Given DeCamp's history in Totem Town, his time in Iran, his work with Colby (CIA Director), the circumstances surrounding the discovery of the Franklin Scandal and LaRouche's involvement prior to the discovery, and the contradictions that exist in the persona of DeCamp and Gunderson....it might be wise to rethink DeCamp and consider that what appears to be a "horse" may not be a "horse" at all, but might be a "zebra".
We lose nothing by re-evaluating the landscape, especially since we know DeCamp had a history of working with individuals in the intelligence community.
These are some of the red flags I see:
So if we just play around with the notion that DeCamp was in training and that he was an MK Ultra test subject, where does that take us?
*Wildly inappropriate sexual advances towards both women and men
Men and women who were sexually abused as children often exhibit extreme, out-of- control and addictive sexual "acting out" (or they may go to the other extreme and shut down sexually, become a celibate nun or monk, etc). The bisexual "swinging both ways" can be a result of having both male and female "alters" (alternate personalities).
* Being orphaned and in an institution as a child
These are places where perps find victims.
* His CIA history
To the non-survivors who are reading this
- Most of the survivors you will meet are people who chafed at the bit, struggled for a long time to get away and finally succeeded. Most may have NEVER accepted the yolk that was put on them at birth or at an early age, they just couldn't figure out how to get away without losing their lives.
There are others though, who never rebel and for whatever reason, go along with the cult mind control agenda with little or no protest. My siblings, for example, are not evil and not sociopaths, but out of loyalty to my parents and fear, they've been controlled all their lives and have never tried to get away.
The "cult" wants it's subjects to surrender their will and their lives to the cult and do their bidding for their entire life. Rewards can be materially substantial, or other perverted pay-offs, for those who value such things.
Their brand of security is really slavery, but not everyone sees things the way I do.
At a certain point in a mind-controlled subjects life, perhaps in their early 40's or 50's, maybe earlier and sometimes later, the higher-ups would prefer a conscious surrender of the will, an accepting of one's "fate," a conscious collaboration and partnership, even though a highly dissociative person will most likely retain areas of dissociation.
Therefore, many who were abused join the ranks of the abusers and the cycle continues....
That is, until people like us come along...