Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri Jun 03, 2022 4:34 am

Belligerent Savant » 12 May 2022 06:01 wrote:
Belligerent Savant » Wed May 11, 2022 3:00 pm wrote:Many embedded links at source.

The day I understood the 'good German'

Publié le 24/02/2022 à 16:58

The most important event in recent human history, which shaped the world as it is today, was the Second World War. It is a topic covered, to this day, in a huge number of books, documentaries, plays and movies. Each writer, director and screenwriter tells a piece of the story. Each one with their own viewpoint and approach.

...

With so many books and movies, it was possible to understand what people at all levels and from all the countries involved thought and acted, from important leaders such as Winston Churchill, one of the main ones in the conflict, to feeling the anguish of a Soviet child running away from death, as portrayed in the tense film "Come and See", an essential masterpiece by Elem Klimov.

However, even after studying and watching everything possible, for me, one single character always remained a great mystery: it is the "good German". This person was the normal citizen of Germany, not radical, but who did not react when the Holocaust occurred. He was part of a society that accepted the elimination of 6 million Jews with a terrifying normality.

It wasn't five or ten thousand people. It was six million. From within Germany, the Jewish population was relevant: 566,000 citizens. Therefore, practically every German had contact with some Jewish family. They were a society that lived in reasonable harmony. Ordinary Germans went to Jewish businesses. Germans had Jewish employees. Their children attended the same schools. They all went to the same clubs, the same restaurants, and played sports together. Friendships were common and natural.

Less than ten years later, how do you, an ordinary citizen, accept that a family of neighbors is removed on trains to concentration camps? How do you accept that your Jewish friend's neighborhood business is closed, with the owners removed from society, without any protest?

Hate speech, the book "Mein Kampf", defamation, repression, dictatorship, censorship, and Goebbels' massive propaganda, no matter how devilishly brilliant they may have been, in my view, were never enough to explain the contempt of almost a whole society for the lives of other human beings.

For something of these proportions to occur, it is not enough for there to merely be a dictatorship. It needs a totalitarian state where the population is in harmony with the dictatorial government. It needs a people that collaborates by denouncing, helping, and not caring about the evil in front of them. For this, the population needs to understand the opposite: that evil is good.

Now, by studying the history of previous pandemics, I have discovered some clues to try to solve the mystery. It became a little clearer when I read a scientific paper that analyzes the typhus pandemic within the Warsaw Ghetto. I had never read anything about the conflict from this point of view.

Published in 2020, already during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study sets out to explain how the disease, which killed between 10 and 40 percent of those infected, was controlled in the ghetto. The neighborhood, surrounded by walls, housed 400,000 people in a small, densely populated space in 1940.

The article "Extraordinary curtailment of massive typhus epidemic in the Warsaw Ghetto", published in the journal Science Advances, was done by Australian researchers from RMIT University Melbourne.

The study is interesting and focuses exclusively on internal actions, from social distancing to combs used to fight lice. It does not set out to analyze the ordinary citizen of Germany in historical context. However, the Australian scientists, in the introduction, bring in underreported information from the external perspective, from outside the ghetto, during the era.

According to the Nazis, the Warsaw Ghetto was a Seuchensperrgebiet (lockdown) to contain the typhus epidemic

Due to losses of soldiers to typhus in World War I, Germany in the 1930s and 1940s had great concern for public health. They cultivated an obsession with infectious diseases. "There was a fanatical fear of typhus spreading to the German people and its army" the Australian scientists explained.

Simultaneously, scientists reached the scientific consensus that Jews were the carriers of the disease. Therefore, to protect the population from the pandemic, a wall was built as a public health effort to contain the typhus spreaders. It was 10 feet high and 18 kilometers long. It was the "epidemic wall". In this way, the Jews of Warsaw, about one third of the entire population of the city, were confined in the neighborhood. The total number of Jews in all of Poland was 3.4 million.

When typhus cases increased in the ghetto, as was to be expected due to the crowding of people in a small space, physician Jost Walbaum, the highest health authority, reinforced the already established scientific consensus: "The Jews are overwhelmingly the carriers and disseminators of typhus infection."

Soon he resolved to spare no effort to control the pandemic. "We have one and only one responsibility, that the German people are not infected and endangered by these parasites. For that, any means must be right," Dr Jost added, being applauded by about 100 people, mostly doctors.

In the following, Hans Frank, one of the highest authorities of the General Government, following science, stated that the murder of 3 million Jews in Poland "“was unavoidable for reasons of public health."

That is, this approach tells us that when there is censorship, propaganda, and public health authorities taking action based on scientific consensus, the population, in fear of a disease, even approves of a Holocaust.

But when I first read this article in 2020, when it was published, the mystery about "good German" remained. After all, it started from a wrong assumption: that the traditionally well-educated German people were stupid enough to believe the gross lie that Jews were guilty of the typhus pandemic.

So it became one more hypothesis among several. I concluded that it was a mystery without solution, and that only by living in that society, at that time, something impossible to happen, I would be able to understand how they passively accepted everything.

The consensus of each era

Vaccines against COVID-19 to date do not reduce transmission [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-021-01041-4]. They do not sterilize the virus. That is already defined by science in several studies. It does not reduce waves in countries. It does not reduce contamination inside the home. Maybe it is even making contamination worse. And maybe it increases the possibility of catching the new variant, the omicron. Recently, for example, Israel, one of the most vaccinated countries, the only one on the planet with the fourth dose, broke the world record of cases per million and saw the number of deaths go way up.

In other words, science has already defined that these vaccines are not a societal pact. You take it for yourself, thinking about your disease, in case you get infected, and not to help society fight the pandemic. Vaccines don't stop infection and they don't stop transmission.

However, on television, the message is different: "The vaccine protects both you and the people around you," said epidemiologist Pedro Hallal on TV Globo, Brazil's largest network, in a recent report. He was just repeating a pseudoscientific consensus created by authorities and massively repeated like Goebbels' propaganda.

By saying that vaccines protect people "around you," a statement as untrue as the claim that Jews were the spreaders of typhus, you point out who is to blame for COVID-19: those who decided not to get the vaccine.

At the same time, making the decision to accept vaccines to escape pressure, such as not losing your job or being able to go to a hospital, is not a simple thing. In the Pfizer study of six-month results, published in NEJM, more people died from all causes in the vaccine group than in the placebo group. There were 15 versus 14. Then, when they updated that number at the FDA, the scenario got even worse for the vaccinated: 21 to 17. By the way, the frightening numbers from VAERS, the side effect reporting system, seem to confirm in real life the risk detected in the "gold standard" study. And nobody knows exactly how much under-reporting there is in VAERS, it is just known that there is.

Besides these discouraging numbers, soon after the beginning of the sales and application in the population, a report in the BMJ, one of the most respected scientific journals in the world, pointed out that there was fraud in the study. In the sequence, the report suffered censorship, like those that occurred during the Nazi era. And then we learned that Pfizer, together with the FDA, asked for 55 years to release the safety data, raising more distrust about the reliability of the product.

And no one at the FDA wants to debate the safety data at all. Anyone who says anything outside the consensus of the bureaucrats is accused, fired, persecuted, offended, and censored. In the Moderna study, the bizarre things are similar. And strange things happen with contractual agreements, as in the case of Astra Zeneca with Brazil, where they want to build a vault to hide the secret agreement, claiming institutional security.

This is because we already knew that 50% of the FDA is funded by the pharmaceutical industries. We also knew that Pfizer paid the largest fine in history for "fraudulent marketing" and we already knew that the FDA, which approved the vaccine, cannot be trusted because, among other things, it has hidden fraud in scientific studies. Furthermore, the FDA has the power to control the press. In other words, the companies rule the press. And the WHO? The same thing, after all, 50% of its income comes from industry.

So, vaccines do not interrupt the cycle and it is at least understandable, given all these facts and data, that someone refuses to go to a healthcare facility and take a simple needle prick, even if it is offered for free.

It becomes even more understandable if someone chooses another option in case of being infected by the virus. Especially if you are someone who is aware of the results of treatment with safe, inexpensive, generic, and off-patent drugs, such as the numbers presented by Dr George Fareed and Dr Brian Tyson, with 3,962 COVID patients treated early with zero deaths.

Or if the person is aware of places that use treatments in their official protocols, such as Uttar Pradesh in India or Chiapas in Mexico, two examples among several that dominated the COVID-19 pandemic.

And I finally understood "good German"

With the pseudoscientific consensus that vaccines protect people "around you" massively disseminated, by reading a news story, I finally understood the "good German".

I needed something that experienced the mood of that time to understand it.

Image

He is a boy from Cyprus. He tried to go to Germany to have surgery. "At the last minute, the Frankfurt hospital told authorities in Cyprus that the surgery wasn't going to happen. The hospital reportedly cited the parents' lack of a COVID-19 vaccine as the reason", the news reports.

"Cypriot authorities reportedly suggested a different guardian journey with the boy to Germany but were unsuccessful in persuading the hospital", informs the report.

With Germany's refusal, they tried in the United Kingdom, the country that was a base of the fight against fascism. It was also denied. Later they tried Israel, the country made up of the people who suffered the Holocaust, but was also refused.

The child was not infected. The parents were not infected. And even with vaccines that do not reduce transmission, they decided that the parents are to blame for the pandemic and sent a message: that their child deserves to die because of it.

What is the difference between the health professionals in those hospitals and the doctors who applauded Dr Jost Walbaum? What is the difference between them and those who saw the trains full of children going to Auschwitz and didn't care? None. They made me understand the "good German". A contempt for the lives of others.

"Recipients are heavily scrutinized to qualify for hard-to-come-by hearts or any other organs for transplant. They have to go to the patient most likely to survive," commented an anonymous "good German" in the news, behaving like the people who were afraid of the starving children in the Warsaw ghetto.

Image

"Ignore the rules, engage in high risk behavior and get tossed off the list for transplants. Same rules that have always been in place," commented a North American who appreciates rules being obeyed.

In other news, a US hospital denied a heart transplant to an unvaccinated patient, condemning him to death. "DJ Ferguson, 31, urgently needs a new heart, but Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston has taken him off the transplant list," said his father, David.

Ferguson is not a person infected with the virus, but just a person who has not taken a vaccine that does not prevent him from being infected or transmitting the virus. "I am in favor without question, are you going to put the guy in the hospital, save a life being able to contaminate several members of the medical and nursing staff?" questioned Thiago, a Facebook user. "Radicalism is you denying science," commented Cleber, from Rio de Janeiro, in the post.

In other words, the "good German" was a guy who believed he was "following science". I have not found any record of Germans who opposed this fear created against Jews. But I believe that probably when someone did object, he was accused of being a "science denier".

It doesn't matter that today we have 10 billion doses administered, and every reasonably well-informed person knows or has heard of someone who, even if vaccinated, contracted COVID. People believe the authorities who call themselves spokesmen of science, not the science itself.

By fear, the main ethical agreement in history was revoked

Image
Defendants during a session of the doctors' trial at Nuremberg. Credit: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Shortly after World War II there was a series of 12 trials in Nuremberg. It was aimed at convicting captured Nazi war criminals. The first one, the most important, took place between December 9, 1946 and August 20, 1947. It was against the lying doctors and scientists.

The charges against them were conspiracy to commit war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conducting medical experiments without the consent of the participants, such as those in the concentration camps and occupied zones. Of the 23 defendants, seven were acquitted and seven received death sentences. The remainder received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment.

Out of this trial came the most important ethical agreement in history: the Nuremberg Code. It was intended to prevent the Nazi absurdities from ever being repeated. The first item of the code, the most essential of all, defines: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential."

It has been explained in detail, so that there is no doubt: "This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion."

Today, Covid vaccines are still experimental. After all, the truth is extremely simple and there is no open question: it is impossible to know the long-term effect. It has been in massive use for just over a year. The amount of doses, for example, has not yet been defined. The long-term effects of vaccines are uncertain. They may, and hopefully will, do no harm. But only a time traveler can claim that the vaccines are safe.

The study records themselves on the official websites document everything, so that there is no doubt: Pfizer's study ends on May 2, 2023. Moderna's ends on October 27, 2022, Janssen's on January 2, 2023, and Astrazeneca's on February 14, 2023.

At the same time, rulers in various places, hearing the grotesque lie that vaccines protect people "around", have decided to implement the useless health passports, coercing and forcing people to participate in medical experiments. In other words, out of fear of disease, they revoked the main human rights agreement in human history. No surprise to a world that considers as normal three countries to refuse a cardiac surgery for a child.

Austria, the first country to easily join the Third Reich, hires agents to persecute those who do not want to participate in the medical experiment. Austrians who are not vaccinated face fines of up to 3600 euros for non-compliance, and can go to prison if they refuse to pay, reports the Swiss website Blick. In addition, Austrian health authorities have even put all unvaccinated people under house arrest.

Australia, on the other hand, went further. Afraid of the unvaccinated, they created their own version of the Warsaw Ghetto. It is located in the northern territories. It is highly guarded and police hunt down escapees. "Australian police have arrested three people who broke out of a Covid quarantine compound in the middle of the night," reports BBC news.

They did not have the virus. "Officers found them after a manhunt on Wednesday. All had tested negative to Covid the day before," the news release said.


And the Australian idea of reviving the Warsaw Ghetto has inspired doctors elsewhere to say phrases worthy of Dr Jost Walbaum. "If I had the opportunity and the authority I would do my best to create concentration camps for the unvaccinated," said the medical director of the Villa Sofia - Cervello hospitals in Palermo, a city that in the past showed appreciation for Mussolini.

Moreover, today it is possible to understand how authoritarianism is implanted with the support of a frightened population and a press that refuses to do its job. In a program on television in Brazil, a reporter afraid of the unvaccinated asked about the implications for parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. A public official explained that parents can face fines and even have their children taken by the state.

In the aftermath the reporter questioned whether ordinary people should report the parents to the authorities. "You should report them," replied the law judge. "As was done with Germans who hid Jews in the basement," journalist Paula Schimitt commented.

In Canada, the country that has already asked its citizens to report people who criticize government health decisions, Judge Cathaline Heinrichs has banned a father from sharing social media posts related to COVID-19 with his son. And it went further: she prohibited the father from discussing the COVID-19 vaccination with his 11-year-old son or providing the child with "other information about the vaccine or the disease" such as the Pfizer study fraud news published in the BMJ.

"Fear corrupts the greatest certainties," said to me by a physician friend, professor of medicine, who has treated 750 COVID patients with only one death, just the one person who did not do all the treatment. He asked for anonymity so as not to suffer persecution, offenses or defamation.

"History repeats itself, first time as tragedy, the second as farce," Karl Marx once said.

Resistance

In 1941, during the Nazi occupation of France, the underground newspaper Défense de la France - France Soir was born. It was the newspaper of the French resistance. They denounced the fascist occupation government, human rights violations, and the false science of the Nazis. They were accused of producing disinformation. Subverting the censorship, in a heroic way, in 1944, they distributed up to 450 thousand copies daily. Besides news, they produced, in their printing plants, passports for persecuted Jews.

With ups and downs, France Soir survives to this day. Now, during the pandemic, they have been denouncing false science, human rights violations, fascist rules, and had their interviews with Luc Montagnier, Nobel Laureate in Medicine, censored on youtube. The newspaper has been accused again of publishing disinformation and they are fighting against totalitarian passports. It is the only newspaper with history that preserves the courage to do all this. "We have the same spirit of resistance," told me Xavier Azalbert, the newspaper's director of publications. It's the coolest place in the world where they invite me to get up on a stool and curse Nazis. It's the tradition of the newspaper.

Disclaimer

I have my ears ready to hear offenses for writing this article. I will accept them all, as long as the person who wishes to offend me first says that he agrees with the child in Cyprus not having his cardiac emergency attended to.

Auteur(s): Filipe Rafaeli, pour FranceSoir



https://www.francesoir.fr/opinions-trib ... ood-german



Australia, on the other hand, went further. Afraid of the unvaccinated, they created their own version of the Warsaw Ghetto. It is located in the northern territories. It is highly guarded and police hunt down escapees. "Australian police have arrested three people who broke out of a Covid quarantine compound in the middle of the night," reports BBC news.


This fails to mention that those people were indigenous kids in a jurisdiction where the only kids locked up are indigenous and doesn't mention that non indigenous people who walked out of Howard Springs whenever they felt like it weren't even followed up on or their "escape" reported.

(It wasn't all of Australia either. It was one state, well wasn't even a state, just a territory.)
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Mon Jun 06, 2022 8:15 pm



Image

Addendum, Two things, I have downloaded video's from youtube for years, and have never had my video's canceled over and over, so it must be a new thing from the 'don't be evils' fucks and or terms of service change. Also, I'm frustrated I can't get a transcription of this...
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Tue Jun 07, 2022 1:59 am

Well...you can pick up the transcript on youtube, more or less. Click on the 3 dots at the bottom of the description, in line with the Likes, dislikes, etc... and select transcript.

:thumbsup 8.6K . :hrumph Dislike . Share . Save . ...


And here is what you get -
(Looks very interesting. Thank you, Griz.)

Hello and welcome to UnHerd Ideas. I'm Freddie Sayers. Biologist Bret Weinstein was, until not very long ago, admired
0:10
across party lines as an independent thinker. He was profiled in the New York Times, and together with the likes of
0:17
Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson, and his own brother, Eric, he was a founding member of the so-called intellectual dark web. Then
0:26
COVID happened and his scepticism about some elements of the pandemic response, including the vaccine programme,
0:34
and his interest in potential other treatments for COVID was deemed to have crossed a line. He was denounced by erstwhile
0:43
friends like Sam Harris, and his massively popular podcast, the Dark Horse, was demonetized on YouTube. Well, this week, he was
0:51
in London, and he came into the studio to talk. I wanted to find out and probe where he had got to in his thinking and what kind
0:59
of world he now feels we live in. Whether you think he went
1:11
too far over the pandemic, or not far enough, whether you strongly agree with him or strongly disagree with him, I
1:17
hope you'll see that he gives an honest account of his experience, and a sincere expression of what he thinks
1:23
went wrong, and what he thinks might be coming next. Enjoy.
1:28
Welcome, Bret. Glad to be here; thanks for having me. So let me start with a impossibly broad, grand
1:34
question, which is two years on from the start of this pandemic,
1:40
what do you feel you have learnt about the way the world really operates that you didn't know before?
1:47
That's an interesting question. I feel like the general role
1:54
that I played during COVID is one that I'm familiar with, but that this particular iteration was remarkable and that many of
2:03
us who actually have been practised at being nuanced in
2:09
the face of power, and bringing along an audience, faced an
2:14
enemy with much more powerful tools. And so I think one has to
2:21
be – I'm not sure how much we know about what we succeeded at
2:27
and what we failed that, but we do know that we got chewed up in a way in this battle that was most unfortunate. So I think
2:36
we've learned something about the power of the enemy and what it will do when the chips are down. Do you know who that enemy is or what that enemy is? How would
2:45
you characterise it? I'm not sure. We know many things. There are entities that
2:51
we can point to – we can point to Gavi and the Trusted News Initiative, the AP and Reuters, and many different organisations
3:00
that played a role in, frankly, slandering us and misleading the
3:06
public with respect to what the reliable information was, and therefore what the good advice was. There's, of course, also
3:13
the CDC, and the WHO and Anthony Fauci. But my model –
3:18
So you consider them the enemy at this point? Well, here's the problem. I don't want to consider them the
3:23
enemy. But what we got during COVID was not an inept response.
3:29
It was the inverse of a good response. And you can't get there through incompetence. Had they simply failed, that would
3:39
be one thing, but what they gave us was a recipe for disaster and
3:45
to the extent that they were willing to do that, for whatever reason, and allow the harm to flow from it that did, I have to
3:54
think of them that way. These people must be removed from
4:00
power lest this happen again. And I would point out, this is evident – even just step back and recognise that the same
4:08
person was responsible for sidestepping the ban on gain of
4:15
function research that the United States wisely enacted and offshoring that work to China, that same person was the person
4:25
at the forefront of our disastrous COVID response, including both the application of vaccines in a completely
4:34
un-nuanced way, and the sidelining of repurposed drugs
4:40
that turn out to be highly effective. So let me ask you to just summarise that for us: what do
4:46
you think the mistake was? Well, I don't know. At some level, the policy appears
4:55
optimised for delivering the maximum number of doses of an experimental treatment based on a completely novel approach to
5:05
disease. That is not a rational thing to do. It was not the
5:11
right tool to apply and to become so obsessive about it that no other tool was allowed – in fact, they were actively
5:17
disallowed – This is vaccines you're referring to? Yes, the vaccines appeared to be the one-size-fits-all solution,
5:25
which is preposterous at a number of levels. For one thing epidemiologically it was not wise to mass-vaccinate in the
5:32
face of an ongoing pandemic. That's very different than vaccinating in advance of a disease outbreak. And this also
5:41
was not done in a way that was risk-stratified. There were lots of people – even if these vaccines had been excellent with
5:47
no known hazard associated with them – there were lots of people who simply didn't need them. People who were safe from COVID,
5:54
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:48 am

Paul Kingsnorth: Why I changed sides in the vaccine wars

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_uAwsVn10Y

UnHerd
• Nov 30, 2021 • Freddie Sayers speaks to Paul Kingsnorth.

Read the article here: https://unherd.com/thepost/paul-kings...

Paul Kingsnorth sees the vaccine wars as symptomatic of a bigger division between two fundamentally different world views: he calls them “thesis” and “antithesis.” When it comes to Covid, “thesis” is the establishment viewpoint: that lockdowns are needed to contain the virus, masks work, vaccines are safe, and people who question them are wrongheaded or worse. When Covid-19 first struck, Kingsnorth took the “thesis” viewpoint.

But over the last few months, his perspective changed. As he writes in today’s UnHerd, the crystallising moment arrived when he woke up to the news that the Austrian government had ‘interned an entire third of the population’. This move, he writes, sent a ‘chill down my spine’.

The “antithesis” view can be summed up as: lockdowns are not needed, masks do not work, the safety and efficacy of the vaccines are being oversold, vaccine passports will not only fail but further segregate society, and in the near future we can expect Giradian scapegoating of the unvaccinated. In other words, we are positioned on the precipice of a slippery slope that leads towards increasingly draconian biopolitical control measures, the grip of which is unlikely to release even once the pandemic is over.

In a conversation with Freddie Sayers on this week’s UnHerdTV, he explains this division and the bigger epistemological divides it reveals. “People are arguing about vaccines,” he says, “but they’re really under the surface arguing about what kind of person you are if you have taken these things, whether you’re a good or a bad person, or clean or unclean one”.

In Kingsnorth’s view, each of us has a line that cannot be crossed. And his has now been reached.

Listen to the podcast version: https://shows.acast.com/lockdowntv-wi...
// Timecodes //
00:00 - 01:30 - Introduction
01:30 - 05:33 - Paul Kingsnorth explains the vaccine wars and their meaning
05:33 - 08:35 - The thesis and antithesis positions of the COVID debate
08:35 - 13:45 - Is the COVID debate a threat to the elite, like Brexit and Trump?
13:45 - 15:32 - Fear as a controlling device
15:32 - 18:51 - What does 'freedom' really mean?
18:51 - 20:23 - Where are we headed?
20:23 - 22:26 - Kingsnorth on what he’s learned in the last two years
22:26 - 25:05 - Where about ‘liberal democracy’?
25:05 - 30:45 - Are the antithesis group yearning for religious meaning?
30:45 - 34:09 - What are the values we should be talking about?
34:09 - 34:37 - Concluding thoughts
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby MacCruiskeen » Wed Jun 08, 2022 5:16 pm

"SADS", sic. Doctors are dumbfounded, flabbergasted, clueless, utterly bereft of any promising lines of inquiry:

Doctors baffled by Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) in healthy young people

By Matthew Roscoe • 08 June 2022 • 11:18

https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/06/08/s ... rome-sads/


"Entertainment: Trending"

Image
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUlq5_MWAAI ... me=360x360


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymPu2PdLW3I

"Here, are you taking the piss?"

"You're fucking giving it away, aren't you?"

Mike Leigh, Naked, 1993.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Wed Jun 08, 2022 8:00 pm

SADS isn't a new thing tho.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Wed Jun 08, 2022 9:00 pm

thanks, conniption I knew that however, at the time the dots weren't showing.. on my layout. Thanks again...
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby MacCruiskeen » Thu Jun 09, 2022 3:46 am

@CaliforniaFrizz

Spanish Police charge big Pharma boss with falsifying Covid-19 vax status.... Why is this not being featured in 95% of mainstream media? Why would a man running a pharmaceutical business be prepared to pay ‘a large sum of money’ to get a saline injection (a pretend covid jab)?

Image
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUrHlaKXwAM ... name=small

9:40 nachm. · 7. Juni 2022

https://twitter.com/CaliforniaFrizz/sta ... eb5MoqAAAA


"Euro Weekly News report: The leader of the network was a nursing assistant at the La Paz University Hospital, where he is accused of charging more than €200,000 euros for fraudulently registering 2,200 people as vaccinated in the National Registry against Covid-19. He has been arrested and is currently in custody."

Note too that that partial list of people willing to pay huge sums to avoid the "lifesaving vaccine" also includes several prominent athletes.

Link to the article in the screenshot: https://www.eutimes.net/2022/05/police- ... on-status/

Further details here:

Many questions remain over the false Covid-19 vaccination certificates bought by stars, sports personalities and business leaders

By Peter McLaren-Kennedy • 27 May 2022 • 9:28

https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/05/27/2 ... ccination/


It's big news in Spain, understandably, but still barely reported in the anglophone mass-media.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Harvey » Wed Feb 08, 2023 8:09 am

mentalgongfu2 » Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:54 am wrote:Just so it's clear to the casual reader Mac, you are the only bullshitter here. I have never pretended to be anything I am not. My only RI sin has been to call out when hyperbolic exaggerated "plandemic" propaganda is verifiably false or intellectually dishonest and internally contradicted. As usual there is no point engaging with you because there is nothing to engage with other than vitriol and namecalling. The only reason i have continued posting in this thread the last year is so the many silent readers will see something other than the idiot consensus of the hive mind that posts 20 articles per day with disparate povs and conflicting claims, all of the 'its fake'variety and demands they all be individually refuted on their own contradictory terms or submit to the one righteous view that Bill gates is Satan or something. I have plenty of actual thoughts represented here, and your false characterization is undercut by anyone who wants to read them. Enjoy your world where anyone who thinks you are wrong is responsible for every conceivable ill of humanity and where you cannot fathom lockdowns have negative effects but there is also a real disease. Go wank it to your disaster fantasies. Your real goal is clearly to berate any disagreement so that it disappears. Looking for The Thought Police? Find a mirror, asshat.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Wed Feb 08, 2023 10:54 pm

Well, lets see if an ass hat gets someone a two week BAN HAMMER.
:thumbsup
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus is seriously dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:05 pm

https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-lied-mrna-not-meant-to-stay-in-arm/
The CDC Lied: The mRNA Wasn’t Meant to “Stay in the Arm”
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests