"End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby Gouda » Wed May 13, 2009 3:31 am

Continuing on the 'coming structural adjustment' sub-category herein,

Social Security and Medicare finances worsen

WASHINGTON – Social Security and Medicare are fading even faster under the weight of the recession, heading for insolvency years sooner than previously expected, the government warned Tuesday.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the head of the trustees group, said the new reports were a reminder that "the longer we wait to address the long-term solvency of Medicare and Social Security, the sooner those challenges will be upon us and the harder the options will be."

Geithner said that President Barack Obama was committed to working with Congress to find ways to control runaway growth in both public and private health care expenditures, noting the promise Monday by major health care providers to trim costs by $2 trillion over the next decade.

The findings in the trustees report, the annual checkup given the two benefit programs, did not come as a surprise. Private economists had been predicting that the dates the programs would begin to pay out more than they take in and the dates the trust funds would be insolvent would occur sooner given the economic recession.

***

Last week:

Statement from the Baucus 8: Why we risked arrest for single-payer health care

By Margaret Flowers, M.D.

On May 5, eight health care advocates, including myself and two other physicians, stood up to Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and the Senate Finance Committee during a “public roundtable discussion” with a simple question: Will you allow an advocate for a single-payer national health plan to have a seat at the table?

The answer was a loud, “Get more police!” And we were arrested and hauled off to jail.

...

The senators understand that most people want a national health system and that an improved Medicare for All would include everybody and provide better health care at a lower cost. These facts mean nothing to most of them because they respond to only one standard tool of advocacy: money, and lots of it.

...

And so, we have entered a new phase in the movement for health care as a human right: acts of civil disobedience. It is time to directly challenge corporate interests.


***

Added on edit:

Since there is no money for anything worthwhile, let's ask the Fed's Inspector General if she knows where the trillions going to Wall Street are:

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXlxBeAvsB8&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcryptogon.com%2F&feature=player_embedded]Rep. Alan Grayson asks the Federal Reserve Inspector General about the trillions of dollars lent or spent or committed by the Federal Reserve and where it went.
Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman responds that the IG does not know and is not tracking where this money is.
[/url]

OK then.

*Heart attack*

(Hospitalization not covered, but social security savings met by early death.)
Last edited by Gouda on Wed May 13, 2009 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Wed May 13, 2009 3:38 am

Bonus:

Subprime Prosecution Stops Foreclosures (But Lets Goldman Sachs Off Hook)

Letting Goldman off excuses what could have been criminal behavior...

"It's not always a perfect world and you can't always secure the perfect justice," says Delahunt. "It would appear that our attorney general did some good work that resulted in a very significant sum of money for redress by their behavior."

Frank agrees. "I can't tell exactly what the considerations were, but I'm inclined to think the value of getting immediate relief for 700 people and saving their homes, yeah, I'd trade off a little for that," he says.
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby jingofever » Wed May 13, 2009 2:26 pm

From Market Ticker:

Ok, now this gets interesting.

In a hearing not covered by the so-called "mainstream media" but covered on Cspan, Liddy, AIG's CEO, in response to a question by Rep Kaptur said:

"When The Fed set up Maiden Lane they took on responsibility for settlement of all of the CDS."

WHOAH!

Ok, now we're getting into interesting territory.

Specifically, I quote: "The Federal Reserve decided we should pay 100 cents on the dollar", but Mr. Issa nailed the truth on this in a followup - they could have purchased those contracts for far less in the open market at the time.

The bottom line is that the testimony was that The Fed decided to settle the contracts in a non-economic manner that resulted in screwing the taxpayer by transferring more than $100 billion dollars of taxpayer money out to these banks when the cash value at the time was FAR LESS.

(Mr. Issa, by the way, is one of the Congressfolk who actually does understand securities - and it shows. He refused to let this go until he hammered it into the ground and got the answer in plain, irrefutable English.)

Bluntly - we got raped.

Is it any surprise that CNBC is refusing to cover this?

Is it any wonder how the banks managed to "report decent profits"?

The allegation just made by Liddy is that Bernanke and The Fed literally stole $100 billion dollars from you and I by intentionally and wantonly overpaying on the settlement of these contracts!

I want to see indictments; nothing less is sufficient any more.


I didn't include any of the underlining or bolding that is in the original.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby anothershamus » Wed May 13, 2009 9:50 pm

QUOTE TO THINK ABOUT
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with their own money.

~ Alexis de Tocqueville (1805 - 1859)

Alexis was a bitchin' dude! He saw that train a comin'!

This is from a new site, (new to me), http://goldtradercomments.blogspot.com/

He also says:

My posts here have become fewer do to less time and the fact that most articles
are making their way to an abundance of other sites, so I expect that those of you
who are putting in the time each day to find THE TRUTH about what's happening in our world, will have found most articles before I post them.

ABOVE ALL, I recommend JSMINESET.COM

AND...INFORMATIONCLEARINGHOUSE.INFO

THEDAILYRECKONING.COM is great for keeping current and a fun read.

There is so much news out there it is almost impossible to read it all, but
the main thread of the news is that WE ARE ALL FUCKED
!

So do your best to prepare for THE WORST as it is just around the corner.
Posted by GOLDTRADER at 5/12/2009 03:40:00 PM
)'(
User avatar
anothershamus
 
Posts: 1913
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: bi local
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Sun May 24, 2009 4:27 am

Pilot project:

California faces its day of fiscal reckoning

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The day of reckoning that California has been warned about for years has arrived. The longest recession in generations and the defeat this week of a package of budget-balancing ballot measures are expected to lead to state spending cuts so deep and so painful that they could rewrite the social contract between California and its citizens. They could also force a fundamental rethinking of the proper role of government in the Golden State.
...

This week, voters said they no longer want the Legislature to balance budgets with higher taxes, complicated transfer schemes or borrowing that pushes California's financial problems off into the distant future. In light of that, Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has made it clear he intends to close the gap almost entirely through drastic spending cuts.

The governor's cutbacks could include ending the state's main welfare program for the poor, eliminating health coverage for about 1.5 million poor children, halting cash grants for about 77,000 college students, shortening the school year by seven days, laying off thousands of state workers and teachers, slashing money for state parks and releasing thousands of prisoners before their sentences are finished.
...

"This is the year everything has fallen apart," said outgoing Assembly Minority Leader Mike Villines, a Republican from the Central Valley. "We don't have an alternative. We're literally at the day of reckoning and have to cut it all out."

The drastic cuts that appear to lie ahead will, by accident, accomplish the stark reduction in state government that many Republicans have long advocated.

...

In the near term, the huge cuts that are about to hit will probably affect nearly every one of the state's 38 million residents. Schwarzenegger's latest budget proposal, for example, would eliminate health care coverage for more than 2 million people, about 1.5 million of them children, said Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access California.
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby smiths » Sun May 24, 2009 7:48 am

pilot project indeed,

buckle up, the ride is only just beginning
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby vigilant » Wed May 27, 2009 2:03 am

http://www.secinfo.com/$/Search.asp



search results for...federal reserve

“Federal Reserve”
1 Registrant (Public Companies / Funds, Significant Individuals / Owners, et al.)
First Last Filing Name Symbol Regulator #

1/4/94 5/4/09 New Filing! Fidelity Federal Reserves [ now Fidelity Charles Street Trust ] U.S. SEC Registrant U.S. SEC # 354046

No Group Members (Non-Registrant Filers: Partners, Affiliates, et al.)
Try “Federa Reserv” or simply “Federal” or “Reserve”.

2 Names (Directors, Officers, Attorneys, Accountants, Bankers, Agents, et al.)
Last Filing Signatory
(more-likely to less-likely)
5/14/09 New Filing! Federal Reserve Bank Of New
5/14/09 New Filing! Federal Reserve Bank Of New York <<<clickable link

1 Industry (based upon 2/3/4-Digit SIC Codes)
SIC Code Name Registrants
(2/3/4-Digit)
6011 Federal Reserve Banks -

2 Businesses (based upon 5/6-Digit SIC Codes)
SIC Code Product or Business Registrants
(4-Digit) In ascending order
6011 Federal Reserve banks *
6011 Federal Reserve branches *
________
* There are SEC Registrants, but only at the 2- or 3-digit SIC Code levels.

A scan of Topics was not performed. Search through Topics now.

-------------------------------------------------------

click result of clickable link above

http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Name.asp?X ... f+new+york


“Federal Reserve Bank Of New York”
Latest Filing: 5/14/09 as Signatory
As: Signatory (Director, Officer, Attorney, Accountant, Banker, Agent, etc.)
List All Filings as Signatory

Search Recent Filings (as Signatory) for “Federal Reserve Bank Of New York”
“Federal Reserve Bank Of New York” has been a Signatory for/with the following Registrant:

* American International Group Inc


hmmmm...imagine that.......play with it...try to follow this trail through company name after company name....and..."good luck with that"....
The whole world is a stage...will somebody turn the lights on please?....I have to go bang my head against the wall for a while and assimilate....
vigilant
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Back stage...
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby smiths » Wed May 27, 2009 9:12 pm

Who Owns the Federal Reserve?

As my first attempt to get a list of current shareholders of the semi-private Federal Reserve in late 2008 did never yield an answer I sent an inquiry to the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) today.
As this is still the most important institution in terms of influencing markets I wonder why the Fed does not publish this extremely important piece of information that could provide valuable information about who really pulls the strings in an organisation which uses two different suffix on the web. The server of the Federal Reserve is named "federalreserve.gov" whereas the FRB's server is registered as "frb.org" (corr.27/5/09/ .
The only lists of shareholders of the Fed found on the web through a Go-ogle search are hopelessly outdated and appear to stem from the first half of the 20th century. Or is anyone still doing business with Chase National?
As non-American I cannot file a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request as this institution was defined as a semi-private organization. According to this wikipedia entry

"The plan adopted in the original Federal Reserve Act called for the creation of a System that contained both private and public entities."

The Federal Reserve Act was pushed through on Capitol Hill on December 23, 1913 after a secretive meeting of the USA's bankers elite on Jekyll Island.
Today I used the inquiry form on the Fed's website and asked the following questions directly to the FRB:

Dear FRB members,
I have a very simple question: Where can I find a list of current shareholders of the Federal Reserve? On the web I only find hopelessly outdated lists that seem to stem from the first half of the 20th century as most of these institutions are not in business anymore. Can you please provide me with a current list of shareholders and the number of shares they are holding?
I have filed this question in autumn 2008 as a general inquiry but never received any answer so far.
My second question concerns the status of the Federal Reserve as there is a server name "federalreserve.gov" but also a server name "FRB.org." Is it a private or a public institution?
My third question is why the shareholders of the Federal Reserve receive a guaranteed 6% dividend that is not taxable?
I am most grateful for an answer.
Yours sincerely
Toni Straka, CEFA

I am curious as to whether I will get an answer to one of the most important questions regarding capital markets.
In order to find truth one usually has to follow the money trail.
Follow the Money - Find the Truth
Let's see where I get. In case I am not getting an answer I am calling all bloggers and everybody else to use the said form so that the Fed recognizes that transparent markets need to be transparent in terms of ownership in the first place and the broad public has a vital interest whether it was private or a public organization whose loose monetary policy and the rejection to regulate markets effectively have led to the biggest economic and financial crisis in mankind's history.
The Fed is certainly the most privileged institution in the world, only having to give testimony on Capitol Hill twice a year and getting away with "missing" $9 TRILLION.
Isn't all this a conundrum? It is!


http://prudentinvestor.blogspot.com/200 ... serve.html
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby smiths » Wed May 27, 2009 11:05 pm

well i have just read my daily dose of financial info and its the first time for months that it all looks very very spooky,
its been kooky since early this year, but now its spooky

i think the big crack is hurtling towards us right now,
there are very ominous signs between the lines of the financial info this week,

i might try this afternoon to put together a wrap of what scares me, but for now ... got gold or silver?
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby vigilant » Thu May 28, 2009 5:43 am

Once Considered Unthinkable, U.S. Sales Tax Gets Fresh Look
May 28th, 2009


cryptogon.com

Via: Washington Post:

With budget deficits soaring and President Obama pushing a trillion-dollar-plus expansion of health coverage, some Washington policymakers are taking a fresh look at a money-making idea long considered politically taboo: a national sales tax.

Common around the world, including in Europe, such a tax — called a value-added tax, or VAT — has not been seriously considered in the United States. But advocates say few other options can generate the kind of money the nation will need to avert fiscal calamity.



how much deeper will these scumbags dig...
The whole world is a stage...will somebody turn the lights on please?....I have to go bang my head against the wall for a while and assimilate....
vigilant
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Back stage...
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby vigilant » Thu May 28, 2009 5:44 am

smiths wrote:well i have just read my daily dose of financial info and its the first time for months that it all looks very very spooky,
its been kooky since early this year, but now its spooky

i think the big crack is hurtling towards us right now,
there are very ominous signs between the lines of the financial info this week,

i might try this afternoon to put together a wrap of what scares me, but for now ... got gold or silver?



look forward to your insight smiths.....per usual


I think what you are seeing is the reaction to the largest gap in bonds we have ever had. This pig has been poked to its limit. Bond buyers are sitting back right now wondering if the cabal has enough slack in the sleeve to pull this off, and if they do what that slack is.

The biggest players got paid first, like the people that were driving the Lehman ship, etc...There might still be people sitting there holding trash, that were promised to get paid, but got chumped out like Bernie Madoff. He got fucked, and fucked hard. You know he was promised, if he would hold a bag, that bag would get paid off. I don't know who he pissed off, but he pissed off somebody. Madoff is a small time piker compared to the real players anyway. 50 billion is only to sneeze at, and he wasn't "old money" like most of the rest were. If we don't have any more billionaire banker suicides, or hedgefund managers bite the dust pretty soon, we're gonna know that the kitty from the musical chairs game has been settled. Everybody got their cut, and now the cuts are on the population for the rest of the bag. I don't hear the chimes rattling for many other big bankers to go down right now, so i'm sorta thinkin that the dust has settled. Its possible a couple of more 100 or 200 billion dollar small time players might hit the skids, but i'm not feelin it right now. Won't matter anyway, that is small change in this game.

Musical chairs only goes so far, and then some folks get left flat on their ass. We are supposed to be the only flat asses in the game, not the players themselves. If it turns out that there is too much phony paper and some huge players get left in the dust, that dust is also pension funds, social security, etc...

Nobody wants to get caught in the whiplash right now by buying heavy into bonds because the bailout might have to be backed off and scaled down by a trillion or so. Right now there are big players begging for their lives, begging to get paid for their participation. The big sharks are eating their meat, and listening to the smaller sharks, who thought they were big sharks, beg for their scraps. The big sharks will have to give up some meat, or the smaller sharks will have to die. Sharks are not known for sharing their food.

If that happens some folks are gonna get hit hard. Some of them have already been found dead or suicided, those billionaire bankers...Some tools get used on both ends, fucked coming and going, and they got used at both ends, like the tools they were. They were big players but their blood was not blue enough. They were seen as pests, billionaires or not, scrambling around the big dinner table trying to be somebody with their puny few billions, and they were crowding the game, and they got the maximum exit.

Most of the big bond investment comes from known sources, and the rest comes from insider fence sitters, or coat tail riders. The fence sitters are sittin.......watchin.......and waitin....

it makes the news sorta spooky and gives it a smoky and foggy flavor.


TICK TOCK WHO WILL GET KICKED AWAY FROM THE TABLE? ANYBODY? PROBABLY NOT...UNFORTUNATELY.

I don't know if this is a force play, or if its for real. There is wayyyy to much phony money in the system, and it is too fast to know. But oh shit...ya know? Possibilities are...well.......like a printing press in Gutenberg....limitless.......damn that Gutenberg press.....



Faber: U.S. Inflation to Approach Zimbabwe Level
May 28th, 2009


Via: Bloomberg: WWW.CRYPTOGON.COM

The U.S. economy will enter “hyperinflation” approaching the levels in Zimbabwe because the Federal Reserve will be reluctant to raise interest rates, investor Marc Faber said.

Prices may increase at rates “close to” Zimbabwe’s gains, Faber said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Hong Kong. Zimbabwe’s inflation rate reached 231 million percent in July, the last annual rate published by the statistics office.

“I am 100 percent sure that the U.S. will go into hyperinflation,” Faber said. “The problem with government debt growing so much is that when the time will come and the Fed should increase interest rates, they will be very reluctant to do so and so inflation will start to accelerate.”
The whole world is a stage...will somebody turn the lights on please?....I have to go bang my head against the wall for a while and assimilate....
vigilant
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Back stage...
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby vigilant » Thu May 28, 2009 9:36 am

I spoke a day or two too soon apparently. Another small bit player bites the dust, so that the big sharks can keep their meat.

Remember those pesky crumb snatchers I mentioned in the above post? Those small time billionaires that are pests at the table? The ones that if they get paid, would take a few crumbs from the bigger boys? Think the game just ridded itself of another "less than blue blood" pest perhaps.....oh, and his whole damn pesky family too. They would have wanted to get paid ya know?


Plane Crash Kills Hedge Fund Co-Founder Along with Entire Family
May 27th, 2009


Via: Reuters:

A private plane crashed in Brazil’s northeastern state of Bahia, killing 14 people, including four children, the Brazilian air force said on Saturday.

The twin-engine plane was coming from Sao Paulo and crashed late on Friday about 450 miles from Salvador in Bahia state, near a luxury resort.

An air force spokesman said there was no report of survivors. The plane was owned by Roger Wright, owner of financial consulting firm Arsenal Investimentos, according to local media. Wright, his wife and two children were on board, local websites reported.

The cause of the crash was not known. The air force said the plane’s black box was found and was being analyzed.

An Arsenal Investimentos spokesman would not confirm who was on board.

A spokeswoman at Brazil’s National Civil Aviation Agency said the plane, a King Air B350, had been inspected and that its documents were in order.

Brazil had two major plane crashes in 2006 and 2007, raising concerns about the safety of air travel in Latin America’s largest country.

In July 2007, all 187 people on board and 12 people on the ground died when a TAM airline Airbus A 320 overshot a runway at Sao Paulo’s Congonhas airport.

In September 2006, a Gol airline passenger jet crashed in the Amazon jungle after it and a small private plane collided. All 154 people on board died.
The whole world is a stage...will somebody turn the lights on please?....I have to go bang my head against the wall for a while and assimilate....
vigilant
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Back stage...
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby smiths » Fri May 29, 2009 12:47 am

sod it, i accidently pressed submit instead of preview, i wasnt ready goddam it ...

oh well, i think a good starting point of where we are headed is this screenshot from one of bloombergs trading facilities,
Image
a major financial media outlet openly taking the piss out of the entire financial system and the crooked government that runs it,

fiduciary - "depending on public confidence for value or currency, as fiat money."

now i dont believe in a lot of what these guys say about how important ownership rights are to civil society, but i do think that an arbitrary trashing of the existing law is a fast-track to breakdown

Arguably the most fundamental, crucial element to a civil society is the rule of law. A corollary to this notion is that of contract rights - when two or more people enter into a valid agreement that they intend to be honored, the agreement should indeed be honored ...
All contracts are important in some way, but credit contracts are particularly important to a functioning capitalist system.
Under long standing bankruptcy laws - enacted and enforced by the federal government under the Constitution - a secured creditor is entitled to first priority. Moreover, these secured creditors are to receive at least the equivalent of the value of their collateral.
Unfortunately President Obama’s actions throughout the Chrysler bankruptcy have trampled over these well worn bankruptcy laws, contract rights, and even the rule of law.
It’s not because any contract, agreement or bankruptcy law calls for it, but because the federal government decided it was politically convenient ... The arbitrary whims of Obama’s administration threaten the very foundation of capitalism.
Henceforth lenders will hesitate to provide credit, and eager entrepreneurs and businessmen will struggle to find it, because any credit can now apparently be confiscated by government greed regardless of the law or the existence of a binding contract. Simply put, the price of borrowing will now go up because lenders must account for a new risk - government intervention.

http://www.intheagora.com/archives/2009 ... e_know_it/


I think it was very clear why the deadlines for Chrysler and General Motors were spread apart the way they were. Chrysler was a ‘test’ for the big one which is GM. So if the administration follows in the same steps as their Chrysler proceedings then it is probably safe to say that GM bond holders will end up with little or nothing, even though they have legal contracts that entitles them to be first in line for reimbursement.

IF GM does fall the same way as Chrysler, and bond holders end up getting shafted yet again one has to ponder what this will mean for any company in the future who needs to sell bonds. Who will want to buy them if the Government can overstep the law and make their certificates worthless?

http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/05/24 ... e-for-war/


this one is an interesting one about the real world, no stimulus, printing press magic ... more about the power of real things like food shortage to be the catalyst for collapse of systems chaos theory style

... Sorry for the info overload on soybeans, but I believe what is happening with soybeans is incredibly important.
The US will run out of soybeans by the end of this summer.
1) The USDA is manipulating data on soybean inventories to hide an enormous shortage.
2) Demand from China is largely responsible for the US soybean shortage.
3) Wednesday night, China's beans settled at $14.88 per bushel, which is three dollars above the US’s Friday closing price of $11.84.

I have been predicting hyperinflation would start in China, leading to the dollar's collapse. This is exactly what is happening. Stimulus efforts and money printing by Chinese authorities is creating massive upwards pressure on commodity prices, especially soybeans. This intense demand for physical commodities is bringing US future markets to their knees.

Conclusion: Now there is a clear time frame for the dollars collapse: it will happen this summer.
1) A default on soybean contracts would quickly lead increase demands for delivery on other contracts (especially gold/silver), leading to more defaults and the collapse of US futures markets.
2) The collapse of the COMEX would lead to an enormous spike in all commodity prices, as investors/end users scramble to secure limited physicals supply.
3) In order to keep domestic prices from spiraling uncontrollably upwards, nations around the world will start selling off their US reserves to boost their domestic currencies.
4) Considering the dollar holdings of foreign governments are about $5.4 trillion, this will rapidly destroy the dollar’s worth.

http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/05/s ... e-for.html


most successful hedge fund dude of the last few years, getting into gold,
speaks for itself really

In light of the fact that hedge fund manager John Paulson recently bought tons of gold and gold miners, we thought it would yet again be prudent to examine what the technicals are saying about the metal this time around.
Although Paulson & Co have said they bought the gold as a hedge, we've noticed a confluence of smart minds flocking to large gold positions over the past few quarters. At one point or another, David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital, Eric Mindich of Eton Park Capital, and Dan Loeb of Third Point have all been in gold (among many other funds we're sure). On one hand, Loeb was using it as a 'hideout' and safety net from market irrationality and volatility, and has since sold out, as noted in his investor letter. Einhorn, on the other hand, holds gold due to future inflationary fears.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/139352- ... think-gold
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby smiths » Fri May 29, 2009 1:18 am

from the uncanny financial ninja
There can be no "green shoots" until foreclosure numbers first stabilize and then start falling. The problem is that this can only occur when unemployment rates first stabilize and then start falling. Clearly this is not happening yet. Throw suddenly rising rates into the mix as the global bond markets shudder under the impossible burden of supporting a global quantitative easing campaign and it quickly becomes obvious that there really are no "green shoots" of recovery.

It has begun. Today equities fell significantly and the "safe haven" bid was not large enough to overcome a deluge of selling. Yields rose. Again. This is not likely to be an isolated incident. This will happen with greater frequency and increasingly disruptive consequences.

We are rapidly approaching the point of no return. Once the event horizon has been reached, there will be no turning back.

Calculated Risk points out that mortgage rates have accelerated higher in Mortgage Rates: Moving Higher.

The bond bubble has finally burst... and there is NO fixing this. Debt monetization (Interesting article by Daniel L. Thornton: Monetizing Debt.) does not work. An increase in debt monetization would be like pouring fuel on a raging fire.

http://benbittrolff.blogspot.com/


headlines like this one abound
When Belief in the System Fades (California Tax Rebellion) (May 20, 2009)
http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmay09/bel ... 05-09.html


Spreading Lies
Long-term interest rates are jumping, with yields on 10-year treasuries now up to 3.73%. Apart from the significant impact on the real economy (e.g. higher mortgage rates ), this development is also placing into doubt the validity of a long-standing leading indicator, i.e. the yield spread between 10-year and 2-year treasury bonds
I believe that, unlike other instances, the spread is widening because of two developments unprecedented in the history of the US (though common enough in other, less developed countries, in the past).

1. On the short end, the Fed is engaged in massive monetary operations (quantitative easing) and is keeping short rates near zero.
2. On the long end, the Treasury is bailing out financial and other corporations by promising to inject trillions of dollars it does not have and has to borrow. This massive supply of new Treasury bonds - present and upcoming - is putting upward pressure on long rates and placing the country's AAA credit rating in serious jeopardy.

Clearly, therefore, the widening of the spread is not due to fundamental economic strength. Instead, it is indicative of the rising risk premium that investors are demanding for lending the US government money for longer period of time.

http://suddendebt.blogspot.com/2009/05/ ... -lies.html


and this one is just for kicks,
i have come to the conclusion that ambrose is one of the signal senders of the bankster elites, so its worth reading his ominous pronouncements to understand what 'they' are preparing us for,

Bond markets defy Fed as Treasury yields spike

The US Federal Reserve may soon be forced to launch fresh blitz of quantitative easing whatever the consequences for the US dollar, or risk seeing economic recovery snuffed out by the latest surge in long-term borrowing costs.

"We could be nearing the end-game for the US dollar but the Fed has little choice at this point. We're in a vicious circle where any policy aimed at supporting the US economy must be at the expense of the dollar."

It is unclear why US bond yields have spiked so violently ... ha ha ha

What is clear is that the market choked on $100bn of US Treasury debt issued in three auctions this week, and on the knowledge that Washington must raise a further $900bn by September. Governments around the world must fund $6 trillion of deficits this year, exhausting the capital markets.

The US is at the front of the firing line. Beijing is clearly losing its patience with the Fed's policy of printing paper, seen as a form of stealth default. There is some risk that further moves to step up quantitative easing could cause China to boycott US Treasury auctions. China and Japan together hold 23pc of all US federal debt.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... spike.html
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby smiths » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:22 pm

In March, I wrote that we not only have a shadow banking system, but also a shadow government - specifically, the Fed and Treasury are spending trillions of dollars of our taxpayer money but refusing to answer Congress or the American people's questions about where the money is going.

Yesterday, well-known economist Robert Kuttner agreed:

The Federal Reserve is unique among America's governing institutions. Its combination of outsized power and lack of democratic accountability exceeds even that of the CIA, which at least reports directly to the president. The Fed's powerful regional banks are accountable to private boards made up mostly of bankers. When current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was named president of the New York Fed in 2003, the search committee was chaired by private-equity mogul Peter G. Peterson and dominated by private financiers. The campaign to get Geithner the job was led by Robert Rubin of Citigroup.

All of this clubbiness was by design. In creating the Fed, Congress appropriated a radical idea from the populists for a more stable and resilient banking and currency system -- but put it in the safely conservative hands of private bankers. This insularity is troubling enough in ordinary times. It is downright scandalous in the aftermath of an economic crisis brought on by banking excesses that in turn were enabled and indulged by the Fed.

The economy was crashed by the activities of a shadow banking system -- mortgage companies, hedge funds, private-equity firms, buyers and sellers of credit-default swaps, and corrupted credit-rating agencies -- none of which were regulated by anyone and none of which troubled the Fed. The system's financiers were often bank holding companies whose activities were supposed to be supervised by the Fed but in practice were not.

As a shadow government, the Fed has mirrored the shadow banking system. Now the Fed has put its own balance sheet at risk, courting inflation down the road -- and inviting a long-overdue backlash.

... Critics across the spectrum are asking why the Federal Reserve should not be subject to the same kind of scrutiny as other agencies in its roles as regulator and emergency lender. Instead, these functions have become entangled in a fashion that defies accountability.

By creating massive liquidity that will eventually either find its way onto the national debt or be monetized as inflation, the Fed is now conducting fiscal as well as monetary policy. It is picking winners and losers, with no stated criteria. The Fed continues to waive regulatory scrutiny in the hopes of coaxing a wounded financial system back to life. It bails out institutions deemed "too big to fail," but in preventing the collapse of several banks, from Merrill Lynch to Bear Stearns to Wachovia to National City, its preferred strategy has been to orchestrate mergers to create even bigger banks, thus redoubling the too-big-to-fail problem.

The Fed has all but taken over the banking system ...
In late April, startling testimony by former Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis revealed that the Fed and Treasury had strong-armed him into purchasing Merrill Lynch even after it came to light that Merrill's losses were far larger than had been revealed. Legally, when there is a "material change" in the condition of a merger partner, the acquiring party may back out of the deal. But according to Lewis' testimony, confirmed both by Paulson and by official minutes of meetings, Paulson and Bernanke pressured Lewis into violating his own legal fiduciary duty to his shareholders, who had to approve the deal based on accurate information. Relying on no legal authority whatsoever, the Fed and Treasury threatened to remove the board and management of Bank of America if they refused to go forward and demanded that Lewis not divulge the conversation. Based on these revelations, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo of New York wrote a five-page letter to the SEC and key Congressional committee chairs, suggesting that the Fed and Treasury may have improperly interfered with Bank of America's legal duty to its shareholders...

According to The Washington Post, the latest Geithner-Bernanke plans were conceived and drafted by such leading investment houses as Goldman Sachs and Pimco, which of course stand to gain or lose many billions depending on what the government does...

Neither [the Congressional Oversight Panel] nor the inspector general has any authority over the Fed...
Where will the Treasury get the money? It will issue bonds, adding to the national debt. You could say that the Fed is essentially serving as a money laundry for eventual Treasury borrowing. Alternatively, the Fed could just create more credit, a process that risks inflation -- increasing unease among many of its senior officials.

Luckily, Kuttner thinks that the Fed's power will decrease, not increase:

However, the idea of giving the job [of systemic risk regulator] to the Fed is now all but dead because of its overreaching...

Greenspan has already fallen from grace, and Bernanke could be next. And though the Fed continues to play an outsized role in containing the crisis, its influence as a largely unaccountable shadow government has already peaked. The only question is how much further damage we will have to endure before both the financial system and its all-too-friendly central bank are rendered more accountable to a broad public interest.


http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2 ... d-has.html
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Political

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest