Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby 82_28 » Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:25 pm

I can't remember where the thread about those severed data cables in the Mediterranean is -- it's from a couple years ago. It's semi hard to search for. However, if someone can dig it up, that would be great.

Just caught this on slashdot and thought this would be a thread as good as any to put it:

"A ship anchoring in a restricted area disrupted an East African high-speed Internet connection. The damaged fiber optic cable is one of three new undersea cables in the area off Kenyan coast. Repairs could take up to 14 days. 'The Teams cable had been rerouting data from three other cables severed 10 days ago in the Red Sea between Djibouti and the Middle East. Together, the four fiber-optic cables channel thousands of gigabytes of information per second and form the backbone of East Africa's telecom infrastructure. Telecom companies were reeling over the weekend as engineers attempted to reroute data south along the East African coast and around the Cape of Good Hope.'"

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/02/27 ... sea-cables

A commenter at /. says thus:

You know that game where you drop a quarter into a fish tank and try to get it to fall into a shot glass to win a prize?

Somehow they keep dropping anchors through 5000 feet of water to hit a cable a few inches in diameter laying on the ocean floor.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:02 pm

82_28 wrote:A commenter at /. says thus:

You know that game where you drop a quarter into a fish tank and try to get it to fall into a shot glass to win a prize?

Somehow they keep dropping anchors through 5000 feet of water to hit a cable a few inches in diameter laying on the ocean floor.


While the cable's diameter is a few inches, the length spans the whole ocean. An anchor might be dragged along the ocean floor for a few hundred feet before lodging. Given many ships, I'd expect this to happen once in a while.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:26 pm

Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby dqueue » Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:38 pm

More linkage...

Is the internet going down?
Third Cable Cut
Informational Thread On Middle East Cable Cuts

Overlay those cable cuts with the Stratfor emails... curious to see what they were talking about at the time.
We discover ourselves to be characters in a novel, being both propelled by and victimized by various kinds of coincidental forces that shape our lives. ... It is as though you trapped the mind in the act of making reality. - Terence McKenna
User avatar
dqueue
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: DC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:11 pm


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/2 ... _ref=false

Huffington Post
March 1, 2012

Bianca Bosker

Google Privacy Policy Changing For Everyone: So What's Really Going To Happen?

Posted: 02/29/12 12:32 PM ET | Updated: 02/29/12 07:26 PM ET

Google’s plan to collapse 60 privacy policies into a single one and combine information it collects about its users has sparked outcry among privacy advocates and scrutiny from lawmakers around the world. Privacy experts have slammed the approach as “frustrating,” “a little frightening,” and even “illegal.”

But users will not notice much of a change when the new privacy policy takes effect on March 1, experts say, noting that the update is, in part, codifying practices that have long been routine.

“Users are not likely to see any difference actually because most of what Google is doing they have been always able to do,” said Jules Polonetsky, director of the think tank Future of Privacy Forum. “They were already tracking, personalizing, and tailoring profiles for users based on the different things that you did. There now will be some more data that will be available to do this.”

The new privacy policy does not allow Google to collect more information about its users, though it does allow Google to do more with the information it has already been collecting across its services. Specifically, the terms permit Google to merge data it has compiled about its users as they engage with Google products, as well as build more comprehensive portraits by drawing on data from a greater number of Google services. YouTube, Gmail, Blogger, Google TV, Google+ and Web History, which records all searches performed on Google.com, will now be able to communicate with each other about a user’s preferences and practices. Some Google products will still maintain standalone privacy policies, such as Google Books, Chrome and Google Wallet.

Merging information gleaned across multiple services isn’t anything new for Google. A Google spokesman noted, “Privacy policies for a long time now have allowed us to combine information that’s associated with a particular Google account.”

But the policy being introduced Thursday will help Google develop richer profiles of its users, cobbled together from data about what videos they’ve watched on YouTube, what their Gmail emails say, what searches they perform and which topics they follow on Google+. Rather than keeping information about your Gmail usage separate from specifics on what you write about on Blogger, Google will pull all of those details together. All Google users will also be required to submit to the new terms, a fact that has privacy advocates up in arms.

Though Google has cast the changes as a benefit to users, saying they will enjoy a "beautifully simple" experience, the ability to piece together more information about users’ activities online will ultimately prove a boon to Google as it challenges other web companies, such as Facebook, in a war over advertising dollars and users’ time.

With more granular data about peoples’ interests, Google can better fine-tune its targeted advertising and gain an edge over its rivals by helping companies access potential customers. Gmail ads have always been tailored to the content of a user’s emails, so a user might have seen information about hotels next to an email exchange about traveling to Mexico. Following the revamped privacy policy, the ads that appear on Gmail could be tailored to a user’s search history, with queries for “sneakers” or “business cards” on Google.com yielding promotions for footwear and office gear alongside a user’s Gmail inbox.

“The privacy changes are taking place in the midst of a data arms race between Facebook, Google and other companies in the space,” said Alan Simpson, vice president of policy for Common Sense Media, an advocacy group for Internet safety issues. “They’re all working to gather as much data and personal information as they can and figuring out ways that they will use our data to develop a better advertising market.”

In addition to more targeted ads, Google users are also likely to find the web company’s products more personalized to match their interests, browsing habits and social networks. Before the privacy policy change, a user’s experience on Gmail or Google’s search engine would be unaffected by his or her choice of YouTube videos, and vice versa. After March 1, if Google sees that a user has searched for “French twist instructions,” YouTube could display videos about styling hair the next time the user visits the site.

Google noted in a video introducing the privacy changes that by sharing more information across its products, the company could deliver “more accurate spelling suggestions because you’ve typed a word before” or “tell you when you’ll be late for a meeting based on your location, calendar and local traffic conditions.”

“The companies in this space all talk in terms of the potential positive, and there are quite a few potential positives,” Simpson said. “There might well be innovations that come out of this that improve Google search, but what we don’t know is how this will impact the way data is being used. “

Google has come under fire for its failure to allow users to opt out of its privacy policy change: The terms will go into effect for all Google users come Thursday, whether they’re comfortable with the changes or not. To dodge the new policy, people can use Google products without logging into the services, or create distinct Google accounts for each Google product, though advocates argue these options are insufficient. Users can also minimize the data Google stores about them by erasing their browsing history and blocking Google from collecting information about their search queries.

Privacy experts also fear that the new policy could encourage Google rivals, which are likewise hungry for users’ personal information, to take an even more aggressive stance toward the collection of personal details and continue chipping away at people’s privacy online.

“Companies keep saying ‘this is the standard’ because they all keep moving the goal post, and every time they move the goal post, everyone jumps up and does the same thing,” said Chet Wisniewski, a security adviser at Sophos. “At some point, you’ve gone too far.”

Want to learn more about what Google knows about you?
Visit Google Dashboard to see what data is associated with your Google Account.
http://www.google.com/dashboard

Check out Google's Ad Preferences Manager to view the interests and demographic information Google has associated with you, or to opt out of targeted advertising.
http://www.google.com/ads/preferences

Clear, monitor, or control the data Google collects information about your browsing history on Web History,
http://www.google.com/history

or on YouTube here
http://www.youtube.com/my_history

or here.
http://www.youtube.com/my_search_history

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby Nordic » Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:05 pm

Losing the ability to eliminate your search history, which is happening, oh, right this minute, is a pretty big red flag. Where do they get off doing this?

I'm going to be using bing.com a lot more.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby eyeno » Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:10 pm

Nordic wrote:Losing the ability to eliminate your search history, which is happening, oh, right this minute, is a pretty big red flag. Where do they get off doing this?

I'm going to be using bing.com a lot more.



Same sort of thing happens to me in firefox. No matter how hard I try to delete the history anytime I start typing "www etc..." in the address bar it brings up every place I ever went. Not sure how or why this is happening but it is. If I were a better puter geek I could probably dig into the bowels and get rid of it but I don't know how. Haven't tried to figure it out.
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:43 am

Nordic wrote:Losing the ability to eliminate your search history, which is happening, oh, right this minute, is a pretty big red flag. Where do they get off doing this?

I'm going to be using bing.com a lot more.


Because if you can't trust microsoft, who can you trust?
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:00 am

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/03/01/ ... signs-help

"Domain seizures are nothing new, but this particular case is interesting. The Department of Homeland Security has seized a domain name registered outside of the U.S., by individuals who are not American citizens, and who registered with a Canadian registrar. From the article: 'The ramifications of this are no less than chilling and every single organization branded or operating under .com, .net, .org, .biz etc needs to ask themselves about their vulnerability to the whims of U.S. federal and state lawmakers (not exactly known their cluefulness nor even-handedness, especially with regard to matters of the internet).'"
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:18 pm

Watch Them Watch You

Firefox now offers an add-on that allows you to see "an interactive, real-time visualization of the entities that track your behavior across the web." See which of them can see that it's you, moving from site to site. It may not surprise you but damn it can cause despair. There's a demo here:

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/collusion/demo/

And no, you're not really seeing them (as if you wanted to).

The conclusion that these entities (advertisers, mostly) know more about you than "your government" makes me figure at least a couple of them ARE "your government."
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby eyeno » Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:26 pm

JackRiddler wrote:Watch Them Watch You

Firefox now offers an add-on that allows you to see "an interactive, real-time visualization of the entities that track your behavior across the web." See which of them can see that it's you, moving from site to site. It may not surprise you but damn it can cause despair. There's a demo here:

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/collusion/demo/

And no, you're not really seeing them (as if you wanted to).

The conclusion that these entities (advertisers, mostly) know more about you than "your government" makes me figure at least a couple of them ARE "your government."



Who makes the add on? I wonder if by being able to see that activity it creates a "handshake" mechanism that only makes one more visible? I've thought about this lately and wondered how many of these add ons may be legit? I'm not a puter geek so I don't know. Any insight on this? Not that i'm all that disturbed about though. Everything is correlated anyway and i'm not doing anything they should care about.
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:19 pm

.

Presumably the add-on is just displaying the entities your machine already knows are tracking your movement by setting cookies from one site that they then see are already on your machine when you visit another. This can be reduced by other add-ons (theoretically), which are the ones I really wonder about.

Thanks to SLAD for pointing out latest developments in the Megaupload story. It stinks dramatically that one such service is attacked but others that provide the same service (US-based and more safely corporate) are not. (Oops, I didn't mean to say the Feds should also shut down Youtube, of course.)


http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/03/the-f ... ew-zealand

The FBI’s Misadventures in New Zealand

by Stuart Jeanne Bramhall / March 2nd, 2012

There is growing suspicion in New Zealand that this country, like American Samoa and Puerto Rico, has become an American colony. Sadly, the unfolding Kim Dotcom1 saga seems to confirm this. On January 20th, a New Zealand assault team consisting of helicopters and special defense forces and police armed with automatic weapons invaded the private Auckland home of Mega Upload founder and CEO Kim Dotcom. The reason for Dotcom’s arrest? In New Zealand such treatment is normally reserved for international terrorism suspects and drug dealers. However the purpose of the January 20th assault was an FBI extradition order for Internet piracy.

Dotcom, who is out on bail, gave his first media interview last night on TV 3 Campbell Live. People have to see this. Americans especially need to watch the interview, as this type of hard hitting investigative reporting has become extremely rare in the US. The twenty-three minute segment leaves absolutely no doubt that the FBI Indictment is nothing but lies and fabrication. If, due to massive legal bungling, some New Zealand judge agrees to extradite this guy, he will undoubtedly be found innocent in US federal court.

The FBI Has Knowingly Violated US Law

The FBI has no case. If Dotcom is guilty, so are dozens of other “cloud”2 Internet providers (for example YouTube) that provide bandwidth for uploading and sharing large files. It appears that, once again, the FBI has knowingly violated US law. I suspect they have done this on the assumption that Dotcom is an easy target because either 1) the New Zealand legal and judicial system is (in their view) made up of ignorant hicks or 2) our current (conservative) National government are such obsequious lapdogs that they will introduce some weird retroactive law in Parliament to alter the rules of evidence (this is legal in New Zealand, owing to the absence of a written constitution).

Protected by the Same Laws as YouTube

John Campbell is a very skillful interviewer. The first point he brings out is the elaborate precautions (based on millions of dollars of legal advice) that Dotcom built into Mega Upload to protect the motion picture and music industry against illegal file sharing activities. The first is the Terms of Service Agreement all Mega Upload users were required to tick. In it they agreed not to share copyrighted material, but only files that they themselves had produced. The second was file deletion rights Mega Upload granted their 180 partners, which included every single member of the Motion Picture Association and many music studios. As Dotcom points out, this is not a legal requirement (YouTube doesn’t grant automatic deletion rights) but something he did voluntarily. This is in addition to the 15 million files Mega Upload has deleted at the request of copyright holders.

The Mega Upload founder goes on to outline the US laws that protect “cloud” servers, which legally are categorized as Internet service providers (ISPs). The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is very explicit that ISPs are in no way responsible for copyright violations of third party users, other than to take down illegal files that are reported to them. Because of privacy protections in the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, ISPs are forbidden from examining files posted by their patrons. Thus they have no way of knowing of copyright violations unless content providers notify them.

Why the FBI Doesn’t Go After YouTube

The CEO of Mega Upload acknowledges that Internet piracy is an enormous problem for all cloud/file sharing providers, including YouTube (now owned by Google, Media Fire, Rapid Share and Shy Drive (run by Microsoft). He asks why the FBI doesn’t go after any corporate cloud/file sharing servers and answers his own question: Google has $50 billion to defend themselves.

Dotcom is surprisingly nonchalant that the FBI has destroyed his billion dollar business. I suspect this may have been their intention all along – in order to intimidate other solo entrepreneurs keen on entering the lucrative cloud/file sharing industry. The FBI, Hong Kong and New Zealand have frozen all his financial assets. He indicates his attorneys presently are working without pay, owing to their concern about the blatant miscarriage of justice by both the FBI and the New Zealand government. Dotcom is clearly relieved to be out of jail, as Mrs. Dotcom is expecting twins in April.

Implications for Cloud Users

The case also has ominous implications for cloud users. When the FBI shut down Mega Upload on January 20th, all their patrons (numbering in the hundreds of thousands) lost all their data. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is preparing to file suit if the FBI fails to retain and return these files to their rightful owners.

Last edited by JackRiddler on Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby wintler2 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:11 pm

JackRiddler wrote:.
Thanks to SLAD for pointing out latest developments in the Megaupload story. It stinks dramatically that one such service is attacked but others that provide the same service (US-based and more safely corporate) are not. (Oops, I didn't mean to say the Feds should also shut down Youtube, of course.)
..


That seemingly random violence trick is an efficient way to terrorise/subjugate a population as well as selectively benefit your allies, as i believe happened in 1930s Germany, 60s Indonesia & 70s Argentina. Who is Kims biggest competitor?
"Wintler2, you are a disgusting example of a human being, the worst kind in existence on God's Earth. This is not just my personal judgement.." BenD

Research question: are all god botherers authoritarians?
User avatar
wintler2
 
Posts: 2884
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:43 am
Location: Inland SE Aus.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:29 pm

wintler2 wrote:That seemingly random violence trick is an efficient way to terrorise/subjugate a population as well as selectively benefit your allies, as i believe happened in 1930s Germany, 60s Indonesia & 70s Argentina. Who is Kims biggest competitor?


mediafire?! hotfile, dropbox? youtube-google? pirate bay?! you tell me.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Postby crikkett » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:54 am

JackRiddler wrote:
wintler2 wrote:That seemingly random violence trick is an efficient way to terrorise/subjugate a population as well as selectively benefit your allies, as i believe happened in 1930s Germany, 60s Indonesia & 70s Argentina. Who is Kims biggest competitor?


mediafire?! hotfile, dropbox? youtube-google? pirate bay?! you tell me.


Bigger than that: RIAA.

http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/24/was-me ... x-service/
Was Megaupload Targeted Because Of Its Upcoming Megabox Digital Jukebox Service?

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012
35 Comments
megabox

Last Thursday the US Justice Department came down hard on Megaupload and its mega founder, Kim Dotcom. In the days since, there has been a shake-up of sorts in the digital storage realm. Several smaller sites have drastically changed their business models. Others, like MediaFire, reached out to me after I published this post attempting to distance themselves from Megaupload.

However, yesterday, a new theory surfaced that indicates Megaupload’s demise had less to do with piracy than previously thought. This theory stems from a 2011 article detailing Megaupload’s upcoming Megabox music store and DIY artist distribution service that would have completely disrupted the music industry.

TorrentFreak first reported about the service in early December 2011. Megabox was just in beta at that time with listed partners of 7digital, Gracenote, Rovi, and Amazon. Megaupload was in a heated marketing battle with the RIAA and MPAA who featured Kim Dotcom in an anti-piracy movie (5:10 mark). The site had just sued Universal Music Group for wrongly blocking Megaupload’s recent star-studded YouTube campaign. Things were getting vicious in December but the quiet launch of Megabox might have been the straw that broke the millionaire’s back.

Dotcom described Megabox as Megaupload’s iTunes competitor, which would even eventually offer free premium movies via Megamovie, a site set to launch in 2012. This service would take Megaupload from being just a digital locker site to a full-fledged player in the digital content game.

The kicker was Megabox would cater to unsigned artists and allow anyone to sell their creations while allowing the artist to retain 90% of the earnings. Or, artists could even giveaway their songs and would be paid through a service called Megakey. “Yes that’s right, we will pay artists even for free downloads. The Megakey business model has been tested with over a million users and it works,” Kim Dotcom told TorrentFreak in December. Megabox was planning on bypassing the labels, RIAA, and the entire music establishment.

Megaupload was likely large enough to actually find success. Other services have tried what Megabox was set to do, but Megaupload was massive. Prior to its closure last week, the site was estimated to be the 13th most visited site on the Internet, accounting for 4% of all worldwide Internet traffic. It boasted 180 million registered users with over 50 million visiting the site daily. Megaupload was already a seemingly trusted service for artists to distribute their work. Megabox would have a monetized that popularity by passing on the bulk of the earnings back to the artists.

“You can expect several Megabox announcements next year including exclusive deals with artists who are eager to depart from outdated business models,” said Dotcom late last year. But that’s probably not going to happen. Kim Dotcom and several other Megaupload executives are now awaiting trial on various charges including racketeering, money laundering, and various counts of piracy. It seems they flew too close to the sun. High on success and a half a world away in New Zealand and Hong Kong, they attempted to take on the music industry head-on. Now they’re in jail.
crikkett
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (5)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests