Elvis » 03 Nov 2019 00:15 wrote:FourthBase » Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:52 pm wrote:do I need to conjure up a whole blog entry about this hypothetical world that imitates Jeff circa 2006 complete with a Dylan quote and spooky photoshop collage?
That would be awesome. Even better, how about find one victim, one survivor, one witness to the Podesta pedo-cannibal ring? I'd pitch in $20 to pay a detective to follow him. I know a guy. I think we're at that stage, you know, because while certainly people have looked for victims or witnesses, so far they've come up with none.
I can easily imagine the worst about Podesta, but all I know for sure is that he and his brother are weird creepy corporate lobbyists and that John is a ruthless and incompetent campagn manager. Center for American Progress? They left the "R" out of CAP.
Is Hillary in on it?
I think it'd be awesome, too. Will do.
Can you imagine a cannibalistic pedo ring that successfully eludes detection by enforcing extra secrecy, that solves the problem of evidence by literally eating the evidence? Sure you can. I understand that it's a travesty out of Kafka to convict people on the principle that the absence of physical evidence and direct testimony only means they were clever enough to dispose of it all perfectly, but you're still left with the situation that the only ghouls you'll ever be able to identify as such are the ones who fuck up. The best criminals will go undetected, only the sloppy ones will get caught. Meaning you wind up rewarding the monsters who learn to clean up after themselves best. You wind up scolding evil elites for not being discreet enough. "Hide it better!", you're teaching them.
And as we've seen, even if there were a peek behind the facade and their grotesque evil leaked out a little, a swarm of gatekeeping apologists -- including some of the most imaginative paranoid critics in the world -- will shove all scrutiny to the furthest margins. Evil that's too hideous to contemplate is precisely that which can hide best in plain sight, deflect attention the easiest.
Let's say the ghoulishness is relatively minimal. As in, no kidnapping and raping second graders, no murdering and eating adults, etc. Can you tell me what would philosophically prevent abortion rights absolutists from ritualistically eating an aborted fetus? No, you cannot. Because nothing does, right? Hell, the only legal trouble would be improper medical waste disposal. In which case, how much evidence would be left? What witnesses would there be? What if all the witnesses except for the victims are diehard converts who never have a change of heart or are people so thoroughly blackmailed they'll never rat?
We wouldn't know anything about the Franklin Scandal were it not for happenstance here and there. Imagine if that Finders van had never been stopped. Imagine if Lawrence King was a better accountant. Imagine if Bonacci et al. had just been disappeared, or converted into lifelong accomplices. What would be left in terms of dots that would lead you to suspect such a thing as the Franklin phenomenon?
Hillary? I don't know if she'd be part of the occult pedo-cannibal cult. I do know her ex-president husband was a frequent flyer on a billionaire pedophile sex trafficker's private rape jet. I do know her daughter was bff-ing it up with that pedophile billionaire's partner-in-crime after he had been caught. I do know she was accused by a Secret Service agent of being a witch, accused again by the original Guccifer of being a witch, and last year was honored in person by a coven of witches. Also, her State Department did help an accused child trafficker escape consequences. It may be sketchy and subject to all sorts of alibis and alternate interpretations, but that's the rough outline of the kind of pattern of dots you'd see for the type of unthinkably evil cunt some people suspect her to be.
