JackRiddler wrote:c2w? can too shut up, and when she does I'm often disappointed that she didn't have more to say. Her reluctance to make reductive pronouncements without showing how she arrived at them, her ability to consider a problem from many angles while still showing patience and respect for those who don't or can't, and her willingness always to do the hard work of reviewing a subject thoroughly and digging up the relevant information for us are all admirable. Even more admirable are the goodness and humanity of the fine mind that shines through in most of her comments here. Not that she's a saint. She's also very good at undressing idiocy with the subtlest in snark, which is entertaining for the way it usually goes over the head of its targets, although that shouldn't be called admirable. She may be a touch too reluctant to punch out unredeemable idiocy, instead of continuing to offer therapy far longer than the idiocy merits. The offer is almost never appreciated. In my own thinking, I try to meet the standards she sets for diligence, circumspection and logic. She's a gift.
This concludes my three paragraph rendering of the single sentence, "You're wrong, c2w? is great."
