
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Wikileaks
Is Oslo terrorist trying to send WikiLeaks a video of the massacre?
See page 885 of his manifesto.
4 hours ago via web
barracuda wrote:8bitagent wrote:this is some of the nearly 80 kids killed
While it's tempting to focus upon the pathos of the children victims, I'd like to point out that it seems a great number of adults were also killed in this incident, so I'm not sure that characterisation is quite correct. For example, in the list provided here by the Norwegian police, 26 of the 42 names are 18 years of age or over, and 13 of those 26 are 25 years or older. I realise this doesn't make the thing any less shockingly awful, but to say "80 children killed" is not entirely accurate.
AhabsOtherLeg wrote:Live Action Role Play. People who dress up as hobbits and ogres and run around hitting each other with foam swords. My brother was at a campsite in Canada once when an elf ran out of the woods, chased by a pile of angry Orcs. It can be pretty disconcerting if you don't know what they're up to.
It's a an Elite Nerd pursuit, for only the most dedicated and asocial of nerds, and thus fits Breivik to a T.
vanlose kid wrote:Oslo finds strength in flower power
The “flower power” movement also is attributed to the words of an 18-year-old survivor of the massacre on the island of Utøya. She mused that “when one man can show so much evil, think how much kjærlighet (love and caring) we can show together.” Her words are quickly going down in history in Norway because they’re largely credited with helping set the tone for the reaction to the attacks. They’ve been spread via social media, Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg quoted them in one of his many addresses to the Norwegian people during the past few days, and here (photo at right) they’ve been taped up on a wall in Oslo.
*
-lupercal.but to methodically execute some dozens of helpless and unarmed children of both sexes requires a specialized skill that I haven't seen evidence of him having acquired.
4GB AEE PD80 Mini DV DVR Camera
This extremely small and lightweight field camera is used to document your operation. 4
GB is equivalent to 2 hour of constant filming. Ive personally tested it and it works great.
Some governments may seize the movie (after you are neutralized) and publish it while
others may bury it or even destroy it to protect the multiculturalist ideology. The reason
is that they may regard any documentation from the Justiciar Knight as a mockery of
their system. On the other hand, they may actually release the film to the press censored
or even uncensored. You may want to bring 2 memory chips and attempt to mail one of
them, if possible. You place the memory chip in a pre-made envelope (with stamps and
the address of a pre-selected news desk that is likely to publish it uncensored). The best
option would of course be to upload the digital movie via high speed internet (your
Iphone) to a distribution site at the end of your mission. Unfortunately though, uploading
1-2 GB would take at least 3-7 hours. Also, there is normally a 200MB-ish cap on email
attatchments so sending the movie to 10-20 newsdesks is not yet an option due to
technological limitations. This will off course change at some point in the future.
Sold on Ebay (Chinese producer)
Cost is 87 USD
lupercal wrote:Drew I'm not certain he didn't, but based on the very familiar m.o. he seems to be an MK patsie whose specific training is to perform as the perp. Sirhan and McVeigh would be good examples, also Oswald. As to the actual killing though, he may or may not have had weapons training, but to methodically execute some dozens of helpless and unarmed children of both sexes requires a specialized skill that I haven't seen evidence of him having acquired. But it's just my opinion at this moment.
AhabsOtherLeg wrote:Live Action Role Play. People who dress up as hobbits and ogres and run around hitting each other with foam swords. My brother was at a campsite in Canada once when an elf ran out of the woods, chased by a pile of angry Orcs. It can be pretty disconcerting if you don't know what they're up to.
It's a an Elite Nerd pursuit, for only the most dedicated and asocial of nerds, and thus fits Breivik to a T.
vanlose kid wrote:Oslo finds strength in flower power
The “flower power” movement also is attributed to the words of an 18-year-old survivor of the massacre on the island of Utøya. She mused that “when one man can show so much evil, think how much kjærlighet (love and caring) we can show together.” Her words are quickly going down in history in Norway because they’re largely credited with helping set the tone for the reaction to the attacks. They’ve been spread via social media, Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg quoted them in one of his many addresses to the Norwegian people during the past few days, and here (photo at right) they’ve been taped up on a wall in Oslo.
*
justdrew wrote:so anyone else catch the meaning of Palingenesis? (see my post on the last page)
There's a heck of a case of wannabe "nominative determinism"
kenoma wrote:He's a millionaire apparently, though I don't know how you make that kind of money off the kind of websites he runs.
kenoma wrote:As for last week's events, I don't really sense the same overwhelming stench I got from 9/11, 7/7 and the Mumbai attacks at an operational level. It is at least far more plausible than it was in those cases that the perpetrator acted alone on the day, and that the police response was genuinely inept.
What has made me feel deeply uneasy since about Sunday morning is that this feels like the launch of a new political product. That was when I heard Sky News reporter Tim Marshall confidently predict that '2083' would become a touchstone text of the European far-right. It struck me as odd, because it's not how the msm usually resonds to a violent 'lone wolf' murderer such as Kaczynski or the London Nail Bomber. Ever since, the mainstream have been giving Breivik's text far more credence than one would reasonably expect - the 'oxygen of publicity', as Thatcher used to say. And I suspect the comments of Melanie Phillips, Glenn Beck and Mario Borghezio regarding Breivik are merely particularly indiscreet samples of what will be widely shared at many dinner parties in elite Europe and America this weekend.
As for what that newly-launched product is and what it should be called, I suspect a bit of investigating into the background of Alan Lake and the mileu he shared with Breivik would help us here.
Joe Hillshoist wrote:The best option would of course be to upload the digital movie via high speed internet (your Iphone) to a distribution site at the end of your mission.
There it is... p 885.
8bitagent wrote:I don't doubt for a nano second that Anders Breivik was the main shooter, and took great sickening pride in it. That smile in the van shows he did a "job well done" in his book.
In Norway, Consensus Cuts 2 Ways
By STEVEN ERLANGER and MICHAEL SCHWIRTZ
OSLO — Nearly all Norwegians of a certain age know where they were when Oddvar Bra suddenly broke his ski pole in the final sprint of a championship ski race in 1982, and Norway had to settle for a tie with the Soviet Union. But the common expression, “Where were you when Bra broke his pole?” has suddenly given way to a darker question — where were you when Anders Behring Breivik was killing Norway’s children?
July 22, the day Mr. Breivik killed at least 76 people, shook a peaceful nation to the core. But for many Norwegians it is also an indelible mark of a country that has evolved away from the monoethnic, egalitarian culture that knew tragedy as a setback in Nordic competition.
Today, more than 11 percent of the population of some 4.9 million were born someplace else — Pakistan, Sweden, Poland, Somalia, Eritrea, Iraq. And the cultural shock of diversity, especially incorporating the growing number of nonwhite Muslims, has already meant the rise of a moderate anti-immigrant party, the Progress Party, to become the second-largest in Norway.
The young people Mr. Breivik shot at a summer camp on the island of Utoya were all Norwegians, but some were the children of immigrants, who have now been memorialized in the country’s greatest modern disaster.
“When you are confronted with multicultural immigration, something happens,” said Grete Brochmann, a sociologist at the University of Oslo. “That’s the core of the matter right now, and it’s a great challenge to the Norwegian model.”
Norway’s leaders, from the royal family on down, have all praised the country’s solidarity, democracy, equality and tolerance, and all vow that these values will not change. Virtuous, peaceful, generous, consensual — this is the Norwegian self-image, aided by the oil wealth that props up one of the most comprehensive social welfare systems in the world.
Einar Forde, a former Labor Party politician, once said: “We are all social democrats.” And a former prime minister, Gro Harlem Brundtland, who was a target of Mr. Breivik’s terror, once remarked: “It is typically Norwegian to be good.”
For all its virtues, the emphasis on consensus here can also promote small-mindedness, smugness and political correctness. That is especially true when newcomers have different notions on certain values, including gender equality and secularism, even in an officially Christian country, that Norwegians hold dear.
“We’re a lucky society for many reasons, and not just oil,” said Ms. Brochmann, citing Norway’s distance from both the euro and the American financial crisis and its strong and transparent democracy.
“But many of these aspects of this consensus society have another side,” she said. “This is also a society of conformism,” she said, citing the “Janteloven,” or Jante law, based on small-town Scandinavian norms that govern group behavior, promoting collectivism and discouraging individual initiative and ambition in a world where no one is anonymous.
Norway is also a strongly patriotic country, independent from Sweden only since 1905, and occupied by the Nazis from 1940 to 1945. So the sense of pride and nationalism here is fierce, and the model built since World War II is strongly defended.
In an interview, Dr. Brundtland noted that Norway had a strongly consensual, cross-party program for almost a decade after World War II before returning to more normal politics. Even then, she said, Norway has “a tradition of trying to formulate and coordinate policies that are broader than what the political system itself would have. We try to have a base that’s broader than the majority.”
Still, she insisted, “it’s not true to say that we have a consensus democracy where we don’t have strong debates and political parties.”
Those debates have also become fiercer on the issue of immigration and integration, Dr. Brundtland conceded, especially with the growing popularity of the Progress Party, a now mainstream group that focuses on an anti-immigration stance. The Progress Party, she said with some distaste, has been pushing acceptable boundaries. “To ask the questions without having any productive answers is not always helpful,” Dr. Brundtland said.
The leader of the Progress Party, Siv Jensen, earned some notoriety in 2009 for using the phrase “stealth Islamization” in a speech, the same year the party became the second-largest in Parliament. Christian Tybring-Gjedde, the head of the party’s Oslo branch, prompted howls of criticism in May when he suggested Muslims were by nature more aggressive than Norwegians.
Even so, such statements are no more provocative than those by right-leaning politicians in other Western European countries, and the party’s stance has resonated with many. Morten Hoglund, a Progress legislator, said the party in recent years has been purging radicals and emphasizing better health care, though he conceded that Mr. Breivik might hurt the party in September’s local elections.
“We have tried as best we can to make sure that we behave in a proper way,” he said. “We are not in the same political family you see with some of the political parties in Europe today.”
But others believe that Progress has helped create the atmosphere in which Mr. Breivik flourished, even if he quit the party because of what he perceived as its moderation.
“There is one political party in this country that has worked with the line of reasoning that the terrorist used to legitimize his atrocities,” said Magnus Marsdal, an author and political analyst. “Of course the Progress Party is not accountable for this guy’s actions, but the sentiments that are spread through political propaganda are not innocent.”
The party plays on the immigrant challenge to religious and cultural uniformity. Some Muslim immigrants, not well-educated, restrict the activities of women, try to arrange marriages, may support genital mutilation and have a degree of homophobia, all of which are cited as adherence to religious or cultural values.
But these values present a direct challenge to the general consensus culture. It is in this area that Islamophobia has reached Norway, together with a more universal resentment of immigrant criminals and “welfare scroungers” of every religion and color.
Thomas Hylland Eriksen, a cultural anthropologist at the University of Oslo, has written extensively on the challenge of immigration to the overriding culture, which features a quiet nationalism. “But there are some unexamined ugly features of Norwegian nationalism that have to do with ethnic nationalism, a feeling of specialness, an element of racism,” Mr. Eriksen said. “Non-ethnic Norwegians are visible and still seen as out of place.”
Minorities think that “if they learn Norwegian, send their kids to school and stop at traffic lights they are 100 percent Norwegian,” he said. But it’s not really true, he said. He cited a prominent Norwegian, Dilek Ayhan, born here of Turkish parents, perfectly fluent, but who is often asked: “Where are you really from?”
There is “a prison of consensus,” Mr. Eriksen said, but it should not be exaggerated and is slowly cracking under the pressure of change. “There is a fairly open debate, but we should be more open and frank about our values,” he said.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests