by glooperoo » Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:55 pm
Here's another article that has some good background info for demonstrating to the reader just how many cameras there are in London that they are reviewing in the investigation, and there the approximate odds that this one crucial camera would happen to be non-functional. <br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://partners.nytimes.com/avantgo/quicknews_story1.html">partners.nytimes.com/avan...tory1.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br> "We know that all four of these men arrived in London by train on the morning of July 7," he said. "We have identified CCTV footage showing the four men at King's Cross station shortly before 8.30 a.m. on that morning of July 7."<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Investigators said they had reviewed more than 2,500 CCTV tapes since the bombings</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, as well as several hundred witness statements, and had fielded more than 1,000 tips from the public. <br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>I think we should start emphasizing that stat: at least 2500 CCTV tapes are being reviewed, and the one that would REALLY come in handy wasn't working. Just another sub-coincidence I guess.<br><br>Also, just as we need to connect the bombing simulations to all those <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2005/5/18/103136/194/7#7">9/11 Wargames</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, we should really start linking this particular CCTV coincidence to destruction of the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A6892-2004May6¬Found=true">9/11 FAA tapes</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, and keeping hammering away at the point that all these London Bombing coincidences, and all these 9/11 coincidences really need to be viewed as one much larger historic terrorism coincidence, where strange, fortuitious strokes of luck have <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>repeatedly</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> occurred, with alarming frequency, in the major terrorist attacks in the 20th century. What does this mean? Does god really love Osama and other mass murderers? If you stick to the official story(s) that's a possibility that can't be ignored. <br><br>We also need to point out how all these coincidences are acknowledged to have occurred, but are largely ignored from the official analysis. <br><br>Can anyone come up with a good term for capturing and describing the much larger coincidence of all these terrorist acts (and assassination, and "accidents", and all the other fun nightmares of our day)? "The Big Picture Coincidence"? "Osama's Syncronicity Syndrome"? Whatever we can come it, I bet it would be helpful to have a term that we can all start spreading. Once the term spreads enough (and new info does seem to be spreading like wild fire these days), we just have to mention it to remind people of what it is we're talking about here that raises so many people's suspicions. We need to be more efficient like that. Who knows how much time we have left before the next coincidentally successfull attack. <br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
