I live two blocks away from NY-14. Some years Crowley has been my rep, some years Maloney.
A real progressive wins and the boss of Queens goes down. I honestly didn't think it possible, because of the eternal, near-insurmountable problem of going up against a corporate-funded permanent incumbent and a big machine, starting with zero name-recognition and no money, in an election most people in the district do not even know is happening thanks to our benighted, non-democratic society. Ocasio raised 1/10 the campaign funds that Crowley did, and that's actually fucking impressive, given that Crowley is a top fundraiser who runs a congressional PAC business. Erm, operation. The congressman from Homeland Security and yes-vote for the war of aggression in Iraq was spreading millions among his colleagues, gunning to replace Pelosi. Last year, he basically chose the new speaker of the NYC City Council.
Oh, and did I mention the outrageously rigged, closed New York party primary system? To vote, one would have had to switch registrations to Democratic 14 months in advance! All this is why voter turnout, in this first primary challenge to Crowley since 2004, was under 4%. That is typical, it was no better in 2004. In fact, out of 27 NY districts, Ocasio got the third most votes of any primary winner, and it was only about 16,000. Maloney got the most with 24,000, in a much richer, high-turnout district; incumbent Eliot Engel also got 21,000. The population of any district is about 730,000.
Ocasio's 24/7 grassroots push, no-bullshit progressive appeal, and capture of the alternative media in the final weeks actually worked. Crowley helped with some remarkable clumsiness, and despite all of the organizational and politician endorsements, the union bureaucracies, Clinton, etc. Paper tiger, exposed!
One block over in NY-12, my district, even Maloney got a scare from the suspect if progressive-talking Suraj Patel. He actually got more votes than Ocasio! Who knows what might have happened, if he'd stayed off the Tinder?*
Help me calm down! Suddenly I believe in Governor Nixon and Attorney General Teachout!
Numbers:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... tions.html===
* FYI, Patel is a hotel chain owner and professor of economics. He really did talk progressive stuff, including single-payer and a stance against military spending and war authorizations. When the NY Times showed up by appointment to his strategy meeting in a bar, he was swiping on Tinder. This was the guy's online strategy: he and his buds lure people in with fake pics on Tinder, and then engage the sucker and confess they're actually looking for votes. Besides the creep factor, how the hell is this going to work? Did they pick anyone up? This genius teaches at NYU?!
.