Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Mon Oct 24, 2016 2:51 am

It just dawned on me -- why are we even having an election when Hillary's masters and subjects already run the entire corporatocracy of the United States? The Deep State, the media, the people doing the polling, Hollywood, the banks, you name it, it's the Hillary crowd in charge.

In fact there really isn't any other crowd in power in the US except the Hillaty crowd. Unless you count wikileaks, and he may be dead soon, just like his mentor/co-founder (who just croaked).

Maybe I should start another thread about this.

Meanwhile here's proof that the polls themselves are controlled by the Hillaryites:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-2 ... versamples
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:30 am

JackRiddler » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:58 pm wrote:The Republican Party has to collapse first for a left movement (social democratic, anyway) party to arise or take over the Democrats. Very hard long as there is a 1. powerful Christian-conservative right with so many statehouses and gerrymandered districts and moolah and media and 2. a winner-take-all system. Need IRV at the least.


Well I think it's happening. Seems to be happening. Least in the mainstream narrative. Karl Rove tonight said on Fox the GOP no longer has a viable map in the US, regarding both Trump and the house and seemingly future races.
Bernie seems to, least on paper, brought Hillary more to the left.

I just worry that once again, good meaning people will be celebrating liberal and socially liberal objectives coming into focus...but then lose sight on foreign policy.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Spiro C. Thiery » Mon Oct 24, 2016 5:44 am

8bitagent » Today, 09:30 wrote:
JackRiddler » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:58 pm wrote:The Republican Party has to collapse first for a left movement (social democratic, anyway) party to arise or take over the Democrats. Very hard long as there is a 1. powerful Christian-conservative right with so many statehouses and gerrymandered districts and moolah and media and 2. a winner-take-all system. Need IRV at the least.


Well I think it's happening. Seems to be happening. Least in the mainstream narrative. Karl Rove tonight said on Fox the GOP no longer has a viable map in the US, regarding both Trump and the house and seemingly future races.
Bernie seems to, least on paper, brought Hillary more to the left.

I just worry that once again, good meaning people will be celebrating liberal and socially liberal objectives coming into focus...but then lose sight on foreign policy.


"Seems to be happening" is the operative phrase. " [At] least in the mainstream narrative" the kicker. I am reticent to comment from an establishment presented perspective, but let's take a look at this:

Narrative: "The GOP is imploding."
Is it? Or is it distilling into a base of what many have long believed to be its deepest ideologies? And since the Democratic Party is wont to veer ever further into GOP ceded territory wherever it exists, is it not the Democratic Party implosion that we are witnessing?

Whether the standard narrative is true or not, JackRiddler is correct that something has to overtake the Democrats. The idea that good will come from therein should be long past toast to anyone serious. As things stand, however, I would say that not much has changed in the sense that the Democrats continue to own the lesser-evil trope. No matter how absurd it gets, they have plenty of folks in apparently all walks of life, from the street to the virtual world, to carry their water by admonishing anyone who criticizes them. In spite of all the remarkable shit we've seen over the last few years, it is gobsmacking to me that anyone could still allude that lesser-evilism as on par with "being adult". That not even the explicit support for the continued current policy of outsourcing due process to targeted assassination and turning prisons into plantations is a disqualifying factor for the office of President should be surprising. Some how it is not.

Now, having said all that, the narrative is bullshit. The evolution of the Democratic Party represents a standard within its own ranks that goes all the way back to its origins. Of course it used to be the party that proudly carried the more racist brand of the two, but having decided to cede that to the Republicans when it was clear no one was trying to capitalize on the plight of Black Americans, it was mission accomplished, LBJ's laments notwithstanding. They became the lesser evil on not only class grounds, but race grounds, as well. Somehow, they remain lesser evil on foreign policy also, in spite of their being a pretty well-established war party.

So, no, neither party is being destroyed here. Instead what we are witnessing is the continuation of hegemony at the ostensible ballot box. Even if Stein and Johnson together were to gather ten percent, there's the whole process by which votes are tabulated that has done less than garner more interest over the last decade, so it is entirely plausible to Joe Sixpack that it's a two-way race and will remain so as long as there remains an apparent plurality for the viewpoint that nothing is off limits for those who can't quit and therefore enable the puppet for Lesser of Off Limits Behavior.
Seeing the world through rose-colored latex.
User avatar
Spiro C. Thiery
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:58 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Luther Blissett » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:30 am

The best part is that fearful centrists think the left is too extreme and just as bad as these new alt right forms. To them, politics (and by extension, society) are becoming "too polarized." Whereas reality does not reflect that.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:08 pm

.

Latest Republican to endorse Clinton? Donald Trump.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKTIDGMdANI

That should make a bunch of ya happy.

Supposedly being slapped with cease and desist, so download it now.

It's a hell of a lot better evidence than the Al Smith dinner!

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby kool maudit » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:25 am

There are three political factions, I think: left-progressive, nationalist-right, and imperial-neoliberal. The last one is inauthentic insofar as it reflects no personal or individual feelings that are disconnected from the needs of the empire. People whose hearts are in both of the first two camps will compromise with this entity. An authentic politics would be a contest between the first two.
kool maudit
 
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby semper occultus » Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:37 am

...I like your analysis...put another way ( dips broad brush in paint pot ) you had the emergance of the Tony Blair style "Third Way" that became hegemonic amongst a certain highlyinfluential political / intellectual class who adopted "left" or 1960's era social liberalism, right wing economics and pretty much abandoned any idea of "national" ideas as a 19th century relic in favour of "globalism"...that in turn has been in crisis since the debacle of their foreign interventions and the 2008 financial collapse....
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby coffin_dodger » Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:21 am

JackRiddler » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:08 am wrote:.

Latest Republican to endorse Clinton? Donald Trump.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKTIDGMdANI

That should make a bunch of ya happy.

Supposedly being slapped with cease and desist, so download it now.

It's a hell of a lot better evidence than the Al Smith dinner!

Our perception produces diametrically opposing results from the same input, Jack. Diversity at it's finest.

The video you link to depicts Donald Trumps attitude to Hilary in 2008. They were friends, then.

In the Fairy Tale, the Clintons have since abused that friendship by persauding their good friend to initially run as a right-wing nutjob spoiler with archaic ideas that offers no viable alternative to their own. Due to the crimson hatred that Trump has for Hilary now - (constantly calling her a liar, not only in a political foe respect, but more tellingly, a snarling personal respect) - it has clearly backfired. They assumed he would not go so far as to lay waste to The System that has served him so well. They miscalculated. Donald did not think it through, initially - now he realises he has been played by the System he loves, he shall not be King and it stings.
This video will certainly not be removed - it is another tool in the containment process - clearly designed to make Trump look duplicitous. In fact, this video, viewed as a supplemental part of the Fairy Story, bolsters the case that these people were good friends once - and that some terrible incident has occured that has turned kinship to hatred.

If I can just make my views clear here - I favour neither of these candidates. They are the same people masquerading as a choice.
What drives their actions is more important to me than their actual, physical actions - because there is usually an opaque gulf between the two, especially so in the political arena.
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Luther Blissett » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:33 am

coffin_dodger » Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:21 am wrote:
JackRiddler » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:08 am wrote:.

Latest Republican to endorse Clinton? Donald Trump.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKTIDGMdANI

That should make a bunch of ya happy.

Supposedly being slapped with cease and desist, so download it now.

It's a hell of a lot better evidence than the Al Smith dinner!

Our perception produces diametrically opposing results from the same input, Jack. Diversity at it's finest.

The video you link to depicts Donald Trumps attitude to Hilary in 2008. They were friends, then.

In the Fairy Tale, the Clintons have since abused that friendship by persauding their good friend to initially run as a right-wing nutjob spoiler with archaic ideas that offers no viable alternative to their own. Due to the crimson hatred that Trump has for Hilary now - (constantly calling her a liar, not only in a political foe respect, but more tellingly, a snarling personal respect) - it has clearly backfired. They assumed he would not go so far as to lay waste to The System that has served him so well. They miscalculated. Donald did not think it through, initially - now he realises he has been played by the System he loves, he shall not be King and it stings.
This video will certainly not be removed - it is another tool in the containment process - clearly designed to make Trump look duplicitous. In fact, this video, viewed as a supplemental part of the Fairy Story, bolsters the case that these people were good friends once - and that some terrible incident has occured that has turned kinship to hatred.

If I can just make my views clear here - I favour neither of these candidates. They are the same people masquerading as a choice.
What drives their actions is more important to me than their actual, physical actions - because there is usually an opaque gulf between the two, especially so in the political arena.


*Still 100% friends.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:46 pm

Image
Last edited by Nordic on Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:00 pm

Nordic » Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:46 am wrote:This is for SLAD.


Warms the heart, does that.

What is politics for, if not inflicting on each other?
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:13 pm

Because it makes a point? I have a son. I don't want him to die in Hillary's wars and I will kill and or die (not Hilary of COURSE) to protect him.

Maybe I should just donate to the Clinton Foundation.

Image
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:18 pm

She's already been declared the winner anyway. It's over. Don't even need to count the votes, just like in the California primary, where they never counted the votes. They just declared her the winner. End of story. Democracy, baby! E're gonna shove it down your throat, put it in a food processor and literally shove it up your ass! We're gonna Gitmo you if you object
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:28 pm

Nordic » Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:13 pm wrote:Because it makes a point?


No, because that point is aimed at someone here.

I know I can be inscrutable but this one is pretty straightforward.

You're not making a point about Hillary, you're scoring points on SLAD.

That said, of course: this is what makes America great, so by all means, carry on.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Rory » Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:33 pm

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/28/fbi-prob ... mails.html

The FBI is probing new emails related to Hillary Clinton, FBI Director James Comey said in a Friday letter.

"In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony," Comey wrote.

"In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation," he added.

"Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony," Comey concluded.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests