The Mind controlled slaves flip out

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:27 pm

This is the kind of thread I usually just read (or not), but normally would never participate in, since I'm not qualified to make a contribution. But, Onesmartrat, you've mentioned a couple of things that really caught my attention; one is your description of Whitley Strieber as a deliberately-programmed MPD. Having read "Transformation", frankly, your explanation makes more sense to me than his.

Second, and more personally, is your description of age-regression as a symptom of programming. I know someone, a grand-mother, who episodically regresses to the age of a young child, perhaps 6 years old, unless she takes a weekly injection (I don't know what it is, but if she doesn't take it, it's a big problem). She's been to a number of psychiatrists, who have diagnosed her as everything from schizoid personality, to manic-depressive, to God knows what else. I figure that if this age-regression thing was a distinct mental illness, they would have been able to diagnose it. In your experience, is this symptom usually related to childhood abuse, or specifically to programming?

Perhaps this woman was abused as a child. I have no idea.

As an adult, she was, however, treated for over 10 years by one psychiatrist who's been implicated in CIA-sponsored MK-Ultra experiments. I know it's not much to go on, but I'd be very interested in your thoughts.
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Still puzzling over the waking up part

Postby LilyPatToo » Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:37 pm

Onesmartrat said:
Once again, look at Streiber if you want an example of a pre-programmed 'awakening" of conscious awarenss to his "secret life' ...there is an agenda there; think about it ....and I will return to discuss that some more.


But why would it be programmed in and not just happen as a result of memory barrier breakdown? What would the advantage be to the program?

The only one I've been able to come up with is kind of diffuse, but here it is anyway: if they want to attract and contain slaves with memory barrier breakdown, then allowing one prominent one to display the symptoms might serve to create a sort of magnet for others.

But that seems to me to be more of a liability than a benefit for the Controllers...? They're risking highly classified information getting very widely disseminated, aren't they? And when survivors get together in large groups, most continue to cling to their common screen memories and to reinforce them in each other, but a few begin comparing notes and waking up to what was really done to them. That can't be good from the Bad Guys' POV, can it?

Thank you for the theory on poor Britney, too. I hadn't thought of that.

marykmusic, I somehow missed the part in the news reports about the back-of-the-neck bar code tattoo--thank you for posting about it. I was a huge "Dark Angel" fan and now when I look at old episodes, I'm astounded at all the MC references. I had no clue back then :oops:

sunny, I didn't realize that ANS painted....fascinating. I wish they'd show some of her work too.

LilyPat
User avatar
LilyPatToo
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Oakland, CA USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

I'm a slave 4 U

Postby marmot » Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:01 pm

Let's assume for a moment that Britney Spears isn't a Monarch-style slave. The immense pressures of her hyper-celebrity-status alone would cause most young women to fall apart. Her having a few minor break-downs shouldn't be reason enough to conclude that her programming is breaking down. It may very well be that her programming and handlers are, in fact, keeping her from completely breaking down.

Considering, even, the short-life span of a presidential model—Brit is still fairly young, highly valuable and, I suspect, very manageable. It’s my opinion that what we’re witnessing here is the normal acting out of a glamorous, international, pop culture icon who’s struggling—like every other human being—with identity (and other) issues. And even though she may be a mind controlled slave (all signs point to yes, especially the mickey mouse club thing), I don’t believe her programs are breaking down, and that her controllers are moving to off her. She’s too huge of an asset!
marmot
 
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:52 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

artistic genius

Postby marmot » Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:37 pm

Talk of ANS painting reminded me of Marilyn Manson's watercolors.
Here's one below:


Image

I don't remember hearing anything about MM being a mind controlled slave. However, my thoughts (keeping with the theme of this thread) turned to Kurt Cobain who offed himself in the prime of his life, and of reading about possible mind control stuff with him.
marmot
 
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:52 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Dreams End » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:00 pm

http://dreamsend.wordpress.com/tag/whitley-strieber/

Lotta good cross pollination going on.

Part 4 in progress...

SRI enters the picture...but perhaps they were there all along.
Dreams End
 

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:14 pm

Kurt Cobain was probably murdered. (IMO)

For the cash. (Who owns all the rights to his (and the rest of the bands) work. 13 Years later, was Dave Grohl the real talent in Nirvana?)

But as far as all that stuff goes.

Courtney Love...
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby LilyPatToo » Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:51 pm

On Jimi Hendrix, from Alex Constantine:
Hendrix manager, Mike Jeffery, by his own admission was an intelligence agent. He frequently boasted he had powerful underworld connections. There were many mafia managed "acts". The CIA/Mafia connection had exercised considerable influence in the music industry for decades. Hendrix wanted out of the contract. He felt he was under surveillance and felt more and more unsafe in New York, his former safe haven. His manager, thus, might have created a Toronto arrest, to silence Jimi. He preferred him to be isolated. He had always been a trusting and open person before, and now he didn't know who to trust.

Was Hendrix murdered? The official cause of death was asphyxiation caused by vomit? The pathologist report left the cause of death open. Monica Danneman (investigator), had long insisted Hendrix was murdered. At the time of her own death, she had brought media attention to the case in a letter and highly publicized court battle.Monica's body was found in a fume-filled car near her home, in south England. It was called a suicide.

She had a lot of death threats, and people who knew her said "she didn't believe in the concept of suicide"


I found out about Hendrix while doing an online search for "broken glass" back in late December of 2005, when one of my alters had a meltdown that involved shattering glass mirrors. Apparently, Hendrix was obsessed with mirrors, too. His lyrics to a song about them is here -- http://www.illuminati-news.com/art-and-mc/field-of-art.htm

"I USED TO LIVE IN A ROOM FULL OF MIRRORS
ALL I COULD SEE WAS ME
WELL I TOOK MY SPIRIT AND I CRASHED MY MIRRORS
NOW THE WHOLE WORLD IS HERE FOR ME TO SEE
I'VE GOT A WHOLE WORLD THAT'S HERE FOR ME TO SEE
NOW I'M SEARCHING FOR MY LOVE TO BE

BROKEN GLASS WAS FALLING IN MY BRAIN
CUTTIN' AND SCREAMIN' AND CRYING IN MY HEAD
BROKEN GLASS WAS FALLING IN MY BRAIN
IT USED TO FALL ON MY DREAMS AND CUT ME IN MY BED
IT USED TO FALL ON MY DREAMS AND CUT ME IN MY BED
I SAID MAKING LOVE WAS STRANGE IN MY BED"


LilyPat
User avatar
LilyPatToo
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Oakland, CA USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Onesmartrat » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:24 am

Hammer of Los wrote:It's interesting you mention Whitley Streiber. I recall reading something he wrote on his website a while ago that really screamed out at me that he had been the subject of ongoing trauma-based mind control programming - and I dont think extra-terrestrials were involved. The peculiar thing was he was recalling events in some detail that, to anyone with any prior knowledge regarding RA/MC programs, would be a dead giveaway, and then coming to a series of really bizarre self-deluding conclusions about the nature and implications of these memories.

There have been threads on Streiber before on RI.

Just as an aside I read Communion about twenty years ago (when I was about twenty years old), and I have never been so terrified by a book before or since. It literally gave me nightmares.



The peculiar thing was he was recalling events in some detail that, to anyone with any prior knowledge regarding RA/MC programs, would be a dead giveaway, and then coming to a series of really bizarre self-deluding conclusions about the nature and implications of these memories.


Bingo! ...that's Streiber's psych-M.O. That's why he was indivdually singled out as a child for his particular "special mission."


Just as an aside I read Communion about twenty years ago (when I was about twenty years old), and I have never been so terrified by a book before or since. It literally gave me nightmares.[/quote]

Interesting; ever pursue the reasons why ...or figure out why you had such a response? I wonder, what prompted you to read such a book in the first place?

-OSR
Onesmartrat
 

Postby Onesmartrat » Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:10 am

AlicetheKurious wrote:This is the kind of thread I usually just read (or not), but normally would never participate in, since I'm not qualified to make a contribution. But, Onesmartrat, you've mentioned a couple of things that really caught my attention; one is your description of Whitley Strieber as a deliberately-programmed MPD. Having read "Transformation", frankly, your explanation makes more sense to me than his.

Second, and more personally, is your description of age-regression as a symptom of programming. I know someone, a grand-mother, who episodically regresses to the age of a young child, perhaps 6 years old, unless she takes a weekly injection (I don't know what it is, but if she doesn't take it, it's a big problem). She's been to a number of psychiatrists, who have diagnosed her as everything from schizoid personality, to manic-depressive, to God knows what else. I figure that if this age-regression thing was a distinct mental illness, they would have been able to diagnose it. In your experience, is this symptom usually related to childhood abuse, or specifically to programming?

Perhaps this woman was abused as a child. I have no idea.

As an adult, she was, however, treated for over 10 years by one psychiatrist who's been implicated in CIA-sponsored MK-Ultra experiments. I know it's not much to go on, but I'd be very interested in your thoughts.


Age- regression in itself is a normal human experience. healthy adults age regress all the time. However, contwext must always be taken into account when we are discussing age-regression in terms of a stress induced "dysfunctional or defensive" state. people subjected to trauma dn childhood abuse are ofetn unable to positively age-regress in a normal healthy mannner, but do in act automatically age-regress to younger age "alters" in order to handle or defend against any internally perceived threat. Example: A form of healthy age-regression would be when an adult can enjoy a puppet show and or even participate by spontaneoulsy picking up a puppet themselves and "pretending" in a playlike atmosphere ....particulary in the context of playing with and or entertaining children.
Trauma abused individuals will have a hard time doing this and may even have an aversion to it. They will not be able to regress in any manner that is playful and will be 'uninterested" and bothered even if someone tries to coax them by handing them a puppet, in this example, or if they do attempt this, it will be a forced type of pretense to which will be obvious they are not "having fun." However, under certain types of stress that reflect a similar "structure" to the kinds of trauma and the structure of their relationship with others in those circumstances, they will be triggerd inot an age-regressed 'protective' state in which they are emotionally and psychologically as they were at a certain age when they endured the original trauma and 'survived' it by adopting certain thinking and behavior.

An example of stresss-induced unhealthy age-regression is George W. Bush. He is constantly being made fun of by the more left-leaning critics that he talks "like an idiot" and on many occassions during spontaneuos questions and answer sessions such as with the media, he trips all over himself linguistically. This is not what it appears. He is experiencing internal stress to such a degree that he automatically is becoming spontaneously age-regressed(and he is a unstable Monarch) to such a degree that what is happening is that emotionally and mentally he is as a boy of about the age of ten or so (my guess) who is trying to answer adult questions and failing miserably. A good and very dramatic example of this that can be detected easily by anyone who looks at it from this perspective will see it clearly when viewing the segment of Michael Moore's 911 film during the time frame within which Bush sitting in a classroom reading a book to children is told that the first tower had been hit ....watch the guy's face shift dramactically to a childlike expression, and it stays that way for a good long time ...this is age-regression big time. His internal state would have been functioning at just about exactly of the age he appears....I would say maybe ten years or a little younger. His response in terms of his behavior was pretty congruent with the confusion and fear that a ten years old boy would probably have had in exactly the same type of circumstance (structurally, that is). That is why when he is first told, he is completely paralyzed psychologically and emotionally with a confused look on his face just as any ten year old kid would be when faced with such a tremendous overwhelming "adult probelm." This is a state, for him, that he automaticaly goes to under similar types of stress; it's a protective mechanism that worked perhaps when he actually WAS a ten year old boy, but is totally dysfunctional in his cpacity as "the most poweful man in the world."

That's the type of sge-regression I am talking about here.

-OSR
Onesmartrat
 

internal mirrors

Postby marmot » Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:45 am

If interested, here's a couple quotes from Cisco from chapter seven of the The Illuminati Formula dealing with mirrors.

Only a few of our alters ever ventured where they were not to go, and they always encountered many obstacles. However, if an alter gets trapped behind mirrors, the alter should not break the mirrors. If the alter is a Christian they can use the blood of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to bind and cast out the demons which are in the mirrors. The danger of the mirrors is the demonology involved. Some things work and some things don’t. We are speaking from our years of experience. The mirrors are deadly and they were everywhere in our System, but they are deadly only if one can’t deal with the demonology. The therapist should at least be aware that these images can be worked with just as if they were real to manipulate situations involving them. But if the structures are going to be worked or toyed with, the therapist and survivor need to have an understanding about the structures...

The fragments will hold all the memories of abuse, so the alter can function. The fragments will also give the alter the appearance of the full range of emotions. If a main alter gets angry or feels guilty, what is happening, is that it has accessed its shadows to express the full range of emotions. The Programmers abuse an alter and get the Shadow alters. Then they hypnotically attach a memory cue (which is a code consisting of the alter’s name, the date of the memory, and perhaps something else to complete the code) to the main alter so that they can access the memory anytime they want. Then they hypnotically & demonically build a one-way mirror between this main alter and the shadow alters they have just created. These one-way mirrors are like one way windows--the reason they are referred to as mirrors is that they are put in the child’s mind via mirrors. Next, they ritually/magickly implant demons to guard the mirror(s) and to guard each memory held by the shadow alters. This separates an alter from knowing itself and its own abuse. The main alter has dissociated the pain, etc. to its shadow alters of itself. The Programmers then use the memory as blackmail to keep the main alter in line. The main alter has dissociated the pain, but will recover the memory if either one of three possibilities happen: a. the Programmer or handler says the memory code 3x, or b. if an event happens that triggers the main alter to remember, c. the main alter tries to remember the abuse and the programming, and in doing so they will be stepping outside of the circle assigned to them and will “break the circle & break the mirrors.” Remember, how we described a Main alter as a small circle with the rays (shadow alters) split off from it. The shadow or family alters of a Main alter are the true history of an alter. The Main alter is given the script to totally love the Programmer/Master. It should be angry at what has happened to it. The ability to direct that anger is lost with the dissociation, but might be retrieved if the alter remembered, so the programmers transfer it by creating some outside person or object for the alter to focus their hate upon. Elaborate hate scripts are then given to the main alter. The love of the Master now protects the Main alter from having to remember its pain. Very few alters and very few non-multiple people would want to remember such trauma and it is very unpopular in society to remember past traumas (how often have you heard expressions “let bygones be bygones”, “the past is past”, “don’t dig up old skeletons”, etc.) As long as the alter loves its Master, it is somewhat safe from remembering its own traumas. And yet for a Monarch slave to regain its own mind, the alters must regain their own memories. That is why to really break down the programming, memory work is need. That Monarch slaves must regain their memories to heal is a hard one for many people and ministers to understand. Most deliverance ministries pray that God would take away their bad memories. Further, the programming holds the lies in place, and the demonology holds the traumas, programs, and memories in place. A Main alter is really in the middle of special purpose Shadow alters which have been split from itself. The Programmers do a reversal on this and tell the Main alter that it is on the outside looking in. Vagabond Programming (which tells an alter it is a vagabond) is then applied to teach the alter it doesn’t belong to the inside world, nor to the outside world. It belongs nowhere. The Main alter will perceive that it is on the outside looking in at mirrors. The -mirrors then guard the inside of the circle. To try to remember the truth is to break the circle of mirrors. The circle of mirrors has magical significance, because it ties in with the witchball or speculum which the witches have used over the centuries to see beyond time and space. The steps that the programmers do, can be explained on many levels. Many of these steps are done for special occult reasons. One of the first things taught to a child is “DO NOT BREAK THE CIRCLE”. This has both the internal meaning “don’t go after your own memories and the external meaning “don’t leave the cult -- the circle.”
marmot
 
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:52 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby LilyPatToo » Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:01 pm

marmot, thank you for that quote--as I said, I have a real problem trying to read that material and have had in the past to rely upon friends to find the bits I need to understand something that's happened to me. This part explained that alter's meltdown:
The fragments will hold all the memories of abuse, so the alter can function. The fragments will also give the alter the appearance of the full range of emotions. If a main alter gets angry or feels guilty, what is happening, is that it has accessed its shadows to express the full range of emotions. The Programmers abuse an alter and get the Shadow alters. Then they hypnotically attach a memory cue (which is a code consisting of the alter’s name, the date of the memory, and perhaps something else to complete the code) to the main alter so that they can access the memory anytime they want. Then they hypnotically & demonically build a one-way mirror between this main alter and the shadow alters they have just created. These one-way mirrors are like one way windows--the reason they are referred to as mirrors is that they are put in the child’s mind via mirrors. Next, they ritually/magickly implant demons to guard the mirror(s) and to guard each memory held by the shadow alters. This separates an alter from knowing itself and its own abuse. The main alter has dissociated the pain, etc. to its shadow alters of itself. The Programmers then use the memory as blackmail to keep the main alter in line. The main alter has dissociated the pain, but will recover the memory if either one of three possibilities happen: a. the Programmer or handler says the memory code 3x, or b. if an event happens that triggers the main alter to remember, c. the main alter tries to remember the abuse and the programming, and in doing so they will be stepping outside of the circle assigned to them and will “break the circle & break the mirrors.”


The demon stuff is not for me, but the rest, as near as I can tell, is very, very accurate. It explains why this alter was always so strangely (to me) happy and childlike before her meltdown, too, and why she was screaming and crying as the glass shattered and kept saying that her "heart is broken". She vanished for a long time afterward and I was afraid she was dead. Gods only know what she remembered, but she came back different--disillusioned and very unhappy, from what I can tell. She's still locked into a room in my mind.

Onesmartrat, that's the best explanation of $hrub's weird behavior that I've heard yet :roll: I've done a lot of reading on his father and the guy sounds as if he was completely disonnected emotionally from his passel of kids. So I can easily imagine him deciding to "improve" them via a trauma-based program, for future use. Ugh. Any insights on Jeb? He's the one I'm most worried about at the moment--MUCH more dangerous than poor screwed up Dubya, who's basically only useful as a hand puppet.

LilyPat
User avatar
LilyPatToo
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Oakland, CA USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:20 pm

Why hasn't anyone answered my question about age-regression? Is it always or usually associated with childhood abuse, or can such symptoms appear from drugs or trauma induced in adulthood? Onesmartrat, if you don't know, just say so. If anybody else knows something, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know.
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

world-building

Postby marmot » Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:25 pm

LilyPatToo wrote:marmot, thank you for that quote...


Sure thing!

LilyPat. What you've written for us, your thoughts and experiences, has helped me understand a little more about structured dissociation. Actually, I'm in the process of writing a novel where most of the action is set within the inner landscape of a programmed multiple. This, in large part, is why I'm so interested in internal landscapes.
marmot
 
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:52 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:27 pm

But the most shocking moment of yesterday's hearing was none of the above (because we already knew that all these things would eventually be uttered), but a clip that had Anna saying that her father had raped her. Plus, she added, her mother knew and did nothing to put an end to the situation. 'You want to hear all the things she did to me? You want to hear all the things she let my father do to me, or my brother do to me? Or my sister? All the beatings and the whippin's and the rape? That's my mother. That's my mom!', Smith was heard saying.


http://news.softpedia.com/news/Anna-Nic ... 7767.shtml
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:42 pm

I'm so sorry, Onesmartrat, I had missed your response. Thank you.

I'm talking about the same thing you are. Imagine a woman in her forties, or fifties or older (currently much older), who is a bit high-strung, but normal.

If she does not regularly take her medication, then out of the blue, you are dealing with a small child. Not child-LIKE, and there's nothing at all artificial or self-conscious about it. She's not behaving the way, say, I would if you asked me to imitate a child. She IS a child the way children really are.

I've known this woman a long time, and never once did it occur to me that she could have DID and that "the child" could be an alter.

My question was: can this manifestation result from trauma induced in an adult? As I mentioned before, the doctor who treated her for 10 years was implicated in the MK-Ultra experiments.

Or must it have originated in childhood?
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests