
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
norton ash » Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:04 pm wrote:Google Berenstain. Look at the book covers. It's all been explained. This is the dumbest meme-argument I've ever seen on the web. Although it's just more evidence that something isn't right.
Don’t be ridiculous, it was always spelled Berenstain Bears, says son of series creators
http://news.nationalpost.com/arts/its-b ... rse-theory
Novem5er » Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:28 pm wrote:norton ash » Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:04 pm wrote:Google Berenstain. Look at the book covers. It's all been explained. This is the dumbest meme-argument I've ever seen on the web. Although it's just more evidence that something isn't right.
Don’t be ridiculous, it was always spelled Berenstain Bears, says son of series creators
http://news.nationalpost.com/arts/its-b ... rse-theory
My emphasized part of your quote is exactly my point. I don't need evidence that it was always spelled Berenstain. That was easy to find. What's harder to explain is why, by my estimate, millions of people remember it differently. Barring a dimensional-shift (as has bee discussed on the Internet, hopefully tongue-in-cheek), it's hard to explain why so many people got it wrong for so many years. I spoke to my mother about it today and she confirms it was always Berenstain in her memory, but she admits that for some reason she always pronounced it Beren-steen.
Stein and Stain are not easily confused in my opinion, yet parents and teachers everywhere got it wrong and infected a generation of children with an imaginary spelling.
Luther Blissett » Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:42 pm wrote:Novem5er » Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:28 pm wrote:norton ash » Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:04 pm wrote:Google Berenstain. Look at the book covers. It's all been explained. This is the dumbest meme-argument I've ever seen on the web. Although it's just more evidence that something isn't right.
Don’t be ridiculous, it was always spelled Berenstain Bears, says son of series creators
http://news.nationalpost.com/arts/its-b ... rse-theory
My emphasized part of your quote is exactly my point. I don't need evidence that it was always spelled Berenstain. That was easy to find. What's harder to explain is why, by my estimate, millions of people remember it differently. Barring a dimensional-shift (as has bee discussed on the Internet, hopefully tongue-in-cheek), it's hard to explain why so many people got it wrong for so many years. I spoke to my mother about it today and she confirms it was always Berenstain in her memory, but she admits that for some reason she always pronounced it Beren-steen.
Stein and Stain are not easily confused in my opinion, yet parents and teachers everywhere got it wrong and infected a generation of children with an imaginary spelling.
I find the parallel universe / alternate reality slip explanation about 10% compelling though. Which is a lot. I believe I am almost exactly the same age as you and I suppose I always saw it as Berenstain, though I never gave it a lot of thought in my younger years. That small 10% of me feels that I always existed in this reality, while you and many others came from "somewhere else" but slipped in here, replacing your selves that were already in existence in timeline alpha.
Have you ever been to southeastern Utah?
Nordic » Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:51 pm wrote:People are dropping like flies right now. Which isn't that unusual for the holiday season, but this time it seems excessive.
I lost an old buddy of mine to cancer on Christmas Day. Then my industry lost 2 of its great old cinematographers, Haskell Wexler and Vilmos Zhigmond. Then Lemmy and Bowie. Several others not of that magnitude that I can't even think of right now. Like a friend of ours who lost her Mom. Seems the list goes on and on. A couple of nights ago I had a dream about a prominent guy in the film biz I used to know back in Denver and now I'm worried about him.
Novem5er » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:07 pm wrote:Nordic » Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:51 pm wrote:People are dropping like flies right now. Which isn't that unusual for the holiday season, but this time it seems excessive.
I lost an old buddy of mine to cancer on Christmas Day. Then my industry lost 2 of its great old cinematographers, Haskell Wexler and Vilmos Zhigmond. Then Lemmy and Bowie. Several others not of that magnitude that I can't even think of right now. Like a friend of ours who lost her Mom. Seems the list goes on and on. A couple of nights ago I had a dream about a prominent guy in the film biz I used to know back in Denver and now I'm worried about him.
Nordic, I am sorry for both your personal and professional losses recently. My wife lost her mother a little before last Christmas and it was a tough time. It's been a year since then and this holiday was an up and down journey of joy and sad remembrance. It was easier than last year and we agreed it was a good holiday for our family, but it wast still not the same as it used to be.
Novem5er » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:31 pm wrote:We would probably ignore the holidays after our recent grief, but we do have young children, so we carry on. It actually was a good holiday in spite of everything, and a year's difference did help. The wound is still there, but it's not as fresh. Within 10 months, my wife lost 3/4th of her family. Her mom died, her brother skipped town shortly thereafter and hasn't even called, and then her grandpa died just a few months ago. Only her grandmother is still here. She has aunts and uncles and cousins, but my wife literally hadn't spoken to them in 20 years due to an old family argument. We speak to them now, but they are really just "people that we know", not family.
Her mom didn't just die; either. She was murdered, so that was kind of hard on top of it (understatement).
But we have kids, so we muddle through somehow (like the Christmas carol says)It seems a lot of us are doing just that.
Nordic » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:38 am wrote:Novem5er » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:31 pm wrote:We would probably ignore the holidays after our recent grief, but we do have young children, so we carry on. It actually was a good holiday in spite of everything, and a year's difference did help. The wound is still there, but it's not as fresh. Within 10 months, my wife lost 3/4th of her family. Her mom died, her brother skipped town shortly thereafter and hasn't even called, and then her grandpa died just a few months ago. Only her grandmother is still here. She has aunts and uncles and cousins, but my wife literally hadn't spoken to them in 20 years due to an old family argument. We speak to them now, but they are really just "people that we know", not family.
Her mom didn't just die; either. She was murdered, so that was kind of hard on top of it (understatement).
But we have kids, so we muddle through somehow (like the Christmas carol says)It seems a lot of us are doing just that.
Whoa! Well that's intense. And a terrible thing! I'm so sorry for all of that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests