Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:23 pm

George Michael to Give Evidence in Phone Hacking Scandal
Pop star continues to rail against 'News of the World' on Twitter
Dave J Hogan/Getty Images
By Rolling Stone
July 11, 2011 12:45 PM ET

George Michael announced on Twitter earlier today that British authorities have requested to interview him about his comments regarding Rebekah Brooks, the editor of the recently shuttered U.K. tabloid News of the World. The pop star took to Twitter last week to celebrate the end of the paper, which has been embroiled in a major phone-hacking scandal. In that string of tweets, Michael mentioned that he once confronted Brooks, who he says had mysteriously entered his home to tell him that "it was never the public" that came to the paper with information regarding his activities, and that "the police always got there first."

In another flurry of tweets today, Michael continued to talk about the phone-hacking scandal, insisting that it is "so important to the future of Britain." This time around, the singer focused his vitriol on
Jonathan Rees,

Jonathan Rees: private investigator who ran empire of tabloid corruption

News of the World paid £150,000 a year to man who obtained information from corrupt police and illegal sources

Share243
reddit this

Nick Davies
guardian.co.uk, Friday 11 March 2011 18.17 GMT
Article history

Jonathan Rees
Jonathan Rees leaves court after being acquitted of the axe murder of his former partner Daniel Morgan. Photograph: John Stillwell/PA

The money came pouring in. Jonathan Rees worked from a dingy office in south London. He lived in a cramped flat upstairs. He was divorced, overweight and foul-mouthed but his business was golden: he traded information. His sources may have been corrupt. His actions may have been illegal. But the money kept coming – from one golden source in particular. As Rees himself put it: "No one pays like the News of the World do."

There was only one problem with Rees's lucrative business. He had caught the eye of Scotland Yard's anti-corruption command who strongly suspected that he was paying bribes to various serving officers and, with great care and some skill, they had managed to place a covert listening device inside his office.

It was that bug which recorded him gloating about the pay he received from the News of the World. It also recorded the vivid detail of an empire of corruption, run with casual ease by Rees and his business partner, Sid Fillery – and liberally greased with cash from the News of the World and other Fleet Street titles. The News of the World alone was paying him more than £150,000 a year.

The listening device was placed in Rees's office in mid-April 1999. It did its job for only six months. In that short time, it provided one highly revealing chapter in a long tale of promiscuous criminality. Further chapters were provided by three other private investigators, all of whom worked separately for the News of the World, all of whom finally ended up in court, all of whom were publicly linked with illegal news-gathering.

Over the following years, the Guardian published a lengthy exposé of Rees's involvement with corrupt police and the procurement of confidential information for the News of the World; the Sunday tabloid's assistant editor is believed to have been arrested and accused of paying bribes to police and other key workers, although he was never charged; the paper was named in a London court as the paymaster for the purchase of information from the police national computer; Rees was jailed for a conspiracy to frame an innocent woman and then accused of conspiracy to murder.

And yet the man who became the prime minister's media adviser, Andy Coulson, has always maintained in evidence to parliament and on oath in court that he knew nothing of any illegal activity during the seven years he spent at the top of the News of the World. The entire story unfolded without ever catching his eye. In the same way, the prime minister and his deputy were happy to appoint Coulson last May to oversee the communication between the British government and its people, even though they were already fully aware of all the essential facts.

It begins with the bug. It is commonplace for journalists to interview police officers, but the listening device recorded Rees routinely paying cash directly or indirectly to serving officers, a serious criminal offence. By April 1999, Rees had been working for Fleet Street for several years, and he had created a vibrant network of corrupt sources.

The bug recorded the sound of Detective Constable Tom Kingston from the south-east regional crime squad collecting cash for himself and for his mate who was an intelligence officer involved in the protection of the royal family and other VIPs. DC Kingston sold Jonathan Rees a Special Branch report disclosing police knowledge of an Albanian crime gang in London, Police Gazette bulletins which listed suspects who were wanted for arrest, and threat assessments in relation to the terrorist targets his mate was supposed to be protecting. Rees sold them to newspapers – primarily the News of the World, the Sunday Mirror and the Daily Mirror.

DC Kingston eventually ended up in prison for selling a huge quantity of amphetamine which he had stolen from a dealer. But Rees had other links to other corrupt officers. His partner, Sid Fillery, was a former officer who had connections all over the force. The bug recorded their relationship with Duncan Hanrahan and Martin King, who had left the Metropolitan police to work as private investigators and who were similarly well connected until both were jailed in relation to police corruption. Hanrahan also admitted conspiring to rob a courier of £1m at Heathrow airport.

Some of what they sold was tittle-tattle: a disparaging remark made by Tony Blair about John Prescott within earshot of a bent officer; gossip about the sex lives of Buckingham Palace servants. But some of it was highly sensitive. When one of Britain's most notorious criminals, Kenneth Noye, was finally arrested, Rees bought and sold details of the secret intelligence which had led to his capture as well as the precise time and route by which he would be driven from prison to court. When the TV journalist Jill Dando was murdered on her doorstep, Rees procured a police source so that he could sell live details of the investigation.

And the corruption did not stop with the police. The listening device caught Rees boasting that he was in touch with: two former police officers working for Customs and Excise who would accept bribes; a corrupt VAT inspector who had access to business records; and two corrupt bank employees who would hand over details of targets' accounts. (One of them had the first name Robert and was wittily referred to as Rob the Bank. The other was simply Fat Bob.)

Beyond that, Rees regularly hired two specialist "blaggers" who tricked their way into phone company records to obtain names and home addresses of subscribers and also itemised phone bills, highly valued on Fleet Street as a list of potential sources. One was a Londoner named Shaun who routinely provided lists of phone numbers called by Rees's targets. The other was John Gunning, a private investigator who has since been convicted of blagging the private information of subscribers from British Telecom's database.

Rees's relationship with journalists was a two-way street. An executive from the News of the World developed a corrupt source in the Passport Office who could provide home addresses, personal details and photographs of anybody who applied for a passport. Rees was paying the executive £100 a time for information from the source (although the executive was passing the source only £25 a time).

One person who is familiar with Rees's operations claims that he or one of his associates started using Trojan Horse software, which allowed them to email a target's computer and copy the contents of its hard disk. This source claims that they used this tactic when they were hired by the News of the World to gather background on Freddy Scapaticci, a former IRA man who had been exposed as an MI6 informer codenamed Stakeknife.

Two other sources claim that Rees was commissioning burglaries. One is a private investigator who was told directly by Rees's network that they had broken into targets' home on behalf of a Fleet Street newspaper. The other is a lawyer who claims to have evidence that a high-profile client was the target of an attempted burglary by Rees's associates in search of embarrassing information. There is no independent confirmation of this.

The bug betrayed the sheer speed and ease with which Rees was able to penetrate the flimsy fence of privacy that shields the vast reservoir of personal information now held on the databases controlled by the police and the DVLA, the phone companies and banks. On one occasion, he was asked to find out about the owner of a Porsche. Armed with the registration number, it took him a grand total of 34 minutes to come up with the owner's name and home address from the DVLA and his criminal record from the police computer.

When the Daily Mirror wanted the private mortgage details of all the governors of the Bank of England, Rees delivered.

When the Sunday Mirror wanted to get inside the bank accounts of Prince Edward and the Countess of Wessex, it was equally easy, as the bug recorded:

Reporter: "Do you remember a couple of months ago, you got me some details on Edward's business and Sophie's business and how well they were doing?"

Rees: "Yeah."

Reporter: "And you did a check on Sophie's bank account."

Rees: "Yeah."

Reporter: "Is it possible to do that again? I'm not exactly sure what they're after but they seem to be under the impression that, you know, she was in the paper the other day for appearing in Hello magazine. They think she's had some kind of payment off them."

Rees: "What? Off Hello?"

Reporter: "Um, yeah."

Rees: "… find out how much."

Reporter: "Well, we just want to see if there's been any change to her bank account. "

This would be a breach of the Data Protection Act unless the courts held there was a clear public interest in establishing the health of the countess's business or her deal with Hello magazine. The payment of bribes would be a criminal offence regardless of any public interest. Rees made no secret of his criminality. At one point the police bug caught Rees telling a Daily Mirror journalist that they must be careful what they wrote down "because what we're doing is illegal, isn't it? I don't want people coming in and nicking us for a criminal offence, you know."

But Rees did get nicked – and for a serious criminal offence. The listening device caught him being hired by a man who was getting divorced and wanted to stop his wife getting custody of their children. Rees came up with a plan. Aided and abetted by yet another corrupt police officer, DC Austin Warnes, he arranged to plant cocaine in the car of the unsuspecting woman, so that she could be charged, convicted and smeared as an unreliable parent.

In order to stop that plot, in September 1999, Scotland Yard raided Rees and charged him with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Fifteen months later, he was taken off Fleet Street's payroll when he was sentenced to six years in prison, increased to seven years on appeal. DC Warnes was sentenced to four years.

And none of this was secret. Apart from the case itself, which was held in open court, the Guardian two years later, in September 2002, ran a three-part series on invasion of privacy and devoted some 3,000 words to a detailed account of Rees's dealings with corrupt police officers and of his use generally of illegal methods to acquire information for the News of the World and other papers.

Based on an authorised briefing by Scotland Yard, the Guardian story made repeated references to the News of the World's involvement and quoted an internal police report to the effect that Rees and his network were involved in the long-term penetration of police intelligence and that "their thirst for knowledge is driven by profit to be accrued from the media". The Crown Prosecution Service found that there was no evidence that the reporters involved knew that Rees was acquiring the material by corrupt means.

A year later, in August 2003, Sid Fillery, who was still running the agency and working for Fleet Street, also got himself arrested and charged with 15 counts of making indecent images of children and one count of possessing indecent images. This was reported in national media. He was later convicted.

All of this extraordinary and well-publicised activity around the News of the World nevertheless apparently escaped the attention of Andy Coulson, even though he had been hired early in 2000 to be deputy editor of the paper under his close friend, Rebekah Wade. And Jonathan Rees was not the only private investigator who was routinely breaking the law for the News of the World without Coulson knowing anything at all about it.

All through the late 1990s, the paper had been hiring an investigator called John Boyall, who, among other services, specialised in acquiring information from confidential databases. He had a wiry young man working as his assistant, named Glenn Mulcaire. In the autumn of 2001, John Boyall fell out with the News of the World's assistant editor, Greg Miskiw, who had been responsible for handling him. Miskiw replaced him by poaching Glenn Mulcaire and giving him a full-time contract.

Mulcaire – as the world now knows – proceeded to hack the voicemail messages of public figures. Journalists who worked at the paper say that reporters were routinely and openly hacking voicemail themselves. Some of them were doing it for stories. Some of them were doing it out of idle curiosity. One reporter, for example, was obsessed with Liz Hurley and routinely listened to her messages and to those of her hairdresser or driver or anybody else connected with her. Mulcaire personally hacked voicemail for special projects or when reporters found they could not do it themselves. He also blagged information from phone companies and banks.

Two reporters from that era have spoken on the record. Paul McMullan, who was a deputy features editor, told the Guardian that he had personally commissioned several hundred illegal acts from private investigators and that his deputy editor, Andy Coulson, must have known about it. Sean Hoare, a legendary showbiz writer, told the New York Times, that Coulson, who was then a close friend, had actively encouraged him to hack voicemail and had listened to messages with him. Coulson denies all this.

In January 2003, Coulson replaced Rebekah Brooks as editor of the News of the World. Two months later, in March 2003, they gave evidence together to the House of Commons media select committee and, in answer to a direct question, Rebekah Brooks declared: "We have paid the police for information in the past."

Asked if she would do so again in the future, her answer was pre-empted by Coulson. "We operate within the law and, if there is a clear public interest, then we will," he told the committee. It was pointed out to Coulson that it was always illegal to pay police officers, regardless of public interest. Coulson suggested he had been talking about the use of subterfuge.

Coulson's ignorance, however, was severely tested by an explosive avalanche of disclosure which began that same month when the Information Commissioner's Office raided the home in New Milton, Hants ,of a private investigator named Steve Whittamore and seized a mass of paperwork which turned out to be a detailed record of more than 13,000 requests from newspapers and magazines for Whittamore to obtain confidential information, many of them potentially in breach of the law. Several staff from the Guardian's sister paper, the Observer, were among Whittamore's customers.

In a blue exercise book, Whittamore recorded all his transactions with the News of the World. He identified 27 different journalists as commissioning his work – well over half of the news and feature writers on the paper, spending tens of thousands of pounds. Greg Miskiw alone was recorded as making 90 requests. Whittamore's invoices, submitted for payment by News International's accounts department, sometimes made explicit reference to obtaining a target's details from their phone number or their vehicle registration.

Whittamore had been running a network of "blaggers" – a hell's angel on the south coast who specialised in posing as a British Telecom engineer to trick their call centres into handing over confidential data on subscribers; two employees of the DVLA who sold the details of car owners; an old friend called John Gunning, who specialised in extracting information from phone companies (and who had been one of Jonathan Rees's two specialist blaggers); and John Boyall – the private investigator who had been working directly for the News of the World until he fell out with them in 2001. And Boyall soon became a pivotal figure for the investigation.

Studying Whittamore's paperwork, the Information Commissioner realised that he was also able to buy information from the police national computer. They contacted Scotland Yard, whose anti-corruption command set up Operation Glade and uncovered a chain of links. A newspaper would ask Whittamore for police data; Whittamore would ask Boyall; Boyall would ask a recently retired officer called Alan King; and King would obtain the information from a civilian police worker in Wandsworth, called Paul Marshall, who invented phone calls from members of the public to justify accessing the police national computer.

This led to the arrest of Boyall. Worse still, from the News of the World's point of view, it is also believed to have led to the arrest of the assistant editor who had dealt with Boyall, Greg Miskiw. The Guardian has put it to Miskiw that he was arrested and questioned at Colindale police station in north London, in the presence of a News International solicitor, about allegations that he had paid cash through Boyall to obtain information from the police computer; that he had also authorised the payment of cash bribes to other sources including the employees of mobile phone companies; and that during this interview with police, he exercised his right to make no comment. Miskiw gave no response to these questions from the Guardian.

Miskiw was not charged with any offence. On April 2005, Steve Whittamore and John Boyall – both of whom had worked directly for the News of the World – appeared at Blackfriars crown court with the two men who had given them access to the police computer. All four pleaded guilty to procuring confidential police data to sell to newspapers. The News of the World was named in court as one of their buyers. The case was reported in national newspapers.

2005 continued to throw up incidents which Coulson failed to notice. Crucially, it was now that Jonathan Rees found his way back to the News of the World. In spite of his prison sentence for attempting to frame an innocent mother and in spite of the Guardian's long exposé of his illegal activities on behalf of Coulson's paper, Rees once again was plying his trade and being paid for it from Coulson's budget. He continued to do so until April 2008 when he was charged with conspiring to murder his former business partner, Daniel Morgan, in 1987, a charge which was finally dismissed yesterday at the Old Bailey.

Beyond that, we now know that during 2005, Glenn Mulcaire was being commissioned regularly to hack voicemail. Evidence which has recently been disclosed in court cases suggests that at least three senior journalists were involved in the commissioning: Greg Miskiw, Ian Edmondson and Clive Goodman. Those three men have one thing in common: all of them worked as news editor of the News of the World, raising the possibility that it was part of their job description to commission work from Mulcaire, the only private investigator who worked on a full-time contract for the paper.

If Andy Coulson had failed to notice any of this consistently illegal activity in his newsroom involving Rees, Whittamore, Boyall and Mulcaire; if none of the reporters who worked with these investigators and/or hacked the voicemail of their targets ever mentioned anything to him; if nobody told him there was police activity around his assistant editor, Greg Miskiw; if he failed to ask why the editorial budget had poured hundreds of thousands of pounds into these investigators; if he failed to read any of the news reports that linked his newspaper to Jonathan Rees's corruption or to Whittamore and Boyall's network of blaggers: finally, in the late summer of 2006, the reality caught his eye.

Scotland Yard arrested Clive Goodman, a former news editor then working as royal correspondent, and Glenn Mulcaire. When they appeared in court in January 2007, they pleaded guilty to hacking the messages of eight public figures and were jailed. Coulson resigned insisting that he must take responsibility even though he had never known anything about it.







a private investigator that he says is a key figure in the News of the World's illegal activities. The singer urged his fans to read up on the Guardian's reporting on Rees, declaring the rival paper to be "the true heroes in all of this."

While on the topic of his home being surveilled by the press, Michael shared an anecdote about a pair of photographers who camped outside his estate for years. "One night in particular, I strolled over the road to one of them and tapped on his window and said 'I hope you like my taste in men," he wrote.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:42 pm

Image


Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown believes journalists from the Sunday Times and The Sun newspapers tried to obtain private information from his financial records and telephone voice messages,



Former British PM alleges reporters sought his personal information
By the CNN Wire Staff
July 11, 2011 1:48 p.m. EDT

London (CNN) -- A scandal that already has taken down Britain's best-selling Sunday tabloid and launched an inquiry into journalistic practices in the country widened Monday with startling allegations against two more News International newspapers.

Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown believes journalists from the Sunday Times and The Sun newspapers tried to obtain private information from his financial records and telephone voice messages, a source close to Brown told CNN.

The efforts date back some 10 years, to when Brown was prime minister and before that chancellor of the exchequer, the source confirmed.

Journalists from The Sun tabloid -- the country's best-selling daily newspaper -- obtained details about Brown's seriously ill son and published a story about him, while people working for the upmarket Murdoch Sunday Times tricked Brown's accountants into handing over financial details, the former prime minister alleges, according to the source.

News International, the British subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation and owner of the papers, did not immediately respond to the allegations. They come in the wake of the closure of another of the company's newspapers, News of the World, over other allegations of illegal breach of privacy.

Until it ceased publishing on Sunday, News of the World was the largest-selling Sunday newspaper in the country.

The decision to close the News of the World followed accusations that it illegally eavesdropped on the phone messages of murder and terrorist victims, politicians and celebrities, and claims it may have bribed police officers. Police said Thursday they had identified almost 4,000 potential targets of phone-hacking.

The widening scandal and public outrage over it threatens to scuttle plans by Murdoch to create Britain's largest media company by acquiring satellite broadcaster BSkyB.

Jeremy Hunt, secretary of state for culture, Olympics, media and sport, announced Monday in Parliament that he was referring the proposed sale to the Competition Commission for a thorough review.

"I know that colleagues on all sides of this house and the public at home feel very concerned at the prospect of the organization which allegedly allowed these terrible things to happen being allowed to take control of what would become Britain's biggest media company," Hunt said.

The company said Monday that it was withdrawing its plan to sell television channel Sky News as part of its acquisition of BSkyB pending further consideration of the bid.

British Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg urged Murdoch to reconsider the acquisition in light of public "revulsion" over the scandal.

Earlier Monday, London's Metropolitan Police angrily blasted leaks from its investigation into illegal eavesdropping by News of the World, hours after British media reported that the paper tried to bribe royal protection officers to get private phone numbers for members of the royal family.

Police said News International had shared information about alleged efforts by reporters to bribe police, and that both sides had agreed to keep the information confidential.

Police said they were "extremely concerned and disappointed" at the leaks, which they said "could have a significant impact on the corruption investigation."

Police, the royal family and News International all refused to answer CNN questions about allegations that a reporter sought company money to pay a royal protection officer for the confidential details about the royal family.

BBC business editor Robert Peston claimed Monday that News of the World e-mails showed former royal correspondent Clive Goodman "was requesting cash from the newspaper's editor, Andy Coulson, to buy a confidential directory of the royal family's landline telephone numbers, and all the phone numbers -- including mobiles -- of the household staff."

Goodman was sent to prison in 2007 for illegally intercepting royal family voice mails. Coulson insisted he knew nothing about the crime, but resigned as editor because it happened on his watch.

He went on to become communications director for David Cameron, who is now the British prime minister, but resigned from that post earlier this year because of fallout from the phone-hacking scandal.

He was questioned by police on Friday and released on bail until October.

Allegations that the paper's eavesdropping extended to murder and terror victims and the families of fallen troops prompted the News of the World's owner to shut down the paper on Sunday.

But the controversy continues.

Murdoch has not apologized to the family of a murdered British teenage girl whose phone messages were illegally intercepted, a lawyer for the girl's family said Monday.

Rebekah Brooks, who was editor of the newspaper at the time 13-year-old murder victim Milly Dowler's phone was hacked, should resign, Dowler family lawyer Mark Lewis also said.

"She should do the honorable thing," Lewis said. "She was editor at the time Milly was taken. She should take editorial responsibility" for the actions of her journalists, Lewis said.

Brooks has since been promoted to chief executive of News International, the company that publishes Murdoch's British newspapers. Murdoch has stood by her so far.

She may be questioned by police about the scandal in the coming weeks, a News International source told CNN Monday.

The source emphasized that Brooks would be interviewed as a witness, not a suspect, if police do question her, and rejected British press reports that the questioning would take place Monday.

The source asked not to be named discussing internal company business.

Dowler's mother and sister met Clegg on Monday, keeping the scandal in the public eye despite the abrupt closure of the best-selling tabloid on Sunday.

They are due to sit down with Labour leader Ed Miliband on Tuesday and Prime Minister David Cameron, a Conservative, on Wednesday, lawyer Lewis said.

Murdoch flew into London Sunday, hours after the final edition of the News of the World hit the stands.

Clegg also said: "We owe it to the Dowlers" to get the bottom of what happened.

The News of the World struck a wistful yet proud tone in its final editorial Sunday, and repeated its owner's apology for the criminal activities that brought the paper down.

"Phones were hacked, and for that this newspaper is truly sorry," it said in an unsigned piece. "There is no justification for this appalling wrongdoing."

The paper welcomed Cameron's call for two inquiries, one into how police investigated the allegations of phone hacking and one into the ethics and standards of British journalists.

Separately, police are already conducting their second investigation into the hacking itself.

Downing Street on Saturday confirmed that Cameron has approached the head of the judiciary of England and Wales to suggest names for the judge to lead the inquiry into the hacking allegations.

News of the World was the first British national newspaper Rupert Murdoch bought, in 1969, as he began to propel himself from Australian newspaper proprietor to international media magnate.

In addition to owning News of the World, and the Sun, News International owns the Times and the Sunday Times in Britain.

Murdoch's News Corporation also encompasses Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post and Harper Collins publishers.


Image

News Corp scandal hits Delaware courts

Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:07pm EDT

-- Alison Frankel writes the On the Case blog for Thomson Reuters News & Insight (newsandinsight.com). The views expressed are her own. --

By Alison Frankel

(Reuters) - Talk about lucky timing.

Back in May, Grant & Eisenhofer and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann filed a consolidated Delaware Chancery Court complaint against the officers and directors of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp (NWSA.O), claiming that the News Corp board fell down on the job when it approved the $615 million acquisition of a film and television production company wholly owned by Murdoch's daughter Elisabeth. "Enough is enough," said the 51-page complaint.

Turns out enough wasn't quite enough after all. Late Friday, facing a deadline to respond to News Corp's motion to dismiss the case, the plaintiffs firms amended their complaint to add allegations based on last week's revelations in the News of the World phone hacking scandal. Weighing in at 94 pages, the newly-amended complaint accuses the News Corp board of ignoring the tabloid's "unlawful and reprehensible activity" even as the evidence of the scandal built.

"The board's refusal to inquire into whether Murdoch loyalists had implicated News Corp [in phone hacking and bribe paying] further confirms its complete inability and unwillingness to cross him, much less to make the hard but necessary decisions independent of Murdoch's personal demands and desires," the complaint says. "These acts have caused the Company to be required to effectively abandon one of its premier properties, face reputational harm, and even risk the loss of the opportunity to acquire BSkyB."

According to Westlaw, the Delaware derivative suit is the only state or federal shareholder claim News Corp faces right now, although scandals like the News of the World mess tend to breed lawsuits. Bernstein Litowitz and Grant & Eisenhofer had a head start because they'd already included some information about phone hacking at News of the World in their May complaint -- as evidence that it would have been futile for shareholders to demand that the board take action to block the acquisition of Elisabeth Murdoch's production company. As the News of the World scandal intensified last week, the firms rushed to supplement their previous complaint to add the latest developments, including details on James Murdoch's involvement and the board's allegedly too-little-too-late appointment of Joel Klein and Viet Dihn -- News Corp board members with U.S. Justice Department experience -- to investigate the scandal.

On Monday, plaintiffs lawyers Jay Eisenhofer of Grant & Eisenhofer and Mark Lebovitch of Bernstein Litowitz told OTC that the phone hacking scandal is yet another example -- along with the acquisition of Elisabeth Murdoch's company -- of the News Corp board's heedless obeisance to Murdoch's wishes. "The board's inaction in response to the phone hacking is part and parcel of a long line of actions and inactions that serve Rupert's interests at the expense of the company and the shareholders," said Lebovitch. Added Eisenhofer: "This is more of the same. Protecting James Murdoch, protecting Rebekah Brooks -- that's what Murdoch wants, that's what the board does."

The Delaware Chancery Court standard for successful derivative suits such as the News Corp action is very tough to meet. Shareholders have to show that the board could not act independently because board members were conflicted. The News Corp complaint points out that six of the 16 members of the board are either Murdoch relations or employees who report directly to Rupert Murdoch. Other longtime directors are old Murdoch friends or political cronies, some of whom allegedly rely on the lavish compensation they receive for their board service. Plaintiffs lawyers claim the News Corp board simply doesn't function the way Delaware boards are supposed to. "The board has allowed Murdoch to operate News Corp as his own private fiefdom with little or no oversight to protect the company and its shareholders," the complaint says.

News Corp is represented in the derivative suit by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. (Skadden partner Edward Welch didn't return OTC's call for comment.) In its motion to dismiss -- which was filed before the hacking claims were added -- the company asserts that independent directors evaluated and approved the Elisabeth Murdoch deal. "It is well-settled that decisions made by disinterested and independent directors are protected by the business judgment rule," the response says. "Plaintiffs allege nothing to suggest that this well-settled principle should not apply here. These allegations are nothing more than a transparent attempt to create provocative, media-worthy sound bites."

Hmm. Sounds like a story Rupert Murdoch would love.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:51 pm

Why Rupert Murdoch Love$ God: World's Biggest Sleaze Mogul Also Getting Rich from Christian Moralizers
Rupert Murdoch is one of America’s number one publishers of evangelical and other religious books.
July 10, 2011 |


Here's what you might not know about Rupert Murdoch: he’s one of the leading religion publishers in the world.

Maybe one day soon Murdoch will go to jail as might his son, as will several of their UK editors if many alleged and disgusting and illegal acts of pirate “journalism” are proved true, ranging from bribing the police to hacking the phones of bereaved family members of killed service men and women and child murder victims. Make no mistake: when it comes to the Murdoch media “empire” we're talking about the lowest form of “journalism” as detailed by the Guardian newspaper.

So are religious moralizers and others writing about religious and/or “moral” themes prepared to enrich the Murdoch “ media juggernaut” forever while Rupert Murdoch further corrupts UK, American and Australian politics while his companies trade in human misery for profit by hacking murder victim's phones, paying off the police, elevating smut to a national sport and even hacking the phones of killed soldiers’ families?

You bet!

Rupert Murdoch is one of America’s number one publishers of evangelical and other religious books, including the 33-million seller Purpose Driven Life by mega pastor and anti-gay activist Rick Warren. Murdoch is also publisher of "progressive" Rob Bell’s Love Wins.

Rick Warren, Rob Bell and company helped Murdoch fund his tabloid-topless-women-on-page-3 empire, phone hacking of murdered teens and Fox News' spreading "birther" and "death panel" lies about the president. They helped Murdoch by enriching him. And these weren’t unknown authors just lucky to get published anywhere, they could have picked anybody to sell their books.

Do the religious authors making their fortunes off Murdoch wear gloves when they cash their royalty checks? Do they ever dare look in the mirror?

The authors publishing with Murdoch serve a religious market so fine-tuned to grandstanding hypocrisy and moralizing, that, for instance, my novels about growing up religious (Portofino, Zermatt and Saving Grandma) will never be sold in the thousands of CBA member (Christian Bookseller’s Association) bookstores because – horrors! – my books have profanity and sex in them!

But those same CBA stores gladly sell tens of millions of books -- annually -- published by Murdoch, a man with the moral rectitude of the herpes virus, a man who runs the companies that gave Glenn Beck a megaphone, that hacked a dead girl's phone, that lied about Iraq's involvement in 9/11, and thus contributed to the war-of-choice needless killing of almost 5000 American soldiers by George W Bush.

You see, Murdoch has bought into and now owns a huge chunk of American religion and is suckling from the profitable God-teat along with the likes of Rick Warren and Rob Bell et al.

Murdoch bought the venerable evangelical Zondervan publishing house. I knew the founding Zondervan family, a clan of strict Bible-believing Calvinists who’d have bathed for a week in the Jordan River to purify themselves if they’d ever even brushed up against Murdoch and his minions! Later generations sold out.

Murdoch also bought the all purpose all-religion-is-great-if-it-sells-something “religion” site “Beliefnet” and "Inspirio" - religious “gift production,” specialists making tawdry religion-junk of the one-more-pair-of-praying-hands made of pressed muck kind.

And Murdoch publishes Rob Bell and other so-called progressives evangelical “stars” as well as run of the mill evangelical right winger’s books though Harper One, the "religious" division of Harper Collins, another Murdoch company.

Murdoch knows something I found out way back in the 1970s and 80s, when I was still my founder-of-the-religious-right Dad’s sidekick and a right wing evangelical leader/shill myself: There’s gold in them-thar God hills! James Dobson alone once gave away 150,000 copies of one of my evangelical screeds that sold more than a million copies. (I describe why I got out of the evangelical netherworld – fled -- in my book Sex, mom and God.)

So here’s my question to Rob Bell of the God-loves-everybody school of touchy-feely theology and/or to the right wing "family values" crowd who worry about gay marriage between responsible loving adults while they perform financial fellatio on the mightiest and most depraved/pagan media baron to ever walk the earth:

What serious, let alone decent religiously conscious person – left or right, conservative or liberal -- would knowingly work to enrich this dreadful man who will go down in history as the epitome of everything that all religion says its against: lies, greed, criminality, and sheer disgusting exploitation of the defenseless that would shame a sewer rat?

Secular “un-saved” and "godless" and "liberal" authors like Jeff Jarvis have pulled books from Harper Collins because it’s owned by Murdoch as he writes: “[my] next book, Public Parts, was to be published, like my last one, by News Corp.'s HarperCollins. But I pulled the book because in it, I am very critical of the parent company for being so closed. It's now being published by Simon and Schuster.”

Where are the big time religion writers like the "I-give-all-my-royalties-to-the-poor" Rick Warren to be found refusing to publish with Zondervan, Harper One or write another word for Beliefnet? What’s mildly lefty Rob Bell’s defense for enriching Murdoch and helping to finance Fox “News” via publishing with Harper One when he could publish with anyone?

For that matter where are the evangelical/Roman Catholic/Muslim—or just minimally decent -- people, religious or irreligious guests and commentators now refusing to be interviewed by Fox News even if it will help sell their books?

Knowing what we know about the union-busting, slime-spreading Murdoch empire and it's disgusting and criminal actions can a moral person work for or use the products of this all-encompassing web of profit, far right politics and corruption?

I don't think so.

But of course the religion writers have plenty of company.

What about journalists working for Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal?

What about Deepak Chopra?

He publishes with Harper One. Thus Chopra is helping finance Fox News. And so is Desmond Tutu. He’s also a Harper One author.

And what about all the “progressive” stars, producers and writers doing deals with the Fox movie empire? Such Hollywood moralists used to boycott working in the old apartheid South Africa, but will work for/with Murdoch today as he empowers the far religious racist right through Fox News! Desmond Tutu used to call for boycotts of far right religious nuts in South Africa oppressing blacks in the name of God, and now he’s a Murdoch contributor!

Go figure!

Why should the people – religious leaders, writers, actors, agents, producers et al -- who help Murdoch wreck America and the UK -- remain respectable in our countries?

Okay, they deserve a second chance.

Mea Culpa!

I published two books with Harper Collins some years ago after Murdoch had taken over. I had a deal with the Smithsonian that was tied into Harper Collins for distribution, then the Smithsonian backed out but my books stayed at Harpers. After they were published I thought about – and regretted -- helping Murdoch. I've never published with them again.

I only have one excuse, I didn’t know much about Murdoch then. But who would willingly publish anything with any Murdoch paper, magazine or book publisher now, knowing what we all know?

Post UK meltdown, will Tutu, Bell, Chopra et al – big time authors with a choice of publishers -- still publish yet more books with Harper One, and/or with Zondervan?

Will liberals in Hollywood still underwrite Murdoch with their lives and continue to work for Fox TV and Fox Films?

It’s time to hold all Murdoch's collaborator’s feet to the fire, especially the big and famous sell outs who can go anywhere with their books or scripts. And why would any decent paper or blog review any book, film or TV show that enriches Murdoch? He should be blacked out before he takes us all down with him.

No more excuses. We all know about Murdoch now.

From here on out it’s time to out those who choose to stay in bed with the sleazy man from down under who elbowed his way into America and the UK, damaged our political systems, perhaps fatally, all the while insulting our intelligence and aiding and abetting our war machine.

We can’t boycott every dubious corporation on earth. But with Murdoch’s sleaze-infested ambition to control the politics of so much of the world a reality a line’s been crossed. It is time to pull an “Arab Spring” on the whole Murdoch empire and overthrow it. And we of the outraged “street” can do it at last because so many political and media leaders, who have sucked up to Murdoch for decades, are running for cover.

I know it’s not considered polite to be judgmental but I’ll say it: to work for any part of News Corp, Murdoch, Fox and/or any or all of his companies, let alone to publish books with him makes you an accomplice to a very bad person.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:19 pm

Image

Image


Olbermann Says He Was "Blackmailed" By Murdoch!
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:37 pm

Toldjaso. I posted about the decoy of 9/11 cellphone calls and the use of Murdoch as a temporary 'Nixon thrown under the bus'-decoy culpability for limited hang-out catharsis.

Today, 'tabloid hacking' linked to 9/11 victim families. "Perhaps."
See 'impossible cellphone calls.'

Today, Carl Bernstein is published by CIA-Newsweek doing a shallow tsk-tsk.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby smiths » Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:54 am

Decoy event to occlude the anniversary of the inside-job 7/7.
Tabloids are spook-run. Spooks hack and do surveillance for psyops.
Stories with victimized girls as anchors are spook stock.


Now the subject is 'merely that Murdoch jerk's TABLOIDS hacking celebrities for sensationalism and profits.'
A limited hangout diversion.
Crumbs thrown to hide the cake.


everythings a nail to a man with a hammer

an immensely power and nasty news and propaganda organization is torn open and shat on in england and across the globe and you call it a decoy to occlude the 7/7 anniversary
and the subject is a hell of a lot more than "hacking celebrities for sensationalism and profits",
the political class are exposed and implicated, left wing and smaller media are given a wider space to work in

according to you, the guardian is part of the grand psyops/spook scheme even though it pursued this story relentlessly for years,
it published massive data through wikileaks,
it published excellent and massive exposes on the international tax havens and money laundering,
the fucking list goes on and on

you hit everything and therefore nothing
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby wintler2 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:30 am

Anonymous threatens police over phone hacking and Julian Assange
Senior source inside hacker collective seeks to embarrass Metropolitan police and judges with 'explosive' revelations

Anonymous threatens attack on police and court computer systems in protest at phone hacking and proposed extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assagne (pictured). Photograph: Lewis Whyld/PA

Figures at the top of hackers' collective Anonymous are threatening to attack the Metropolitan police's computer systems and those controlled by the UK judicial system, warning that Tuesday will be "the biggest day in Anonymous's history".

The collective is understood to be seeking to express anger over News International's phone hacking and at the threatened extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. ..

"Wintler2, you are a disgusting example of a human being, the worst kind in existence on God's Earth. This is not just my personal judgement.." BenD

Research question: are all god botherers authoritarians?
User avatar
wintler2
 
Posts: 2884
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:43 am
Location: Inland SE Aus.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby lucky » Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:40 am

Apols if this has already been mentioned but it is only an ilegal act to hack in to phone messages if the person you are hacking HAS NOT listened to the message already.
There's holes in the sky where rain gets in
the holes are small
that's why rain is thin.
User avatar
lucky
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:39 am
Location: Interzone
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby gnosticheresy_2 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:13 am

lucky wrote:Apols if this has already been mentioned but it is only an ilegal act to hack in to phone messages if the person you are hacking HAS NOT listened to the message already.


That was the reason the Met gave for not investigating in the first place. It's also incorrect.
User avatar
gnosticheresy_2
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:52 am

Miliband to meet Cameron to discuss remit of phone-hacking inquiry

Labour leader will urge PM to ensure inquiry goes far wider than allegations against News International and the Met

Patrick Wintour, political editor
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 12 July 2011 14.25 BST

Ed Miliband will meet David Cameron this week to dicuss the remit of the phone hacking inquiry. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Ed Miliband will urge David Cameron to hold a wide-ranging, judge-led inquiry that covers more than wrongdoing at the News of the World or failures within the Metropolitan Police to investigate phone hacking allegations.

At a meeting with the prime minister and deputy prime minister later this week, Miliband will call for the inquiry to examine malpractices at other newspapers and the relationship between the press and police forces elsewhere in the country, as well as hacking allegations against the News of the World.

The Labour leader is due to meet Cameron and Nick Clegg to discuss the terms of reference either on Wednesday evening or Thursday. He will also call for the inquiry to look more widely at the issues surrounding the relationship between politicians and media owners.

Miliband's aides claimed Jeremy Hunt, the culture secretary, proposed a far narrower inquiry when he spoke to the Commons on Monday.

At his Downing Street press conference on Friday David Cameron said he thought the inquiry into the future of the media and its regulation should be conducted by a panel of experts rather than a judge.

Miliband was speaking after discussions with the shadow cabinet and a meeting on Tuesday with the family of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, whose phone was hacked by journalists at the NoW.

Miliband is expected to table a motion for a Commons debate to take place on Thursday on the phone hacking affair and the government's handling of the competition commission's inquiry into News Corp's planned takeover of BSkyB.

Hunt has said it will take six months for the commission to complete its work, although it can prolong the inquiry by a further three months.

As culture secretary Hunt is free to take as long as he wishes to decide whether to accept the decision on media plurality. Potentially, this would give him time to delay a final decision until the ongoing police investigation is complete.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby Stephen Morgan » Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:15 pm

http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.com/2011/0 ... ption.html

And if any man was to have accumulated enough “insurance policies” of his own – enough to enable him to defy the government and law and parliamentary democracy of an entire nation, that man is Rupert. Just imagine - what dirt he must have upon hundreds of important people - members of parliament, civil servants, police officers – and members of the judiciary, note? Such material is, no-doubt, spectacular. But it would fade into insignificance – compared to evidence that the previous British government knew of his hacking of members of parliament – and thousands of constituents, members of the public - and of the cabinet – and of Whitehall - but yet had the dogs called-off – because they were frightened of him – and what he knew about them.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:56 pm

blackmail......dogs eating dogs

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:18 pm

Phone hacking: Scotland Yard anger at 'campaign to undermine investigation'
Scotland Yard last night effectively accused News International of deliberately leaking information in an attempt to undermine the police investigation into phone hacking and corruption at the News of the World.

Scotland Yard say series of leaks about NOTW investigation part of "deliberate campaign" to undermine police work.

By Mark Hughes, Crime Correspondent


Britain’s biggest police force took the rare step of issuing a statement alleging a “deliberate campaign to undermine the investigation” following the publication of stories which suggested royal protection officers had been paid for information by the newspaper.

The statement, widely interpreted as an attack on News International, said the force believed that the information known by only “a small number of people” has been selectively leaked to “divert attention from elsewhere”.

The wording of the statement suggests what many already suspect, that News International leaked information which allegedly links Mr Coulson to the phone hacking scandal in an attempt to divert focus from Rebekah Brooks, its current chief executive.

The statement was released yesterday afternoon after reports on the BBC website and London’s Evening Standard newspaper detailed allegations against Andy Coulson, the News of the World’s former editor, and Clive Goodman, the paper’s former royal correspondent.

The stories alleged that emails, passed from News International to Scotland Yard, included a request by Goodman to Mr Coulson for money to pay a police officer for information on the royal family.

The story was the latest which had angered Scotland Yard.

Sir Paul Stephenson was forced to issue a statement last week announcing a second inquiry into alleged payment of police officers by the News of the World.

It came after it was reported, and confirmed by the company, that News International had handed emails to detectives allegedly showing details of payments to a handful of police officers totalling about £130,000 during the four-year editorship of Andy Coulson.

It was reported that the emails were discovered by News International in 2007 but not passed to the Metropolitan Police until four years later. News International sources said that it was only when Rebekah Brooks and James Murdoch became aware of the emails that they were passed to police.

The sudden emergence of the emails which allegedly show criminality at the paper appeared to implicate Mr Coulson, who is no longer a News International employee, in the scandal.

The existence was revealed the day after the News of the World was alleged to have hacked the voicemail of the missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler. That hacking was said to have taken place under the tenure of Rebekah Brooks, now the company’s chief executive.

The timing was noted in the Yard’s blistering attack, which suggested that the leaking of information was designed to “divert attention from elsewhere”.

The Metropolitan Police statement also details meetings between News International and the force, saying that all parties had agreed to keep the details of the investigation confidential.

The statement, issued this afternoon by Scotland Yard, said: “It is our belief that information that has appeared in the media today is part of a deliberate campaign to undermine the investigation into the alleged payments by corrupt journalists to corrupt police officers and divert attention from elsewhere.

“At various meetings over the last few weeks information was shared with us by News International and their legal representatives and it was agreed by all parties that this information would be kept confidential so that we could pursue various lines of inquiry, identify those responsible without alerting them and secure best evidence.

“However we are extremely concerned and disappointed that the continuous release of selected information - that is only known by a small number of people - could have a significant impact on the corruption investigation.”
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:04 pm

Image
Phone hacking: we've seen only 170 victims out of 3,870, says Scotland Yard
Fewer than one in 20 potential victims of the News of the World phone hacking scandal has been contacted by Scotland Yard, the officer leading the inquiry disclosed yesterday.

By Mark Hughes, Crime Correspondent

10:40PM BST 12 Jul 2011

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers said that there were 11,000 pages of evidence in the force’s possession, including 3,870 names, 5,000 landline telephone numbers and 4,000 mobile numbers, but only 170 people had been told that they were potential victims.

The relatively small number of people spoken to by police showed the scale of the Yard’s investigation and the potential length of time it has to run.

The inquiry, code-named Operation Weeting, has been going for six months and is staffed by 45 full-time detectives. Mrs Akers said the investigation would last at least until October, but hinted that it could take years to complete.

Giving evidence to a home affairs select committee, she told MPs: “There is an awful lot more work to be done, I can see how that looks. I hope I do not have to come back here in five years’ time to explain why we have failed. I guarantee it will be a thorough inquiry.”

After the session, the Labour MP Chris Bryant, who had his phone hacked in 2003, said: “It does look like it will take a long time for all of the victims to be contacted and I am sure that is pretty depressing for a lot of people.”

The evidence in Scotland Yard’s possession was seized from Glenn Mulcaire, a private investigator working on behalf of the News of the World, in 2006.

Mulcaire and Clive Goodman, the paper’s royal correspondent, were jailed after admitting phone hacking in 2007.

Scotland Yard has been criticised for not contacting all those named in the Mulcaire documents in the early days of the inquiry. It was disclosed yesterday that it was not until the new operation began in January this year that all of the data seized from Mulcaire were placed on a searchable computer database.

Officers are now analysing the database and contacting every identifiable person on it. Mrs Akers said: “It is difficult when you are using the criminal law to try and define what is a victim.

“I took the approach that regardless of what the criminal law said, there are a vast number of people who feel their privacy has been violated.

“I intuitively formed the opinion that we should treat them the same as you would someone whose criteria meets the strictness of a victim in law.”

The exact number of victims has not been established. Sources explained that while the number of names, landlines and mobile numbers totalled nearly 13,000, the number of victims would be much lower because data overlap.

Mrs Akers also said that the investigation team were establishing the identity of new victims each time they visited a victim named in the Mulcaire material.

She explained: “There are nearly 4,000 names in the Mulcaire documentation. We have undertaken to visit each one of those people and as we do that we are showing them pages of material and as we show them that they identify a range of other people or numbers which in turn belong to people who we have also then said we will go and see.”

Mrs Akers used her appearance to appeal to the media world for evidence, suggesting that organisations have evidence of phone hacking at News International which they have not shared with the police. “There must be people sitting on material … anyone holding material — which clearly people are from the amount of media coverage — now is the time for me to say please, if you have got anything that would support my investigation, we are six months down the line, now would be a good time.”

Mrs Akers accepted that the Metropolitan Police’s handling of the investigation had damaged public confidence in the force. “It is everyone’s analysis that confidence has been damaged,” she said. “And if we do not get this right it will continue to be damaged, but I am confident we are working tirelessly.”
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Report: UK tabloid hacked into voicemails

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:39 pm

Hacking the voicemail of 9/11 victims?

Wow...hopefully Murdoch doesn't politically survive this scandal
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests