Question about Clintons private server

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Question about Clintons private server

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu May 05, 2016 12:22 pm

I see a whole lot of people's (not RI members) new found faith in the FBI and right wing assholes that have been going after the Clintons for 20 years in getting to the bottom of Clinton's server scandal. I have no faith in either of them. Does anyone here believe the FBI will "get" Clinton? Does anyone here believe the NSA does not already have everything Clinton had on that "private" server? If so have they "shared" that with the FBI like they shared all the original 9/11 crime scene evidence?

Was Clinton so naive to think the NSA wasn't collecting all her stuff like they were collecting everyone else's? Did she care?

Isn't the NSA holding back stuff about Benghazi?

They can't give it up cause that wouldn't look good that they were spying on the Sec of State....could they?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby zangtang » Thu May 05, 2016 2:54 pm

just bargaining chips to be used in exchange for 'nice to haves' on the agencies shopping lists, i imagine.

- part exchange, tho - you wouldn't want to give up leverage that could last you a full 8 years..........
zangtang
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Thu May 05, 2016 4:39 pm

That's my hypothesis on how this is playing out behind the scenes: whatever compromising material is on there is cancelled out not only by its relation to other NSA/FBI/Security Snooping State Shenanigans, but because it would compromise other overworld types much higher up the elite food chain than Hillary herself.

It would surprise the hell out of me if she were indicted. If I saw her acting unhinged in the way Ted Cruz did in the last week, that would be a tell, but she's been cool as a cucumber. I don't think her private server is her achilles heel. I think her achilles heel is just being Hillary.
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Gone baby gone
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby Karmamatterz » Thu May 05, 2016 8:28 pm

All good replies to the OP, esp by StillRobertP.

No way would they give up juicy blackmail morsels that could be used later. For all we know exposing all the emails would likely expose more scummy behavior by that alphabets. The NSA probably detected this private email server almost immediately and unless it was using state of the art crypto had access right away. When the the FBI and NSA publicly state we need weaker encryption it's a red herring.

Not sure what the exact reasoning for her to setup her own server, most likely she didn't trust the people who manage whatever system(s) are used by the rest of the state dept. staff.
User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby Karmamatterz » Thu May 05, 2016 10:20 pm

If the info on Wikipedia is true (I frankly don't trust Wiki all that much) then Hillary gets props for using the server as a red herring in foreign diplomacy, or she is complete freaking idiot. Anybody who knows anything about IT would cringe at the setup. She didn't even bother to have in a place an SSL certificate, one of the most basic security features anybody who is remotely competent knows this. I've setup plenty of SSL certs on servers, not that hard to do. Running any server without encryption is like having sex without a condom and just hoping your partner doesn't get pregnant.


Server security and hacking attempts Edit

In 2008, before Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State, Justin Cooper, a longtime aide to Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, managed the system. Cooper had no security clearance or expertise in computer security.[34] Later, Bryan Pagliano, the former IT director for Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, was hired to maintain their private email server while Clinton was Secretary of State.[35][36] Pagliano had invoked the Fifth Amendment during congressional questioning about Clinton's server. In early 2016, he was granted immunity by the Department of Justice in exchange for cooperation with prosecutors.[37][38] A Clinton spokesman said her campaign was "pleased" Pagliano was now cooperating with prosecutors.[39]

Security experts such as Chris Soghoian believe that emails could be at risk of hacking and foreign surveillance.[40] Marc Maiffret, a cybersecurity expert, said that the server had "amateur hour" vulnerabilities.[41] For the first two months after Clinton was appointed Secretary of State and began accessing mail on the server through her Blackberry, transmissions to and from the server were apparently not encrypted. On March 29, 2009 a “digital certificate" was obtained which would have permitted HTTPS encryption.[1]

Former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael T. Flynn,[42] former United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates,[43][44] and former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency Michael Morell[45][46] have said that it is likely that foreign governments were able to access the information on Clinton's server. Michael Hayden, former Director of the National Security Agency, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency said "I would lose all respect for a whole bunch of foreign intelligence agencies if they weren't sitting back, paging through the emails."[47]

Clinton's server was configured to allow users to connect openly from the Internet and control it remotely using Microsoft's Remote Desktop Services.[41][48] It is known that hackers in Russia were aware of Clinton's non-public email address as early as 2011.[49] Server records also show that, using a computer in Serbia, a hacker had scanned Clinton's Chappaqua server at least twice, in August and in December 2012. It was unclear whether the hacker knew the server belonged to Clinton, although it did identify itself as providing email services for clintonemail.com.[41] During 2014, Clinton's server was the target of repeated intrusions originating in Germany, China, and South Korea. Threat monitoring software on the server blocked at least five such attempts. The software was installed in October 2013, and for three months prior to that, no such software had been installed.[50][51]
User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby justdrew » Thu May 05, 2016 11:03 pm

what was her e-mail address on that server?

There's no reason to even think she would have anything "bad" there as it was an official address used for government business. If she wanted an email for nefarious purposes, it would be like bob1234@whatever.com - not her widely known "official" e-mail address. Which had to be setup by multiple IT people within the governments IT. It was allowed to happen, it could have easily been prevented, so she'd have had no reason to think it was unacceptable. Personally, I think it's just a case of taking bad advice from an old IT "guru" she relied on.

By all means, let us snoop through EVERY single person who has access to classified info and ensure none of them have ever got a bit of it into less-secure locations. and by the way, what's so secure about the official infrastructure? Wasn't it just a few months ago we were told shitloads of government servers had been compromised for years?

If there was anything serious there, it would have come out long before now.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby 82_28 » Fri May 06, 2016 1:04 am

Sanders presented an olive branch from the very beginning about this "issue" but she is cut throat -- he stuck up for her. But what really would any of us care about the content of the emails? I know I sure wouldn't and I am normally into such stuff. I know she's lame and that is really all we need to care about. Everyone online who is "left wing" says we must get behind her. Sorry not happening. I will perhaps not vote at all. It is Sanders or Stein and that is it.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby NeonLX » Sun May 08, 2016 11:08 am

82_28 » Fri May 06, 2016 12:04 am wrote: Everyone online who is "left wing" says we must get behind her. Sorry not happening. I will perhaps not vote at all. It is Sanders or Stein and that is it.


I keep pointing out that there's nothing "left wing" about $hillary. Most liberals' reactions are the same as if I'd taken a shit in a crowded swimming pool.

I'll write in Sanders or Stein too. No way I'm voting FOR Hillary, even if I'm supposedly voting AGAINST Drumpf.
America is a fucked society because there is no room for essential human dignity. Its all about what you have, not who you are.--Joe Hillshoist
User avatar
NeonLX
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Enemy Occupied Territory
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby Luther Blissett » Sun May 08, 2016 11:13 am

Good points, I have to admit that I was guilty of the naïveté that Seemslikeadream described in her first post until I read this thread. Of course! Of course it's going down the way Robert Paulson explains.

Her address on the server was "hrod" followed by some numbers, which I thought was funny.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun May 08, 2016 11:47 am

I also agree with Robert. The emails in question were retroactively classified - the information when sent and received was not at the time classified, but were much later in time. It's a non-issue, really.
Once that's been said, the conversation turns immediately to Benghazi!
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby Nordic » Sun May 08, 2016 7:32 pm

Hrod? Like "Hot Rod"?

Hot Rod Clinton.

That could help her.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby smoking since 1879 » Mon May 09, 2016 7:22 am

kinda cross post with the nuclear meltdown thread...


Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Hillary Clinton's Emails About Fukushima -- And Then A Black Out As She Goes to Japan to Support US Nuke Cartel

I only have a few takeaways from the review of several thousand emails to and from Hilary Clinton in 2011 Spring. But first the skeleton in the closet. Clinton had almost daily email communications on Fukushima, then 2 aids or handlers implored her to go to Japan even though she was really tired from so much travel. After that second email imploring her to go to Japan, ALL HER FUKUSHIMA EMAIL STOPPED---well at least it was not disclosed in the email disclosure.



"Sending this fyi but not for forwarding"

[SNIP]

"Radiation leak from the Fukushima reactor [****************REDACTED*****************] Stay indoors if at all possible. There is nothing, no events, parties, sports, movies, etc that are worth getting more exposure to radiation. This stuff travels far, very far"


http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.cz/2016/02/hilary-clintons-emails-about-fukushima.html
"Now that the assertive, the self-aggrandising, the arrogant and the self-opinionated have allowed their obnoxious foolishness to beggar us all I see no reason in listening to their drivelling nonsense any more." Stanilic
smoking since 1879
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: CZ
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby Karmamatterz » Mon May 09, 2016 7:51 am

User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon May 09, 2016 7:59 am

smoking since 1879 » Mon May 09, 2016 6:22 am wrote:kinda cross post with the nuclear meltdown thread...


Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Hillary Clinton's Emails About Fukushima -- And Then A Black Out As She Goes to Japan to Support US Nuke Cartel

I only have a few takeaways from the review of several thousand emails to and from Hilary Clinton in 2011 Spring. But first the skeleton in the closet. Clinton had almost daily email communications on Fukushima, then 2 aids or handlers implored her to go to Japan even though she was really tired from so much travel. After that second email imploring her to go to Japan, ALL HER FUKUSHIMA EMAIL STOPPED---well at least it was not disclosed in the email disclosure.



"Sending this fyi but not for forwarding"

[SNIP]

"Radiation leak from the Fukushima reactor [****************REDACTED*****************] Stay indoors if at all possible. There is nothing, no events, parties, sports, movies, etc that are worth getting more exposure to radiation. This stuff travels far, very far"


http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.cz/2016/02/hilary-clintons-emails-about-fukushima.html



thanks ...I can't believe I missed that
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Question about Clintons private server

Postby smoking since 1879 » Mon May 09, 2016 11:52 am

seemslikeadream » Mon May 09, 2016 12:59 pm wrote:
smoking since 1879 » Mon May 09, 2016 6:22 am wrote:kinda cross post with the nuclear meltdown thread...


Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Hillary Clinton's Emails About Fukushima -- And Then A Black Out As She Goes to Japan to Support US Nuke Cartel

I only have a few takeaways from the review of several thousand emails to and from Hilary Clinton in 2011 Spring. But first the skeleton in the closet. Clinton had almost daily email communications on Fukushima, then 2 aids or handlers implored her to go to Japan even though she was really tired from so much travel. After that second email imploring her to go to Japan, ALL HER FUKUSHIMA EMAIL STOPPED---well at least it was not disclosed in the email disclosure.



"Sending this fyi but not for forwarding"

[SNIP]

"Radiation leak from the Fukushima reactor [****************REDACTED*****************] Stay indoors if at all possible. There is nothing, no events, parties, sports, movies, etc that are worth getting more exposure to radiation. This stuff travels far, very far"


http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.cz/2016/02/hilary-clintons-emails-about-fukushima.html



thanks ...I can't believe I missed that



:whisper: i don't think it was ever in the msm
"Now that the assertive, the self-aggrandising, the arrogant and the self-opinionated have allowed their obnoxious foolishness to beggar us all I see no reason in listening to their drivelling nonsense any more." Stanilic
smoking since 1879
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: CZ
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests