Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
slow_dazzle wrote:Well said Jack. What we need is a multi-layered approach to finding a way out of the mess, an approach based upon reality rather than wishful thinking and ignorance of scientific fact. And we need to start right this minute because the ship is already taking on water. We should call a halt to all road building as soon as we can and I am a huge fan of local food production for local consumption. And one of the biggest changes we could effect is to downsize our lifestyle; that is one of the fastest ways to cut individual overheads and decrease pressure on resources. It won't be easy and there will be concomitants such as job losses when demand decreases and thus impacts upon the economy. But if we don't try the economy will be toast anyway after we start going down the other side of the energy plateau.
It might be a little simplistic to sum up the myriad of problems in one sentence. Nevertheless, the basic problem is we are using too much of everything from energy through water to physical resources. We need to downsize and we need to slow our lives down so we can become a community and find real purpose, meaning and contentment in life.
About the snide comment regarding Wintler's sig line. There is a saying that goes something like "Those who can make you believe in absurdities can make you commit atrocities". There is a sibling to that basic truth: those who can make you believe in fairy tales can make you look in the wrong place for the truth. Sometimes this fairy tale is deliberately, and cynically, peddled by those who don't want people to start asking the right questions. Sometimes the fairy tale is passed on by those who fail to engage with reality. Either way, the end result of the fairy tale telling is to lead people up the garden path.
vigilant wrote:I have to go with slimmouse on this one. ...
..The problem though – of which the commissioner seems to be wholly unaware – is that by far the bulk of set-aside is not available, being already dedicated to non-food production. This we have noted before, in the context of the land being used for biofuels production, but that is by no means the only use.
According to the commission's own website, such uses include the production of textile fibres (flax, cotton and hemp), starch for industrial use, vegetable oils, chemical and pharmaceutical products and medicinal plants. Maize is also produced, not only for bio-energy but for several industrial processes such as surface finishing and heat and sound insulation. Maize particles can also be used in the packing industry for fragile goods.
Additionally, there is widespread growing of linseed, with the oil used for paint products and a co-adhesive in popular fibreboard. It also replaces some solvents and petroleum-based chemicals in the products' formulations, and is used in linoleum flooring. ..
Thus, while in 1993/94, 17 percent of set-aside was under production (EU-12) it rose to 44 percent in 1995/96 (EU-15) and while it dropped to 20 percent for some years, the combination of increased demand for biofuels and the CAP reforms which brought about the Single Farm Payment scheme opened the floodgates. Currently, therefore, the bulk of usable set-aside land is under cultivation and, in 2006 the commission was reporting that more than 95 percent of the non-food set-aside areas were dedicated to energy crops.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... rying.html
JackRiddler wrote:This discussion confuses me. It's like everyone's trotting out their favorite jazz move.
So my multi-clause question runs as follows
May I simultaneously be ..
Can I? Without contradicting myself and without needing to pick a single item from the above as my hobby horse or bete noir?
Just wondering.
slimmouse wrote:But Ive always said hes full of shit anyways.
wintler2 wrote:vigilant wrote:I have to go with slimmouse on this one. ...
shoulda done some research first, say on the 2007 suspension of set-aside across the EU....The problem though – of which the commissioner seems to be wholly unaware – is that by far the bulk of set-aside is not available, being already dedicated to non-food production. This we have noted before, in the context of the land being used for biofuels production, but that is by no means the only use.
According to the commission's own website, such uses include the production of textile fibres (flax, cotton and hemp), starch for industrial use, vegetable oils, chemical and pharmaceutical products and medicinal plants. Maize is also produced, not only for bio-energy but for several industrial processes such as surface finishing and heat and sound insulation. Maize particles can also be used in the packing industry for fragile goods.
Additionally, there is widespread growing of linseed, with the oil used for paint products and a co-adhesive in popular fibreboard. It also replaces some solvents and petroleum-based chemicals in the products' formulations, and is used in linoleum flooring. ..
Thus, while in 1993/94, 17 percent of set-aside was under production (EU-12) it rose to 44 percent in 1995/96 (EU-15) and while it dropped to 20 percent for some years, the combination of increased demand for biofuels and the CAP reforms which brought about the Single Farm Payment scheme opened the floodgates. Currently, therefore, the bulk of usable set-aside land is under cultivation and, in 2006 the commission was reporting that more than 95 percent of the non-food set-aside areas were dedicated to energy crops.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2007/0 ... rying.html
I'd suggest a little research and thought before following another of SMs parades of ignorance.
-JackRiddler wrote:This discussion confuses me. It's like everyone's trotting out their favorite jazz move.
So my multi-clause question runs as follows
May I simultaneously be ..
Can I? Without contradicting myself and without needing to pick a single item from the above as my hobby horse or bete noir?
Just wondering.
Absolutely JR, putting it all together is in fact the only way out of this diabolical mess, and i second - no third - every item on your agenda. Except maybe 'against .. the bourgeoisie', cos i'm not sure who they are these days.
wintler2 wrote:I'd suggest a little research and thought before following another of SMs parades of ignorance.
-
slimmouse wrote:Ethanol is responsible for the food crisis. Too fucking funny. You couldnt make this crap ( with deference to sunny) up
slow_dazzle wrote:Please post some data to show why you think this is being made up and to what end. And don't resort to nasty comments because disruption is what the reptilians undoubtedly welcome along with disinformation, divide, disrupt and deride. We don't want to do their work for them, now do we?
Now slow_dazzle, you know SM never provides ANY meaningful evidence and never argues a coherent train of thought; that how you can tell he's a spoilt mommys boy. Why do SMs significant others (e.g. poster 'vigilant') always agree with the pro-elite wacko? I suspect its cos his selfpitying whining is even louder in person than online.slimmouse wrote:.. As for the request for Data SD. Ive asked you about 20 questions in prior posts, none of which youve even attempted to answer, and now you expect data from me ?
Slimmouse lies again and again, his pro-elite bullshitter cred only grows. SM demonstrates how arrogance feeds ignorance, as keeps trying to make a point that my link from preceeding page rebutted - what a fucking moron, too arrogant to even read my quote or the link. The dweeb also cites no competing evidence because ...his whining verbal diarhea works just fine on mummy, so why shouldn't it here? Boy is she making a rod for her own back. Personally i can't wait till SMs balls drop, then maybe he'll go out into the real world and find a clue.slimmouse wrote:.. Farmers paid millions to sit on emptry land, and the food crisis is the result of Bio fuel farming ?
wintler2 wrote:Oh frabjulous day! apparently there is no COC problem with SM swearing and telling lies, except the fearsome moderator wrath demonstrated by Sunny. So i guess a little 'quid pro quo' is in order, without breaking my vow not to refer to the useless wanker in the first person. Sorry JR, SD and others trying to make a useful thread of this, but i can't backdown before a bully and have to speak about the cretin in a lingo he can ken.Now slow_dazzle, you know SM never provides ANY meaningful evidence and never argues a coherent train of thought; that how you can tell he's a spoilt mommys boy. Why do SMs significant others (e.g. poster 'vigilant') always agree with the pro-elite wacko? I suspect its cos his selfpitying whining is even louder in person than online.slimmouse wrote:.. As for the request for Data SD. Ive asked you about 20 questions in prior posts, none of which youve even attempted to answer, and now you expect data from me ?Slimmouse lies again and again, his pro-elite bullshitter cred only grows. SM demonstrates how arrogance feeds ignorance, as keeps trying to make a point that my link from preceeding page rebutted - what a fucking moron, too arrogant to even read my quote or the link. The dweeb also cites no competing evidence because ...his whining verbal diarhea works just fine on mummy, so why shouldn't it here? Boy is she making a rod for her own back. Personally i can't wait till SMs balls drop, then maybe he'll go out into the real world and find a clue.slimmouse wrote:.. Farmers paid millions to sit on emptry land, and the food crisis is the result of Bio fuel farming ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests