Project Willow wrote:Jeff wrote:Well, for me at least, it's because Bryant's book shows up the false opposition of the patriot/LaRouche camp, which has owned the Franklin scandal since the beginning thanks to DeCamp/Gunderson. That needs to be discussed, and I think these threads have been very beneficial for that.
I would argue that the patriot/LaRouche connection wasn't immediately obvious or well known until exercises like these. As it stands now, from an outsider's point of view, the discourse props the perception that, as Lbo said, Franklin is a LaRouche conspiracy. I hope a new Bryant thread or two will pop up soon and serve as counter balance.
Percival, it's
never as simple as "fruit of a poison tree", not in the pedo network/mc arena. It may be comforting to make sweeping generalizations, or to assign actors into very defined roles. There is too much gray, too many hidden under paintings, and few to no broad brushes on the palette. See what you did? I dun gone metaphor crazy!
PW, I was thinking in painting terms too - we use the phrase "connect the dots" but what if there are ONLY dots - like a pointillist painting?
Going into too much detail may actually be less illuminating than stepping back and looking at the bigger picture.
I was surprised to see the deCamp / Larouche connection, 2 minutes on Google shows that decamp paid $2000 to the Larouche 2004 presidential campaign.
My take of the interviews I have seen with decamp is that he is pretty congruent in what he is saying. There are a couple of instances where his body language changed dramatically - one in particular was around the area of Johnny Gosch's father. That is worth checking out much more than the Larouche involvement.(*)
I agree with what lbo said - as well as information gathering, I'm wondering what the purpose of this information gathering is?
For example, is that THE Larry King at BMW Sterling? If so, shouldn't Paul Bonacci be notified to claim the $1,000,000 owed to him?
(*)I was surprised to see the deCamp / Larouche connection, 2 minutes on Google shows that decamp paid $2000 to the Larouche 2004 presidential campaign.