Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:43 pm


http://www.counterpunch.org/patrick06022011.html

June 2, 2011
No NATO Bombs for King Hamad al-Khalifa
Bahrain Regime's Onslaught on Pro-Democracy Women


By PATRICK COCKBURN

Bahrain's security forces are increasingly targeting women in their campaign against pro-democracy protestors, despite the official lifting of martial law in the island kingdom yesterday.

The ending of martial law and a call for dialogue from King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, appear to be part of a campaign to show that normal life is returning to Bahrain.

The Bahraini government is also eager to host the Formula One motor race, which was postponed from earlier in the year, but may be rescheduled to take place in Bahrain by the sports governing body meeting in Barcelona tomorrow.

There are growing signs that Bahraini police, riot police and special security are detaining and mistreating more and more women. Many are held incommunicado, forced to sign confessions or threatened with rape according to Bahraini human rights groups.

Ayat al-Gormezi, a 20-year old poet and student at the Faculty of teachers in Bahrain, was arrested on March 30 for reciting a poem critical of the government during the pro-democracy protests in Pearl Square, the main gathering place for demonstrators, in February. She was forced to give herself up after police raided her parents' house and made four of Ayat's brothers lie on the shore at gunpoint. She was not there at the time. One policeman shouted at their father "tell us where Ayat is in fifteen minutes or we will kill each of your sons in front of your eyes."

Masked police and special riot police later took Ayat away telling her mother that her daughter would be interrogated and would have to sign a document. Her mother was told to pick up her daughter from "Al-Howra" police station, but has not seen her since her arrest. She did speak to her once on the phone when Ayat told her that she had been forced to sign a false confession. Her mother has been told confidentially that Ayat is in a military hospital as a result of injuries inflicted when she was tortured.

Film of Ayat addressing a cheering crowd of protestors in Pearl Square at night in February shows her to be a confident-sounding young woman in a black abaya. At one point in her recitation she says "we are the people who will kill humiliation and assassinate misery, we are the people who will destroy the foundation of injustice." At the end of her poem she addresses King Hamad directly and says to him of the Bahraini people "don't you hear their cries, don't you hear their screams." As she finishes the crowd shouts "Down with Hamad."

Ayat's call for change was no more radical than that heard in the streets of Tunis, Cairo and Benghazi at about the same time in the heyday of the Arab spring. But her reference to the king might explain the visceral fury shown by the Bahraini security forces who, going by photographs of the scene, smashed up her bedroom when they first raided her house and could not find her.

Bahrain is the first country affected by the Arab Spring where women have been singled out as targets for repression. Bahraini human rights groups say that hundreds have been arrested. Many women complain of being severely beaten while in custody and one woman journalist was beaten so badly that she could not walk.
In another case, a woman doctor, who was later released but may be charged, says she was threatened with rape. She told Reuters news agency that the police said: "We are 14 guys in this room, do you know what we can do to you? It's the emergency law [martial law] and we are free to do what we want."


Despite the lifting of martial law, first imposed on March 1, there is no sign of repression easing. Some 600 people are still detained, at least 2,000 have been sacked from their jobs, and some 27 mosques of the Shia, who make up 70 per cent of the population, have been bulldozed.
The protests started on February 14 in emulation of events in Egypt and Tunisia with a campaign for political reform, a central demand being civil and political equality for the majority Shia. The al-Khalifa royal family and the ruling class in Bahrain are Sunni.
The targeting of women by the security forces may, like the destruction of Shia mosques, have the broader aim of demonstrating to the Shia community that the Sunni elite will show no restraint in preventing the Shia winning political power.

Shia leaders complain that the state-controlled media is continuing to pump out sectarian anti-Shia propaganda.
The government is eager to show that Bahrain can return to being an untroubled business and tourist hub for the Gulf. Having the Formula One race rescheduled to take place on the island towards the end of the year would be an important success in this direction.

The New York-based Human Rights Watch has written to the Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), which meets in Barcelona tomorrow, saying that the motor race would take place in an environment of unrelenting "punitive retribution" against pro-democracy protestors, who are being charged on absolutely no evidence, of being part of an Iranian plot against the government.


Ironically, if the Formula One race does go ahead it will be without a quarter of the staff of the Bahrain International Circuit, the host of the motor race, who have been arrested, including two senior staff. Most have been sacked or suspended, accused of approving of the postponement of the Formula One event earlier in the year.
In a bid to stem the flow of bad publicity the government is relying primarily on suppressing news by detaining and beating local reporters.
The one international journalist based permanently in Bahrain earlier this month was ordered out of the country. Even foreign correspondents who have obtained entry visas have been denied entry when they arrive in Bahrain.

Patrick Cockburn is the author of "Muqtada: Muqtada Al-Sadr, the Shia Revival, and the Struggle for Iraq.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby AlicetheKurious » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:10 am

I don't even know why American officials still bother to mouth self-righteous platitudes about "freedom" and "democracy. I mean, even if Abu Ghraib and Camp Delta and Bagram, etc., hadn't already exposed the ugly truth to the world, America's blatant hypocrisy in supporting the Israelis' war crimes, the Bahraini regime's ethno/religious oppression and Saudi Arabia's regime, one of the least democratic on earth, would have. The only logical conclusion is that this bullshit is purely for domestic consumption.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby AlicetheKurious » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:43 am

I usually loathe the New York Times for its blatant bias and lack of integrity, especially but not only, about the Middle East. But this overview is worth reading:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/magaz ... wanted=all

On Edit: not surprisingly, it doesn't address one of the most important factors that has allowed the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups to elbow their way to the forefront -- the massive financial and political support they receive from Gulf monarchies desperate to contain and subvert the Egyptian revolution. Neither does it address the blatant pressure from the US and from the IMF and the World Bank, to prevent any but cosmetic changes to the Egyptian political and economic systems.

Incidentally, I should have known something was up when Hillary Clinton praised Al Jazeera. Since the uprising in Bahrain and the invasion by Saudi troops at the invitation of the Bahraini regime, the Qatari royals have closed ranks with the Saudi and other monarchies and Al Jazeera has undergone a radical transformation, from possibly the most brilliant news network on earth, to a cheap propaganda outlet for the Muslim Brothers and for the monarchies. Most of its best programs have been yanked off the air and its best journalists have resigned in protest at the shameful new direction. It's heartbreaking.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby AlicetheKurious » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:32 pm

How scared are the Gulf monarchies? VERY scared:

Egyptian 10-year-old expelled for ‘inciting a revolution’ in Kuwait
When 10-year-old Bassem asked his teacher in Kuwait 'Why didn't you have a revolution in your country?' he didn't expect to be expelled from school for inciting a revolution
Ahram Online, Friday 3 Jun 2011


Bassem, a ten-year-old Egyptian child residing with his parents in Kuwait, was expelled from school for asking his teacher “Why didn’t you have a revolution in your country?” according to the Kuwaiti Al-Ra’y (The Opinion) newspaper.

In fact, that simple question caused him to be blacklisted from any Kuwaiti school.

The child’s father, a professor at Kuwait University, was shocked to hear the news of his son’s suspension and the reason behind it. After receiving the news from his son, Bassem’s father went to the school to hear it for himself. The administration replied that he was suspended because he was “inciting a revolution in Kuwait.”

The father told the Kuwaiti Al-Ra’y newspaper that he had done all he could to convince the school to change the decision and that his son does not even understand the meaning of the word “revolution” and that he only picked it up from media channels, but to no avail.

After failing to convince the school, Bassem’s father said he went to the education headquarters to meet the general director, Roqaya Hussein, who informed him that the suspension decision cannot be reverted.

He then went to the ministry of education to meet the assistant secretary, Mona Al-Loghany, who echoed that Bassem was “inciting a revolution” and was, therefore, suspended.

Bassem’s father said his appeal arguing that his son’s teacher wrongly estimated the statement was not accepted, which means that his son will lose a whole academic year since the decision came at the end of his current school year.

The father said he also complained to Minister of Education Ahmed El-Melify, and the Egyptian Embassy has even interjected on his behalf to change the decision to suspend Bassem, which has come to nothing.

He concluded that he is putting his hopes in the legal administration currently looking into the case. Link
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Jun 04, 2011 1:35 am


http://www.arabist.net/blog/2011/5/28/t ... words.html

Tantawi, eating his words
By Issandr El Amrani May 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM Share

From the Pakistani newspaper Dawn, in a report on Wikileaks US Embassy cable reports on Pakistan:

The dismissive attitude towards Pakistan is, however, not limited to Western governments. In a cable dated December 21, 2009, Egyptian Defence Minister Mohamed Hussein Tantawi told US Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair that Egypt encountered the same suspicions from Pakistan as the US did. Pakistanis, he said, “don’t trust Egyptians either.” He went on to say that “while the Pakistanis were ‘difficult’… Egypt was still trying to ‘work with them.’” According to the cable, Mr Tantawi, who has previously served as the Egyptian Defence Attache to Pakistan, also pointedly noted that “any country where the military became engaged in ‘internal affairs’ was ‘doomed to have lots of problems.’”


Priceless.

Tantawi's history as Egyptian Defense Attaché in Pakistan in the 1980s — probably as a major conduit in the Saudi and US-led effort to send mujaheddin to fight the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan — deserves a closer investigation. The relationships Tantawi must have developed with key actors in that semi-covert war (which Egypt backed, with even al-Ahram carrying advertisements to "join the jihad" in Afghanistan) such as Prince Bandar. Hence the long-held rumor that not only Tantawi has close relations with the al-Sauds, but also that he is a religious conservative whose views would not be out of sync with the Muslim Brothers.






http://www.almasryalyoum.com/en/node/45 ... um=twitter

Muslim Brotherhood website editor resigns in row with leadership

Noha El-Hennawy
Sun, 29/05/2011 - 15:56

The editor of the Muslim Brotherhood’s official website, Ikhwanonline, resigned on Sunday to protest against the criticism from one Brotherhood leader of the site’s coverage of protests in Cairo on Friday.

Abdel Guelil al-Sharnouby tendered his resignation to the group’s Supreme Guide earlier today after Essam al-Erian, a prominent Brotherhood figure, dismissed Ikhwanonline’s coverage of last week’s protests as unprofessional.

Erian added that a reshuffle of the site staff is planned.

In a phone interview with Al-Masry Al-Youm, Sharnouby fended off Erian’s accusations, insisting that his coverage toed the Brotherhood’s official line. The Brotherhood officially opposed the protest, which aimed at pressuring the ruling military council into making faster and deeper reforms.

“I believe [the statement] is an attempt to disavow the group’s responsibilities and level accusations at the wrong [suspect],” Sharnouby said.

Last week the Brotherhood issued a strongly-worded statement discouraging Egyptians from participating in Friday's protests, dismissing them as “a revolution against” the people and “attempts to drive wedges” between them and the military.

In another statement, the group sought to denigrate groups calling for the rally by accusing them of being “secular and communist”, two terms that carry negative connotations of atheism in Egyptian society.

On Friday, Ikhwanonline coverage took this stance, according to Sharnouby. Earlier in the day, the site carried a headline stating that there was a low turnout on the “Friday of Wedges”, in reference to claims that the protests aimed to put a wedge between the people and the military.

“We were interacting with the group's earlier statement which refused participation, called on people not to participate and described the protest as driving wedges," said Sharnouby, who has headed the site’s editorial board since May 2004.

By mobilizing the masses against Friday's protesters, the Brotherhood had antagonized many commentators and activists. For the past three days, the local press and television channels have swarmed with opinion pieces and talk show discussions that accused the Brotherhood of political opportunism and of reproducing the same verbal tactics that Mubarak’s regime adopted against its opponents.

On his Facebook page, Sharnouby implied that Erian’s statement was a maneuver “to appease the political elite at the expense” of the website.

Erian could not be reached to comment on the matter.

On Friday, tens of thousands took to Tahrir Square to pressure the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces to expedite the trials of former regime figures, cease monopolizing the drafting of new laws, dismiss inefficient” ministers, and improve the wage scheme in the public sector.

In the meantime, other groups renewed calls for the postponement of the parliamentary elections and the promulgation of a new constitution before the new parliament is elected, an arrangement that the Brotherhood vehemently opposes.

The Brotherhood insists that parliamentary elections be held in the fall as scheduled, and that the new parliament be in charge of the new constitution, as stipulated in the military decree issued in March.

Other political forces contend that early parliamentary elections will benefit Islamists and members of Mubarak’s former party who still maintain strong networks at the grassroots level.





http://www.almasryalyoum.com/en/node/461670

Betting on the Brotherhood’s youth

Amar Ali Hassan
Thu, 02/06/2011 - 17:45

In 2005, a reporter from Al-Wafd newspaper asked me what I thought about the future of the Muslim Brotherhood. As part of my answer, I said that I would bet on the group’s youngsters. I thought they belonged to a generation that interacted greatly with the outside world – through the internet, books and satellite TV – exposing them to a variety of alternative ideas, be they leftist, liberal or enlightened Islamist. I also believed the educational capacity of the Brotherhood leaders was declining as the youths became more exposed to other cultures and experiences.

One month before the revolution, Omar al-Beltagy (son of the prominent Brotherhood leader Mohammed al-Beltagy) asked me to give a lecture to a group of young Brotherhood members about the group’s vision for the upcoming period. I didn’t end up delivering the lecture because of the revolution. I did, however, read a document that Omar al-Beltagy sent to me and found it to be clearly influenced by the experience of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey.

Three days before the revolution, I participated in a discussion at the Press Syndicate about a book by Gamal Nasr, former media advisor to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Supreme Guide. I critiqued Essam al-Erian, a prominent Brotherhood spokesperson, for claiming that nobody had invited the Brotherhood to participate in the 25 January protest. I argued that the protest was not a dinner party or a wedding that required an invitation and that the Brotherhood – as the most organized opposition group in Egypt – should have joined the rally. I told them if they did not do this they would be held accountable before God and history.

As I left, three Brotherhood youths approached me and said “We will not abide by their orders; we will be participate.” I saw tens of them in Tahrir Square on 25 January. The Brotherhood’s leaders and other obedient followers did not participate until after 28 January, dubbed the Friday of Rage, when the military issued a statement recognizing the legitimacy of the revolution.

When I was invited to gives lectures in various villages and cities after the revolution, I traveled with Ahmed Ban, a young Muslim Brother who I met through the distinguished economic intellectual Gouda Abdul Khaleq. Ban was a model of a politically conscious youth who was open to other ideas and put Egypt’s interest ahead of the Brotherhood. Hearing him talk reassured me that I had made the right bet a few years ago. This feeling was reinforced when other Brotherhood youths rejected their leaders’ boycott of subsequent Friday demonstrations. Instead, these young people joined other political forces in the square in an effort to avoid divisions and complete the revolution. In Tahrir, they would run into me amidst large crowds and press my hand. A precious feeling it was.

Today, nobody is asking the Brotherhood youth to revolt against their elders or split from their organization. Instead, we urge them to maintain their resolve and do their best to formulate a new vision for the group and open it up to all of Egypt. We want the Brotherhood youth to support a civil state based on equality, solidarity and honesty, a position in line with the teachings of Islam. We also want them to press their elders to respect the principles outlined in the program of the Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party, such that their actions are consistent with their words.

As for those in Brotherhood who want to distance the group’s young people from Egypt’s youth movement – even after the Brotherhood prided themselves on the fact that their youths participated in the revolution from the start and had representatives in the Revolutionary Youth Coalition – they should be confronted from within the organization.

Two months ago, the Brotherhood established its revolutionary legitimacy by celebrating the actions of their youth; today, it is punishing them and pushing them away, thereby putting the organization’s credibility on the line.

Nevertheless, I still bet on the Brotherhood youth. They are engaged in a difficult struggle, but I believe they will succeed in promoting awareness and enlightenment inside the group. To the youth of the Brotherhood, I say: Do not distance yourselves from the broader Egyptian youth movement. Egypt stands above all divisions and organizations. Only with a strong Egypt will the East be proud.

Translated and abridged from the Arabic Edition.





http://www.almasryalyoum.com/en/node/462386

10-year-old Egyptian child accused of inciting revolt in Kuwait School

Fri, 03/06/2011 - 14:40

Image
Photographed by AFP

A Kuwaiti school expelled a 10-year-old Egyptian student for inciting revolutionary sentiments, a leading Kuwaiti daily reported on Friday.

The Kuwaiti daily newspaper Al-Rai said Friday that a teacher dismissed the fifth grader from school after she accused him of instigating a revolt in the oil-rich country.

The newspaper reported that the teacher decided to dismiss Bassem Fathy from al-Shaya School after he asked her, "Why don't you make a revolution in your country?".

The newspaper reported that the student's father filed a complaint with school administration, which said that the dismissal came because the boy "incited a revolt in Kuwait."

The father also filed a complaint with the Ministry of Education of Kuwait, which has not yet responded.

Tens of thousands of Egyptians work in Kuwait, which provided significant financial assistance in January to its citizens in an effort to prevent the type of unrest breaking out across the region.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:00 am

JackRiddler wrote:According to the cable, Mr Tantawi, who has previously served as the Egyptian Defence Attache to Pakistan, also pointedly noted that “any country where the military became engaged in ‘internal affairs’ was ‘doomed to have lots of problems.’”


JackRiddler wrote:Tantawi's history as Egyptian Defense Attaché in Pakistan in the 1980s — probably as a major conduit in the Saudi and US-led effort to send mujaheddin to fight the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan — deserves a closer investigation. The relationships Tantawi must have developed with key actors in that semi-covert war (which Egypt backed, with even al-Ahram carrying advertisements to "join the jihad" in Afghanistan) such as Prince Bandar.


What's interesting is that when Mubarak was still Vice President under Sadat, he was personally responsible for the "mujahideen" file -- their indoctrination and recruitment in Egypt and transfer to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets. IOW, both Mubarak and Tantawy have a history of partnering together to collaborate with the US and Saudi Arabia at the expense of Egyptians. Furthermore, Tantawy's personal loyalty and devotion to Mubarak was so unquestionable that he was entrusted by Mubarak to head the Republican Guard, a special elite army separate from the rest of Egypt's armed forces, whose allegiance is solely to Mubarak himself. Now Saudi Arabia is frantic to subvert the Egyptian revolution at all costs, as is Israel's "ally" the US...and Tantawy, at least for the next few months, is in charge of Egypt.

The pressure on Tantawy must be incredible. Our advantage is that thanks to the revolution, we have legitimacy on our side and Tantawi and the Armed Forces Council absolutely cannot afford to be seen as agents of foreign powers. It's the people's job to make sure that this pressure, from us, continues to escalate until it counterbalances and overwhelms the pressure coming from Saudi Arabia and Israel's "ally" the US.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby stefano » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:47 am

Egypt is to pay interest "variable from 1.5%" (not sure what that means) on its $3bn standby funding from the IMF. Such a big discount to the almost 13% it pays on bonds that the juice will almost certainly be in the form of rules to open the market up (further?).

Then this week (excerpts, my bold):

US business looks to support change in Egypt

Executives from Google, Citigroup, Boeing and other U.S. companies visit Cairo this week to explore opportunities in post-Mubarak Egypt and urge the interim government to tackle problems that have discouraged foreign investment in the past.

"We are really looking at the range of possibilities for private sector-led growth" in areas such as tourism, transportation and infrastructure, Lionel Johnson, vice president for Middle East Affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, told Reuters before the trip starting on Monday.

"American companies for a long time have been welcome in Egypt by the government and by the people. But I think in terms of the issue of governance, there has been a lack of accountability and transparency," Johnson said.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S.-Egypt Business Council support Obama's plan to develop a regional framework to promote trade and investment in the Middle East and North Africa, an area of some 400 million people whose combined exports about equal Switzerland's with 8 million people.

"It's going to be the job creation that ultimately decides the success or failure of these societies," Johnson said, adding he will visit Israel before returning to the United States and then lead U.S. business delegations to Iraq and Tunisia in coming weeks and months.
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:30 pm

.

A new milestone. Thanks to vanlose kid in the general EU-MENA revolution thread.

Yemenis in Sana'a celebrate the departure of President Ali Abdullah Saleh. Photograph: Yahya Arhab/EPA

Image

Image

Image

*
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:53 pm


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylon ... burbs.html

SYRIA: Big cities remain ambivalent as regime brutality takes its toll

June 5, 2011 | 11:05 am


While the regime of President Bashar Assad has cracked down on smaller cities in Syria, residents of the nation's large cities, including Aleppo and the capital Damascus, seem ambivalent about staging mass protests.

Syrians in some parts of the country have taken part in the uprising, with videos showing apparent brutality in the face of ongoing protests. In this graphic video, soldiers allegedly plant weapons on corpses in Hama near Karak mosque to support the story told by the regime and state news agencies that Islamic fundamentalist terrorists are behind the bloodshed.

But others feel that Assad’s government remains legitimate. Activists say that may be the result of religious pressure: "The regime uses clerics to justify their actions, and religious figures have an immense power to manipulate people in Aleppo and Damascus specifically," said one activist.

Activists say 89 people have been killed over the last three days.

"Military helicopters are shooting randomly on Jisr Alshghour city for half an hour now. There are news of 10 martyrs so far. The army was deployed next to the national hospital, and several tanks are heading to the city from the direction of Al Zawyeh mountain," a report produced by an activist network said.

According to Wissam Tarif, director of prominent human-rights organization INSAN, snipers deployed on rooftops in Idlib, Syria, have wounded 26 people.

"Residents there created a human shield to stop tanks from rolling on into Idlib," he said.

In the coastal city of Banias, army personnel were being pulled out and members of the security apparatus were taking over the checkpoints, Tarif said.

Sunday was also the scene of the larget demonstration yet to be witnessed in Deir Ezzor as more than 60,000 protesters allegedly flocked to the street, activists reported.

But as military offensives encompass various cities, entrenched support for the regime has not yet been uprooted.

As turmoil continues in rural and suburban areas, the biggest cities of Damascus and Aleppo, which have benefited from the economic policies of the last decade, have remained relatively quiet.

But for many in Damascus and Aleppo, fear rather than support keeps them from taking to the streets.

"The level of oppression is inconceivable. Many protests are stopped even before they begin. Phones are tapped, and organizers are arrested before they can do anything," said an activist in Damascus who requested anonymity out of fear of punishment.

Gradual and continuous indoctrination to support the 40-year-long rule of the Assad famly has made many docile, she said.

The Syria Conference for Change, which took place last week in Turkey, played its part in rendering a more formal opposition with clearly stated demands.

Participants voiced their clear support of Syrian protestors in their effort so to overthrow the regime. They called on the president to step down and vowed that they would peacefully achieve democracy.

According to Tarif, exiled Syrians together with other protestors are scheduled to gather in front of the International Criminal Court in the Hague on Tuesday, to demand that the tribunal deliberate Assad's offenses.

-- Roula Hajjar in Beirut

Photo: Syrian security forces mock and allegedly plant arms on dead bodies in Hama. Credit: YouTube

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:39 pm

.

Things are accelerating again!

Off the top of my head, just the last week or less, what have I seen in the news?

- 120 cops and security forces were shot dead June 6 in Jisr al-Shughour, a relatively isolated and un-Twitterable northern city in Syria, according to Damascus. The government is saying rebels set up an ambush and somehow surrounded and massacred the whole lot. Other stories claim security forces deserted to the rebel side rather than carry out a crackdown, and were massacred by other security forces. No reporters are there. Prima facie it seems a battle among security forces is a likelier explanation for such a high number of casualties, but who knows the real number, what really happened and how, which propaganda outlet to believe about this? All that's certain is that Damascus has now announced the mother of all crackdowns is about to hit the town.

- Also, supposedly, everyone who lives there is running away. Makes sense. Turkey is receiving large unspecified numbers of refugees from Northern Syria and keeping the press away from talking to them. The Turkish government has made clear assurances that they will take refugees, but also want to avoid highlighting this, for obvious reasons.

- Tripoli just sustained the latest biggest-yet bombing run yesterday and the government says 30 killed. Misrata is still a stalemate. Gates, on his Farewell Tour to Stir Up Some Final Chaos, met the NATO chiefs on this and the talk in the air was that air wars don't work, ground troops are needed.

- Obama's supposedly seriously considering a larger Afghan withdrawal -- from there to where, one might ask.

- Saleh's got major burns on his body and there's no way he'll be returning to Yemen from Saudi Arabia. By the time he can, some other resolution will have been forged without him (or a full-scale civil war). This is the moment of truth for Yemen, but it appears to have become the third nation in the Arab world to have overthrown the long-standing tyrant, if still a thousand miles away from a better form of government and a better life for its people.

- Obama met the Kalifa king of Bahrain in a closed-door session at the White House, details unknown. In case anyone ever needed a controlled experiment to determine whether the needs of empire or the supposed policies of presidents are paramount, the Arab spring has provided it. Long-standing tyrants in Libya, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain have all reacted to uprisings as tyrants, and conducted massacres and humiliations and crackdowns on their respective peoples. Three of them were previously official friends, one a very sort-of enemy, highly tolerated (Assad). None of them stands out as the good guy, but of the four countries in the last 30 years any reasonable person would have most preferred to have lived in Libya. If Gaddafi is a war criminal indictable by the ICC, and no one else in any of these messes qualifies for an indictment, then the ICC has once again shown its high-minded ideals are rhetoric, and its reality is to kowtow to NATO interests for survival.

And we're seeing the same with the West in general. Now Libya is the one targeted for "humanitarian intervention," and yesterday's best buddy to most the G7 leaders, Gaddafi, is the world's worst villain. They've got oil, cash and are closest to Europe, there's no tolerating an independent development there. Even before the events, Yemen had invited US forces in to conduct drone massacres on its own uprisings of the poorest of the poor (oh, sorry: "al-Qaeda"), so logically there, the Saudis are supposed to mediate a solution that everyone hopes will keep a lid on the "chaos," without regard for the human rights considered so important in Libya. Bahraini rulers invited an invasion by Saudi troops as a reliable force for helping a cruel crackdown on the Bahraini majority, and the US executed a massive arms deal to the Saudis in the middle of it. Syria gets a lot of heated rhetoric but isn't to be touched, there's too much fear of what may follow the (unlikely) fall of Assad among the Israelis and anyway, Syria's a tough country to take on right now. The differing US and Western reactions to each of the four situations can be explained entirely by the immediate needs of empire, and bear no relation whatsoever to the rhetoric of democracy, or the illusion that the elected policy of an elected government is the prime determinant of decisions, rather than the evolving geostrategy of a permanent imperial elite.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby gnosticheresy_2 » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:00 pm

JackRiddler wrote:.
The differing US and Western reactions to each of the four situations can be explained entirely by the unchanging needs of empire, and bear no relation whatsoever to the rhetoric of democracy, or the illusion that the elected policy of an elected government is the prime determinant of decisions, rather than the evolving geostrategy of a permanent imperial elite.



Fixed. It's always the same, boringly the same all the time. Foreign policy objectives are the only thing that transcend local election results, they're the permanent fixture of all national politics, which is why the same elite stays in power all over.
User avatar
gnosticheresy_2
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:27 pm

.

Right on schedule, US in the power vacuum initiates an escalation in Yemen.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world ... nted=print

June 8, 2011
U.S. Is Intensifying a Secret Campaign of Yemen Airstrikes

By MARK MAZZETTI

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has intensified the American covert war in Yemen, exploiting a growing power vacuum in the country to strike at militant suspects with armed drones and fighter jets, according to American officials.

The acceleration of the American campaign in recent weeks comes amid a violent conflict in Yemen that has left the government in Sana, a United States ally, struggling to cling to power. Yemeni troops that had been battling militants linked to Al Qaeda in the south have been pulled back to the capital, and American officials see the strikes as one of the few options to keep the militants from consolidating power.

On Friday, American jets killed Abu Ali al-Harithi, a midlevel Qaeda operative, and several other militant suspects in a strike in southern Yemen. According to witnesses, four civilians were also killed in the airstrike. Weeks earlier, drone aircraft fired missiles aimed at Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical American-born cleric who the United States government has tried to kill for more than a year. Mr. Awlaki survived.

The recent operations come after a nearly year-long pause in American airstrikes, which were halted amid concerns that poor intelligence had led to bungled missions and civilian deaths that were undercutting the goals of the secret campaign.

Officials in Washington said that the American and Saudi spy services had been receiving more information — from electronic eavesdropping and informants — about the possible locations of militants. But, they added, the outbreak of the wider conflict in Yemen created a new risk: that one faction might feed information to the Americans that could trigger air strikes against a rival group.


Well you have to kill one or the other, and the other one will be your friend until you kill them too. Or something. Main thing is, those missiles need replacing so MIC's happy, and you can't just let the Yemenis sort it out themselves because the Saudis might not like the results. So let GID pick the targets and fire away.

A senior Pentagon official, speaking only on condition of anonymity, said on Wednesday that using force against militants in Yemen was further complicated by the fact that Qaeda operatives have mingled with other rebels and antigovernment militants, making it harder for the United States to attack without the appearance of picking sides.


Guess we'll have to pick a side then. That's really too bad.

The American campaign in Yemen is led by the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command, and is closely coordinated with the Central Intelligence Agency. Teams of American military and intelligence operatives have a command post in Sana, the Yemeni capital, to track intelligence about militants in Yemen and plot future strikes.

Concerned that support for the campaign could wane if the government of Yemen’s authoritarian president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, were to fall, the United States ambassador in Yemen has met recently with leaders of the opposition, partly to make the case for continuing American operations. Officials in Washington said that opposition leaders have told the ambassador, Gerald M. Feierstein, that operations against Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula should continue regardless of who wins the power struggle in Sana.


Well if they say so it must be so, right?

The extent of America’s war in Yemen has been among the Obama administration’s most closely guarded secrets, as officials worried that news of unilateral American operations could undermine Mr. Saleh’s tenuous grip on power. Mr. Saleh authorized American missions in Yemen in 2009, but placed limits on their scope and has said publicly that all military operations had been conducted by his own troops.

Mr. Saleh fled the country last week to seek medical treatment in Saudi Arabia after rebel shelling of the presidential compound, and more government troops have been brought back to Sana to bolster the government’s defense.

“We’ve seen the regime move its assets away from counterterrorism and toward its own survival,” said Christopher Boucek, a Yemen expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “But as things get more and more chaotic in Yemen, the space for the Americans to operate in gets bigger,” he said.

But Mr. Boucek and others warned of a backlash from the American airstrikes, which over the past two years have killed civilians and Yemeni government officials. The benefits of killing one or two Qaeda-linked militants, he said, could be entirely eroded if airstrikes kill civilians and lead dozens of others to jihad.

Edmund J. Hull, ambassador to Yemen from 2001 to 2004 and the author of “High-Value Target: Countering Al Qaeda in Yemen,” called airstrikes a “necessary tool” but said that the United States had to “avoid collateral casualties or we will turn the tribes against us.”


Oh, right. Oops.

Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen is believed by the C.I.A. to pose the greatest immediate threat to the United States, more so than even Qaeda’s senior leadership believed to be hiding in Pakistan. The Yemen group has been linked to the attempt to blow up a transatlantic jetliner on Christmas Day 2009 and last year’s plot to blow up cargo planes with bombs hidden inside printer cartridges.

Mr. Harithi, the militant killed on Friday, was an important operational figure in Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and was believed to be one of those responsible for the group’s ascendance in recent years. According to people in Yemen close to the militant group, Mr. Harithi travelled to Iraq in 2003 and fought alongside Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian operative who led the Qaeda affiliate in Iraq until he was killed in an American strike in 2006. Mr. Harithi returned to Yemen in 2004, those close to the militants said, where he was captured, tried and imprisoned in 2006 but released three years later.

Even as senior administration officials worked behind the scenes with Saudi Arabia for a transitional government to take power in Yemen, a State Department spokesman on Wednesday called on the embattled government in Sana to remain focused on dealing with the rebellion and Qaeda militants.


That's gotta get an award for something. Six of one, half dozen of the other, who's going to tell "us" we can't do what we will, even if we have no idea what that is. Check out Afghanistan, same thing.

“With Saleh’s departure for Saudi Arabia, where he continues to receive medical treatment, this isn’t a time for inaction,” said the spokesman, Mark Toner. “There is a government that remains in place there, and they need to seize the moment and move forward.”


Muhammad al-Ahmadi contributed reporting from Sana, Yemen, and Eric Schmitt and Scott Shane from Washington.

More in Middle East (4 of 35 articles)
Yemen’s Opposition Aims To Strip President of Power

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby elfismiles » Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:46 am

Doesn't the new War on a Fourth (or is it Fifth or Sixth now) Front deserve its own thread?

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby AlicetheKurious » Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:45 am

It's becoming very clear that the headquarters of the counter-revolution in Egypt is within the government itself (that's not even counting the Armed Forces Council):

    08 June, 2011
    A return to the past? Egypt's neoliberal counter-revolution


    In a harshly worded statement Egypt's "interim government" led by Essam Sharaf - a former member of the influential "higher policies secretariat" of the ruling party NDP - today vowed to begin enforcing the "anti-strike law" that was issued in April and bans any strikes or protests that disrupts the economy (in contradiction with international treaties signed by Egypt that confirm the right of workers to resort to peaceful strikes to press their demands on employers).

    Shortly after the statement was issued on the governments web page, Central security forces and plain-clothes agents descended on tenant farmers that had been staging a peaceful sit-in outside the Cabinet, protesting years (or rather decades) of displacement and ill-treatment by the state. Several farmers were arrested and hauled into police vans, according to Nora Shalaby who was there and took these pictures:

    These images are a dark reminder of the state of things before January 25, when central security forces in cooperation with plain-clothes agents and thugs routinely clamped down on peaceful demonstrations in Egypt, and comes days after the military arrested five Petrojet workers, who had been taking part in a two-week sit-in outside the petroleum ministry protesting the sacking of 1200 workers. It also comes after renewed accusations of police brutaliy, most notably in the case of a bus driver that was allegedly taken to the police station in Ezbekiyya and beaten to death last week after refusing to pay a bribe to a police officer* - an event that sparked protests and riots in the area.

    On the same day Samir Radwaan, new minister of finance after Youssef Boutrous Ghali (who fled Egypt before Mubaraks ouster and was handed a prison sentence of 30 years in absentia last week on charges of corruption and squandering of public wealth), promised that Egypt won't back away from the "economic reforms" and free-market polices pursued under Mubaraks decades-long rule. (He doesn't seem to understand that in a supposedly democratic Egypt, that should be up to the voters to decide). As elsewhere where the neoliberal doctrine has been applied since the 70's, these "reforms" (mainly privatization of public enterprises and tax-cuts for companies and the rich) resulted in exploding inequality, a rapid decline in the quality of public welfare and increasing poverty. They have proved disastrous for the majority of the population, to the extent that they may be identified as the single most important cause of the revolution.

    In what was perhaps an unintended coincidence but still a very clear signal of the inclinations of Egypt's current rulers, a proposed capital gains tax of 11% was reportedly cancelled today, after pressure from investors and the head of the national stock exchange. So today's events can be summed up: at the same time as the government vows to use force against farmers and workers who insists on demanding a fairer share of Egypt's wealth after the revolution, demanding "patience" of poor families who can barely feed their children let alone send them to decent schools, they quickly bow to pressure from the privileged minority who benefited most of Mubarak's corrupt and neglectful rule. Disturbing, to say the least. Link

* I've heard all the conflicting versions of what supposedly happened, including from eyewitnesses and the victim's family, but none of them included that the driver refused to pay a bribe to the policeman.

I confess to feeling terribly betrayed: even long-time activists were not aware that Egypt's "revolutionary" Prime Minister Essam Sharaf was a member of the "Higher Policies Secretariat" of Mubarak's NDP. It explains so much. Egypt's revolution is like a vigorously boiling pot, and the government is its lid.

However, during this volatile period, the current government has a very fragile hold on power -- Prime Minister Sharaf draws his legitimacy solely from Tahrir Square. The plan is to replace this lid with a much heavier one, one obtained through "democratic" elections in September. In the two remaining months, we have a window of opportunity in which either the people will mobilize effectively and take full control of their government or lose it conclusively.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Live: Al Jazeera coverage of Egypt’s growing revolution

Postby vanlose kid » Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:04 am

Egypt's IMF-backed revolution? No thanks

Year after year, the IMF praised Mubarak's 'progress'. Signing up to its $3bn loan now hardly seems a break with the past

Wael Khalil
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 7 June 2011 14.30 BST

News that the Egyptian interim government has struck a deal with the IMF through which the fund will hand Egypt a $3bn loan has met with differing reactions. It was greeted with relief by some, as proof of the country's positive economic prospects in the medium and long term, and a rebuttal to those scaremongers who have been loudly warning that Egypt is on the verge of bankruptcy because of the revolution and of the continuing protests and street activities.

But many people, myself included, were unhappy with this news and the impact such a loan will have on deepening the country's debt and mounting debt servicing burden.

And there's a more disturbing detail – this is the IMF for God's sake. I recall repeatedly demonstrating over the past 10 years against the Hosni Mubarak regime and chanting against the "Fund" and the "Bank", meaning the IMF and the World Bank. "We will not be governed by the Bank, we will not be governed by imperialism", we chanted, "and here are the terms of the Bank: poverty, hunger and rising prices."

The IMF and the World Bank have for years been pushing the neoliberal measures implemented by Mubarak and his governments, piling praise on him for his courage and achievements.

Year after year, the international experts would commend the Egyptian economic "progress" and "performance" while the majority of Egyptians watched as their lives deteriorated and their living conditions worsened. A survey by the International Republican Institute found that 60% of the population felt their living standards had fallen over the previous year, and that this was one of the key reasons for participation in the 25 January revolution.

Year after year, we watched how the rich and powerful got richer and even more powerful. Year after year, we waited in vain for the successive economic growth to trickle down to the poor and working masses. None was forthcoming.

And while the IMF and similar international institutions called on Egypt to eliminate "waste and efficiencies" such as social measures or food subsidies, they maintained a polite silence on the outrageous corruption perpetrated by the country's ruler, his family and their friends and cronies. Mubarak's last finance minister, Youssef Boutros-Ghali, a graduate of the IMF who served as chair of its policy advisory committee, was sentenced to 30 years in prison for corruption related to improper use of cars impounded by Egypt's customs service. Boutros-Ghali was sentenced in absentia as he was one of the few clever officials that left the country as soon as the protest that led to the bringing down of Mubarak's regime started in January.

I believe that this country's future lies not with the same highly paid, unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats of the IMF, nor with their sacred indicators of budget deficits and market economics. Our future lies with a new home-grown economics that caters for the majority of Egyptians, the schools where their children are educated, the hospitals where they receive healthcare, and the jobs that guarantee them decent and honourable living.

Our revolution, before it called for bringing down Mubarak, has called for "social justice and human dignity" and we will not stop until that is achieved.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... t-imf-loan


*
"Teach them to think. Work against the government." – Wittgenstein.
User avatar
vanlose kid
 
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests