Page 2 of 3

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:16 pm
by brainpanhandler
But sometimes the spooks get a little too close to overt.
Look at the 100-page coloring book for the new 'Tinker Bell' (now at grocery stores as stand-alone marketing kiosks with the DVD) and see on page 39...
...OMG. It's the CIA emblem on the coin in "Tink's treasures."


I have to see that.

In the K-5th section of the Cia's Kid's Page there is an informative graphic of the Cia's seal which explains it's various elements and their meaning.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:39 pm
by brainpanhandler
From the IMDb message board:

Operame wrote:I think I have watched every episode with my 4-year-old daughter. My only real complaint is that none of the art or music is by women. None of it, at least not that I have seen or heard myself or been able to find on Wikipedia. (Okay, arguably some of the folk art was done by women, like the kuna molas.) I wouldn't mind if they had just a few women, but none? Surely they could find some music by Anna Magdalena Bach, Amy Beach, Florence Beatrice Price, or Elisabeth-Claude Jacquet de la Guerre.

Sure, I had to look those people up to write this, but I'd never heard of half the male composers they use on the show. Ditto about the artists. Someone working on this show had to do some research. Even if they're restricted to using works in the public domain (which I wouldn't think Disney would have to worry about, moneywise), couldn't they find some women's works? I'm not sure they're making any new episodes, but I wouldn't mind seeing a whole season with women.

If I've missed any artists -- musical or visual -- on the show who are women, please, point them out to me!


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0756522/boa ... /110672900

They're right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Li ... s_episodes

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:59 pm
by Attack Ships on Fire
You lost me as soon as you made the allegation that the cloud in the screengrab was a chemtrail. I know, big deal, who cares, but I also believe that there needs to be a devil's advocate in this discussion.

Where can I get a job as a creator of a show designed to inseminate CIA controlled memes into the consciousness of children? It seems like steady work, plus, I would totally rip off this forum for episode ideas.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:32 am
by Nordic
Attack Ships on Fire wrote:You lost me as soon as you made the allegation that the cloud in the screengrab was a chemtrail. I know, big deal, who cares, but I also believe that there needs to be a devil's advocate in this discussion.

Where can I get a job as a creator of a show designed to inseminate CIA controlled memes into the consciousness of children? It seems like steady work, plus, I would totally rip off this forum for episode ideas.


Absolutely. You've got to be at an HMW-level of nuts to see that in that graphic.

It's a fucking jet plane flying through a cloud. Big Fucking Deal.

It's shit like that which GUARANTEES that this sort of observation will never make it into anyone's mainstream. Thanks for that! Now WHO'S helping the CIA again ...??

But like I said earlier the fact that the CIA has a section of their website for kids is pretty fascinating and Just Plain Weird.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:28 am
by brainpanhandler
AOF wrote:You lost me as soon as you made the allegation that the cloud in the screengrab was a chemtrail.


As I rather easily predicted would be the case for many readers.

I know, big deal, who cares


If you know this, then shut the fuck up.

but I also believe that there needs to be a devil's advocate in this discussion.


Thanks. I'll take your application under consideration.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:30 am
by brainpanhandler
Absolutely. You've got to be at an HMW-level of nuts to see that in that graphic.

It's a fucking jet plane flying through a cloud. Big Fucking Deal.


You're not very observant, are you?

It's shit like that which GUARANTEES that this sort of observation will never make it into anyone's mainstream. Thanks for that! Now WHO'S helping the CIA again ...??


Just doing my part for god and country.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:53 am
by brainpanhandler
I've asked Jeff to move this thread to the Psyops and Meme Management forum.

I did a little digging around on the origins of Little Einsteins. It seems the show is the result of Disney's purchase of a company called Baby Einstein.

From the Baby Einstein About Us page:


Our Philosophy

Over a decade ago, Baby Einstein was founded by Julie Clark, a mom who wanted to share her love of humanities with her baby. Her intent was to create products that offered interactive experiences for her and her daughter to discover the world together. While Baby Einstein has grown over the years, this same philosophy is at the heart of everything that we do. All of our products are designed to encourage discovery and inspire new ways for parents and little ones to interact.

Baby Einstein offers a wide range of developmentally appropriate products for babies and toddlers. What makes Baby Einstein products unlike any other is that they are created from a baby's point-of-view and incorporate a unique combination of real world objects, music, art, language, poetry and nature — providing you an opportunity to introduce your baby to the world around them in playful and enriching ways. This simple principle is the foundation for The Baby Einstein Company and its products.

Children and Electronic Media

All Baby Einstein products, including its video line, are designed as interactive tools for parents to use with their babies. Since the debut of the very first title, Baby Einstein videos/DVDs were developed with the idea of creating a “digital board book,” allowing a parent to have two free hands while enjoying and experiencing the video with their little one – leaving their hands free to clap, point to objects and interact with their baby.

The Baby Einstein Company believes, along with the child development experts with whom we have consulted, that parent-child interaction is one of the most critical elements to the development of a healthy and happy baby during the first three years of life. Baby Einstein products are not designed to make babies smarter. Rather, Baby Einstein products are specifically designed to engage babies and provide parents with tools to help expose their little ones to the world around them in playful and engaging ways — inspiring a baby's natural curiosity.

That being said, The Baby Einstein Company is aware of the ongoing discussions regarding children and television viewing, particularly as it pertains to infants under the age of two years old. And, while we respect the American Academy of Pediatrics, we do not believe that their recommendation of no television for children under the age of two reflects the reality of today’s parents, families and households – for example, a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study found that 68% of all babies under two years old watch screen media on any given day. The Baby Einstein Company believes that when used properly, developmentally-appropriate video content can be a useful tool for parents and little ones to enjoy together.

Key to our perspective is our belief that parents/caregivers play a critical role in defining the “appropriate use of television.” The Baby Einstein Company has built its reputation on creating developmentally appropriate content that parents/caregivers know they can trust to use with their little ones, and it is our responsibility to continue providing them with superior products they can feel good about using with their children. Alternatively, we believe it is up to parents/caregivers to make decisions on what they feel is appropriate for their children — and that includes whether or not they choose to use television, how much television their child is allowed to watch, what they are allowed to watch, etc. Baby Einstein respects the decisions parents make for their children and believes its videos and other products are just one of many tools and activities parents can use throughout the day to interact and bond with their child.


http://www.babyeinstein.com/en/our_story/about_us/

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:22 am
by IanEye
Image

only somewhat related, but I think there is something subversive about turning 'beat on the brat with a baseball bat' into a child's lullaby...

http://www.amazon.com/Rockabye-Baby-Lullaby-Renditions-Ramones/dp/B000L22TA6

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:51 am
by brainpanhandler

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:58 am
by orz
Thanks for that, great find!

Big Jet is a realistic depiction of an F-something or other or at least much mroe realistic than the rest of the graphics.

Let me introduce you to this little thing called clip art.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:47 pm
by Hugh Manatee Wins
"Little Einsteins" as a title brands the keyword 'genius' as MALE, a technological transposing of the white-bearded 'God' image to the military-industrial level.

That image of the kidz in the Republican red plane- Note the MALES in front and females riding along watching. Women are wanted by the Warfare State as supportive assets but not as leaders.

This gender dominance framing is the anchor for sustaining the male-run Warfare State.
And CIA-Disney is a critical tool for accomplishing this.

Despite the 'controversy,' children are methodically turned into video addicts before they can walk since tv and movies are the US government's most important conditioning tools.
Four year-olds who can't even read know which movies are CIA-Disney from the logo and are attracted to the brand.

'Hannah Montana' is one of many models of DUAL IDENTITY training for both being a spy and considering people to be suspicious and deserving to be monitored by NSA etc.

'Hannah Montana' dolls are now the most desired toy by American girls and have replaced 'Barbie' in status.

There has been an absurd number of female spy shows out in the last 10 years.
The campaign is pretty obvious.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:14 pm
by brainpanhandler
Not surprisingly little Billy looks like he's in bit of a stupor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9i3bqvF ... re=related

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:29 pm
by brainpanhandler
Image


Gary Marsh is President, Entertainment, Disney Channels Worldwide, a role he was promoted to in September 2005.

Disney Channels Worldwide is the global kids and family TV business of The Walt Disney Company and comprises 67 channel feeds around the world, including 27 Disney Channels, nine Toon Disney channels, 10 Playhouse Disney channels and 19 Jetix channels, which in total reach more than 600 million viewers in over 100 countries in the U.S., Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific, Latin America and South Africa. The group's multiplatform strategy includes subscription video-on-demand and content-rich broadband websites Jetix.tv and DisneyChannel.com -- which, ranks as the #1 kids entertainment website among Kids 2-14.

Marsh is responsible for leading the effort to create world-class Disney and Jetix-branded programming for kids and families around the world. He oversees original programming teams in Burbank, London and Japan, and the development and production of an entire slate of original programming -- both live action and animated – for Disney Channel Worldwide. He also manages the U.S. Planning, Scheduling and Acquisitions teams, Original Movies, Original Series, Casting, Talent Relations and Production for Disney Channel U.S. and Jetix U.S.

Marsh oversaw the development of Disney Channel's successful original programming slate that includes the hit series "Hannah Montana," "The Suite Life of Zack & Cody," "Wizards of Waverly Place," "That's So Raven," "Kim Possible" and "Lizzie McGuire." In addition he oversees the blockbuster Disney Channel Original Movie (DCOM) franchise, comprising over 70 titles, including the most recent smash hits "Camp Rock," "The Cheetah Girls 2," "High School Musical" and "High School Musical 2" which, for their premiere telecasts, delivered 8.9 million, 7.8 million, 7.7 million and 18.6 million Total Viewers, respectively. "The Cheetah Girls 2" soundtrack debuted at #5 on the Billboard Top 200 album chart, and the quadruple-Platinum-selling soundtrack for "High School Musical," the #1 selling album of 2006, made history as the first TV movie soundtrack to reach #1 on the Billboard Top 200 album chart and by entering the Billboard Hot 100 chart with an unprecedented nine songs. Among the other hugely popular titles in the DCOM franchise are "Jump In!," "The Cheetah Girls" (2003), which yielded a double-Platinum-selling soundtrack, and the "Halloweentown" franchise.

Marsh also supervises development and production of the popular Playhouse Disney preschool programming which includes "Mickey Mouse Clubhouse," "Handy Manny," Disney's "Little Einsteins" and "My Friends Tigger & Pooh."

From 2001-05, Marsh was Executive Vice President, Original Programming and Production, Disney Channel. He was Executive Vice President, Original Programming, from 1999-2001, and Senior Vice President, Original Programming, from 1994-99. He joined Disney Channel in 1988 as Executive Director, Programming, and was promoted to Vice President within months.

Throughout his tenure at Disney Channel, Marsh has supervised projects that garnered the highest industry and critical acclaim, including multiple Emmys and Humanitas Prizes, plus Peabody, NAMIC (The National Association for Multi-ethnicity in Communications), New York International Film and Television Festival and Parents' Choice Awards. He was also a 2005 Honoree of Girls Incorporated, which recognizes industry leaders who are excellent role models for girls and young women.

Prior to joining Disney Channel, Marsh was Director of Movies and Miniseries at Columbia Pictures Television. He was previously Vice President, the Garth Group, a consulting firm in New York City, where he specialized in creating media for political campaigns. His clients included New York Mayor Ed Koch and Walter Mondale.

Marsh is a Phi Beta Kappa, summa cum laude graduate of the University of California at Los Angeles, where he earned a Bachelors of Arts degree in Communication Studies.

He and his wife, Jody, and their daughter, Zoey, reside in Sherman Oaks, California.

Disney Channels Worldwide is part of the Disney-ABC Television Group.

http://www.disneychannelmedianet.com/ex ... arsh.shtml

___________________________________________________________

Doesn't he have to be somehow complicit in this? What do people like this guy have to know?

And, while we respect the American Academy of Pediatrics, we do not believe that their recommendation of no television for children under the age of two reflects the reality of today’s parents, families and households


I gotta look up this recommendation by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:00 pm
by brainpanhandler
From the American Academy of Pediatrics website.

TV and Toddlers

It may be tempting to put your infant or toddler in front of the television, especially to watch shows created just for children under age two. But the American Academy of Pediatrics says: Don't do it! These early years are crucial in a child's development. The Academy is concerned about the impact of television programming intended for children younger than age two and how it could affect your child's development. Pediatricians strongly oppose targeted programming, especially when it's used to market toys, games, dolls, unhealthy food and other products to toddlers. Any positive effect of television on infants and toddlers is still open to question, but the benefits of parent-child interactions are proven. Under age two, talking, singing, reading, listening to music or playing are far more important to a child's development than any TV show. For more information on your child's health, visit www.aap.org.


http://www.aap.org/sections/media/ToddlersTV.htm

A search for televison on their site brings up a lot of interesting looking articles.
Search results for television

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 3:03 am
by Attack Ships on Fire
brainpanhandler wrote:
If you know this, then shut the fuck up.


And miss the chance to watch the paranoid video brigade get their panties in a bunch over yet another inkblot-that's-really-the-second-shooter-on-the-grassy-knoll-halleujah? Not a chance!

Please, find a way to link Fisher Price's Little People to the reptillians plan to reduce the human race by 9/10ths of its present size. The evidence is staring you right in the face!