wildly attractive. This is Paul's fantasy, of course, and what he is saying within it is painful, honest, awful and makes "It Is Fine!" as much a psychological horror film as it is an exercise in midnight movie madness.

The statement Stewart makes in his script -- that handicapped people can not only be as sensitive as everyone else, but just as horrible -- is made eloquent, if bizarre, via Glover and Brothers' otherworldy vision, rendered via elegant cinematography and a pronounced sense of the strange.”
JOHN ANDERSON
Variety Magazine

http://www.crispinglover.com/it_is_fine!.htm

trailer
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby FourthBase » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:45 pm

Stewart in real life, circa 1977:

http://www.kutv.com/mediacenter/local.a ... avCatId=26

"Because when you're right, you can win."
“Joy is a current of energy in your body, like chlorophyll or sunlight,
that fills you up and makes you naturally want to do your best.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Gender role models for militarism, not pedophilia.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:08 pm

Spielberg is a USG propagandist and his hero is Disney and he collects Norman Rockwell paintings because these are his professional peers. (Rockwell worked with the USG for WWII and the early Cold War but bowed out against Vietnam.)

Spielberg's themes are often related to MILITARY RECRUITING, not sex per se.
Gender role-modeling along the lines of the primary message that 'boys become men by fighting evil' is the sex angle here, not pedophilia. Same message from Spielberg's buddy, George Lucas, in 'Star Wars.'

This is the reason for the psy-ops movie focus on boys 'rising to challenges,' usually with weapons as in 'Hook' or 'Pirates of the...' Or with mystical powers as in 'Harry Potter.'

Until very recently, African Americans were the anchor of the economic draft.
This is why in 'Hook' Peter Pan (Robin 'Good Morning Vietnam' Williams) makes the eager-to-fight black boy the new Kommander when Pan goes back to being a boring old family guy.

I'm sure that interest in using Michael Jackson for propaganda purposes was behind Spielberg's interest in him until Jackson's private life became instead useful for GOP agit-prop demonizing celebrities-blacks-liberals all at once. Too useful to pass up by spooks.

Bill Cosby came to TV as a CIA man with a gun. Then visited the widow King in 1968.
How ironic.

Black sports celebrities are put into military recruiting movies.

Eddie Murphy was used as a young black alpha-male militarist for a while.
Then Will Smith.

Samuel Jackson and Denzel Washington are the mature black military recruiting models.

Does Steven Spielberg focus much of his fantasy life on young people? Did he portray children wallowing in sewers filled with fecal matter in Schindler's List? Did he use children to finger paint an adult in Hook? Does he collect the illustrations of Norman Rockwell, such as the one showing a young boy in his underwear examined by a doctor? Are the inclinations of Steven Spielberg above suspicion by the media-fed culture? Was Steven Spielberg very friendly with Michael Jackson? Wasn't Michael Jackson supposed to play Peter Pan in Steven Spielberg's version of the story? Now that Michael Jackson is no longer held in favor by the mass media, does Spielberg associate with him? Do Michael Jackson and Steven Spielberg share similar opinions about the sexuality of young boys?

Did Joseph Goebbels popularize certain ideals to the mass culture? Does Steven Spielberg attempt to do the same thing?
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Gender role models for militarism, not pedophilia.

Postby IanEye » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:52 pm

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:
This is the reason for the psy-ops movie focus on boys 'rising to challenges,'


Hugh, i have some funny words for you:

Bildungsroman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildungsroman

Künstlerroman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCnstlerroman

Bildungsroman usually contain the following course:

The protagonist grows from boy to man or girl to woman.

The protagonist must have some reason to go on this journey. A loss or discontent must jar him or her at an early stage away from the home or family setting.

The process of maturing is long, arduous, and gradual, consisting of repeated clashes between the needs or desires of the hero and the views and judgments enforced by an unbending social order. This bears some similarity to Sigmund Freud's concept of the pleasure principle versus the reality principle.

Eventually, the spirit and values of the social order become manifest in the protagonist, who is then accommodated into society. The novel ends with an assessment by the protagonist of himself/herself and his/her new place in that society.

The character is generally making a smooth movement away from conformity. Major conflict is self vs. society or individuality vs. conformity.
There are themes of exile or escape.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildungsroman_examples_%28pre-1930%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildungsroman_examples_%28post-1930%29
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4863
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Postby monster » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:53 pm

Is it the same Crispin Glover that freaked out on David Letterman?
"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."
User avatar
monster
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Everywhere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coming of Rage Stories

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:15 pm

IanEye wrote:
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:
This is the reason for the psy-ops movie focus on boys 'rising to challenges,'


Hugh, i have some funny words for you:

Bildungsroman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildungsroman
.....


Yah, gut stuff. The age old socialization stories are formulaic, growth through Darwinian adversity. As mein fuhrer said "I'll give you something to survive about!"

This is no doubt what George Lucas studied to design 'Star Wars' to reverse Vietnam Syndrome right after military conscription was ended and the US went to an all-volunteer army.

And with the marriage of fascism to media technology producing the birth of the monster called PsyOps, we must rise to the challenge of stopping this many-headed beast!
Infowarriors - sharpen your points!
Expose - thrust - rebut! Expose - thrust - rebut!


Image
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coming of Rage Stories

Postby elfismiles » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:23 pm

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:And with the marriage of fascism to media technology producing the birth of the monster called PsyOps, we must rise to the challenge of stopping this many-headed beast!
Infowarriors - sharpen your points!
Expose - thrust - rebut! Expose - thrust - rebut!


Image


Hi Hugh! Thanks for using my good friend (and my PsiOp Radio co-host) Mack White's wonderful War of the Worlds artwork that we used for the special Halloween issue (WoW was a Halloween psyop / prank) of The Austin Para Times newspaper that I was the editor of at that time.

It was drawn specifically for one of Mack's most reproduced articles (the lead story for that issue) which I helped him research:

TELEVISION AND THE HIVE MIND
by Mack White
http://www.mackwhite.com/tv.html

SMiles
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Coming of Hive Stories

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:16 am

elfismiles wrote:.....
Hi Hugh! Thanks for using my good friend (and my PsiOp Radio co-host) Mack White's wonderful War of the Worlds artwork that we used for the special Halloween issue (WoW was a Halloween psyop / prank) of The Austin Para Times newspaper that I was the editor of at that time.

It was drawn specifically for one of Mack's most reproduced articles (the lead story for that issue) which I helped him research:

TELEVISION AND THE HIVE MIND
by Mack White
http://www.mackwhite.com/tv.html

SMiles


Well boy howdy! One of my favorite articles. Double plus good on both of ya!
We definitely should stay in touch...

Finding your 'TV hive mind' article was a big help when I found it shortly after 9/11 and I was trying figure out what psy-ops culture was and how it fit into the manufacturing of history.

I have a copy of Hadley Cantril's 1940 book 'The Invasion From Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic.'

It's a 1966 paperback with a truly garish purple - orange - red cover that just screams "wacky wacky - not a serious government study of you plebes."

The whole study of who panicked and who didn't boiled down to...critical thinking.
And this is why psy-ops culture sabotages critical thought just like an MKULTRA drug so that people will be more easily swayed by swill.

I found lots of psychological parallels between the 1938 War of the Worlds event and 9/11 including the preceding events creating expectations feeding the cognitive dissonance of facing something with no precedent.

This creates a high degree of suggestibility. No wonder the 9/11 cover story took.

page 203-205
Prolonged bewilderment combined with a lack of basic training to seek the causes of maladjustment are precisely the conditions most conducive to frustration and anxiety.
Individuals are sooner or later likely to rebel at a situation which is far from satisfactory and that they cannot understand. They neither have the opportunity nor the training to see the complex and contradictory bases creating their maladjustments. Yet they desire an understanding and their desire increases with their perplexity.
They become highly suggestible to some simple and sovereign formula provided by a demogogue. The whole tactics of Hitler show the importance he places on providing directed relief to bewildered souls. If they are not already sufficiently bewildered, bewilderment can be manufactured by sufficient propaganda.
.....
Our study of the common man of our times has shown us that his ability to orient himself apropriately in critical situations will be increased if he can be taught to adopt an attitude of readiness to question the interpretations he hears. But when he achieves this healthy skepticism he must have sufficient and relevent knowledge to be able to evaluate different interpretations. If he is to judge these interpretations intelligently, his knowledge must be grounded in evidence or tested experience. If this skepticism and knowledge are to be more widely spread among common men, they must be provided extensive educational opportunities. And if this final critical ability is to be used more generally by common men, they must be less harassed by the emotional insecurities that stem from underprivilaged environments.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Culture Studies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest