Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby Plutonia » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:55 pm

The vaccine/autism myth has been driven by the Cult of Scientology. It's hasn't been reported much but if you go looking, you can find reams of connections. Three reasons I can think of why the cult would be interested in establishing false cause/cure alternate reality: 1) Financial gains from selling their "treatments", 2) Recruit parents through selling "hope", 3) Further their war on psychiatry. 4) A step towards their long-term goal of Clearing the Planet- which is to convert those who can be converted to Scientology and disposing of the rest of us.

Wakefield is connected to known Scientology group (many links at original):
Holford and Wakefield both find Safe Harbor for bad vaccination science

However, when I was looking into the debate around Sunday’s awful Observer story on MMR, I found another surprising correspondence: both Holford and Wakefield appear to be linked to the Safe Harbor organisation. Safe Harbor is a controversial ‘alternative’ mental health organisation, which was established by “a very prominent Scientologist called Dan Stradford who apparently has reached the level of Operating Thetan – Level VIII” and which has had a history of substantial Scientologist involvement. As the quackometer shows, Holford is on Safe Harbor’s advisory board.

Wakefield, too, has been plugged by Safe Harbor: their newsletter advertised his presence at a ‘Defeat Autism Now’ conference. Safe Harbor also had someone who they rather chummily referred to as “Dr Andy Wakefield” speaking at their Miami conference, and even threw a dinner in Wakefield’s honour. I’d presume that ‘Andy’ is the same Dr Wakefield – I can’t think of any other Gastroenterologists with the same name who were also Research Director of the ICDRC. I can’t find any reference to Safe Harbor providing Holford with any dinners – which seems a bit unfair, given Holford’s status as a prominent nutritionist.


Infiltration of autism care groups and promotion of mercury/vaccine connection (again with the links):
Autism and Scientology again

Awhile ago, I wrote a post the detailed the disturbing links between the DAN! movement and scientology. It transpired that scientology – being a movement that is big on non psychiatric modes of treatments is a good fit for DAN! adherents. Both value detoxification for a range of things and it seems Scientologists have not been slow to ingratiate themselves into the DAN! movement. So far, I’ve identified three Scientologists who are also DAN! Doctors. One of them was involved in the death of a parent of a schizophrenic man in 2002.

One of the darlings of the autism/vaccine movement is Julia Berle who’s son, Baxter, was used in a Generation Rescue advert. Ms Berle is a frequent poster to various autism/vaccine groups. Her signature reads;

"Julia, mom to Baxter, recovered in 2005, Founding Parent of Generation Rescue"

As mum to a recovered child, Ms Berle’s opinion is sought in many places and she never stints from dispensing the advice she got far and wide.

Baxter Berle was diagnosed (at least partly it seems) by Scientologists. If I may quote myself:

Baxter Berle attended a school called ‘The Learning Castle’ which is an alleged elementary ‘feeder’ school for the Renaissance Academy with which it shares a campus (there seem to be about seven separate units on campus all feeding the Renaissance Academy). Here’s a little bit of information about the Director of the Renaissance Academy, Ann Hazen;

"Renaissance Academy is truly bringing education back to life through the use of a full academic program, athletics, the Arts, a warm and caring staff coupled with the brilliant study and educational philosophies of humanitarian L. Ron Hubbard."

Yup, they’re Scientologists too.

So Scientologists had a big say in the diagnosis of Baxter Berle. What about his recovery? I was recently forwarded this email by a member of a autism/vaccine group Ms Berle is also a member of:
—- begins—-

Re: Opinion of Dr. Nancy Mullan ?
Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:25 pm—- In autisminterventionsocal@yahoogroups.com,
“djberle” wrote:

Hey there,

We used Dr. Mullan to recover Baxter. I like that she stays cutting edge on top of all new topics as it relates to autism. She attends numerous conferences to stay current. I also highly respect her availability to parents and compassion to “work with you” on
all aspects (to include financial to some degree). She cares deeply for our children and wants to help them….Our experience with her was very positive. I refer her often to other local. parents. I also refer Dr. Hirani as she helped us as well.
—- ends—-

So Dr Mullan recovered Baxter. Dr Mullan is also a Scientologist. She is the Medical Director of the Scientology owned Safe Harbor organisation. She also used Dr Hinari who studied under Julian Whittaker – another doctor with Scientology connections.

Here we have a situation where Scientologists have (maybe) diagnosed, treated and recovered a boy. This boy was subsequently turned into one of the poster children for successful recovery by Generation Rescue (of whom Ms Berle describes herself as a founding member).

Maybe I’m just a cynic but this reeks of ‘set up’ to me.


Autism, scientology and the moonies

Introduction

I never imagined when I started blogging about autism just how deep the rabbit hole of quackery went. It never ceases to amaze me how the relationships between some of the people deeply involved in the mercury militia start to unravel with some occasionally disturbing results.

Over the last few weeks, I’ve come across some of the most disturbing relationships yet. As the title suggests, there seem to be disturbing links between some mercury militia members and the Unification Church (the moonies) and there are definite links between established scientologists and DAN! as well as other non-DAN! mercury militia resources. Most disturbing of all is the suggestion of a relationship between The Moonies and Scientology with an apparent agenda to encourage the mercury militia and possibly even help finance or otherwise aid the legal fight some parents are undergoing with relation to vaccines and autism.

Autism and The Moonies

The most direct connection between autism and the moonies is that of Dan Olmsted. Olmsted works for UPI which the Unification Church owns. As we all know, Dan Olmsted is a more than ready exponent of the mercury militia belief system, churning out credulous and easily refuted piece after piece. Clearly the aim here is not debate but propaganda.

But still, it never occurred to me that Olmsted might be working towards a UPI agenda until very recently. Not until a second UPI journalist, Lidia Wasowicz started working on the exact same story. Then I became interested. Why have two reporters covering the exact same story from the exact same perspective but independently of each other? Is it possible that some of the senior people at UPI felt Olmsted alone wasn’t getting the job done?

After all, the Moonies make no secret of their aim with UPI (and the Washington Times which they also own):

"And how independent is the once-proud UPI? As Moon noted on Nov. 30, 2000, shortly after buying the news service, “The best way to become famous will be to write articles about Rev. Moon. The media organization that employs the reporters who write such articles and publishes them will be respected around the world. UPI was purchased just as it was about to collapse, and it is being supported now. UPI can write such articles.”"

Or as the Rev put it on another occasion;

"...to establish “the journalism of the Kingdom of Heaven” one first needs “the wire service of the Kingdom of Heaven…”"

And to what end?

"“Merely reporting the facts of the news will be much too elementary,” explains Moon. A more important role of the media is “to determine how to interpret and evaluate the facts, and thus provide the direction in which the audience is guided."

Quite. Its my opinion we’re now seeing that born out with the doubling up of autism-mercury journalism on UPI these days.

The editor-in-chief at the Washington Times felt so strongly about this that:

"Washington Times editorial page editor William P. Cheshire and four of his staff members resigned during Borchgrave’s tenure as editor-in-chief charging that he had allowed an executive of the Unification Church to dictate editorial policy."

Some executives of UPI as well as being Moonies are also in the Korean CIA.

But what’s the motive? Why would the moonies want to push the idea of a vaccine link to autism?

If we take a look at the sort of businesses the Moonies own and/or invest in we can see that they have very healthy interests in two interesting money makers – sea fish restaurants and homoeopathic/naturopathic medicine. One of these interests is blamed for increases in mercury and the other is big business amongst autism/biomed practitioners. I’m given to understand that the US CAM market (Complimentary/Alternative Medicine) is worth about US$28billion per annum. It would definitely be in the Moonies interests for more people to eat mercury containing sea fish and to also buy more CAM products.

But that’s pretty spurious in terms of a link. Its a ‘maybe’. Its certainly not proven.

However, the odd coincidences keep mounting up. Dan Olmsted used to work closely with fellow UPI journalist Mark Benjamin until the latter left UPI. Before he did however, Benjamin also grew interested in the vaccine/autism hypothesis.

So where did Mark Benjamin go after leaving UPI? It seems that in March of 2005, Benjamin published his first story for his new employers – Salon.com. Three short months later, RFK Jr published his misbegotten Deadly Immunity piece. Indeed, two Benjamin articles are quoted on the thiomersal links page on Salon.com

Coincidence? Maybe.

Maybe this is too: An accompanying piece to RFK Jr’s piece was Lujene Clark’s sidebar describing the work of nomercury.org and her son’s autism. Its never been clear to me how Lujene and RFK jr came together to set this up. Until now:

"Believe me, Dan Olmsted gets the connection! He is builing (sic) up to a climax with this series to debunk the Kanner theory of autism….He and Mark Benjamin broke the Larium story as well as being instrumental and the driving force behind exposing the Gulf War Syndrome."

Also note the date of this post. Also about three months or so before ‘Deadly Immunity’. The common thread between RFK Jr and Lujene Clark is Mark Benjamin via Dan Olmsted. One current UPI journo and one ex-UPI journo, both coming from a background of a news agency less interested in facts than making sure the ‘right’ interpretation is placed upon events.

But this is still just conjecture. I think its interesting and worth pursuing but it was just playful fantasy until a second UPI journalist suddenly started sharing mercury-militia propaganda publishing duties with Olmsted. That’s the most suspicious thing so far, but even that isn’t very suspicious.

Of much more solid and worrying connection is the one to Scientology.

Autism and Scientology

Everybody knows that Scientology has an almost rabid outlook on psychiatry and what they deem psychiatric labels. Its so bad that Xenu-lover John Travolta is allegedly hiding the fact of his son’s autism for fear of offending his masters in Scientology.

Scientologists have a natural theoretical affinity with the mercury militia and in particular the DAN! ideology. They are firmly against medication and firmly in favour of ‘detoxification’ when combined with saunas. The belief is that detoxification ‘loosens’ the toxins which are then sweated out in intense saunas. Sounds familiar right?

Just like the moonies, scientology has untold business interests in all-natural and CAM based treatments, particularly detoxification treatments. So, when you combine business interests with religious zeal you get people highly motivated to move in on people they target.

Are there any scientologists targeting autism? Oh yes. Scary but true.

There is Nancy Mullan, MD, nutritional psychiatrist and Scientology owned Safe Harbor Medical Director. She attended a conference wherein she:

"...reviews one of the most critical nutritional biochemical cycles which, when faulty, can contribute to autism, schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder."

I’ve also been notified by commenter ‘culvercitycynic’ that Ms Mullan is also a registered DAN! doctor.

And here’s another Scientology front: Narconon Arrowhead. The Medical Director is a man named Gerald D. Wootan – he’s also a DAN doctor. Thank you to my anonymous friend who forwarded me that info :o)

Then there is Dr. Julian Whitaker who is with the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, established by the Church of Scientology to expose what the church calls psychiatric violations of human rights and who pushes a variety of CAM treatments including chelation. Guess who he’s friends with?

"a special thanks to some special people – [...] Dr. Julian Whitaker, Dr.Rashid Buttar…"

Then there’s scientologist David Minkoff who once attended a Defeat Autism Yesterday conference, sharing a platform with Rashid Buttar, DAN! doctor Gunnar Heuser and Erin Giffin of Amy Yasko’s practice.

Minkoff is also well regarded by teh folks on Evidence of Harm email list such as MarK Sircus who says of the Scientologist:

"...a fine physician…in the chelation and toxicology field like Dr. David Minkoff…"

Amazing how far Scientology has managed to insinuate itself into DAN! isn’t it? But is that the end of it? Not by a long chalk.

Scientologist husband and wife team Jean Ross and karl Loren are actively marketing Chelation to autism customers

Another scientologist recently made national television in the US.

In 2002, a schizophrenic named Jeremy Perkins visited a Scientologist doctor called Conrad Maulfair at the behest of his Scientologist mother. Maulfair told Jeremy’s mother that it wasn’t Schizophrenia but in fact high levels of arsenic and metals that were causing Jeremy’s issues. Maulfair had to say this as he cannot, by virtue of his belief in Scientology, accept or diagnose a psychiatric reason to explain Jeremy. He recommended chelation. Jeremy’s mum decided on her own treatment – also not psychiatry – and then in 2003, in the grip of schizophrenia, Jeremy stabs his Scientologist mother to death.

This scientologist, Dr Conrad Maulfair, is a DAN! Doctor. His failure to correctly diagnose has now led to a death.

And here’s Hubbard and Scientology worshipper Dr Arturo M Volpe expounding the benefits of treating autistic children with Methyl B12 and FIRS (far infrared saunas) – he even quotes DAN! Doctor, Sidney Baker.

And then there’s Boyd Haley. Haley was amongst a gaggle of Scientologists making sworn depositions for an amalgam/mercury case in 2002. They lost of course but amongst the Scientologists testifying were: Raymond G. Behm and our old friend David Minkoff. Once again, Boyd Haley demonstrates the calibre of his rationality in the company he keeps and the ‘science’ they present.

There’s also significant Scientology representation amongst the law firms involved the autism/thiomersal litigation. For example, in June 2001 legal firm Baum Hedlund announced a class action lawsuit against thiomersal containing vaccine manufacturers as part of the now defunct Mercury Vaccine Alliance.

Paul Hedlund is described as;

"has also been in business with several other Scientologist lawyers, including fellow Slatkin investor George “Skip” Murgatroyd. He and Michael Baum were also both investors with Scientologist ponzi artist Reed Slatkin."

And Michael Baum is described as;

"....a former staffer with the Church of Scientology’s Guardian Office (the Church’s secret service operation that preceded the Office of Special Affairs) and is an Unindicted Co-conspirator for his work on Operation Snow White, the domestic espionage case which sent eleven Scientologists to prison, including L Ron Hubbard’s wife."

Its clear to see that Scientology has its claws well into the mercury/thiomersal/chelation/autism community. What that community decides to do about that is a matter for their conscience.

Scientology and Recovery

Last year, Generation Rescue launched a full page advert thanking scientists for their work in establishing a thiomersal/autism connection. Embarrassingly, most of the quoted scientists co-signed a letter stating that their work had essentially been misrepresented.

The background of the advert used the image of a young boy called Baxter Berle who the advert stated was recovered from autism. KNBC News in the US presented a report which contained the following:

So, the school district first diagnosed Baxter and then later removed his diagnosis. What school did Baxter Berle attend at that time? Baxter Berle attended a school called ‘The Learning Castle’ which is alleged to be an elementary ‘feeder’ school for the Renaissance Academy with which it shares a campus (there seem to be about seven separate units on campus all feeding the Renaissance Academy). Here’s a little bit of information about the Director of the Renaissance Academy, Ann Hazen;

"Renaissance Academy is truly bringing education back to life through the use of a full academic program, athletics, the Arts, a warm and caring staff coupled with the brilliant study and educational philosophies of humanitarian L. Ron Hubbard."

Yup, they’re Scientologists too. Here’s Ms Hazen’s personal site and here’s a Scientology official website featuring Ms Hazen.

The Moonies And Scientologists – In It Together?

There seem to be disturbing signs of a pact between the Moonies and Scientologists to further their agendas jointly. bear in mind they seem to have mutual interests so it would make sense.

The Council for National Policy was a group started in 1981 by a man called Tim Lahaye. It brought together powerful members of both the Moonie and Scientology groups. From the link;

"Beverly LaHaye, as was previously noted, is the wife of Tim LaHaye. She also was and still may be part of the CNP, and also founder of Concerned Women for America. She joined forces with Citizens Council on Human Rights, a group affiliated with Scientology, and Gary Bauer’s Family Research Council, which has benefited as well from Rev. Moon organizations and money. This all under the umbrella of social change and “Christian family values” in America. Mrs. LaHaye and Bauer appeared and spoke together in a 1995 rally against psychiatric practices on children. The question is, regardless of a good cause, is it necessary for these evangelical leaders to join forces with Moon, Scientology and the Intelligence community? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize that many groups use charitable giving/participation, patriotic associations and demonstrations of community or national good will to obfuscate their true objectives and agenda, or to conceal and deflect attention from their wrong-doing…...LaHayes group, the Council for National Policy, is just one example of evangelical organizations being filled with Intelligence officers, Moon representatives and Scientology members."

Another ‘front’ group was called ‘Americans Preserving Religious Liberty’ (APRL) which was established in 1982. Renowned sociologist Dr Anson Shupe Jr;

"....was cognizant of APRL’s ties with Scientology, stating in a 1984 publication that “[b]oth Scientology and the Unification Church were extremely active” in the organization…"

So we can see that Scientologists and Moonies have acted together in the past. Whether they are again or not is not a settled question but I hope someone with more resources than me can follow these things up. Autism shouldn’t be associated with cults.


More info here - though the links are scrambled.

The problem with this false cause/cure debate is that I don't think that vaccinations are necessarily safe, but to say so is to more-or less side with the cultists. Ergh!

On edit: it's worth reading through the comments at Kevin's blog to get a feel for the kind of virulent response that questioning the mercury militia garners. You can also google "John Best" + "foresam" to see a curebie in action.
Last edited by Plutonia on Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister

T Jefferson,
User avatar
Plutonia
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby undead » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:58 pm

Come on! Are you really defending this hack?


At least he didn't call Wakefield a Scientologist. That's generous.

Edit: DAMN! I spoke too soon. Not surprised.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby barracuda » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:10 pm

stickdog99 wrote: Where is the evidence for this?


Nope, I'm not gonna do your googling for you. I advise you to read this exhaustive previous thread on the subject, even though I realise it won't in any way change your opinion.

Come on! Are you really defending this hack?


Yes. Wakefield is a fraud.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:11 pm

Plutonia wrote:The vaccine/autism myth has been driven by the Cult of Scientology.


I hope you don't mind if I did not find those links particularly persuasive. I don't think you'd find six degrees of separation between Scientologists and Big Pharma, either.

The term "mercury militia" is particularly insulting to me. Why is it a crime to want one's kids to suffer less exposure to mercury? And why the fuck does mercury need to be in vaccines anyway?
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6617
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:12 pm

barracuda wrote:
stickdog99 wrote: Where is the evidence for this?


Nope, I'm not gonna do your googling for you. I advise you to read this exhaustive previous thread on the subject, even though I realise it won't in any way change your opinion.

Come on! Are you really defending this hack?


Yes. Wakefield is a fraud.


LOL. Rational discussion at its finest.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6617
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby undead » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:18 pm

The problem with this false cause/cure debate is that I don't think that vaccinations are necessarily safe, but to say so is to more-or less side with the cultists. Ergh!


This seems like a rather simplistic and counterproductive attitude, doesn't it? Also, what is the "cure" part of it? Labeling is a simplistic strategy and usually indicates that a person who does it has no leg to stand on. But hey, you can't just go around criticizing the pharmaceutical industry unchecked because that would be, uh... oh yeah, aiding and abetting the fearsome menace of Scientology, which everyone should be afraid of.

ETA: It is also very simplistic to assert that anything the Church of Scientology supports must be completely false. You could call Scientology the No Planes / Jews Did It of pharmaceutical industry criticism, but the rigor applied to the 9/11 question is apparently too much for this issue.
Last edited by undead on Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby barracuda » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:27 pm

stickdog99 wrote:LOL. Rational discussion at its finest.


I haven't heard much rational discussion yet on this thread, mostly innuendo and scare tactics.

For reference, here's Brian Deer's expose of Andrew Wakefield:

Part one

Part two

Part three

Image

Image
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby undead » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:34 pm

You mean scare tactics like mongering scare about getting measles when people don't get vaccinated? Anyone scared about that?
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby barracuda » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:36 pm

No, I mean scare tactics about getting autism from vaccines for which there is no evidence.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:45 pm

barracuda wrote:
stickdog99 wrote: Where is the evidence for this?


Nope, I'm not gonna do your googling for you. I advise you to read this exhaustive previous thread on the subject, even though I realise it won't in any way change your opinion..


OK, so I read the entire thread, and it clearly proved that compared2what? is a better barrister than catbirdsteed. It also proved that Deer, given free rein to attack for seven years, has become better at being a prosecuting attorney than is Wakefield at being a defense attorney. Personally, I find compared2what?'s advocation for Deer strangely adamant and overstated. But I guess she liked the guy?

compared2what? basically starts out by postulating that because she has seen no reason to question any of Deer's allegations against Wakefield that she will consider all of these allegations true unless and until she is furnished with reasons to question them. Then she proceeds to use Deer's own "trustworthy" allegations against Wakefield to "prove" Deer's conclusions against Wakefield. compared2what? goes to great pains to argue that Deer had nothing to do with the GMC's investigation, a contention that Deer's most recent BMJ diatribe makes wholly laughable.

Since you are obviously not up to the task, barracuda, perhaps we could persuade compared2what? to rise to the defense of her favorite journalist?

(edited to reflect c2w's reported gender)
Last edited by stickdog99 on Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:06 am, edited 3 times in total.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6617
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby undead » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:46 pm

Well, there are plenty of cases of children who develop autism shortly after being vaccinated, but they will clearly never be documented in clinical literature if this case is any indicator. I prefer real world experience over corporate financed clinical studies when forming opinions, but then again I am a secret agent of the Chruch of Scientology and you should assume I'm making things up.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby undead » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:49 pm

stefano wrote:Since you are obviously not up to the task, barracuda, perhaps we could persuade compared2what? to rise to the defense of his favorite journalist


I think C2W is female. Besides that, I would expect her to join in any moment since she is the most reliable pharmaceutical hack on this forum besides barracuda, specializing in Scientology hysteria.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:52 pm

barracuda wrote:
stickdog99 wrote:LOL. Rational discussion at its finest.


I haven't heard much rational discussion yet on this thread, mostly innuendo and scare tactics.

For reference, here's Brian Deer's expose of Andrew Wakefield:

Part one

Part two

Part three

Image

Image


Yes, Deer's claims conclusively prove Deer's claims! LOL

And it is a tragedy if a single person thinks for himself or herself before simply lining up to inject his or her offspring with every vaccine that has been added to the official government sanctioned schedule. I mean, ONE WHOLE PERSON DIED and all that!

Now, what of the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated primate research on which the plug was pulled because of Deer's intrepid and dogged crucifixion of Wakefield? Care to comment on that? Do you support such research?
Last edited by stickdog99 on Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6617
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby barracuda » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:52 pm

stickdog99 wrote:Since you are obviously not up to the task, barracuda, perhaps we could persuade compared2what? to rise to the defense of his favorite journalist


Well, since the title of the thread is "Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?", perhaps you should marshall some evidence that Wakefield was actually acting in good faith with his original report, and include some citations along those lines from reputable researchers with documentation, rather than worry about whether Brian Deer is a nice guy or not. Though to be perfectly honest, I don't see a shred of evidence presented here that cast even the slightest glimmer of bad faith upon the actions of Brian Deer. I mean, so far, "He got PAID!! OMG" is about the best you can do.

undead wrote:I think C2W is female. Besides that, I would expect her to join in any moment since she is the most reliable pharmaceutical hack on this forum besides barracuda, specializing in Scientology hysteria.


Care back that assertion up, undead? Or are you just gonna talk out of the side of your neck?
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Did Andrew Wakefield Perpetrate an "Elaborate Fraud"?

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:12 pm

barracuda wrote:
stickdog99 wrote:Though to be perfectly honest, I don't see a shred of evidence presented here that cast even the slightest glimmer of bad faith upon the actions of Brian Deer. I mean, so far, "He got PAID!! OMG" is about the best you can do.

I am not questioning Deer's nicety. I am questioning his "journalism". Here are some examples of his "journalism":

“Please let me know if Andrew W has his doctor’s license revoked,” wrote Mr 11, who is convinced that many vaccines and environmental pollutants may be responsible for childhood brain disorders. “His misrepresentation of my son in his research paper is inexcusable. His motives for this I may never know.”

The father need not have worried. My investigation of the MMR issue exposed the frauds behind Wakefield’s research. Triggering the longest ever UK General Medical Council fitness to practise hearing, and forcing the Lancet to retract the paper, last May it led to Wakefield and Walker-Smith being struck off the medical register.

Wakefield, now 54, who called no witnesses, was branded “dishonest,” “unethical,” and “callous." ...

Wakefield phoned them at home, and must have at least suggestively questioned them (!), potentially impacting on later history taking. ...

A syndrome necessarily requires at least some consistency, but, as the records were laid out, Wakefield’s crumbled. ...

So here—behind the paper—is how Wakefield evidenced his “syndrome” for the lawsuit, and built his platform to launch the vaccine scare. ...

Wakefield, however, denies wrongdoing, in any respect whatsoever. He says he never claimed that the children had regressive autism, nor that he said they were previously normal. He never misreported or changed any findings in the study, and never patented a measles vaccine. None of the children were Barr’s clients before referral to the hospital, and he never received huge payments from the lawyer. There were no conflicts of interest. He is the victim of a conspiracy. He never linked autism with MMR. ...

The journal, meanwhile, took 12 years to retract the paper, by which time its mischief had been exported. As parents’ confidence slowly returned in Britain, the scare took off around the world, unleashing fear, guilt, and infectious diseases—and fuelling suspicion of vaccines in general. In addition to measles outbreaks, other infections are resurgent, with Mr 11’s home state of California last summer seeing 10 babies dead from whooping cough, in the worst outbreak since 1958. (Now Wakefield is to blame for babies too young to get vaccinated dying from the whooping cough!)

Wakefield, nevertheless, now apparently self-employed and professionally ruined, remains championed by a sad rump of disciples.


This is the "journalism" of your champion! LOL

*****

As far as Wakefield is concerned, I am not sure whether he is merely one of a million financially compromised medical researchers who has been fed into the buzzsaw or a carefully constructed poison pill who the anti-vaccine movement swallowed up whole to its lasting detriment.

The only thing clear to me at this point is that Deer cherry picked his case against Wakefield at least as much as Wakefield cherry picked his case against MMR.

I will anxiously await the first article in which Deer takes on a vaccine manufacturer's study (perhaps for using an injection of alum as its "safety control" as Merck does?) or a pro-vaccine study (perhaps for using the Hep A vaccine as "the control" to prove the herd immunity effect of influenza vaccination as another recent and highly publicized study did) with the same vigor he applied to his 4,000 point assault on Wakefield.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6617
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests