Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Ex-Ariz. Senate Aide Found Shot Dead In Car
POSTED: 8:53 am MST December 21, 2010
UPDATED: 9:37 am MST December 21, 2010
PHOENIX -- Phoenix police said a man found fatally shot in a car has been identified as a former chief of staff for the Arizona Senate.
Police identified the victim Monday as 51-year-old Christopher Smith, who worked in the state Senate for 11 years and was chief of staff until 2000.
Sgt. Trent Crump of the Phoenix Police Department said Smith's death is being investigated as a homicide.
Smith most recently worked for Cox Communications.
Police said Smith was found inside a vehicle Saturday night in the 1000 block of South 18th Avenue with multiple gunshot wounds.
Witnesses later told officers they had seen a young male shoot a man inside the car. The shooter then fled.
Police said Smith had been shot in the head and was taken to a Phoenix hospital, where he later died.
8bitagent wrote:Luther Blissett wrote:It must be so difficult for fringe-right websites to reconcile their conspiracy theories with their views as they communicate them to people like Loughner.
Just look at the way the spotlight has been put on the "tea party" phenomenon. I miss when anti government meant you were against the Bush appointed wars and abuse of power.
Now "anti government" means inciting hatespeech and crypto-violent statements directed at women service providers, democratic politicians, etc.
The Tiller shooting, the Holocaust museum, the killing of those 4 cops by that anti government guy in Pittsburgh, the guy who flew a plane into an IRS building, the guy who attempted to storm the pentagon with a gun...I think it was clear that we'd see a ramping up of these violent actions.
Bottom line, the name of the game is polarizing Americans. The shrinking white middle class who feel threatened and pumped full of hate by racist wonks like rush and inciteful polarization on Fox, the Tea Party rallies, etc.
I fear what this year could bring with the nutcase stuff. I know I've greatly toned down my anti government rhetoric, even tho it came more from a leftist point of view.
Luther Blissett wrote:8bitagent wrote:Luther Blissett wrote:It must be so difficult for fringe-right websites to reconcile their conspiracy theories with their views as they communicate them to people like Loughner.
Just look at the way the spotlight has been put on the "tea party" phenomenon. I miss when anti government meant you were against the Bush appointed wars and abuse of power.
Now "anti government" means inciting hatespeech and crypto-violent statements directed at women service providers, democratic politicians, etc.
The Tiller shooting, the Holocaust museum, the killing of those 4 cops by that anti government guy in Pittsburgh, the guy who flew a plane into an IRS building, the guy who attempted to storm the pentagon with a gun...I think it was clear that we'd see a ramping up of these violent actions.
Bottom line, the name of the game is polarizing Americans. The shrinking white middle class who feel threatened and pumped full of hate by racist wonks like rush and inciteful polarization on Fox, the Tea Party rallies, etc.
I fear what this year could bring with the nutcase stuff. I know I've greatly toned down my anti government rhetoric, even tho it came more from a leftist point of view.
I don't think that any of us should temper our anti-government rhetoric for any reason. That's one difference between progressives and the fringe right - progressives can do enough independent thinking for themselves to be able to criticize the system until the world truly is a better place. The fringe right needs to be scared, they need someone to tell them how to channel that fear and how to think for them. If they were capable of independent thought and of higher levels of criticism, the wouldn't see the need to resort to physical violence against other humans.
http://my.firedoglake.com/valtin/2011/01/08/jared-loughners-possible-mental-illness/
Jared Loughner’s Possible Mental Illness
By: Jeff Kaye Saturday January 8, 2011 4:07 pm
...
However, this doesn’t mean that mind control conspiracies by the government don’t exist. I’ve documented government documents, including of contemporary vintage, that prove such activity by the government still occurs. If one reads the history of this kind of research, attempts to really use mind control are not applied to schizophrenic individuals, though one does look for highly suggestible individuals, and then apply drugs and hypnosis and other programming techniques. The success or failure of such enterprises is highly classified.
Here’s an example taken from one of Mr. Loughner’s videos, showing the strangeness of his thinking and language, which is circular, syntactically intact, but with extremely opaque meaning, which relies on repetitiveness. The language implies something very profound, which only the thinker understands:
Twyla LaSarc wrote:Text of DHS Memo on Loughner
MEMO:
... But no criminal record? Intervention by someone?*[/b] no direct connection - but strong suspicion is being directed at AmRen / American Renaissance. Suspect is possibly linked to this group. (through videos posted on his myspace and YouTube account.). The group’s ideology is anti government, anti immigration, anti ZOG (Zionist Occupational Government), anti Semitic. Gabrielle Gifford is the first Jewish female elected to such a high position in the US government. She was also opposite this group’s ideology when it came to immigration debate.* DHS have a list of names and dates of birth of all victims.* the ACTIC is still playing a major role in the investigation...
Simulist wrote:While there is a distinction to be made between the genuine Left and the Right, it is also clear to me that this distinction is rarely evident in the behavior of the two major political parties in America today. Rhetoric is sometimes another matter, but talk is cheap.
Vast numbers of so-called "progressives" seem equally eager to advocate for the whims of the establishment as the so-called "conservatives," but they do it with wording that traditionally sounds more sensitive. And yet, when push comes to shove — and the establishment wants another war, for example — most politicians that label themselves "progressives" eagerly line up to fund it, lots of "progressive" media apologists find a way to make the case to the progressive base, and the dissenting voices on the genuine (and toothless) Left help progressives feel that they're still on the side of "the good guys."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests