Odd codenames for bombings

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Odd codenames for bombings

Postby AlicetheCurious » Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:53 am

Could "Stepford" be a reference to mind control subjects? In any case, the codenames are certainly intriguing: either somebody is trying to tell us something, or they are sure they can get away with such puerile taunts. So far, they do seem to be right...<br><br>By the way, the author does seem to be missing the obvious meaning of "head", no?<br><br>(SNIP!)<br><br>"One intriguing aspect of the London Bombing report is the fact that the MI5 codename for the event is "Stepford".<br><br>The four "bombers" are referred to as the "Stepford four". Why is this the case?<br><br>There is no place in the UK called Stepford, the word HAS to be a reference to the novel and film The Stepford Wives. Of course the plot of this sci-fi film is that the the wives of Stepford are actually completely submissive servants, gynoids created by an elite group of men.<br><br>The only entry in the dictionary for the word Stepford has the following description: pertaining to a person with a conforming and compliant attitude, much like a robot .<br><br>So does this explain why the four bombers seemed to be completely calm, acting normally, going for Big Macs, buying return tickets, arguing over being short changed before they blew themselves up?<br><br>I am NOT suggesting that they were literally robots before that gets taken out of context, yet the MI5 codename is very revealing in that it suggests the operation was a carefully coordinated and controlled one with four compliant and malleable patsies following direct orders.<br><br>Now if MI5 has no idea who was behind the operation or whether there were any orders coming from a mastermind, why would they give the event the codename "Stepford"?<br><br>We welcome any rational alternative explanations for this.<br><br>Perhaps even more intriguing is the codename for the July 21 failed bombings. MI5 refer to this event as "Hat".<br><br>What kind of codename is Hat? It describes nothing about the events of 21/7.<br><br>The literal meaning of the word hat is "a cover for the head". i don't see any other possible meaning the word hat can have.<br><br>If we are to take the first bombing operation as the "head" then are MI5 suggesting 21/7 is some kind of cover for it?"<br><br>Full article:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/chains/signs20060201_WorldNews.php#8278779491d7c23aba59365a0f9">signs-of-the-times.org/si...a59365a0f9</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
AlicetheCurious
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 7:45 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Odd codenames for bombings

Postby orz » Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:30 am

Interesting... tho I guess "Stepford" could just be an observation of the unusually calm behaviour and mundane family backgrounds of the alleged bombers, it doesn't inherently imply inside knowledge of mind control etc...<br><br>Codenames are odd... i've never understood how they pick them... sometimes they seem totally random/unrelated which makes sense to me (that's rather the point of having one i thought, to have a name for the case that isn't descriptive of it?), but then in cases like this where they're creepily relevent...<br><br>No idea about Hat <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to 7/7 London bombings

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests