Multiple explosions rock London

[tabasco1776]

The timelines being published are contradictory, sometimes wildly so.<br><br>Here's one:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,15861290%5E661,00.html">www.heraldsun.news.com.au...61,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>There's a differing one at the aforementioned Wikipedia link, and there's a AP graphic appearing in a lot of newspapers today that show the first blast at 8:51, second at 8:56, third at 9:17, and fourth at 9:47. <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

When I was a kid, we used to jump across an old one for dares. <p></p><i></i>

[rain]

'no mention was made of the thousands of Danes (and Swedes, Norwegians and Germans who traveled to Denmark) who protested 'The Dear Leader' on his 59th birthday...'<br>see July 6, 2005. -<br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/">www.waynemadsenreport.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>and I think we know why Italy got a special mention.<br><br>'forty families bereft, forty lovers lonely'<br>but hey, shrubby can't even say ' let them eat cake.'<br>'it's mine, all mine.'<br> <p></p><i></i>

[Peachtree Pam]

Rain,<br><br>I was reminded of Ron Suskind's quote from a Senior Bush advisor:<br><br>"The aide (a senior adviser to President Bush) said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors ... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." -- Ron Suskind, New York Times Magazine, Oct. 17, 2004.<br><br>Well, here we are left to study the "new reality" while waiting for the next "new reality" to be created (Italy or Denmark)....<br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[rain]

yes, I know Pam. that's a classic quote, indicative of the extent of the brazen arrogance of these magi-techno-hoodlums. but I've ceased feeling silly or even suspecting that we're just 'studying that reality - judiciously, as you will...'<br>what I wanted to say yesterday, but didn't, especially to all my kel(t)ic brothers and sister, - the sky is falling. wake up. get up. stand up. and shout 'up', we see you and we will not go quietly, or otherwise, into the nightmare.<br> <p></p><i></i>

[st4]

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/07/does-anyone-really-know-what-time-it.html#comments">rigorousintuition.blogspo...l#comments</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Egad. Sorry about my 911 math screw up, Jeff. How embarrassing. It was a crazy day. I was on about ten different message boards while watching the news coverage and wasn't thinking too well. I didn't recognize at the time that 911 would come up every time you subtracted those numbers no matter what the date was. My bad.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/embarassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[antiaristo]

London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/090705bombingexercises.htm">www.prisonplanet.com/arti...rcises.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <p></p><i></i>

[anon]

"I didn't recognize at the time that 911 would come up every time you subtracted those numbers no matter what the date was."<br><br>It's still the wrong number however many times you dial it. Madrid was not 911 days after 9/11.<br> <p></p><i></i>

[sullymongous]

> 1394 days since 911<br>> 483 days since the Madrid bombing<br>> 1394 - 483 = 911<br><br>what you are basically describing here is that (if your numbers are correct) there were 911 days between 911 and madrid bombing.<br><br>(days since 911) - (days since madrid) = (days between 911 and madrid)<br>1394 - 493 = 911<br><br>so no matter what day 7/7/05 happened on, you could make an equivalent statement. for instance, suppose 7/7/05 happened X days from 7/7/05. then you could say:<br><br>(1394 + X) days since 911<br>(483 + X) days since the Madrid bombing<br>(1394 + X) - (483 + X) = 911 <p></p><i></i>

[anon]

"...if your numbers are correct..."<br><br>They aren't. <p></p><i></i>

[smiths]

in the general spirit of trying to correct wrong information to build a clearer picture here is a blog that has 'probably' more accurate info<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://fairvotewatch.blogspot.com/2005/07/bus-bomb-press-has-it-wrong.html">fairvotewatch.blogspot.co...wrong.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>just for the record i think the number stuff is irrelevant. surely events are more important. if the olympic announcement had been 4 days earlier and the g8 summit also started 4 days earlier i'll bet my left testicle the bombs would have also blown up 4 days earlier <p></p><i></i>

[rain]

courtesy of ICH<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9413.htm">www.informationclearingho...le9413.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <p></p><i></i>

[Starman]

Oh My Gawd <gag>;<br><br>From the Information Clearinghouse link rain posted:<br><br>Blair: "But what you cannot do is to say that this issue of weapons of mass destruction, proliferation of chemical weapons, biological weapons and nuclear capability in the hands of highly unstable states ... that these are issues that don't need to be dealt with." <br><br>Get that -- Iraq is described as 'unstable' -- It's not an accident that Saddam was Iraq's leader for what, some 30 years? And of course, the US was instrumental in undermining Iraq's government through the 50s and 60s, eventually bringing the Ba'athe party to power and assisting Saddam all the way as the US's strongman in the Middle East. It's been well-argued that the crippling sanctions imposed on Iraq made the Iraqi people critically dependant on Saddam, thereby solidifying his hold on power. How could such a horrible mistake, a gross miscalculation, have happened if it wasn't intentional?<br><br>The only way I can explain the free-pass the MSM have given the Bush/Blair war criminals is that they've been effectively gotton-to. The public's accomodation in not looking behind the fabrications and distortions is a singular act of moral cowardice and denial, perhaps aggravated by the high load of cognitive dissonance they've been subjected to -- but IMHO it doesn't excuse them from doing their civic duty in seeking to be informed on critical issues and demanding their officials be held accountable. The 'buck' has to ultimately stop with us.<br>Starman<br> <p></p><i></i>