Fascists are the Tools of the State

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby American Dream » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:37 am

Originally found at Who Makes the Nazis?:


http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/arch ... d-pasolini

How P2 and its fascist henchmen murdered Pasolini

Published on Thursday, 05 April 2012 13:16 Written by Alfio Bernabei

Neofascists played a role in the killing of Pier Paolo Pasolini, the writer and film director, who was found battered to death on the night of 1 November 1975 on a stretch of beach at Ostia, near Rome.

Thirty seven years after the event that shook Italy’s cultural and political world, a picture is gradually taking shape of a planned execution carried out by a gang of up to six people. At least two of them frequented a branch of the MSI (Movimento Sociale Italiano), the party founded after the Second World War by the diehard nazifascists of Mussolini’s Salò Republic.

Some testimonies also point to links with individuals who were later to be found connected to the terrorist organisation Armed Revolutionary Nuclei (NAR – Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari), as well as with the Roman underworld associated to the far right, in particular the Banda della Magliana, a criminal gang that was subsequently named during investigations into some notorious murders, including those of the former Prime Minister Aldo Moro and the banker Roberto Calvi.

Image
Pino Pelosi, the only man convicted for the killing

The disappearance of documents belonging to Pasolini, and the hastily discarded testimonies gathered by an undercover agent who obtained confessions from the two neofascists of responsibility in the murder, also cast doubts on the role of the Italian Secret Service and members of the judiciary. Both were at the time heavily infiltrated by P2 (Propaganda Due), a Masonic lodge that was using rightwing terrorists and petty criminals to carry out atrocities and executions as part of the so-called “strategy of tension”.

Suspicion is mounting that Pasolini’s murder was carried out within the framework of P2’s plans to subvert the constitutional order. According to the 1981-1984 parliamentary investigation led by the MP Tina Anselmi, P2 was acting as a clandestine “parallel government” or “a State within the State”.

Interest in Pasolini’s murder was reignited last December when Pino Pelosi burst into a crowded room during the presentation of a book in Rome and announced that the killer was still alive. Pelosi, now 53, was arrested on the night of the crime and told police he had acted on his own to protect himself from sexual advances. He was 17 at the time. With his nine and a half year jail sentence well behind him, Pelosi is now admitting that he was used by people who had devised a plan to silence the author.

At the time of his death Pasolini was vehemently attacking destructive forces in Italian society which, in his opinion, were creating a wasteland for a whole generation of young people, a process amounting to a kind of mental rape for which much of the responsibility rested with the politically corrupt ruling Christian Democratic Party and its cronies.

In books and articles he was proclaiming the need to put “the State on trial”, by which he probably meant the entire Cabinet, the heads of the then publicly owned companies and a large chunk of the military and even of the judiciary. Endowed with a clear insight into the riddles and obfuscations of power games, he was convinced that Enrico Mattei, President of ENI, the Italian Petrol Company, had been assassinated in a staged plane crash. A book he was working on at the time of his death, Petrolio (Oil), published posthumously, dealt with the Mattei affair. After Pasolini’s murder 78 pages disappeared from the only manuscript in existence. They have never been found.

Rumours have circulated for years that the man who took over from Mattei, Eugenio Cefis, was the real head of the P2 Masonic Lodge, part of the Stay Behind/Gladio organisation. The purpose of this network was to prevent the Communist Party from gaining enough strength to form a government. Among the “gladiators’” tasks was to maintain a climate of fear through terrorist acts with the objective of making a military intervention appear justifiable for the restoration of law and order.

Acting through a variety of neo-Nazi outfits, the P2/Stay Behind/Gladio network was targeting those who were getting too close to unmasking its plotters at the top. Journalists and leftwing investigative magistrates were the victims of attacks and assassinations. As a novelist and film maker reaching for truths outside the purely forensic, Pasolini could be perceived even as a bigger threat. Moreover, he had a huge following among the intelligentsia. Though capable of embarrassing blunders, like his servile interview with the poet Ezra Pound, his firm stance against fascism was to be found in virtually every book he wrote. Many of his films also focused on a critique of oppressive forces, whether in the shape of social conventions (Theorem, Pigsty) or perverse political power (Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom).

At the time of his death he was completing the latter film, perhaps the most eloquent and disturbing attack on fascism in the history of cinema. The plot dealt with the sexual components of power and its maintenance taken to murderous extreme. Using the literary framework of one of the Marquis de Sade’s libertine novels, he was showing how even sophisticated cultures ranking high in the production of the arts – music, literature, architecture, all referred to in the film – can succumb to the unscrupulous manipulation of power hungry thugs who, by imposing their will on supine populations, can abuse and destroy whole generations.

With unprecedented directness, Pasolini was warning audiences that while nazifascist threats can be easily detected when dressed up in the conventional garbs of brutal domination, enabling a counter reaction, it is far more dangerous when the process of subjugation is carried out in ritualistic forms of apparent ordinariness by seemingly innocuous people, until they turn into monsters, by which time it’s too late and everyone feels complicit and compromised with the fait accompli. This is why the message of Salò was and remains so shocking.

Particularly in Italy, where no purge had occurred after the Second World War, the film contained an exhortation to remain vigilant about nazifascists lurking in every office, in every street, in schools, at newspaper desks, among intellectuals and in the Church.

Seen in the light of Pelosi’s most recent revelations, Pasolini’s murder was planned with extreme care. First, there was the theft of film cans from the shooting of Salò. Pasolini wanted to retrieve the material. The youth he had befriended, Pelosi, already in contact with petty criminals and neofascists, was probably used as the go-between to let the author know that the cans could be retrieved, but if he called the police or made too much noise everything would be destroyed. As Pasolini and Pelosi remained in contact, the chances were that sooner or later the latter would entice the homosexual author to some secluded place where the killers could step in and commit the crime undetected, thus allowing the “killed by his own depravity” version of events to prevail in the investigations and in popular belief.

On the night of 1 November Pasolini and Pelosi drove to a beach in Ostia. Pelosi now says that soon after they parked, a scooter arrived with two men. Then a car pulled in with three or four men on board and finally a second car arrived carrying only its driver. “We had been followed all the way”, Pelosi says. The trap having been set, Pasolini was savagely beaten up. One of the cars drove repeatedly over his body to crush the thorax and make sure he was dead.

Image
Police examine the murder scene on a beach at Ostia

Pelosi maintains that he took the blame for the killing because his family received threats. At his trial it was found that he could not have acted alone. No investigations followed to find his accomplices. A confession of responsibility in the crime obtained by a lone undercover policeman, Renzo Sansone, who questioned two brothers, Giuseppe and Franco Borsellino, was quickly discarded. Pelosi now confirms the two brothers, who frequented the MSI branch in the Tiburtino district of Rome, were indeed present at the scene of the killing. Among others named is a man called Sergio Pinna, who vanished soon after, never to be found again, and Giuseppe Mastini, still in jail because of a string of murders.

According to some testimonies, Mastini’s links with neofascists went as far as being friendly with Gilberto Cavallini who was to become one of the leaders of NAR, the nazifascist armed group whose members were later to be found guilty of the 1980 Bologna massacre in which the P2/Gladio organisation was involved.

There are many aspects of Pasolini’s murder that are still unclear. But little doubt remains that those who decided to silence him relied on some neofascists for his execution.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby American Dream » Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:25 am

Creation’ and ‘Use’ of the Nazis

By Nikos Raptis
Source: teleSUR English
January 22, 2015



“Wired”

All animals are “wired” to strive to survive, to live in relative comfort, and to live symbiotically.

Therefore, humans, as animals, have all these qualities. In addition they have a brain that can think technologically and in a much lesser degree to think scientifically.

Ordinary humans, apply this additional technological ability to survive, live in relative comfort, and live symbiotically. By “ordinary” we mean exactly that: survival, comfort, symbiosis.

However, at some point in human history, some humans, individually or in a group, managed to usurp the technological achievements of the ordinary people and use it to their advantage and then, they elected themselves as “leaders.” Probably, originally it was the physically stronger, but mentally and morally weaker, individuals who started this racket of “leadership.”

Now, a single person or a small group of persons cannot impose their will on the many. So, the leaders have to use violence to impose their will. The instrument to do that was and is the thug.

But before we go on with the “evaluation” of the thug, it is useful to clarify who are “the many.”

Our “western” civilization, already spread over the entire planet by the US [Empire], is based on the ancient Greek intellectual culture. Let us, then, examine what the intellectuals of the ancient Greeks thought about “the many.”

In most English dictionaries there is a strange-sounding Greek entry: “Hoi polloi” [pronounced as hoy poloy, accent on both “o”s]. There is no Greek who would be able to recognize that sound as Greek. Also, if explained to him what are the actual Greek words he will probably burst into laughter. The actual Greek words are: “oi polloi”, pronounced as “ee pollee”, accent on the final”ee”. The “oi” is the plural of the masculine definite article. The “polloi” is the plural of the adjective “polys”, which means a lot, many. Therefore, the dictionary entry “oi polloi” means “the many.” For this article we shall use the form for the correct sound, that is the form “ee pollee.”

The ancient Greeks with the expression “ee pollee” referred to the ordinary people in contrast to those that were considered as the intellectual elites. Especially, for Socrates and Plato “oi polee,” as ignorant and unreasonable, deserved only contempt. Thus, that other august class, the intellectual elites of the West, many centuries ago, swallowed the Socratic contempt hook, line and sinker. For example, Erasmus (1466 – 1536), that great admirer of the ancient Greeks, defined ee pollee as: “the multitude of the gross people,” where, of course, the word “gross” meant: ignorant or untutored. Thus, we find, in 1853, Roget’s Thesaurus defining ee pollee as: “the herd,” “the beast with many heads,” “the great unwashed,” etc. By the way, the Greek word “Thesauros” means treasure!

[Parenthesis: In my Greek high school, in the 1940s, we were reading all about the trial of Socrates in the original texts. The teacher, a rather sympathetic oldster, had the “serious” task of protecting us from the “miasma” of communism. So, he was striving to prove to us that “ee pollee” were simply shit. So, one day standing in the middle of the classroom, he raised the palm of his right hand and declared; “Here, see (!), my fingers do not all have the same length”, and so, after having demolished the demand that humans should be socially equal, he triumphantly returned to his seat.]

Needless to say that through this contempt for ee pollee, the world gained leaders as W. Bush, Ashcroft , or Cheney.

The thug

The thug has been “used” continuously through human history in all places under all kinds of names; “sthag” in India [its birthplace], “trabuco” in Spain, “kabadayi” in Turkey, etc. However, at some point it gained a dignified name full of “patriotism” and “social sensitivity”. The name: “National-socialist”, also known as “Nazi.”

A very interesting and historical ‘’use” of thugs took place in Corinth, one of the most important cities of the Greek antiquity. Corinth was so rich and cultured that there was a slogan that declared: “It is not attainable for everybody to sail to Corinth.” Inevitably, Corinth became the home of, Lais (421- 340 BCE), the most beautiful and expensive prostitute in ancient history.

Around 52 years after the birth of Christ this is what happened in Corinth:

After these things Paul departed from Athens and came to Corinth. … Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision. Be not afraid, but speak and hold not thy peace: … for I have much people [Greek Christians] in this city [Corinth]. … Then all the (Christian) Greeks took Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the [Jewish] synagogue and beat him…” [The Acts, 18:1-18, The King James’ Version of the Bible].

We have to note that those Jews in Corinth, at that time, were immigrants.

Two thousand years after the incident in Corinth with Saint Paul and the Greek thugs, again in Corinth a certain Greek named Bookooras, the leader of the Greek Nazis in Corinth, repeated the feat with the help of the brave local Nazi-thugs. Two years ago they chased a group of dark-skinned immigrants at the port of Corinth, who to survive plunged into the sea at the harbor of Corinth. That they did not drown was not due to the benevolence of the Nazi-thugs. Finally, Bookooras, a Nazi member of the Greek Parliament, was imprisoned for participating in a criminal organization. When he had to defend himself in the Parliament he started crying asking to be released from prison.

Another recent “use” of the Nazi-thugs in an extremely obscene way, was that in Ukraine where the U.S. Embassy “used” the historically very “effective” murderous Ukraine Nazi-thugs to, in essence, initiate an occupation of the Ukraine by the U.S., through the EU, as a proxy. A repeat of what happened in Greece in the 1940s and which lasts up to this day.

The ruling world elites while “creating” their “instruments” of violence spread the work of the thug over a short spectrum. On one end of the spectrum there is the “lumpen-thug” and on the other end there are the rather aristocratic military. In the middle there is the policeman, a combination of both ends: the “militarized thug.”

[Note: That, among the military, there are some individuals who are “normal” persons, does not diminish the universal truth about the spectrum of “instruments” of violence.]

So, who are the people who become lumpen-thugs, that is, Nazis?

A general remark: These individuals have a common characteristic. They have crooked personalities and that crookedness was mostly acquired through the family, the elementary school, poverty, etc.

– We start with the most obvious candidates: the sadists. A choice based on the testimony of a world class expert: Rudolph Diels, the “creator” of the “GeStaPo” of Hitler.

The regular crooks with a criminal record.

Many males that happen to have or create [chemically] a massive muscular system.

Persons that feel weak in body and personality, who seek protection through a violent group.

Complex-ridden, patriotic persons. [Scoundrels according to Samuel Johnson.]

– And so on…


Concluding, we can say that the the “lumpen thugs” are a very valuable instrument for the “rulers”, especially during the initial stages of their “rule.” As was mentioned elsewhere, this stage can be called the “Roehm-phase” of the Nazis, in “honor” of Hitler’s master-thug, Ernst Roehm.


https://zcomm.org/zcommentary/creation- ... the-nazis/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby coffin_dodger » Fri Jan 23, 2015 4:37 am

^^ I notice a distinct change of nuance in your posts recently, AD.

quoting from the piece above, a couple of examples:

Now, a single person or a small group of persons cannot impose their will on the many. So, the leaders have to use violence to impose their will.


The ruling world elites while “creating” their “instruments” of violence spread the work of the thug over a short spectrum.


Can I just clarify that the anti-fascist movement (incidentally, why don't they have their own name? i.e. the opposite to left is right, on/off, forward/backward, Conservatives/Labour, Democrats/Republicans etc) now accepts that there are ruling elites?

For years, your message has been - (to paraphrase) 'there are no specific rulers, The System(tm) is an organic, self sustaining entity, directed only by it's own momentum". This stance seems to have been recently abandoned. Why is this - could it be that the evidence of a ruling elite is becoming so transparent that a 180 degree turn on a previously immutable stance is neccessary to avoid looking out of touch?

I'm wondering if anti-fascists are just as much as a 'tool of the state' as the fascists themselves.
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby American Dream » Fri Jan 23, 2015 5:27 am

You set up (false) dichotomies at your own convenience and blithely create your own straw men to wrestle with.

Have fun with that!
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby coffin_dodger » Fri Jan 23, 2015 5:34 am

American Dream » Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:27 am wrote:You set up (false) dichotomies at your own convenience and blithely create your own straw men to wrestle with.

Have fun with that!


Huh? Er, yeah. OK. :thumbsup
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby American Dream » Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:10 pm

The New State Repression zine | Microcosm Publishing

Only the presence of provocateurs within the movement could create factions and sow dissension, plant false evidence that could then be used to confuse and alienate supporters or create the basis for criminal frame-ups, and make certain that targeted leaders met their appointments with assassins’ bullets. But these methods also contained risks. The types of people who can be hired to carry out these tasks are usually psychologically unstable, often drawn from the criminal element. Sometimes they “defect” to the groups they are supposed to disrupt. Sometimes they feed their employers false information in order to keep their jobs.

Kitson’s approach answered some of these problems, if only because, by institutionalizing repression as a permanent feature of capitalist society, his system furnishes more opportunities for the state to recruit, place, and test its agents long before they are called upon to perform the most extreme kinds of provocations.




American Dream » Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:44 am wrote:
Yes- fascists do function as proxies for the State, mercenaries at the employ of elite interests, and etc.- and they have filled this role for over 80 years now.

Even though they may be deeply, deeply infiltrated, they do also represent insurgent forces, albeit truly creepy, ugly and destructive insurgent forces:


Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Liberal counterinsurgency versus the paramilitary right

In this article I'm going to discuss U.S. security forces' changing response to the paramilitary right. I will argue the following:

Although U.S. security forces have an important history of collaborating with or even sponsoring right-wing paramilitary groups in the United States, the past three decades have seen the rise of an insurgent far right that rejects the legitimacy of the U.S. government and has sometimes taken up arms against it.

Security forces have periodically cracked down on this insurgent right when it has engaged in open warfare against the state apparatus, but to a large extent their approach to the insurgent right has been reactive, inconsistent, and counterproductive from the standpoint of maintaining social control.

A liberal faction of the ruling class is promoting a smarter approach to combating the paramilitary right, one that is both more preemptive and more sensitive to rightist fears of state repression. This approach, which has been advanced most fully by the New America Foundation, represents an application of counterinsurgency strategy, a theory of repression that addresses popular grievances in order to bolster elite power more effectively.


Federal agencies have a long history of covert involvement in far right paramilitary organizations, but the nature of this involvement has changed dramatically as the politics of the U.S. far right have changed. During the 1960s, the FBI often refused to intervene as the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacists physically attacked civil right workers. Between 1969 and 1972, U.S. Army's Military Intelligence and the Chicago Police jointly operated a far right group called the League of Justice, which burglarized, bugged, and vandalized socialist and anti-war groups. In 1971-1972, the FBI sponsored the paramilitary Secret Army Organization, which targeted anti-war leftists with spying, vandalism, mail theft, assassination plots, shootings, and bombings. The SAO was based in San Diego and claimed branches in eleven states. Most notoriously, in 1979 an FBI informer and an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms helped to plan the Greensboro massacre, in which a coalition of Klansmen and neonazis murdered five members of the Communist Workers Party. (See Donner, Protectors of Privilege, pp. 146-50; Churchill and Vander Wall, Agents of Repression, pp. 181-2.)

Starting in the early 1980s, the political center of gravity within the far right shifted from a traditional focus on targeting leftists and people of color to a fascist ideology that identified the "Zionist Occupation Government" in Washington as the main enemy. Several Klan leaders re-emerged as neonazis, such as Tom Metzger, who founded White Aryan Resistance, and Louis Beam, who joined Aryan Nations and pioneered the concept of "leaderless resistance." Some far rightists called for a White revolution to overthrow the U.S. government, as portrayed in William Pierce's 1978 novel, The Turner Diaries, while others envisioned an independent Aryan enclave in the Pacific Northwest. In 1983, members of several far-right groups formed an underground paramilitary group known as The Order, which "declared war" on the U.S. government, robbed banks and armored cars, counterfeited money, assassinated Jewish talk show host Alan Berg, and engaged in armed combat with police. Other groups followed The Order's example.

The federal apparatus responded aggressively to this shift. Leonard Zeskind writes that "the Reagan administration's Justice Department…had previously demonstrated little interest in federal prosecutions of attacks by white supremacists on black people and other ordinary citizens," but The Order and related groups pushed them to respond more aggressively. "The FBI planted more confidential informants inside white supremacist groups, started tapping phones, and made arrests in a number of incipient criminal conspiracies" (Blood and Politics, pp. 145-6). By 1985, the federal government had killed The Order's leader in a shootout and sent most of its members to prison. Over the next few years, members of several other neonazi groups were arrested and prosecuted, although the biggest effort -- the 1988 Fort Smith trial of fourteen white supremacists on seditious conspiracy and other charges -- ended in acquittals.

Although many white supremacists rejected an underground strategy, the 1980s gave the movement a list of martyrs and cemented militant opposition to federal authority as an ideological pole on the far right. In the early 1990s, neonazis began to link up with hardline Christian rightists, libertarians, and Birchite anti-globalists in the germ of what would become the Patriot movement, the first U.S. mass movement since World War II in which fascist and non-fascist rightists worked together in coalition. Patriot groups did not necessarily embrace right-wing revolution or racial ideology, but they regarded the U.S. government as part of a plot by globalist elites to take away their freedom, and they advocated forming "citizen militias" to defend themselves against tyranny. Deadly and arguably murderous operations by federal officers fed the growth of the movement, especially the 1992 siege and arrest of white supremacist Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge, Idaho (an operation that killed Weaver's wife and teenage son along with a U.S. marshal), and the April 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas (in which eighty members of the cult and four federal agents died).

By 1996 the Patriot movement included some 850 identified groups. An entire subculture, encompassing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of supporters, regarded the established state apparatus as evil and illegitimate. With tens of thousands of them organized in private armed units and a network of "common law courts" claiming to exercise government functions, the movement was creating a type of embryonic dual power in some areas. Although the majority of Patriot activists viewed this as a defensive stance, neonazis and others who advocated offensive actions against the state were a significant part of the mix.

At first, security forces did little to clamp down on the Patriot movement overtly. (Zeskind and others have pointed out that a predominantly black or brown movement spouting anti-government rhetoric and conducting paramilitary training would have been treated very differently.) But in April 1995, neonazi Timothy McVeigh and others blew up the Oklahoma City federal building, killing 168 people, and Patriot militias were widely blamed for the attack. After that, the FBI pursued a wide-ranging crackdown. Here are a few examples from 1995-1998, drawn from a Patriot movement timeline compiled by the liberal Southern Poverty Law Center, which works closely with the FBI:

a tax protester arrested for placing a failed bomb behind the Reno, Nevada, IRS building

three members of the Republic of Georgia militia charged with manufacturing shrapnel-packed bombs and training a team to assassinate politicians

twelve members of the Arizona Viper Team arrested on federal conspiracy, weapons and explosives charges

seven members of the Mountaineer Militia arrested in a plot to blow up the FBI's national fingerprint records center in West Virginia

former Sons of Liberty and other tax protesters set fire to the IRS office in Colorado Springs

eight members of a militia group arrested in connection with a plan to invade Fort Hood, Texas, and kill foreign troops mistakenly believed to be housed there

three men, including one with ties to the separatist Republic of Texas, charged with conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction after threatening President Clinton and other federal officials with biological weapons.


This crackdown contributed to the Patriot movement's collapse in the late 1990s. The movement remained stagnant for a decade, but has been growing fast again since President Obama's election in 2008 and is now believed to be larger than at its peak in the 1990s. Patriot movement groups continue to promote fears of a New World Order conspiracy and challenge the legitimacy of the existing state apparatus, and the movement continues to overlap with more hardline fascist currents.

The state apparatus seems to be conflicted about how to address the paramilitary right. Over the past decade, FBI reports have repeatedly identified right-wing violence as a serious threat, for example in 2004. In 2006, the FBI warned that neonazis were trying to infiltrate law enforcement agencies, and in 2007 they highlighted the threat from solo white supremacists (prefiguring, for example, Wade Michael Page's attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin earlier this year). But in 2009, when conservatives denounced the Department of Homeland Security for a report on the resurgence of "Rightwing Extremism," DHS repudiated the report and disbanded the unit that was studying non-Islamic domestic terrorism. Also in 2009, a report about the militia movement from the Missouri Information Analysis Center (one of the DHS-sponsored "fusion centers") met a similar fate.

Enter the New America Foundation, an elite-based think tank that addresses foreign policy, counterterrorism, and a range of other issues. In 2011 and 2012, their staffers and fellows warned in various media (such as a scholarly study, a panel presentation, and a heavily cited CNN op-ed) that home-grown "extremists" -- and especially rightists -- posed a terrorist threat as big as or bigger than Islamist groups. At the same time, NAF is critical of blundering government efforts that fuel the growth of the far right. In May 2012 they put out a detailed policy paper, by investigative journalist J.M. Berger, about an early 1990s undercover operation called PATCON, in which FBI agents created a dummy white supremacist group to gather intelligence about violent plots by far rightists within the budding Patriot movement. Among other criticisms, the policy paper argues that PATCON helped reinforce Patriot movement paranoia about government repression and agents provocateurs -- and compares this to the effect of scattershot police surveillance on American Muslim communities. In NAF's view, infiltration is still "an important tool," but it needs to be managed more responsibly and with more understanding of how it can damage targeted communities' "trust in government and willingness to cooperate with law enforcement" (p. 23). (Thanks to Nick Paretsky for pointing me to NAF's PATCON policy paper.)

To understand the significance of this report, a bit of background about the New America Foundation is important. First, NAF represents the liberal Eastern establishment wing of the ruling class. Almost two-thirds of the members of its board of directors hold positions in business (most frequently investments), while the rest are mostly academics or journalists. Over three-quarters of the directors hold Ivy League (mostly Harvard) degrees or work at an Ivy League university, and some forty percent of them are current or former members of the Council on Foreign Relations. NAF's board is chaired by Eric Schmidt (chair and former CEO of Google); other prominent board members include hedge fund manager Jonathan Soros (son of George Soros) and "end of history" political scientist Francis Fukuyama. Not surprisingly, some right-wing conspiracy theorists have pointed to NAF as a major node linking global capitalists, Marxist journalists, and the Obama administration in a sinister plot to manipulate public opinion.

Second, NAF is a strong proponent of counterinsurgency strategy (COIN). Kristian Williams has described COIN as a style of warfare that's characterized by "an emphasis on intelligence, security and peace-keeping operation, population control, propaganda, and efforts to gain the trust of the people" (p. 84). NAF argues that "the 'global war on terror' is better conceived as a global counterinsurgency campaign, which typically involves a 20% military approach and an 80% 'softer' approach that uses other levers and incentives." The foundation has promoted this shift with regard to Iraq, Pakistan, and -- perhaps most interestingly -- India: An October 2011 article by NAF's Sameer Lalwani criticized the Indian government's heavily militarized approach to combating the maoist Naxalite insurgency as "brutal and incomplete (by western standards)" and urged institutional overhauls to redress the "distribution of power controlled by the state and elite cadres." This approach is in the tradition of the CIA funding European social democrats in the 1950s in order to undercut support for Communism.

As many leftists have argued, COIN is as much a sophisticated approach to state repression as it is a form of warfare. Williams argues that "the two major developments in American policing since the 1960s -- militarization and community policing -- are actually two aspects of a domestic counterinsurgency program" (p. 90). In The New State Repression, Ken Lawrence highlighted security forces' shift from a reactive approach -- targeting groups after they've engaged in some kind of political protest -- to a preemptive approach, which assumes that even in periods of calm, opponents of the state are "out there plotting and organizing, so the police must go find them, infiltrate them, and plant provocateurs among them" (p. 6). Lawrence traced this "strategy of permanent repression" to the work of British counterinsurgency expert Frank Kitson in Kenya, northern Ireland, and elsewhere, which involved, for example, the creation of "pseudo gangs" as a tactic to confuse and weaken genuine opposition forces...



http://threewayfight.blogspot.com/2012/ ... ersus.html
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby American Dream » Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:39 pm

http://anti-racistcanada.blogspot.com/2 ... could.html

6 February 2015
Give CSIS More Powers? Sure! What Could Possibly Go Wrong?


Image

KOBO: http://store.kobobooks.com/en-CA/ebook/ ... t-cover-up
Amazon (Digital): http://www.amazon.com/Race-Traitor-Cana ... B00JA05FYM
Amazon (Paperback): http://www.amazon.com/Race-Traitor-Cana ... 502779714/

Back in November, two Canadian soldiers were murdered by individuals who may have been radicalized by an extremist interpretation of Islam, but who most certainly were not right in the head. The two incidents were horrible tragedies and, for a time, most Canadians were able to put aside petty, partisan, bickering.

In response to these two murders as well as the real or perceived threats posed by extremists (particularly those associated with ISIS, or ISIL, or EIEIO, or whatever the hell they are referring to themselves as now), Harper's Conservative government proposed a new law that would give sweeping new investigative powers to CSIS, Canada's spy agency. Justin Trudeau has suggested that the Liberals will support the legislation. Mulclair has said the NDP will oppose passage of the bill.

We say, good for you Mr. Harper!

These are dangerous times and we need to do everything we as a nation can do to protect the citizens of this country from fanatics who would harm us all. CSIS should be given every tool it can to stop the maniac before they can act.

Right?

Sure, there are people who suggest that the current laws are perfectly fine as evidenced by the arrests of suspected extremists that have already take place without the use of the advanced tools that the proposed law would give to CSIS. Oh, and there is concern that the wording of the legislation is so broad as to encompass any group the government decides is a threat:

.... On close inspection, Bill C-51 is not an anti-terrorism bill. Fighting terrorism is its pretext; its language reveals a broader goal of allowing government departments, as well as CSIS, to act whenever they believe limply defined security threats “may” – not “will” – occur.

So why does this bill exist? What is it fighting? And why is it giving intelligence officers powers that are currently reserved for the RCMP and other police forces?

CSIS is an intelligence agency. It is secretive, and it is supposed to be. Why does it suddenly need police powers to do its job? Until now, police powers were reserved for the police – an organization that is public, and which in a democracy must be.

Have you ever met a CSIS agent? Was he out in uniform, walking the beat? No. CSIS works in secret. It is furthermore immune from Parliamentary oversight.

And now, if Bill C-51 passes, CSIS will be able to disrupt anything its political masters believe might be a threat. As the bill is currently written, that includes a lot more than terrorism.


And of course there those who foolishly worry that CSIS might, through the use of an informant, infiltrate a group of people who have extremist views but who haven't the tools or the wherewithal to act on those views, but then go on to encourage members of the group to act in such a way as to become a threat and thus justify their investigation of the group.

Well that is just speculative crazy talk! That could never, ever, happen. CSIS would never endanger Canadians by making already dangerous individuals far more dangerous by organizing them and providing with resources and training.

Right?

Uhm.... right?

Strange way to ensure national security

Image

Oh, right! It already has happened.

There was a lecherous old newspaper man from Pennsylvania who once said that people who would give up their essential liberty for a little bit of security deserve neither freedom nor security. This seems to be an especially pertinent sentiment now.

If our readers would like to know more about the potential dangers of giving CSIS the new powers proposed by the government, you need to go no further than Elisa Hategan'sRace Traitor, a first hand account of Hategan's recruitment into the Heritage Front. More relevant to this discussion though is how Hategan explains how a group of already dangerous boneheads were provided with the organizational structure and resources that made it significantly more dangerous than it would otherwise have been by Grant Bristow who was credited as one of the founders of the Heritage Front while also on the payroll of CSIS.






American Dream » Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:21 pm wrote: http://anti-racistcanada.blogspot.com/2 ... -race.html

30 March 2014

The Heritage Front: The True Story in Race Traitor
We'll provide the blurb from Amazon (links added by ARC):

Set in 1990s Toronto, RACE TRAITOR is the visceral true story of a teenage girl who becomes entangled in Canada’s most powerful white supremacist group, the Heritage Front – a domestic terrorist group later revealed to have been created and funded with the assistance of Canada’s spy agency, Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS).

To sixteen-year old runaway Elisse, the new friends she encounters in the secretive Heritage Front are the family she’s never had. They feed her when she’s hungry, watch her back, and Wolfgang Droege, one of the group’s charismatic leaders, introduces her to a trusted friend, notorious Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, who provides her with shelter and work.

In less than a year, Elisse evolves into an extremist groomed for a leadership role in the far-right movement. Her loyalty earns her the attention and tutelage of Grant Bristow, co-founder of the Heritage Front, who is training a secret faction of skinheads and neo-Nazis in information-gathering and terror tactics targeting political opponents. Rapidly drawn into their web of hatred, Elisse witnesses an escalating campaign of terror from which there seems no way out.

Forced to confront her sexual orientation and secret heritage, Elisse realizes that she must fight back. But when she attempts to shut down the vicious organization that had brainwashed her and terrorized innocent Canadians, she learns that a darker force is behind the façade of the Heritage Front: Canada’s own spy agency, backed by the government that was supposed to protect her.

At only eighteen, Elisse’s testimony will lead to the criminal convictions of prominent white supremacists including Wolfgang Droege. Within months, Grant Bristow would be exposed as an undercover CSIS agent. Although Operation Governor never led to the arrest of a single Canadian racist, Bristow will be placed into the Witness Protection Program and given a package worth hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, while the teenage girl who had named him as a criminal will be denied police protection and forced to go on the run for her life.

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby Searcher08 » Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:43 pm

coffin_dodger » Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:37 am wrote:^^ I notice a distinct change of nuance in your posts recently, AD.


quoting from the piece above, a couple of examples:

Now, a single person or a small group of persons cannot impose their will on the many. So, the leaders have to use violence to impose their will.


The ruling world elites while “creating” their “instruments” of violence spread the work of the thug over a short spectrum.


Can I just clarify that the anti-fascist movement (incidentally, why don't they have their own name? i.e. the opposite to left is right, on/off, forward/backward, Conservatives/Labour, Democrats/Republicans etc) now accepts that there are ruling elites?[/quote]

The "Antifa movement" would seem to be two very different things - there is an academic Antifa, which is now a big industry with several big UK universities having both Depatments and Consultancies dedicated to this - such as the University Of Northampton. There are professional Journals set up with new researchers who cross-pollinate each other. There are also big connections to the Israeli Right, and MilIntel on both sides of the Atlantic. Then there is a much more working class grass roots and longer standing thing like Hope Not Hate, Rock Against Racism etc.
I have no issues with any antifa being an academic subject. I DO have issues when it is done so as dishonestly as it is being done ar RI, with both Israel and globalist funding being Do Not Talk subjects.
You will NEVER EVER find American Dream discussing the rise of fascist tendencies in Israel or in the USA.


For years, your message has been - (to paraphrase) 'there are no specific rulers, The System(tm) is an organic, self sustaining entity, directed only by it's own momentum". This stance seems to have been recently abandoned. Why is this - could it be that the evidence of a ruling elite is becoming so transparent that a 180 degree turn on a previously immutable stance is neccessary to avoid looking out of touch?

I'm wondering if anti-fascists are just as much as a 'tool of the state' as the fascists themselves.
[/quote]

Professional "anti-fascists" are ABSOLUTELY tools of the (emerging) state.

An emerging world where vague unclear emotional debates around fuzzy topics without an action bias and with a self-hatred, fear of causing offence to some, disinterest in engagement and lack of clarity are the prime value sets of social interaction.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby semper occultus » Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:27 pm

Then there is a much more working class grass roots and longer standing thing like Hope Not Hate, Rock Against Racism etc.


...not sure HNH are an example of working class grass roots tbh...


First, the clique of which he is a part now running Hope Not Hate is largely composed of the pro-EU hard right Labour faction ‘Progress’ (see NFB 10 p.59-60/75), chief among whose patrons is the oleaginous pro-EU Peter Mandelson. It gets even worse. In both February 2012 and (we understand) in February 2013 (see NFB 10 p.61-62), HNH have been in receipt of substantial funding from the Department of Communities and Local Government, brokered by DCLG ‘Integration Division’ boss Andrew Jordan, and HNH speakers are frequent participants at DCLG-sponsored seminars, along with Matthew Goodwin and various spooks. In this respect, whereas originally funding was forthcoming to counter the EDL, it now seems legitimate to argue that here we have government funded HNH turning its sights on a political party, UKIP, that is a major problem for their Tory paymasters. That cannot be right, and is surely questionable legally.

http://www.borderland.co.uk/sport-mainm ... -hate.html
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby Searcher08 » Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:41 pm

semper occultus » Sat Feb 07, 2015 10:27 pm wrote:
Then there is a much more working class grass roots and longer standing thing like Hope Not Hate, Rock Against Racism etc.


...not sure HNH are an example of working class grass roots tbh...


First, the clique of which he is a part now running Hope Not Hate is largely composed of the pro-EU hard right Labour faction ‘Progress’ (see NFB 10 p.59-60/75), chief among whose patrons is the oleaginous pro-EU Peter Mandelson. It gets even worse. In both February 2012 and (we understand) in February 2013 (see NFB 10 p.61-62), HNH have been in receipt of substantial funding from the Department of Communities and Local Government, brokered by DCLG ‘Integration Division’ boss Andrew Jordan, and HNH speakers are frequent participants at DCLG-sponsored seminars, along with Matthew Goodwin and various spooks. In this respect, whereas originally funding was forthcoming to counter the EDL, it now seems legitimate to argue that here we have government funded HNH turning its sights on a political party, UKIP, that is a major problem for their Tory paymasters. That cannot be right, and is surely questionable legally.

http://www.borderland.co.uk/sport-mainm ... -hate.html


Semper, you are a star. :thumbsup

I had found Hope Not Hate quite difficult to research - their structure is quite opaque, but I had given them the benefit of the doubt by focusing on them as they were originally set up rather than as they are now. This makes their links with"Professional Anti-Fa" people much different (people from HnH have shared conferences with the Community Security Trust and some very spookily connected organisations - I had thought from a "have to have someone from the real world" perspective. Anything connected to Mandy immediately takes on a new and different complexion.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby semper occultus » Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:47 pm

I can scan the article from NFB 10 that goes into this issue in pedantic detail if you like
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby Searcher08 » Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:53 pm

semper occultus » Sat Feb 07, 2015 10:47 pm wrote:I can scan the article from NFB 10 that goes into this issue in pedantic detail if you like


Please, I would love to see that, especially if there are any links with orgs like Common Purpose - this tidbit just in passing
On 25 November, The Daily Telegraph too published a comment piece on CPUK, noting that the Rotherham Director of Childrens' Services, Joyce Thacker, heavily criticised in the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal, was a member of CPUK,
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby jakell » Sun Feb 08, 2015 8:34 am

Searcher08 » Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:43 pm wrote:You will NEVER EVER find American Dream discussing the rise of fascist tendencies in Israel or in the USA.



Sorry to snip, but I put this down to this being a mainly North American board**, and if questionable stuff is posted concerning matters close to home, he is more likely to get called on it. Us Old Worldies have been having a go but it's an uphill struggle. I'm envisioning a huge 'Jeux Sans Frontiers' style layer cake with a small number of hurt cats trying to traverse it.
(I know cats are far too cool to participate in anything so undignified, but I like those images).

The Israel thing is something else, possible too hot a potato.

** The Canadian thing above is a rare departure.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby Luther Blissett » Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:06 pm

When I'm researching domestic paramilitary / fascist groups on the forum, many of my returns are American Dream posts.

Or do you mean fascism in U.S. government? While I agree that there are some fascist elements in our laws and actions, and as a younger and lazier person I might have said "the U.S. is a fascist state!" with no qualifiers, I was satisfied by the quibble that played out here a few years ago ("What is fascism and how do we define it?", "The U.S. is not a fascist state") that what the U.S. is doing might be partially influenced by fascism but is something newer and entirely different. Not neofascism, not proto-fascism, not even techno-fascism. It's just science fiction coming to life on board a planet being sucked dry. I think I might have even been finally turned by a JackRiddler poem, of all things. That's a strange realization.

But if we're talking about American Gladio B / organized crime / paramilitary militias / etc., I think there's a ton to be found in American Dream's posts. Search for the name of any militia whose members have been convicted of a Strategy of Tension-esque terrorist act.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fascists are the Tools of the State

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:13 pm

.

There's a thread right now in GD that touches on the premise of fascism in Israel: "Fascist Tendencies in Israel".

Given AD's zeal and passion for exposing/raising awareness of any/all fascist tendencies, AD will surely be offering a response to that thread shortly, drawing from AD's vast, seemingly infinite trove of sources, consistent with AD's approach towards applying only the most RIGOROUS standards towards supporting ANTI-FASCIST commentary, OR where appropriate, calling out sources with spurious intentions.

I'm so confident of this -- given his singular focus on this topic -- that I will be holding my breath until such a response is provided.

Starting............ now.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests