The Crown

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The Crown

Postby marykmusic » Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:05 pm

(Sent to me by someone I trust-- MaryK)<br><br>What You Didn't Know About Taxes & The 'Crown' <br><br>There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply ‘The City.’ <br><br>The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms. <br><br>In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world’s trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world’s oceans. <br><br>The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown’s commerce and the Crown’s wealth. As of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown. <br><br>The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln’s Inn and Gray’s Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar. <br><br>The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple. <br><br>The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter ‘S,’ denotes a legal entity of the Crown. <br><br>At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a ‘color of title.’ Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent. <br><br>The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace. <br><br>Another method used to hoodwink natural persons is enfranchisement. Those cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a corporation. A ‘juristic personality’ has been created, and you have entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity relationship with the Crown. <br><br>These invisible contracts include: birth certificates, citizenship records, employment agreements, driver’s licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract. <br><br>Tax protestors and (the coming) draft resistors trying to renounce the parts of these contracts that they now disagree with will not profit by resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges will reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract law jurisprudence. Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in effect. <br><br>These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule the broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English common law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a ‘bill of benefits,’ conferred on us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes). Protestors and resistors will also lose their cases by boasting of citizenship status. Citizenship is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, “Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements.” The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states, “….citizens shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind…” <br><br>What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown’s debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income. And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all enfranchised persons (that’s you) can be held personally liable for the Crown’s debt. <br><br>The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn’t have been possible were it not for the Crown. They view the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it – as an operation of law – the identical same full force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain. <br><br>Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The Crown also views bank account records as their own private property, pursuant to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us ever read. <br><br>The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find that they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not to disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the Crown also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of commerce. <br><br>When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality was created. It is this personality (income and assets) that IRS agents are excising back to the Crown through taxation. <br><br>A lot of ink is being spilled currently over Social Security. Possession of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown’s lex as ‘conclusive evidence’ of our having accepted federal commercial benefits. This is another example of an equity relationship with the Crown. Presenting one’s Social Security Number to an employer seals our status as taxpayers, and gives rise to liability for a reciprocal quid pro quo payment of taxes to the Crown. <br><br>Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement endowment benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die, your spouse gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is divided (forfeited) among other premium payers who haven’t died yet. <br><br>But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity attachments as an act of defilement and will proceed against us with all due prejudice. For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thoroughgoing study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be deemed a ‘stranger to the public trust,’ forfeit all enfranchisement benefits and close all bank accounts, among other things. Citizenship would have to be made null and forfeit and the status of ‘denizen’ enacted. If there are any such natural persons extant who have passed through this fire, I would certainly appreciate hearing from them… <br> <p></p><i></i>
marykmusic
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Central Arizona
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Crown

Postby sussurus2 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:22 pm

<br>In the words of Mr. Cleese, "Well, I guess that's it then."<br><br>So, one finds oneself curious if the person you trust wrote this themselves, or were passing it on from somewhence else?<br><br>I know someone who tried to pass through those rings of fire. <br><br>After a few years "without prejudice" and having made it halfway through the second hundred thousand dollars in legal fees vis-a-vis IRS, he decided it wasn't worth it to try to exercise actual independence (ref. UCC, etc.) and capitulated.<br><br>However, that has done nothing to quench is exquisite spirit, nor his fine work in carving out other spaces and calling out signposts so that others can find and co-create such alternative spaces, together in community. <br><br>Harry Harrison's _Stainless Steel Rat_ metaphor comes to mind...<br><br>S.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
sussurus2
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 6:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Crown

Postby dbeach » Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:38 pm

"This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply ‘The City.’ '<br><br>This crown seems like the real world power<br><br>Read it last yr ..her nibs owns the USA and viceroy GHWBush is trying very hard to make it his gift to her. Not a benevolent queen<br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Anti was saying it for long enough.

Postby Peak Oil bullcrap » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:25 pm

<br><br> Marys article rather simplifies what Antiaristo has been saying around here for long enough.<br><br> Anyone who things theyve escaped the shackles of the British Monarchy and her fiscal friends and associates, needs to think again - Big time.<br><br> The Square mile is the Fiscal enforcement division, pulling of any number of scams from legalised extortion of the taxpayer ( through loans to Nation Govnts the world over ), to the Lloyds of London scam, in which the US govnt stood lamely by whilst her citizens were robbed blind by the City.<br><br> Not that the US govnt had much choice in the matter anyways, courtesy of the treason felony act, about which Antiaristo has warned you at length.<br><br> This is where the monarchy, or the legal division step in. The strongarm division. The legalised mafia ( have a look at the statute books ). <p></p><i></i>
Peak Oil bullcrap
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:09 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Crown

Postby OnoI812 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:47 pm

So in case you ever wondered why the "Amish" refer to all outsiders, no matter race, color or creed, as "The English"... wonder no more ....Now where's my damn thresher! <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Crown

Postby marykmusic » Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:33 pm

My friend was only passing this on. He knows a good story when he sees one.<br><br>And yes, of course Anti has been talking about this. I just couldn't resist bringing it up again. --MaryK <p></p><i></i>
marykmusic
 
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Central Arizona
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Economics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest