Primary sources for the keyword hijacking theory.

[Wombaticus Rex]

Hugh, I would like to see you address cuda's question on "Falsifiability" and the Scientific Method. I think you need to address that in order to make the claim you're using "scientific method."

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Just now, listening to the SF Bay area National Propaganda Radio station, right after an interview with Stewart Copeland that included his finding out his dad was CIA and then into how his band, 'The Police,' stole other musical genres....

...the corporate sponsor ad for the half hour was a search engine optimization business that uses keywords to exploit Google ads...

No coincidence. Sometimes the SF NPR corporate sponsor is a George Lucas foundation.
No coincidence. These are examples of the local offices of a national psyops system using inoculation and forestalling.

"Falsifiability" is not a core element of The Scientific Method.
It is something Popper stuck on to deal with metaphysics.

Repeatability of an hypothesis is the empirical confirmation that reveals a covert system and its attributes.

[barracuda]

"Falsifiability" is not a core element of The Scientific Method.
It is something Popper stuck on to deal with metaphysics.

And my contention is that without any primary sources or the ability to falsify your hypothesis, this is precisely what we are dealing with here - metaphysics. Faith.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Wrong, barracuda.

After accidently noticing a news psycle keyword hijacking and remembering that 'Mr North' came out to theaters in 1988 when I was following Ollie North's crimes....

I checked movies to see if KH was evident there. Yup. 'Paperclips.'
A psyops outfit that works for the White House and Pentagon did a KH/mem-reversal of Project Paperclip.

That was two examples of the same cover-up of the post-WWII complicity between CIA and Nazis.

Hypothesis: Cognitive science and media marketing are used to carry out military-intelligence social-control agendas.
Experiment:
> Examine primary sources known to be complicit with the USG during WWII, Hollywood and Disney for concurrent correlation between script production and distribution and real world events.
> Examine primary sources exposed as CIA media by DCI William Colby in the 1975-76 Church Commitee Hearings.
> Compare with primary Pentagon Psychological Operations documents and CIA documents and whistleblower's characterizations of covert operations.
> Correlate with cognitive science, child developmental psychology, sociology for chronological history.

Result: 100% correlation.

Hypothesis confirmed using scientific method.

BTW, that Mickey Mouse in the Barracuda Triangle story was from 1990 and promoted 'SDI' and the use of laser missiles to rule the world. It even included the use of a "dud" that misfires as intentional to fool bad guys.
It also portrayed the Green Party of being commie red at the heart, a CIA psyops message since 1979 when the Green Party was just becoming a real party. And Dr. Seuss also did negative framing of the Left and the Green Party back then. So did Steven CIA Spielberg in 'Gremlins,' an allegory about containing commies and Greenies.

[barracuda]

Anecdote is not science, my friend. How can I determine a real "hit" in KWH from a coincidence?

[jingofever]

Anecdote is not science, my friend. How can I determine a real "hit" in KWH from a coincidence?

The same way scientists determine the real hits while studying the Bible Code.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Anecdote is not science, my friend. How can I determine a real "hit" in KWH from a coincidence?

What "anecdote?"

I clearly lined out the hypothesis, the primary documents, the (ongoing) experiment, the massive repeated confirmations over decades. Psyops manuals and mass media are in perfect consonance since 1942.

I've repeatedly spelled out the basic fingerprint formula of psyops which is most often evident in this culturally complex camouflaged embedded phenomenon-

> Providing relatively more benign associations with keywords, themes, and images that are subversive to power
("Counterpropaganda" as defined by Army Field Manual FM 33-1 Psychological Operations)
> Providing role models and stereotypes that promote the National Security culture of militarism, hierarchy, coercion, and social cohesion within predictable group dynamics.

> Subliminal negative framing of whistleblowers, egalitarians, democracy, humanitarians, anti-authoritarians
> Subliminal positive framing of cover stories hiding abuse, corruption, atrocity, covert operations, authority

> Subliminal negative framing of females and the social roles associated with them - nurturer, negotiator, life-giver, etc.
> Subliminal positive framing of males and the social roles associated with them - warrior, dominator, killer, etc.

I analyzed many hundreds of media products of all types over decades to determine these patterns so that others do not have to reinvent this wheel.

[barracuda]

Again, how can I tell the difference between a hit and a coincidence? And how do you actually test your accuracy or perform a control on these "experiments"?

Anybody who pursues this topic will find out that I'm right.

I know, I know - sell everything you have, give the money to the poor and come and follow me.

[Wombaticus Rex]

Anybody who pursues this topic will find out that I'm right.

This thread exists because about a dozen people who are pursuing this topic don't think you're right.

Just a quick reality check.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Pick a scandal. There's a counterpropaganda campaign to counter it using tv and movies.

Nuclear fallout? Poverty in Appalachia? Civil Rights movement murders? Gang rape by US contractors?
Operation Condor? Agent Orange?

Or a source, Disney-Lucas-Spielbeg.

Pick one. Explore.

[barracuda]

Pick one.

[barracuda]

Again, how can I tell the difference between a hit and a coincidence? And how do you actually test your accuracy or perform a control on these "experiments"?

BTW, that Mickey Mouse in the Barracuda Triangle story was from 1990 and promoted 'SDI' and the use of laser missiles to rule the world. It even included the use of a "dud" that misfires as intentional to fool bad guys.
It also portrayed the Green Party of being commie red at the heart, a CIA psyops message since 1979 when the Green Party was just becoming a real party. And Dr. Seuss also did negative framing of the Left and the Green Party back then. So did Steven CIA Spielberg in 'Gremlins,' an allegory about containing commies and Greenies.

I sincerely doubt this to be the case. We've been over this ground before. You're repeating yourself.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Again, how can I tell the difference between a hit and a coincidence? And how do you actually test your accuracy or perform a control on these "experiments"?

I gave you the formula above.

But I start with Context. Timing. And track record. Is there a subject that TPTB are hiding?
The techniques for hiding info are finite and learnable.

All sources either have a track record that fits with National (in)Security state agendas or not.
Some of them are sleepers who establish creds and then later go into the sewer.
These sources are trickier and require a longer arc of monitoring.

Like Jim Marrs.
He pretended to be a JFK expert for years, using his spacey name as discrediting, before going all out disinfo in 1996 with 'Alien Agenda' to sabotage the Assassinations Record Review Board and the growing internet.

Like David Robb.
People loved his book about the Pentagon's influence in Hollywood.
But his new book, 'The Shrink and the Gumshoe,' about Nixon's shrink and how this played out in the 1960 campaign against John Kennedy....pretends that the Warren Commission was 100% correct and Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.

Hmmm. Keyword hijacking of "Kennedy" pretending to be an expose but reinforcing a cover-up.
s. o. p.

[barracuda]

That does not explain how to differentiate between a hit and a coincidence.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

.....
I sincerely doubt this to be the case.
......

And you accuse me of "anecdotes?' sheesh.