by Ferry Fey » Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:11 pm
I've been very impressed about what I've seen coming out of the Team8 group, starting with their 911 research.<br><br>Here's an idea you all might want to keep aware of. One of the team8 posters says while showing a contradiction, "We have another bullshit witness!!..." <br><br>None of us that I've seen trying to explore what happened on 911 initially tried to verify witness statements against known, incontrovertible fact. It's something that I think has only started to be explored properly in the past year or so.<br><br>It really helps the research move along if we actively examine every statement given by officials and alleged witnesses to see if it tests out. For that matter, we need to double check the statements made by the people on Our Side too. Reality checks work both ways.<br><br>We need to also be aware that we still haven't learned how to present that information on contradictions in a truly effective way. Too often it gets lost in narrative, rather than presented in a way that is visually accessible or even just verbally presented in a more useful way.<br><br>FAQs are an excellent way of using the holes in your opponents' arguments to present truth. When an official gives a totally bullshit quote to the press, don't piss and moan. Thank them for handing you the structure of your FAQ.<br><br>Another way of representing the gulf between official explanations and reality is to set it up as a series of "claim/refutation" statements.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Claim: witness says that he was on a bus and saw the Tavistock bus explosion, because they'd been ordered off Tube trains and onto buses due to the Underground explosions.<br><br>Fact: The order to shut down the Tube trains was given a half hour after the bus blew up.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>