Can anybody think of an innocent reason for the way this video was edited or why nobody else seems to have noticed?
https://twitter.com/_rosiesantana/statu ... 4924992512A gif alternating between the opening still frame (00:00 to 00:01.1) at the beginning of the film and another frame from approx 7 seconds.
The film is described as:
a video from my camera footage inside from the start of the collapse until the lose of connection
After the establishing still shot, over which sound apparently continues to run, we see live footage commence at just over a second into the video and after everything in the room has moved position in relation to the establishing shot. Note the white object (left lower corner) and what I will call the window sill (possibly a kitchen counter) which appear more or less in the same spatial relationship to the camera. Objects lining the left wall are still in motion one away from and the other toward the wall as live footage begins. But it seems clear we can not confirm that we either saw or heard the moment of the event, just the immediate aftermath.
In support of that case, during the opening still frame (just over one second in duration) note what appears to be shattered glass already present on the window sill. This indicates prior onset of at least one earlier event, by itself this indicates an attempt to deceive in light of the above statement. After the fact of editing into the film a single still frame for over one second, concealing the entire onset of whatever event occurs to leave objects in the room in motion, we should at least be curious.
We can see that the top of the entrance door frame has moved from left to the right and the dimensions of the room itself appear to be pinched significantly toward the ceiling. This may partly be accounted for by a slight change of angle in the camera position increasing the evident lens distortion caused by the wide angle of the lens, though this is not obviously corroborated by the position of the white box and window sill in relation to the camera view. Any such movement appears negligible although the sill itself and the camera may have moved away from vertical together, thus creating this effect. The top of the door frame definitely appears be shifted significantly toward the centre of the room while the other door frame, seen obliquely at the far end of the left wall appears bowed outward slightly and actually pushed inward - toward the centre of the room from its housing. Many objects appear to be at unexpected angles to each other.
At nine to ten seconds the second box lining the left wall moves slightly and then shortly afterwards the whole room sways and eventually the window frame sways too before the scene blacks out.
What all this demonstrates is apparent and deliberate tampering, obscuring two events prior to the showers of debris and the beginning of collapse.
Why?
Perhaps to give a false impression of the missing events? Maybe to nullify the number of witnesses who claimed to have heard an explosion or explosions? At first glance the footage certainly tries to convince us we that we have seen a full sequence of events but upon looking more closely, we see clear evidence of tampering and evidence of two separate events even before live footage begins. This unseen second event which causes damage to the room, subsequent to that which caused the broken glass, likewise takes place off stage. The sill area is then showered with dust and small pebble like debris but importantly, the sound recording from the security camera (?) appears to relay very little noise at all beside the sound of (concrete?) fragments raining down.
At first glance we would reasonably conclude from this footage that there was definitely NO explosion.