Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
seemslikeadream » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:11 am wrote:8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:27 pm wrote:Wouldn't it be ironic if it's the "liberal/progressive" choice that leads us to World War 3, and not the buffoonish 80's tv celebrity?
He is a fucking racist pedophile misogynistic women groping asshole who wanders into a teenage girls dressing room to look at naked children...not a silly buffoonish 80's tv star...and if he wasn't running for president against Clinton he would have been raked over the coals here in the pedophile thread but now he gets a pass as just a silly celebrity cause everyone hates Clinton .....so Clinton hate trumps a fucking child molester/rapist/misogynistic/rampant xenophobe
women and children would beg to differ with you
Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.
seemslikeadream » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:22 am wrote:Lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of raping 13-year-old girl gets December hearing
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.2828413
Postby 82_28 » Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:50 am
Most of Jeff's posts to FB atm are about the US election if you're not following him. Many of our Canadian brethren are just as into this as we are. Don't want to be, but we've been forced into this.
Harvey » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:13 pm wrote:SLAD, I understood that you don't like Trump but I've yet to encounter an ardent admirer at RI.
It's clear that Trump will not be the next president. If you temporarily refused to discuss Clinton in terms of her track record and her stated intentions in order to propagandise for her as a brake upon Trump, the necessity for that lesser evil argument is over. There are other options which can and should be explored, precisely because MSM never will. You must do what you think is right. Spamming other threads with Trump isn't.
8bitagent » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:19 am wrote:
If Bill Clinton flew, at least 11 times without Secret Service on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express plane to his island, ya know theres gotta be video of him. Even if Bill didnt partake in any schtooping.
I get the sense some of the hackers are America. I'm guessing those who hacked into John Podesta's current email and twitter account were American 4chan users.
8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:34 pm wrote:Luther Blissett » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:25 pm wrote:It all depends upon what others have given them. Unless you're extremely in the know it's impossible to tell what's been collected by whom and where it is.
I think those in possession of Trump leaks are probably much less afeared of the traditional mainstream institutional means of releasing information. Any media outfit would be thrilled for anything salacious. Not so with Clinton. The Fourth Estate is there to protect the imperialist candidate and any dissension from the left is met with hostility. (begrugingly I guess "dissension" from "the right" might be treated the same way but we all know who those types would be and what their motivations are) Wikileaks is supposed to be for dissident whistleblowers, not those with the backing of so much Western power and Wall Street money.
I'm all for continuing to embarrass the Trump campaign.
Let's say you got someone prominent within your target's campaign's business email addresses from one of her numerous DC gigs and posed as someone she might be tangentially associated with through a new gmail account. Hypothetically let's say you wrote, for instance, a small snippet of PHP code that runs a script to gather keystrokes, or, maybe, resets a password. Hypothetically maybe you embed the executable script in an old filetype that behaves like an image, or embed it directly into a PDF of a Wall Street Journal or other sympathetic conservative media outlet and deliver it to her. Or perhaps hypothetically maybe you would be inclined or motivated to just straight up phish her with something realistic-looking. English is your first language and you are crafty.
Skip forward a couple steps. I can assure you that you can feel safe enough to pass them on to the Washington Post and everyone involved will protect your anonymity.
Where is this left? Or even moderate left anymore? All I see at this point across social media is now an iron lockstep 1984 agenda between once pro Bernie left leaning news, mainstream media, the Bernie Left, the neocons,
and now the Republicans to blackout anything negative about the Clinton campaign. Outside of Drudge, Fox News and Breitbart, theres not a peep on the massive wikileaks unfolding. Not even the leftist sites that used to always love Wikileaks. Not even from the Bernie left who spent a year bashing Clinton. Now that we have an endless tsunami of stuff the Bernie people only wish had been released in the primaries...tumbleweeds.
Nothing but 24 hour celebrity sex stuff with Trump. Im looking the noise coming from Russia, US foreign policy experts...it ain't good. A number of even mainstream media reports like CNN illustrating
how we're hurtling toward a hot war with Russia. Which I'm sure is what Hillary and her Bush neocon PNAC backers cannot wait for in their apocalyptic vision
JackRiddler » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:31 am wrote:Previews of coming releases are bullshit or if you prefer shit-stirring until proven otherwise. In fact, previews of coming releases are practically an admission it's a wish, not a reality.
Also, who at this point is "Anonymous"? A few have been arrested, and we never bother to track that. What are the odds the original collective is still at it?
Wombaticus Rex » Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:36 pm wrote:JackRiddler » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:31 am wrote:Previews of coming releases are bullshit or if you prefer shit-stirring until proven otherwise. In fact, previews of coming releases are practically an admission it's a wish, not a reality.
Also, who at this point is "Anonymous"? A few have been arrested, and we never bother to track that. What are the odds the original collective is still at it?
Really stretches credulity to accept that a video of a US president engaged in rape was 1) accessible to hackers of any skill level, and 2) existed on a server anywhere to begin with.
You put shit like that in a safe. In a locked room. In a locked floor of a locked building.
On an island.
Harvey » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:13 pm wrote:
I wondered how much blackmail material was in those safety deposit boxes emptied during the Hatton Garden Heist.
Novem5er » Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:40 am wrote:8bitagent » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:19 am wrote:
If Bill Clinton flew, at least 11 times without Secret Service on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express plane to his island, ya know theres gotta be video of him. Even if Bill didnt partake in any schtooping.
I get the sense some of the hackers are America. I'm guessing those who hacked into John Podesta's current email and twitter account were American 4chan users.
That said, I'd love to see us push past Warp 9 and really see what this baby can do.
And I'm not buying the whole Russian Hackers thing, either. When you read all these official press releases, everything is "we believe", etc, etc. No evidence provided. This is completely irresponsible of the Obama administration. Since when is it proper to outright accuse a foreign power of attacking your political process without showing any evidence, and without going to the UN for a resolution? It's bullshit and it's amping up the conflict with Russia.
8bitagent » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:20 pm wrote:
I feel it cannot be understated that the left has become the very thing they were against: the Bush idiots. The people who didnt care Bush rigged the 2000 election, is a war monger, in bed with
wall street and globalist interests and above the law. Such a surreal time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests